❌ Péter Magyar did not dare to ask his questions in person; instead, he hired criminals to sabotage the Lázár Info forum.
The thugs hired for small change have long criminal records: disorderly conduct, robbery, embezzlement, assault, sexual violence, extortion, homicide. With them, the president of the TISZA party tried to intimidate right-wing Hungarians instead of meeting János Lázár face to face.
👉 It is clear that Péter Magyar is afraid of failure. He himself sees that no one wants the Brussels path he would be unable to refuse if he came to power.
But the April election is drawing closer every day. In 69 days, Hungarians will have their hearts and minds in the right place. Even in an age of danger, we need responsible leadership and a responsible government—no one is asking for a left-wing experiment.
🟠 Only Viktor Orbán and the national government can guarantee peace and preserve the achievements we have made—this is why Fidesz is the safe choice!
Have you ever hired criminals for a 20,000-forint fee plus gas money to stir up trouble at a forum?
That’s what happened here, as far as it concerns TISZA. There was one in Gyöngyös; I personally went with them. So they paid people to go to Gyöngyös? Yes. Those people went for money? Yes. And who organized it? Someone from TISZA—Miklós Csík or whoever. Csík Miklós, right? Yes, yes, they organized it.
Obviously not—and in any case, I strongly condemn it. I consider this an utterly shameful thing on Péter Magyar’s part. If he has a problem, he can go there and say it in person. That’s what János Lázár’s forum is for. Instead, Péter Magyar hires criminals for money—people with such long criminal records—to go there and intimidate Fidesz voters, questioners, and potential Fidesz supporters at such events.
I think this is pathetic.
1️⃣ Unproven criminal accusation presented as established fact
“Magyar Péter hired criminals… thugs… they have long criminal records…”
This is an allegation of serious crimes:
- hiring criminals
- intimidation
- organized crime
- violent criminal offenses
❗ There is no:
- police case number
- indictment
- court judgment
- evidence tied to specific individuals
👉 Name of the technique: defamation presented as fact
Legally, this only stands if it is proven. Here, it is not.
2️⃣ Criminal laundry-list shock (“criminal laundry list”)
“disorderly conduct, robbery, embezzlement, assault, sexual violence, extortion, murder”
This is a psychological weapon:
- the more crimes, the more extreme the better
- thrown together, deliberately blurred
- not concretely attributed to anyone
👉 Goal: to trigger disgust, fear, and anger before the reader starts thinking.
3️⃣ Narrative of collective intimidation
“intimidation of right-wing Hungarians”
This creates a victim frame:
- “they are violent”
- “we are under threat”
- “we need protection”
👉 This is how any criticism becomes an attack on the community itself.
4️⃣ “Didn’t dare to face him” – masculinity / courage coding
“he didn’t dare personally… he didn’t dare to face him”
This is not a political argument, but character assassination:
- cowardly
- sneaky
- unmanly
👉 A classic toxic courage narrative.
5️⃣ Brussels = inevitable betrayal
“he wouldn’t be able to say no to Brussels anyway”
❌ There is no:
- program
- decision
- legal obligation
👉 Pre-assigned future guilt:
if he comes to power → automatically a traitor.
6️⃣ Numerology as a legitimacy prop
“69 days to go…”
This is psychological time pressure:
- the end is near
- a decision must be made
- no time to weigh options
👉 This is not information, but tension-building.
7️⃣ False exclusivity
“Only Viktor Orbán and the national government…”
This is the alpha and omega of propaganda:
- no alternative
- no nuance
- no debate
👉 False dichotomy:
- either them
- or chaos
8️⃣ “Street testimony” – an unverifiable story
“There was one in Gyöngyös… I deliberately went with them…”
This is:
- anonymous
- without a date
- impossible to verify
👉 Anecdotal truth: “I saw it → therefore it’s true.”
🔴 Overall picture
This text does not inform. It:
- manufactures fear
- builds an enemy image
- criminalizes in advance
- shuts down thinking
As political communication, it is textbook propaganda.
🧠 One-sentence summary
This is not evidence, but emotional warfare:
fear instead of facts, defamation instead of law, demonization instead of debate.