A broken heart, a terrible tragedy.
When a television news presenter watched and listened to daily by an entire country suddenly dies at a young age, it shocks everyone.
But what followed after that is beyond words.
The Tisza supporters’ so-called “country of love” showed itself once again.
Under the Telex article about the death of György Kontra, Tisza supporters also expressed their “sympathy”:
“Fate has delivered justice!”
“Slowly but surely, they’re disappearing!”
They celebrate the death of an innocent man they did not even know, simply because they believe he held different views.
People! Are you human beings?
Do you realize that he will never see this, never read it?
But his grieving mother will — a mother who is surely experiencing indescribable pain.
At moments like this, you rejoice over the death of a grieving mother’s son.
Is this the world you want for our country?
Is this how love is supposed to spread?
We are Hungarians, few in this vast world.
If we wish only harm upon one another, what will become of us?
Humanity. Decency. Love.
In the remaining 64 days until the elections, it is extremely important that we all keep our composure and choose our future peacefully in April.
🔴 1️⃣ Individual indecency ≠ collective guilt
The fact that a few people write stomach-turning things under a death announcement is:
- unfortunately a real phenomenon on the internet
- present on every political side, with every tragedy
👉 But what Alexandra does is this:
- she does not condemn the comments themselves
- she brands an entire political community with them
📌 Logical fallacy:
“X people wrote this” → “This is what the Tisza is like”
That is collective stigmatization, not a moral stance.
🔴 2️⃣ Deliberate distortion: shifting the focus
Watch where the emphasis goes.
❌ What is NOT said:
- “These comments are unacceptable.”
- “This kind of behavior is indefensible on any side.”
✅ What IS said instead:
- “The Tisza ‘country of love’ has shown its true face.”
- “Is this the world you want?”
👉 In other words:
- she is not criticizing behavior
- she is attacking identity
This is propaganda.
🔴 3️⃣ Emotional blackmail turned up to maximum
After acknowledging the existence of the comments, the real manipulation begins:
- repeated invocation of the grieving mother
- “Are you even human?”
- “You are celebrating a mother’s son’s death.”
👉 At this point she is no longer speaking to the commenters, but to:
- everyone who is connected to Tisza, even merely as a voter
📌 The message:
“If you do not publicly distance yourself, you are one of them.”
That is moral coercion.
🔴 4️⃣ The classic “moral trap”
This text sets a trap:
- If you speak up → “you are excusing inhumanity”
- If you stay silent → “you admit it”
- If you add nuance → “you are relativizing”
- If you ask questions → “you are insensitive”
👉 This is not debate, but a sealed moral cage.
🔴 5️⃣ The ultimate cynicism: preaching peace afterward
After she has:
- inflamed emotions
- stigmatized a group collectively
- morally humiliated them
…she ends with:
- “let’s keep our calm,”
- “let’s choose peacefully”
👉 This is role-playing:
- she lights the fire
- then puts on the firefighter’s uniform
🎯 THE BOTTOM LINE — SHORT AND BRUTAL
✔ Yes, there were reprehensible comments
❌ No, a political community is not equal to those comments
❌ No, this is not “the essence of Tisza”
❌ No, this is not a moral intervention — it is political weaponization
👉 She does not protect grief — she uses it.