The Kapitány-style energy austerity plan that has come to light clearly outlines what the TISZA Party is preparing for.
The program itself states that Péter Magyar and his allies must “immediately begin,” among other things, banning cheap Russian energy and abolishing the protected price system.

In the following lines, the package even details that as early as this year, they would impose a 600 billion forint special tax on all Hungarians, and would also tax savings for another 360 billion forints.

Moreover, they themselves are fully aware of the consequences.
They explicitly state, in black and white, that the bills of families, pensioners, and young people could immediately rise to as much as three times their current levels—meaning that each of us would be forced to pay up to 800,000 forints more per year.

This is something we do not even want to hear about. We understand that István Kapitány and his allies want to make huge profits by penalizing Hungarians, but we will not allow ourselves to be stripped of our money.

As long as the national government remains in place, we will stand by low taxes and affordable utility costs—this is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

---

Good morning! Another leaked plan from TISZA has surfaced: the so-called “energy independence tax.” What exactly is this?

There is nothing new under the sun, as István Kapitány has already spoken about the need to move away from cheap Russian energy. This would mean that an average Hungarian family would have to pay roughly 2 million forints more per year, since there would be no price caps, no protected pricing, and no utility cost reductions.

Moreover, István Kapitány would place an additional burden on Hungarian families through a special tax—the so-called “energy independence tax”—which would also affect household savings.

So in my view, we should not allow this to happen and instead remain on the path of security.

🧠 Quick situational overview

👉 Main narrative:

“TISZA = brutal price hikes + taxes + triple utility bills”
“Fidesz = protection + cheap energy + security”
“The election = saving your wallet vs. being looted”

👉 Hidden formula:
fear + specific numbers + a “leaked document” + enemy construction
→ “if not us, you’ll lose millions every year”

👉 🔥 Bottom line:

there is no proven source
the numbers are extreme
emotional shock → political mobilization

🔍 Manipulation techniques (detailed)

1️⃣ “Leaked plan” = false authentication

👉 Excerpt:
“came to light… leaked plan”

Technique:
there is no verifiable source
yet it is presented as an “internal document”

Goal:
➡️ to create the appearance of credibility without evidence

Reality:
➡️ if the document cannot be identified, it is a propaganda trigger

2️⃣ Shock effect through specific numbers

👉 Excerpt:
“600 billion tax”
“360 billion tax on savings”
“800,000 HUF / year”
“2 million HUF loss”

Technique:
large numbers make the claim sound more believable
stacking several numbers creates a sense of collapse

Goal:
➡️ to trigger financial panic

Effect:
➡️ you stop thinking and start reacting

3️⃣ Simple false cause-and-effect

👉 Claim:
“Russian energy ends → everything gets more expensive → you pay”

Technique:
a complex economic issue is reduced to a one-sentence chain

Goal:
➡️ to oversimplify reality

Reality:
➡️ energy prices are not the result of a single decision

4️⃣ Enemy construction (demonization)

👉 Excerpt:
“they will empty our pockets,” “punishment”

Technique:
the political opponent is framed as someone who intentionally wants to harm people

Goal:
➡️ to create emotional hatred and close ranks within the camp

5️⃣ “They themselves wrote it down” = false evidence

👉 Excerpt:
“they write it down in black and white”

Technique:
it refers to supposed evidence
but provides no quote and no source

Goal:
➡️ to shut down debate by presenting the claim as settled fact

6️⃣ Repetition = feeling of truth

👉 The same points repeated again and again:
tax
utility bills
price hikes
Russian energy

Technique:
➡️ repetition effect

Effect:
➡️ the more often people hear something, the more true it feels

7️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Message:
either Fidesz = security
or TISZA = collapse

Technique:
➡️ no middle ground is allowed

Goal:
➡️ to force a voting decision through fear

8️⃣ “Families, pensioners, young people” = emotional trigger

Technique:
all social groups are addressed at once

Goal:
➡️ to make everyone feel personally threatened

9️⃣ Leader = savior (protector framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“as long as the national government is here…”

Technique:
the state is framed as a shield
the leader is framed as the protector

Goal:
➡️ to strengthen loyalty

🔟 “Nothing new here” = normalization

👉 Excerpt:
“there is nothing new under the sun”

Technique:
➡️ a falsehood is treated as if it were already a known fact

⚠️ Critical point

👉 If:

TISZA denied it
the “600-page program” was also fake
there is no official document

then this is a classic case of:

👉 a manufactured narrative + repetition-based propaganda

🧨 Short, punchy summary

👉 This is not a program. It is:

a claim labeled as “leaked” without evidence
stacked, shocking numbers
a simplified chain of falsehoods
emotional fearmongering

👉 Goal:
not to inform, but to create fear and win votes

Fill out the National Petition and protest against brutal price hikes!

