Enable closed captions for subtitles.
Tag: neverforget
It’s exactly the same in Hungary.
“The liberal world order has come to an end; the era of nations is beginning.”
Viktor Orbán:
“The liberal world order has come to an end; the era of nations is beginning.”
Go Hungary! 🇭🇺
no words…
szentkiralyi and orban
The key word of the next period — not just the next four, but the next ten years — will be security.
And we feel that we have been able to provide security for this country so far, and that we will be able to provide security in the future as well.
When it comes to concrete political issues, the key element of this security is war.
I have said this to you several times already: I participate in the meetings of the European Council, where European leaders are sitting, and a huge change has taken place there.
These council meetings have been transformed — they have become war councils, they decide about war.
I quote them: How do we win? How do we win the war? I could go on.
So everything has changed, and we must expect that now — not alone, but still only a few of us — are countries that, instead of the logic of a war economy, war loans, and wartime conduct, propose a completely different strategy for the European Union and for ourselves.
This strategy is peace, stability, peace agreements, and a peace economy.
Most recently, there were already three of us. And I believe there will be more.
My assessment of the situation is that across Europe, social movements opposing the pro-war elite are growing rapidly.
1️⃣ “Security” as a Rubber Concept
“The key word of the next ten years will be security.”
“Security” is never defined: military? economic? energy-related? rule of law?
Because it remains vague, every later claim can be retroactively attached to this empty frame.
This is classic frame-building: anyone who disagrees is automatically positioned as being “against security.”
👉 This is not a statement, but an emotional anchor.
2️⃣ Self-Justification Without Evidence
“We have provided security so far, and we will continue to do so.”
There is no benchmark, no comparison, no data.
Proof by assertion: repetition turns the claim into something that feels true.
Past and future are mechanically linked: if it supposedly worked yesterday, it must work tomorrow.
👉 Politics is turned into a matter of belief, not evaluation.
3️⃣ “War Council” – Dramatized Enemy Construction
“The meetings of the European Council have turned into war councils.”
A heavy metaphor that projects wartime imagery onto a political body.
No minutes are cited, no concrete decisions named → symbolic exaggeration.
The quoted line “How do we win?” is given without a source.
👉 The goal: fear + separation.
4️⃣ False Dichotomy
“War economy, war loans, war logic ↔ peace, stability, peace economy”
The argument is framed as if only two paths exist.
All intermediate options are erased: defense + diplomacy, sanctions + negotiations, etc.
The concept of “peace” is monopolized: anyone who disagrees is labeled “pro-war.”
👉 This is moral coercion, not debate.
5️⃣ “Few but Right” – The Chosen-Ones Narrative
“Not alone, but still only a few of us…”
Martyrdom and prophecy combined:
- we are few → therefore brave
- we will be many → therefore right
Future vindication is pre-granted.
👉 A textbook case of populist self-mythologizing.
6️⃣ “Growing Social Movements” – A Data-Free Crowd
“They are growing rapidly all across Europe…”
Who? Where? How many? Measured when?
“The people” appear as an abstract, faceless mass that only the speaker can interpret.
Bandwagon effect: if many believe it, it must be true.
👉 This is sentiment, not an empirical claim.
⚠️ Internal Contradiction
- “We are not alone”
- “We are still only a few”
- “Resistance is growing across Europe”
👉 Simultaneously isolated, exceptional, and representative of the majority—depending on what best serves the moment.
🧠 Overall Picture – What Is Actually Happening?
This speech is not really about war or peace.
It is about:
- identity construction (“we are on the right side”),
- fear framing (“they want war”),
- and morally shutting down debate before it can even begin.
Orbán: I asked Trump for a protective shield, but there was none available that would suit both countries.
What we haven’t said like this before is that yesterday
I also concluded an agreement with the American president
on a so-called financial protective shield.
So the situation is that if Hungary were to face any kind of external attack,
including against its financial system,
the Americans have given their word
that in such a case they would protect Hungary’s financial stability.
This is a very important matter.
And if Hungary were to be subjected to such an external attack —
let’s say a speculative or politically motivated one —
then we can count on an American financial protective shield.
I can count on it.
And this is how I am planning for the future.
When the little lapdog Viktor Orbán keeps rubbing up against Vladimir Putin,
Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, issued a statement on the United States’ intervention in Venezuela.
The statement was supported by 26 of the EU’s 27 member states; the only country that did not support it was Hungary.
This is exactly how things end up — just as expected.
When the little lapdog Viktor Orbán keeps rubbing up against Vladimir Putin,
May my luck with the lottery be exactly as good as this outcome was expected to be.
2026 Budapest vs szentkiralyi alexandra fidesz propagandist
For English subtitles, please enable CC.
1️⃣ Initial Role Framing:
“Destructive mayor” vs. “Besieged city leader”
Szentkirályi Alexandra (Fidesz-style propaganda)
Master frame:
- Karácsony = incompetent
- Budapest = on the verge of collapse
- Cause: left-wing leadership, “tantrums,” “chaos”
Techniques:
- Personification (every problem = Karácsony’s fault)
- Removing context (no mention of central government takeaways)
- Constant crisis messaging
👉 Responsibility pushed downward
Karácsony Gergely’s communication
(based on the uploaded speech)
Master frame:
- Budapest = a functioning city
- Threat: government financial seizing
- Battlefield: legal, constitutional
Techniques:
- Institutional level references (Curia, Constitutional Court, State Audit Office)
- Concrete figures (≈100 bn HUF taken away)
- Historical analogy (constitutional autonomy)
👉 Responsibility pushed upward
2️⃣ “We work hard” – same sentence, opposite meaning
Szentkirályi:
“We would help, but Karácsony is incapable.”
