alexa

Well, here it is — the “Ukraine-loving country.” These video thumbnails can be seen on a Ukrainian YouTube channel with more than half a million subscribers.

Péter Magyar is shouting, while behind him Zelensky is watching with satisfaction.
There’s constantly a crosshair on Viktor Orbán’s head.
Elsewhere, Péter Magyar is shouting a battle cry together with Ursula, and again there’s a crosshair on the prime minister’s head.

So, I think there are no more questions.

According to the Ukrainians themselves, Péter Magyar is a man of Brussels and Zelensky, while Viktor Orbán — even according to the Ukrainians — will never allow Hungary’s money to be taken to Ukraine.

This is what we are deciding on April 12. If we get dragged into financing Ukraine and the war, Hungarian young people will be paying the price for decades.

Unless Viktor Orbán remains in power. That’s why Fidesz is the safe choice.

Here is a Ukrainian news channel with roughly half a million subscribers. I collected some thumbnails for you to show how they illustrate their videos. You can see Orbán Viktor with a crosshair on his head, a smiling Zelensky, the “favorite candidate,” the Ukrainian candidate Péter Magyar, and once again a crosshair on Orbán’s forehead.

So after this, I don’t think anyone can really have questions about who the Ukrainians are rooting for in this election. So what if, on April 12, we vote instead to keep a Hungarian government — not one directed from Ukraine?

🧠 Quick Situation Overview

👉 Main narrative:

“Tisza / Péter Magyar = Ukrainian / Brussels puppet”
“Ukraine = danger, money drain, war”
“Orbán = protector who stops this”
“Election = a matter of national survival”

👉 Underlying formula:

fear + external enemy + betrayal + savior
→ “if you don’t vote for us, the country will be in danger”

🔍 Influence Techniques (detailed)

1️⃣ Visual manipulation → illusion of “evidence”

👉 Example:
“YouTube thumbnails… crosshair on Orbán’s head”

Technique:

  • cherry-picked images
  • no context
  • visual shock (crosshair = violence, threat)

Goal:
👉 trigger emotional reaction (outrage, fear)

Effect:
👉 “if they do this to him → they are enemies”

➡️ This is not evidence, but an emotional trigger

2️⃣ False generalization

👉 Example:
“according to the Ukrainians…”
“who Ukrainians support”

Technique:

  • one YouTube channel → “all Ukrainians”
  • homogenizing an entire nation

Goal:
👉 create a simple black-and-white picture

Effect:
👉 critical thinking shuts down
👉 “they are all on the same side”

3️⃣ Guilt by association

👉 Example:
“Péter Magyar behind Zelensky”
“together with Ursula”

Technique:

  • linking people through images, not facts
  • presenting political actors as “one bloc”

Goal:
👉 “if he’s with them → he’s against us”

Effect:
👉 you don’t evaluate programs → you look at “who they stand with”

4️⃣ Construction of an external enemy

👉 Example:
“a government controlled from Ukraine”

Technique:

  • threat to sovereignty
  • image of foreign control

Goal:
👉 activate national defense reflex

Effect:
👉 fear + anger
👉 “we must defend ourselves”

5️⃣ Fearmongering (economic + war)

👉 Example:
“Hungarian youth will be paying for decades”

Technique:

  • projecting a future catastrophe
  • without concrete evidence

Goal:
👉 generate anxiety

Effect:
👉 “this is too risky → better not change anything”

6️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Example:
“Hungarian government OR Ukrainian control”

Technique:

  • presenting only two options
  • eliminating all alternatives

Goal:
👉 force a simple choice

Effect:
👉 “if not A → then B (bad)”

7️⃣ Savior narrative (protector framing)

👉 Example:
“Orbán won’t allow it…”
“only he can protect”

Technique:

  • leader = shield
  • person = nation

Goal:
👉 tie sense of safety to one person

Effect:
👉 stronger loyalty, less criticism

8️⃣ Repetition + reinforcement

👉 keywords:

  • Ukraine
  • crosshair
  • war
  • money

Technique:

  • repeating the same frame multiple times

Goal:
👉 imprinting

Effect:
👉 “familiar → feels true”

⚠️ What really matters

This text does not prove anything, it:

  • suggests through images
  • generalizes
  • creates fear
  • tells a simple story

👉 it doesn’t tell you what is true
👉 it tells you what to feel

🧩 Why it still works

It is effective on people who:

  • feel uncertain (war, money, future)
  • don’t verify sources
  • want quick, simple answers

👉 in this state, the brain:
doesn’t analyze → it defends

💬 Short, raw summary

👉 This is a textbook propaganda mix:

  • visual shock (crosshair)
  • external enemy (Ukraine)
  • betrayal narrative (Tisza)
  • fear (money + war)
  • savior (Orbán)

→ it doesn’t inform, it directs