With Shell Captain’s leaked program today, an average Hungarian family would lose nearly 2 million forints a year.

We have entered the final two weeks, but nothing has changed on the left — it is still one austerity measure after another.

The energy-austerity plan associated with Captain that came to light today clearly sets out what the TISZA Party is preparing for.

The program itself states that Péter Magyar and his allies must “immediately begin,” among other things, banning cheap Russian energy and abolishing the protected price.

In the following lines, the package even details that they would impose a 600 billion forint special tax on all Hungarians as early as this year, and would also tax savings for another 360 billion forints.

And they themselves are fully aware of the consequences.

In black and white, they write that the bills of families, pensioners, and young people could immediately rise to as much as three times their current level, meaning they would make all of us pay an extra 800,000 forints a year.

Well, this is exactly what we do not want to hear about. We understand that István Kapitány and his people want to make huge profits from punishing Hungarians, but we will not let them empty our pockets!

As long as the national government remains in place, we will stand by low taxes and low utility costs, which is why Fidesz is the only safe choice!

How much would a TISZA government cost you? Well then, let’s calculate it!

First, if there were no utility-price protection because we moved away from cheap Russian energy, that would mean your current annual utility bill of 250,000–350,000 forints would immediately rise to 1 million forints, so you would lose about 700,000 forints a year right there.

Then, if there were no protected fuel price at petrol stations and Russian oil were phased out, instead of the current 595 forint petrol price, you would be looking at 1,000 forint petrol and about the same for diesel. That would take another 600,000–900,000 forints a year out of the family budget.

Then István Kapitány also said they would abolish all kinds of special taxes, margin caps, and price-reduction measures, which would again mean losing roughly 180,000–360,000 forints per year.

And then, from the Captain material released today by a former TISZA expert who broke away from the party, it also emerged that they would introduce a so-called energy-independence tax. Other European Union countries have already done this, especially those with EPP-style leadership similar to Péter Magyar. This would mean introducing an annual tax of 1.5 percent on all savings — on your securities or any savings you hold in forints.

So if we assume that you have, say, 10 million forints in savings, that alone would mean a loss of 150,000 forints per year, year after year.

So, all in all… calculate it this way: if TISZA came to power, it would mean a loss of nearly 2 million forints every single year for you and your family.

Are you ready to hand that over to Péter Magyar and his people?

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “TISZA = brutal price increases, taxes, impoverishment”
• “Fidesz = protection, cheap utilities, security”
• “Election = protect your wallet vs. being stripped of your money”

👉 Hidden formula:

fear + concrete numbers + “calculated loss” + enemy image
→ “if not us → you’ll lose millions every year”

👉 🔥 Core message:

➡️ an unverifiable “leaked plan”
➡️ aggregated, shocking numbers (~2 million HUF/year)
➡️ ending with forced immediate political decision-making

---

🔍 Manipulation techniques

1️⃣ “Leaked document” = false credibility

👉 Example:
“leaked program”, “revealed by a defected expert”

Technique:
➡️ no source, no verifiability
➡️ yet presented as “insider information”

Goal:
➡️ preempt criticism (“this is already proven”)
➡️ create an illusion of credibility

---

2️⃣ Shock through extreme numbers (shock economics)

👉 Example:

• “2 million HUF loss per year”
• “utilities 3× higher”
• “1000 HUF fuel”

Technique:
➡️ multiple separate items added together
➡️ worst-case scenarios presented as facts

Goal:
➡️ trigger immediate emotional reaction (panic)
➡️ bypass rational thinking

---

3️⃣ False causality

👉 Example:
“phasing out Russian energy → automatically 3× utility costs”

Technique:
➡️ complex market → simplified linear cause-effect
➡️ no intermediate factors (market dynamics, subsidies, EU, etc.)

