The story of a Hungarian mother who “fled back home” from Germany because of migration and gender indoctrination. This is why we must vote wisely.
The migration situation in Germany had become problematic. I no longer allowed my child to go into the city center, not even in broad daylight. This is a cautionary story for a new generation of voters, told by Erika, who grew up here, lived here, then moved to Germany—and eventually returned to Hungary. But why?
I had a teenage child, a daughter, whom I absolutely wanted to rescue from the educational environment and the migration-related changes we were exposed to. So a few years ago, we truly returned home to Hungary.
The migration situation in Germany was problematic. I no longer let her enter the city center even during the day, because public safety was nowhere near what it had been 10, 15, or 20 years ago.
In education, expectations around male and female roles have changed significantly, and I could not identify with that.
That is why we must pay attention to ensuring that all of Budapest—and North Pest as well—remains free from immigration.
🧠 Psychological Influence – What does this “extra interview” actually do to you?
1️⃣ The illusion of a “credible witness”
This woman is not an expert, not a decision-maker, not a data source. Yet she is framed as someone who has “personally encountered the danger.”
👉 Psychological effect: The viewer does not feel persuaded, but rather:
“One of us is finally saying the truth.”
This triggers identification, not thinking.
2️⃣ Fear wrapped in “motherhood”
The key element of the sentence is not migration, not gender — but the child.
“I had to rescue my teenage daughter…”
👉 This is a deliberate choice, because:
the mother = moral shield
the child = unquestionable emotional argument
The viewer’s inner reaction:
if you doubt → guilt
if you question → the feeling of being a “bad parent”
This is emotional blackmail, not argumentation.
3️⃣ Controlled panic: “not even in broad daylight”
This phrase is not accidental.
“in broad daylight” → nowhere is safe
no place, no time, no exception
👉 The goal: There must be nothing concrete to verify. Fear must remain floating, ungraspable.
This is what psychology calls diffuse anxiety induction.
4️⃣ The “escape” narrative
“We fled back home from Germany.”
This is an extremely strong psychological word.
👉 Message to the viewer:
The West = danger
Hungary = last refuge
Anyone who would stay or question → irresponsible.
This shuts down thinking, because from “escape” there is no debate — only survival.
5️⃣ A pre-manufactured conclusion
At the end, there is no question.
“That’s why we must vote wisely.”
👉 Psychological mechanism:
after the emotional surge, there is no time left to think
an immediate political command follows
This is classic emotional steering: fear → relief → obedience.
🎯 What is really happening?
This interview is not about the mother.
It is a role, used to:
normalize fear,
morally disable questioning,
and transfer the viewer’s internal control to a political narrative.
📌 The real goal is not for you to believe. 📌 The real goal is for you to not dare to doubt.
The Government of Hungary is launching a National Petition to send a clear message to Brussels: WE WILL NOT PAY!
We will not pay for the Russian–Ukrainian war, we will not pay for the operation of the Ukrainian state over the next ten years, and we will not pay higher utility bills because of the war.
Somehow this ugly opposition math just doesn’t add up. So how many opposition voters are there actually? And where exactly are those so-called “disappointed Fidesz voters”? 🤔🤔🤔
More on this in the latest episode of the Gyalogátkelő – podcast! Link in the comments 🙂
Wasn’t the story supposed to be that there already was an opposition base — about one and a half, or almost two million people — back in ’22? Depending on the multiplier, of course.
And then, on top of that, people started writing to me in the comments saying that another 400,000 new Tisza voters would show up and completely wipe out Fidesz.
Who are these people? The ones who were just born?
So now we have two million opposition voters, plus another 400,000 — that’s already 2.4 million. And then Momentum offered up its body, soul, and service, Dialogue (Párbeszéd) also volunteered, and I’ve just seen that Péter Jakab did as well — they all offered themselves to Tisza.
But then, logically, that would mean there should be, say, two million Tisza voters — and on top of that, I don’t know… I’ve heard figures like another one million opposition voters.
So how does the math work out when it comes to, for example, the DK?
Could it be that what’s really happening here is not that disappointed Fidesz voters are forming the base of the Tisza Party, but rather disappointed opposition voters?
Former DK voters, maybe? Former Momentum supporters?
What is actually happening in Dezse’s statement?
This is not analysis — it’s guided doubt. He doesn’t answer; he works with questions — and that is deliberate.
🎯 The goal
Not to help you understand the numbers, but to:
confuse you,
make you distrust the opposition,
while simultaneously reassuring you as a Fidesz supporter.
1️⃣ “The math doesn’t add up” — not criticism, but a message
When he says:
“Somehow this ugly opposition math doesn’t add up”
👉 he doesn’t calculate, 👉 he doesn’t refute, 👉 he just creates a feeling.
