Kyrylo Sazonov, a Ukrainian soldier and blogger, stated with a smile that Ukraine halted oil deliveries in order to increase Tisza’s chances in the election.
Brussels and Kyiv are colluding against Hungarians, thereby putting Hungary’s security at risk.
We will not allow this! Let’s fill out the national petition and on April 12 send a message to Péter Magyar, Zelenskyy, and Ursula as well: Hungarians are not to be played with!
Fidesz is the safe choice!
It is absolutely astonishing. A Ukrainian military blogger openly said that yes, oil deliveries to Hungary were stopped in order to cause inconvenience to Fidesz ahead of the election, because rising fuel prices would hurt them and help bring Péter Magyar to power — someone who serves the goals of Brussels and Ukraine.
1️⃣ Designating an External Enemy – “An Ukrainian soldier admitted it”
📌 Technique: authority framing + amplification of a single example
👉 A statement by a Ukrainian soldier-blogger is presented as if it reflected the official position of the Ukrainian state.
👉 One individual → the intention of an entire country.
🎯 Goal:
– To create the appearance of “evidence”
– To concretize the enemy image
💥 Effect:
The audience feels: “They admitted it.”
2️⃣ Conspiracy Framing – “Brussels and Kyiv are colluding”
📌 Technique: coordinated external attack narrative
👉 Multiple external actors (Brussels, Kyiv) grouped into a single hostile bloc.
👉 Hungary positioned as the victim.
🎯 Goal:
– To frame the election as a sovereignty struggle
– To elevate a domestic political debate into a geopolitical threat
💥 Effect:
Voters no longer weigh policy options, but think in terms of “national self-defense.”
3️⃣ Activating Economic Fear – “Fuel prices will skyrocket”
📌 Technique: everyday livelihood trigger
👉 Fuel prices = immediate, personal, easy-to-understand threat.
👉 Presented as a political consequence.
🎯 Goal:
– To provoke anger and anxiety
– To link price increases to a political opponent
💥 Effect:
An economic issue → reframed as a deliberate political attack.
4️⃣ Delegitimizing the Internal Opponent – “Péter Magyar is Brussels’ and Ukraine’s man”
📌 Technique: agent narrative
👉 Not portrayed as an independent political actor, but as a proxy.
👉 Framed as representing foreign interests.
🎯 Goal:
– To undermine credibility
– To turn the election into a question of loyalty
💥 Effect:
The question shifts from “What does he represent?”
to “Whose man is he?”
5️⃣ Mobilizing Closure – “We won’t allow it! Petition! April 12!”
📌 Technique: emotional climax + immediate call to action
👉 Anger → signature → vote
👉 Strong, combative language.
🎯 Goal:
– To convert emotional energy into political mobilization
– To consolidate the voter base
💥 Effect:
The message encourages action rather than reflection.
🧠 Summary
This narrative rests on three pillars:
- External interference (Ukraine + Brussels)
- Internal traitor (the opposition)
- Existential threat (energy prices, security)
The election is thus framed not as a contest of programs, but as a moral battle about national self-defense.