Goal:
➡️ create a simple “cause → catastrophe” narrative
➡️ make fear easy to understand

---

4️⃣ Additive manipulation (“calculation trick”)

👉 Example:

• 700k utilities
• 600–900k fuel
• +180–360k other
• +150k savings tax

= “~2 million”

Technique:
➡️ individually uncertain figures
➡️ combined into a “certain loss”

Goal:
➡️ create a personal, tangible sense of loss
➡️ present it as a “calculated fact”

---

5️⃣ Enemy framing + attribution of intent

👉 Example:
“they would strip us of our money”, “they would punish Hungarians”

Technique:
➡️ economic policy debate → framed as deliberate harm

Goal:
➡️ generate anger
➡️ moral rejection of the opponent

---

6️⃣ Wallet fear framing

👉 Key line:
“how much would it cost YOU”

Technique:
➡️ national policy → translated into personal financial loss

Goal:
➡️ make everyone feel directly affected
➡️ create a direct personal threat

---

7️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Message:

• Fidesz → affordable life
• TISZA → collapse

Technique:
➡️ no alternatives
➡️ no nuance

Goal:
➡️ simplify the decision
➡️ force a binary choice

---

⚠️ Biggest red flags

👉 Multiple issues at once:

• ❌ no verifiable source
• ❌ all numbers are assumptions / maximum estimates
• ❌ complex economics → reduced to one-line causality
• ❌ aggregation → “guaranteed 2 million loss”

👉 This is campaign-style calculation, not economic analysis.

---

🧩 In short

👉 This text is not about what will happen, but about making you:

➡️ fear
➡️ calculate (incorrectly)
➡️ get angry
➡️ vote

❌ Enough of Tisza’s hate campaign!

Recently, I spoke with Aunt Margit, who was already campaigning for Fidesz back in 1998, but she says she has never received a threat like this before. Someone pinned a message to her door telling her she was forbidden to continue campaigning, and they wrote about her in an utterly unacceptable tone.

👉 This is the result of Péter Magyar and his people making hatred and vile abuse the norm among their supporters. But we know that you can never build a homeland or a community on that!

The national government believes in the power of love and stands for peace. That is why Fidesz is the only safe choice!

“They also put something on my door.”
“On your door? Did they stick some kind of note on it?”
“Yes.”
“And what did they put there?”
“Well, they wrote: ‘In Hungary, you are not allowed to campaign for Fidesz, I forbid it.’”
“Someone actually forbade you?”
“Yes, and then there was all sorts of stuff, calling me a complete idiot.”
“Do you really mean that? Was your name written there specifically?”
“So in practice, they were threatening you here.”
“Yes, they know I support Fidesz.”
“Really?”
“Seriously? But had there been threats before?”
“Well, nothing like this. They did say before that they would never vote for Fidesz. But nothing like putting something on my door.”
“And what exactly did they write?”
“Well, exactly that, with my name nicely written, ‘Margitka, I forbid you to go campaigning for Fidesz,’ and then they scribbled on it.”
“And they saw that it was there?”
“Yes, because I had already been campaigning there for a while before. So they saw me out campaigning, and then they wrote that they were forbidding me, forbidding me from campaigning.”
“And they wrote some nasty things too?”
“Yes.”
“And what did they write, if I may ask?”
“Well, I don’t know exactly what they wrote.”
“Oh dear… in this so-called country of love… Horrible.”
“Well, I’m very sorry.”
“But please don’t lose your enthusiasm.”
“I understand.”
“Please don’t let this horror break you. That’s what these people are like, and that is exactly why we have to be there on April 12. All the best to you, and please don’t let them get to you.”