💡 Message to the listener:
“Relax, these people are talking nonsense. You’re on the right side.”
This is cognitive reassurance, not analysis.
2️⃣ The question that isn’t a question
“So how many opposition voters are there now?”
This is not genuine curiosity. It’s a rhetorical trap:
no stated answer,
no counter-argument,
no data.
👉 The listener completes the thought themselves:
“They must be lying.”
This is projection: he lets you draw the conclusion — but he controls the direction.
3️⃣ The key trick: “not former Fidesz voters, but opposition voters”
When he gets to this:
“Maybe they’re not disappointed Fidesz voters, but disappointed opposition voters?”
“Don’t worry. There’s no breakthrough. They’re just stirring the air.”
This is anxiety-reducing propaganda.
5️⃣ Short, direct summary (if you want to say it plainly)
Dezse doesn’t calculate — he plants uncertainty. He doesn’t debate — he undermines with questions. His goal isn’t truth, but to calm the Fidesz listener:
“There’s no danger. The opposition is just eating itself.”
This is what the Tisza supporters are like! They pocket million-forint teacher salaries, don’t pay taxes, receive state scholarships, and yet relentlessly criticize the government. Müller Anna’s behavior is outrageous.
The Tisza challenger is a teacher—specifically a high school teacher—who, if I saw correctly, earns a salary in the millions. She is a mother of three, so she doesn’t even have to pay certain charges, she received the Köbüki scholarship—she grabbed that from the state as well—and yet she still claims that everything is wrong with education. It’s very strange to hear this. As for the historically large wage increase, I’d say we’re not even halfway through it yet, since it will last until 2031. If we interrupt it now and start moving backward, that would be a major step back, because the goal is to value our teachers, to make the teaching profession attractive. And it is indeed very interesting when someone—precisely as a teacher—stands against this. I said it correctly, didn’t I, that the average gross salary is above 900,000, meaning that one-million-forint salaries easily exist. That’s right. Moreover, we know exactly that if Tisza introduces its new tax structure—which has already been backed up in many places—then teachers will certainly earn at least 100,000 forints less, and many family benefits will be taken away from them.
🎭 1. Apparent message (surface)
The statement suggests that:
Müller Anna is a “pampered” teacher
she earns a million-forint salary
she received a state scholarship
she benefits from family support
yet she is ungrateful because she criticizes education
Therefore, what she says is “uncredible” and “outrageous.”
This is the shop window. On the surface, it talks about money and fairness.
🎯 2. The REAL function (unspoken)
This is not a policy debate, but an act of intimidation by example.
The real goals of the message are:
❌ To take away teachers’ right to speak ❌ To punish those who criticize from within ❌ To deter other teachers from expressing public opinions
Message to the others:
“If you earn well → stay silent.” “If you receive anything → you have no right to criticize.”
This is enforced loyalty, not argument.
🧠 3. Psychological tricks used
1️⃣ Financial delegitimization
“Million-forint salary → no right to complain”
➡️ As if income buys silence. A moral trap: if you earn well, shut up.
2️⃣ Benefits = obligation to remain silent
Scholarship, family support, wage increase → “you owe us.”
➡️ This is feudal logic, not democratic thinking.
3️⃣ Implanting fear about the future
“If Tisza comes, you’ll earn 100,000 less.”
➡️ Projected loss without evidence. Classic: “if not us, it will be worse.”
4️⃣ Personal attack → silencing systemic critique
The focus is not on the state of education, but on the person criticizing it.
➡️ This is ad hominem—avoiding the real debate.
🔥 4. The most important unspoken message
The real meaning is this:
“It doesn’t matter whether you’re right. What matters is whether you’re loyal.”
This is not about teachers. This is about every public servant.
🧩 5. What is conspicuously missing?
❓ A single concrete professional rebuttal ❓ A single data point about education quality ❓ A single response to the actual criticisms
Instead, we get:
money
envy
fear
moral shaming
🧠 One-sentence summary (ideal for a short video)
This is not a debate about education. It’s a message to everyone: if you receive anything from the state, you have no right to ask questions.
A good teacher loves children and their vocation. The national curriculum can be rethought, but there is one thing we must never compromise on: we must fight against Hungary being led by a Tisza government whose nominee for education minister writes “Little Josephine” fairy tales.
The left-wing parties have already divided the turf: they want to keep North Pest in the hands of the Democratic Coalition. That is why the Tisza Party has put forward an extremely weak candidate here. We must not allow this!