Trick:
- Government makes the decisions → the city pays
- Then the consequences are blamed on the city leadership
👉 Classic scapegoating
Karácsony:
“It is the workers of Budapest who keep the city running.”
Counter-frame:
- Bus drivers, maintenance workers, public services
- Budapest = community, not political spoils
👉 System narrative, not a personal myth
3️⃣ Autonomy vs. Subordination – the real dividing line
Szentkirályi / Fidesz:
- Budapest should be a “good child”
- Pay up
- Don’t argue
- Don’t sue
👉 Logic of central domination
Karácsony:
- Ruling of unconstitutional takeaways
- Winning lawsuits
- Defending self-government
👉 Logic of municipal autonomy
Why Budapest is a threat to Fidesz:
“If Budapest can breathe, the whole country might breathe.”
4️⃣ Propaganda-level distortions in Szentkirályi’s messaging
What keeps disappearing from the narrative:
- ❌ the 100 bn HUF taken from Budapest
- ❌ the lawsuits the city has won
- ❌ the rule-of-law judgments
- ❌ the fact that the government decides, the city pays
👉 Not a ‘different opinion’ — but information suppression
5️⃣ Summary Table
| Aspect | Szentkirályi (Fidesz) | Karácsony |
|---|---|---|
| Cause of conflict | The mayor himself | Government financial takeaways |
| Rhetoric | Personal attacks | Institutional, legal |
| Proposed solution | Obedience | Rights protection |
| Image of Budapest | Failure | Autonomous community |
| Political goal | Offload responsibility | Create legal precedent |
🔚 One-sentence essence
Szentkirályi’s propaganda does not defend Budapest — it hides the fact that the government is deliberately squeezing the city. Karácsony’s message is precisely to expose that, using law and facts.
Szentkirályi deliberately misinformed the public.
The pro-government media is loudly citing The Economist to claim that Fidesz will win the 2026 election — now let’s look at the reality
Domestic news
December 31, 2025 – 16:43
Zách Dániel
Only a few dozen votes per day are being cast in an online poll that has been running since November 12 and will continue until next May, in which the British Economist asks its readers whether they think Fidesz will win the most seats in the 2026 parliamentary elections.
Based on the current results, around 57 percent of respondents believe that Fidesz will not have a majority in the new parliament, nor will the ruling party’s list win the most mandates.
21 percent think Fidesz will have a majority, and 17 percent believe it will not have a majority but will still win the most seats.
In contrast, Tények.hu, in a paid Facebook post, claims that The Economist says Fidesz–KDNP will win the 2026 elections — a claim also reported by Magyar Nemzet and Hirado.hu. Among the pro-government outlets mentioned, only the first indicated in its headline that this is not the opinion of the British weekly, but merely the current state of an ongoing reader poll.
Even the liberal Economist now predicts that Fidesz will win the elections!
More than half of respondents believe that the national government will receive a renewed mandate for another four years.
Public opinion polls show the same trend. FIDESZ is continuously gaining strength, while Péter Magyar keeps stumbling from one scandal to another.
People can see clearly: Hungarians reject the Tisza Party’s austerity package, refuse illegal migration, and stand firmly behind the Hungarian government’s anti-war policy!
The events of recent months have shown the direction ahead. We are the frontrunners — in April we must show our strength together!
Go FIDESZ, Go Hungary!
Only 102 days to go!
Kossuth Award-winning disgrace of Hungary
Yes, you’re seeing it right — he’s already drunk, and his speech… well…
It’s already terrible that if someone asks the question “war or peace?”, then of course the answer is peace. I simply don’t understand how there can be people who call themselves Hungarian and still say: “No, no, we must attack the Russians and we must help Ukraine.” What benefit do we get from that? And if we make too much noise, we’ll end up with an atomic bomb dropped on us. Well, no thank you. So I absolutely do not want war. Peace is perfectly fine for me. Okay? That’s all.
“Fight Club”: How Fidesz Is Building a Digital Army for the 2026 Election
English subtitles are available via the CC button.
The Telex report covers the “Fight Club” event organized by Fidesz as part of its preparations for the 2026 election. Most of the participants interviewed had little to no idea what the event was actually about, often giving vague or contradictory answers about its purpose. The organization reflects the party’s activist network and its broader communication machinery at work.
The report also touches on a bill submitted by János Halász, which could restrict domestic funding for civil organizations and independent media under the justification of preventing “foreign influence.” Supporters of the government frequently claim — without presenting concrete evidence — that certain media outlets (such as Telex or 444) “serve foreign interests.”
The report includes instances where journalists were obstructed from doing their work by an associate of Fidesz party director Gábor Kubatov. According to Fidesz’s communication, these efforts are all part of building a “digital freedom fight” to secure victory in 2026.