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Elderly Fidesz supporter = victim”
• “Opposition (Tisza / others) = aggressive, threatening”
• “Campaigning = has become dangerous”
• “Election = self-defense / standing your ground”

👉 Hidden formula:

fear + empathy + moral outrage
→ “if not us → this is the kind of world that comes”

👉 🔥 Core message:

➡️ a single, unverifiable story
➡️ emotional shock → political mobilization
➡️ ending: “go vote (for Fidesz)”

---

🔍 Manipulation techniques

1️⃣ Victim narrative (victim framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“they stuck it on the door… they forbid it… they threatened her…”

Technique:

• elderly woman → automatic empathy trigger
• “defenseless citizen” image

Goal:

• emotional engagement (not rational level)
• “this cannot be allowed”

Effect:

➡️ viewer immediately sides with the “victim”
➡️ critical thinking decreases

---

2️⃣ Unverified story presented as fact

👉 Excerpt:
“someone forbade it… they posted it…”

Technique:

• no evidence (no photo, no name, no context)
• yet treated as an established fact

Goal:

• trigger fast emotional reaction
• remove time for verification

Effect:

➡️ “if it was said → it must be true”
➡️ even fake or distorted stories can work

---

3️⃣ Enemy construction (enemy framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“they forbid it… insulted her… wrote nasty things…”

Technique:

• no specific perpetrator
• yet clearly implied: “they” (the opposition)

Goal:

• suggest collective guilt
• demonize the political opponent

Effect:

➡️ “they are dangerous”
➡️ polarization increases

---

4️⃣ Fear framing

👉 Excerpt:
“this never happened before… threats…”

Technique:

• sense of escalation (“things are getting worse”)
• turns it into a personal safety issue

Goal:

• voting = self-defense
• not a political decision → a survival reaction

Effect:

➡️ fear = strongest mobilizing force
➡️ rational thinking pushed into the background

---

5️⃣ Leading interview

👉 Excerpt:
“Are you serious?”
“They threatened you?”
“They wrote nasty things too?”

Technique:

• interviewer steers the answers
• reinforcing (non-neutral) questions

Goal:

• extract the desired narrative
• dramatize the story

Effect:

➡️ not a spontaneous conversation
➡️ شبه-scripted interaction

---

6️⃣ Emotional closure + political call-to-action

👉 Excerpt:
“that’s why we must be there on April 12”

Technique:

• story → immediate political conclusion
• no logical transition

Goal:

• emotion → vote conversion

Effect:

➡️ classic propaganda arc:
story → outrage → action

---

7️⃣ “It wasn’t like this before” (nostalgia + decline narrative)

👉 Excerpt:
“this never happened before”

Technique:

• idealization of the past
• present framed as dangerous

Goal:

• change = threat
• “we must return to order”

Effect:

➡️ activates conservative reflex
➡️ reinforces status quo protection

---

⚠️ Key takeaway

This video does not provide information, it delivers:

👉 an emotional trigger package

• sympathy (elderly woman)
• fear (threats)
• anger (unknown “perpetrators”)
• ending with a political direction

---

🧩 Short summary

➡️ Uses a single, unverifiable story
➡️ Elderly victim → maximum empathy
➡️ Enemy framing → without concrete evidence
➡️ Fear → political mobilization
➡️ Ending: “go vote”

Józsefváros is not “nyolcker”!

Józsefváros and Ferencváros are sad examples of how badly things can turn out after a wrong decision.
Four years ago, the left-wing candidate managed to win here—then did nothing, achieved nothing for the people living here.

The drug situation is getting worse, public cleanliness and public safety are deteriorating, parking is now the most expensive here, and the roads are in terrible condition.

It’s no surprise that András Jámbor—who four years ago swore to represent the people of Budapest living here—is not even daring to run in the election now.

Four long, completely wasted years.

And now here comes the new left-wing “savior.” Perhaps even worse than the previous one. Krisztina Bódis has nothing to do with Józsefváros or Ferencváros, but she does have something to do with the LGBTQ fairy-tale book “Csipke Józsika”, which she wrote.

She could also talk about the hundreds of millions of forints her foundation failed to account for.

If the 8th and 9th districts do not want to throw away another four years, they should vote for Dr. Orsolya Ferencz!

Orsi is the only candidate who can defend regulated fuel prices, who stands for low utility costs, who wants to restore order in the district, who shows zero tolerance toward drugs, and whom every resident can rely on.

Orsi is also the anti-war candidate, who will not allow Hungarian money to be sent to Ukraine.

In both Józsefváros and Ferencváros, Fidesz and Orsi are the safe choice!