The Democratic Coalition is holding a post-New Year’s Eve event in North Pest. Their local representative, Balázs Barkóczi, managed to make everyone in the area laugh when he wrote on Facebook that he “demands a hospital for North Pest.”
This is the representative of the very party that, when it was in power, destroyed the healthcare system: they closed hospitals, drove doctors away, and introduced hospital visit fees. Since 2010, the civic government has had to gather everything from the ruins and rebuild it anew. That is why the Democratic Coalition has no place in North Pest either.
🎭 1. Apparent message (surface level)
The text claims that:
the Democratic Coalition has “divided up” North Pest,
the Tisza Party deliberately nominated a weak candidate,
Balázs Barkóczi is ridiculous and unserious,
the DK “when it was in power” destroyed healthcare,
everything was bad before 2010 and everything has been “rebuilt from ruins” since then,
therefore, the DK has no place in North Pest.
This is the shop window.
🎯 2. The REAL function (unstated)
This is not about local issues at all, but about:
scapegoating (“they ruined everything”),
activating fear tied to the past (visit fees, hospital closures),
“Take a look at how intelligence is overflowing. Yesterday I introduced you to János, who poses on Facebook in a T-shirt depicting a hanged Orbán. Now let me introduce you to another intelligent voter from Tisza: Lajos. Lajos is the one who has been commenting under several of my posts that he’s waiting for me to show one of my body parts. ‘Flash a muff,’ as he puts it.
Now, you might reasonably ask me why I’m once again bringing up such an idiot from the other side. Well, exactly because we’ve just returned from the anti-war rally in Kaposvár. And the thing is, one can legitimately ask why the right organizes programs for itself every weekend, and why right-wing people gather—especially now, in the final stretch of the campaign—to meet each other, talk, and listen to the politicians they want to see leading the country.
And this is precisely why. There is such a huge need for this kind of intellectual cleansing, or intellectual boost, that these meetings provide. Because in everyday life we’re consumed by social media; we spend most of our time there. And the result is that we might start to believe that in Hungary there are more people like this Lajos and János—people who are this sick, with such sick ideas—and that all sense of Hungarian identity, intelligence, and basic humanity has completely died out in them.
Then the weekend comes, we gather—each time in a different city—and what used to happen once, or at most twice a year at the Peace March now happens every single weekend at these anti-war rallies. Because when you go there, you meet kind-hearted, friendly, smiling people, who are even capable—when the opportunity arises—of asking intelligent, thoughtful, normal questions of their prime minister.
You see, this is what has held this entire community together for a long time now. The fact that we don’t spend most of our time writing filthy, hateful comments at the other side. Instead, we work, raise children, run households, build our lives. And when such an opportunity comes along, we go out on the weekends, meet each other, and have good conversations at these anti-war rallies or in any right-wing community.
Because that’s who we are. And that’s why, no matter how much the other side flails, no matter how many laughing emojis they hand out, no matter how aggressive they are, and no matter how hard they try to wage some kind of psychological warfare on people—it won’t succeed. Because they don’t have what we have.
They don’t know that feeling. That sense of spiritual superiority, that inner peace, that happy awareness of how good it is to be Hungarian today—how good it is to be born Hungarian, how good it feels to be proud of being Hungarian—while still being able to get ahead in life, being allowed to live, even receiving help if you want it. And on top of that, having a prime minister who looks out for the interests of Hungarian people, rather than selling the country off to whichever multinational or EU leader happens to be next in line.
That is an incredibly reassuring feeling. I hope we’ll be able to feel it for a long time to come.
People like Lajos, on the other hand, will be stuck in the comments forever. You’re miserable. Every last one of you.
Tisza commenters vs. the right-wing community. There’s a difference between the two that’s hard to miss. That’s exactly why anti-war rallies and right-wing community events are so necessary. Because they feel extremely comfortable on social media and create the illusion that their stupid, aggressive behavior is the majority.
But it’s not. In Hungary, sane people are still in the majority. And in April, we’ll prove that with numbers 😉😉😉😉”
🎭 1. Apparent message (surface level)
The speech claims that:
“Tisza” commenters are primitive, sick, and aggressive,
the right-wing community, by contrast, is intelligent, moral, hard-working, and family-oriented,
social media presents a distorted picture, while in reality “we are the majority,”
anti-war rallies provide intellectual and moral purification,
the country’s leader (Viktor Orbán) represents the interests of Hungarian people, not those of “multinationals” or “Brussels.”
This is the storefront.
🎯 2. The REAL function (unspoken)
This is not argumentation, but identity-reinforcing and exclusionary propaganda.