🧠 Quick overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Left-wing = chaos, decline (locally)”
• “Fidesz candidate = order, security, protection”
• “Local problems = consequence of bad political decisions”
• “Election = order vs. deterioration”

👉 Underlying formula:

local anger + fear + enemy image + national themes
→ “if not us → everything gets worse (both locally and nationally)”

👉 🔥 Core message:

➡️ local issue → packaged into a national ideological frame
➡️ concrete problems → emotionally exaggerated
➡️ conclusion → “only solution: Fidesz candidate”

---

🔍 Manipulation techniques (detailed)

1️⃣ Exaggeration of local problems (fear framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“the drug situation is getting worse… public safety is deteriorating… roads are in terrible condition”

Technique:
➡️ real or partially real issues → framed as a general crisis
➡️ no data, no comparison

Goal:
➡️ create frustration
➡️ “everything is bad” perception

---

2️⃣ Total delegitimization (total failure framing)

👉 “did nothing, achieved nothing”

Technique:
➡️ 0% performance narrative
➡️ black-and-white simplification

Goal:
➡️ prevent voters from evaluating
➡️ trigger automatic rejection

---

3️⃣ Personal attacks + character assassination

👉 “not even running”
👉 “has nothing to do with the district”
👉 “failed to account for hundreds of millions”

Technique:
➡️ discrediting the person
➡️ unproven or context-free accusations

Goal:
➡️ destroy trust
➡️ shift focus away from policies

---

4️⃣ Cultural trigger (LGBTQ as enemy image)

👉 “LGBTQ fairy tale book”

Technique:
➡️ cultural issue → turned into a political weapon
➡️ emotional trigger (especially for conservative voters)

Goal:
➡️ identity-based mobilization
➡️ “us vs. them”

---

5️⃣ “Savior candidate” (protector framing)

👉 “the only candidate”
👉 “will protect… stand up… restore order…”

Technique:
➡️ presenting a single solution
➡️ exaggerated capabilities

Goal:
➡️ eliminate alternatives
➡️ create a sense of security

---

6️⃣ Topic blending (local → national → geopolitical)

👉 local issues → utilities → fuel → war → Ukraine

Technique:
➡️ mixing completely different levels
➡️ logical jumps

Goal:
➡️ bypass complex thinking
➡️ create an emotional chain

---

7️⃣ Fear appeal (war framing)

👉 “Hungarians’ money will be sent to Ukraine”

Technique:
➡️ external threat
➡️ financial loss + war

Goal:
➡️ trigger existential fear
➡️ increase voter mobilization

---

8️⃣ False dilemma

👉 “if not her → four years wasted”

Technique:
➡️ only two options:

bad (left-wing)
good (Fidesz candidate)

Goal:
➡️ oversimplify the decision

---

🧩 Why does it feel like “everything includes Ukraine”?

Because this is a standard campaign strategy:

👉 local issues alone are not strong enough to mobilize voters
👉 so they are linked to:

• war
• energy prices
• national sovereignty
• Ukraine

➡️ this creates a strong emotional package

---

⚠️ Critical point (very important)

One of the biggest manipulations in the text:

👉 turning a local election into a global conflict

In reality:

• a district-level representative
• does not decide on war, Ukraine, or national energy policy

➡️ but the text presents it as if they do

---

🔥 Summary

👉 This text:

• builds on local issues (with some real basis)
• but heavily exaggerates and simplifies them
• uses personal attacks
• overlays national + war narratives
• offers a single solution

👉 Mechanism of effect:

anger (local) + fear (national) + identity (cultural)
→ pressure to vote

From a ruined building with a dark past into a bastion of freedom!

The Citadel has not only been renovated — it has been reborn. Visitors are now greeted with a previously unseen panoramic view of the nation’s capital, a unique historical exhibition unlike any other in the country, and new green spaces where they can relax, along with a café and restaurant.

Budapest has become a better place for both residents and visitors alike. The government continues to develop the capital even when the city leadership leaves it behind. That is why, in Budapest as well, Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice!

Visit the Citadel from Saturday afternoon and discover it for yourselves!

It’s actually really great, because people tend to forget that such a place even exists — and it’s not small, nor insignificant, right here in the city. It used to be a dead place. Yes, basically that’s true. A whole generation has grown up without knowing anything about it. And now it will be brought back into circulation. The goal is to present the entirety of Hungarian history in 90 minutes — 1,200 years of history, which took an incredibly long time to create, with many debates among historians. So overall, it has a fantastic atmosphere here. It looks amazing — truly like a painting.

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Government = rebuilds, gives life”
• “Budapest = neglected (opposition’s fault)”
• “Citadella = national symbol + success project”
• “Election = progress vs. decline”

👉 Hidden formula:
emotion + pride + spectacle + enemy image
→ “if they win → progress, if not → decay”

👉 🔥 Core point:
a tourism/architectural project → elevated into political legitimacy

---

🔍 Manipulation Techniques (detailed)

---

1️⃣ Hero framing

👉 Excerpt:
“From a dark past, ruined building to a bastion of freedom!”

Technique:
➡️ simple renovation → “historic redemption”
➡️ physical change → moral/metaphorical meaning

Goal:
➡️ project = symbolic victory
➡️ government = “savior”

Effect:
➡️ exaggerates the importance of the investment
➡️ forces emotional identification

---

2️⃣ Rebirth narrative (rebirth myth)

👉 “not just renewed, but reborn”

Technique:
➡️ redundant, intensifying wording
➡️ “renewal” → “miracle”

Goal:
➡️ maximize positive emotion
➡️ push rational thinking into the background

Effect:
➡️ assigns unrealistic significance

---

3️⃣ Activation of national pride

👉 “the nation’s capital”, “1200 years of history”

Technique:
➡️ local project → elevated to national identity level

Goal:
➡️ criticism = framed as “against the nation”
➡️ political debate → identity conflict

Effect:
➡️ triggers emotional defense mechanisms

---

4️⃣ “Never seen before” type exaggeration

👉 “a panorama never seen before”

Technique:
➡️ absolute, unverifiable claim
➡️ hyperbole

Goal:
➡️ maximize sense of novelty

Effect:
➡️ FOMO (“you have to see this”)

---

5️⃣ Experience marketing + lifestyle packaging

👉 “green spaces, café, restaurant”

Technique:
➡️ political message → wrapped in lifestyle marketing

Goal:
➡️ sell politics indirectly
➡️ attach it to positive experiences

Effect:
➡️ lowers resistance

---

6️⃣ Enemy framing (blaming city leadership)

👉 “when the city leadership abandons it”

Technique:
➡️ implicit blame
➡️ no concrete evidence

Goal:
➡️ shift responsibility
➡️ simplify political conflict

Effect:
➡️ “they are bad → we are good”

---

7️⃣ False causality

👉 “Budapest has become a better place… therefore… vote”

Technique:
➡️ one project → proof of entire city condition
➡️ from this → political conclusion

Goal:
➡️ oversimplify complex reality

Effect:
➡️ normalizes irrational conclusions

---

8️⃣ Direct political call-to-action

👉 “Orbán Viktor and Fidesz are the safe choice”

Technique:
➡️ advertisement → propaganda → direct campaign

Goal:
➡️ turn emotional state into immediate political decision

Effect:
➡️ bypasses critical thinking

---

9️⃣ “Dead place → life” contrast (before-after manipulation)

👉 “It was a dead place”

Technique:
➡️ past framed as extremely negative
➡️ present framed as overly positive

Goal:
➡️ maximize contrast

Effect:
➡️ exaggerates the sense of progress

---

🔟 Expert legitimization (appearance)

👉 “a lot of disputes between historians”

Technique:
➡️ conflict presented as a sign of credibility
➡️ “they took it seriously”

Goal:
➡️ increase perceived professional weight

Effect:
➡️ preemptively neutralizes criticism

---

🧩 Overall picture

This is a classic political advertising + propaganda hybrid:

👉 tourism development
➡️ turned into national symbol
➡️ wrapped in emotional experience
➡️ combined with enemy framing
➡️ leading to electoral mobilization

---

🎯 In one sentence

👉 “A visually appealing renovation is inflated into a national-level ‘miracle’, and then used to argue that there is only one politically correct choice.”

Today, standing up for right-wing values and supporting the national side requires real courage.

While we are facing unprecedented hostility and pressure in our everyday lives from the representatives of Tisza’s so-called “country of love,” we must not back down now.

In the next two weeks, we must show our strength. Let us show that we are here for each other, here for our country, and that we stand loyally with Viktor Orbán, who has been fighting for us uncompromisingly for decades.