The purpose of the text is to:
deepen the us-versus-them divide,
dehumanize the opponent (“sick,” “miserable”),
convey a sense of moral superiority within one’s own camp,
invalidate criticism on psychological grounds (it’s not untrue because it can be refuted, but because “they” are the ones saying it).
🧩 3. Propaganda and manipulation techniques used
1️⃣ Isolated extreme examples → generalization
“János,” “Lajos” – sexual, aggressive comments
➡️ Classic cherry-picking: a few unacceptable comments are magnified into a collective identity.
“This is what the other side is like.”
Not evidence, but character assassination at the group level.
2️⃣ Moral superiority narrative
“we work, raise children, run households”
➡️ Implied message:
if you’re critical → you don’t work,
if you’re in the opposition → you don’t have a family,
if you comment → you’re immoral.
This is self-justifying identity construction, not fact.
The red mailbox is going to its first location. By now, everyone knows that this is where we collect the problems and questions people have, the things residents are dissatisfied with, what causes everyday frustration, what they feel is missing, or even what they see as an opportunity here in Újpalota and across the 15th district.
From January 27, the mailbox will be placed on the main square in Újpalota, where it will remain until February 1. We’re waiting for your messages there, or you can also send them by email to nemetbalasvagyok@gmail.com.
We are starting a new chapter in the 15th district, as well as in the northern part of the 4th district, in Káposztásmegyer. It’s going to be good!
How old will you be in 2046? 🤔 According to Brussels’ leaked plan, we would be paying for Ukraine’s war until then. $800 billion in support, plus another $700 billion in military spending – all from European taxpayers’ money.
But it doesn’t stop there: Ukraine’s unconditional EU accession, the destruction of Hungarian farmers through GMO Ukrainian grain.
The Tisza Party would say yes to every demand from Brussels, but we cannot allow Hungarians to be put in danger! 🛑 We defend Hungarian interests! 🇭🇺 Let’s not allow decisions to be made about us, without us!
In April too, Fidesz is the only safe choice.
How old will you be in 2046? You probably don’t even want to think about it, yet according to Brussels’ new plan, you would still be paying for Ukraine’s war until then.
In short: $800 billion for Ukraine from European taxpayers’ money and accelerated EU accession by 2027, without conditions. $700 billion for weapons and armies, GMO Ukrainian grain and food on your table, and of course the rights of the Hungarian minority still won’t matter.
The free-for-all can continue while globalist big capital grows rich off Ukraine.
Hungary’s position, by contrast, is very clear: Hungarians’ money belongs to Hungarians, Hungarian farmers must be protected, and decisions must not be made about us without us.
That’s why the April election is not just about four years, but at least ten years of our future. If we give in to Brussels now, Hungarians are finished. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.
🎯 The real function (why this text exists)
This text does not inform. It:
👉 creates existential fear 👉 paralyzes with a distant time horizon (“2046”) 👉 offers no escape route (“if we give in now, it’s over”) 👉 demands exclusive loyalty
This is mobilizing panic communication, not political argument.
🧠 Key manipulations – point by point
1️⃣ “How old will you be in 2046?”
Time-trap
Most people cannot realistically think 20 years ahead. The question triggers anxiety, not reasoning. Classic future-dread framing.
👉 Not data, but a psychological anchor.
2️⃣ “Leaked Brussels plan”
Unproven authority
No document No decision-making mechanism No legal binding force
👉 The word “leaked” exempts the claim from proof.
3️⃣ Stacked shock numbers ($800 + $700 billion)
Numerical shock therapy
Not budget lines No annual breakdown No member-state contribution ratios No legally approved commitments
👉 The number doesn’t explain — it hits.
4️⃣ “Unconditional EU accession”
Legally false claim
EU accession = unanimity + negotiation chapters + veto rights It cannot happen without Hungary.
👉 The text conceals that the brake is in the Hungarian government’s hands.
5️⃣ GMO Ukrainian grain = destruction of Hungarian farmers
Scapegoating + oversimplification
No price, quota, quality, or market regulation analysis No alternatives Only fear imagery
👉 Farmers become an emotional shield.
6️⃣ “If we give in now, Hungarians are finished”
Doomsday logic
No middle ground No negotiation No correction
👉 This is cult logic, not politics.
🔴 The core contradiction
“Don’t decide about us without us!”
⬇️
While the text simultaneously hides that:
Hungary has veto power Neither accession nor funding is automatic
👉 Cognitive dissonance: If we have no say — why do we have a veto?
We live in an age of danger. War, migration, energy crises, and tax increases threaten our everyday lives. This is what the world has become today.
In times like these, we must not experiment. We need responsible leadership that can keep Hungary out of war—and only Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are capable of doing that.
We are the only safe choice. Only the national government can guarantee peace and security for Hungary.