Let us stick together and not allow ourselves to be silenced, because we are the silent majority!

And on April 12, let us all be there and vote for certainty—vote for Fidesz!

I assume I am not alone in feeling that an overwhelming wave of anger and hatred is being directed at those who dare to express their opinions from the national side. Ordinary citizens—not just frontline politicians—are experiencing levels of threats and aggression that we have not seen in decades.

I know very well that nowadays, openly holding a right-wing opinion, standing up for Fidesz, and supporting the national side is a courageous decision. But this is exactly what I would like to ask of everyone in the next two weeks.

Because we also need to show that we are here for one another—this is very important—that we are here for our country, and that we are here for the man who has fought through the past decades on our behalf.

That man is called Viktor Orbán.

🧠 Quick overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Right wing = courage”
• “Opposition (Tisza) = aggressive, hateful”
• Orbán Viktor = fighting/warrior leader
• “Election = standing up vs. backing down”

👉 Hidden formula:
fear + moral superiority + collective identity + leader cult
→ “if you are with us → you are brave; if not → you are backing down”

---

🔍 Manipulation techniques (detailed)

1️⃣ Moral reframing

👉 “…embracing right-wing values is real courage”

Technique:
➡️ turns a political choice into a moral decision
➡️ not a debate → but “brave vs. weak”

Goal:
➡️ delegitimize opposing views
➡️ morally reinforce the in-group

---

2️⃣ Victim framing + fear

👉 “unprecedented anger”, “pressure”, “hatred pouring down”

Technique:
➡️ portrays own side as victims
➡️ creates a vague, unproven sense of threat

Goal:
➡️ emotional mobilization
➡️ “we must defend ourselves” mindset

---

3️⃣ Enemy construction (enemy framing)

👉 “Tisza’s ‘country of love’ representatives”

Technique:
➡️ mockery + labeling
➡️ paints an entire group as negative

Goal:
➡️ increase polarization
➡️ reinforce “us vs. them”

---

4️⃣ Collective identity framing

👉 “we are here for each other”, “we are the silent majority”

Technique:
➡️ strengthens sense of belonging
➡️ creates illusion of majority support

Goal:
➡️ pull in undecided voters
➡️ increase loyalty

---

5️⃣ Leader–nation fusion

👉 “…who has been fighting for us for decades” → Orbán Viktor

Technique:
➡️ leader = national interest
➡️ personal loyalty = patriotism

Goal:
➡️ make criticism harder
➡️ build personal loyalty

---

6️⃣ False dilemma

👉 “we must not back down” / “vote for the safe choice”

Technique:
➡️ reduces options to two:

• with us → good
• against us → danger / weakness

Goal:
➡️ simplify a complex political choice

---

7️⃣ Urgency + mobilization

👉 “in the next two weeks”, “on April 12”

Technique:
➡️ creates time pressure → less rational evaluation

Goal:
➡️ trigger immediate action

---

🔥 Core takeaway (brief)

➡️ emotion > facts
➡️ fear + identity + leader
➡️ political choice → moral obligation
➡️ complex reality → “we are good, they are bad”

---

💬 Short comment-style summary

This text doesn’t argue—it builds emotion:
courage vs. fear, “us vs. them,” and loyalty to a leader.
The goal is not to convince with facts, but to hold the camp together and mobilize it.

There’s no way to sugarcoat this ❗
After István Kapitány let something slip at a public forum, a defector from Tisza made Kapitány’s energy transition plan public. The reality is shocking: they would abolish protected prices and the utility price caps, break away from cheap Russian energy, and this would lead to drastic tax increases that every Hungarian would feel in their wallets.

👉 The document clearly states:
“We must settle our conflicts with Ukraine, and this is not possible without phasing out Russian energy sources.”
However, this would mean “expanding fiscal space,” which justifies the introduction of new taxes. As a result of cutting off Russian energy, utility bills would increase by at least 2.5 times, placing a heavy burden on Hungarian families.

According to the leaked document, they are planning to introduce a temporary, two-year “Energy Independence Tax” on savings, and they would also use the 600 billion forints from the utility protection fund to “reduce the budget deficit.”

📈 So if Péter Magyar were to come to power, one of his first measures would be what István Kapitány spoke about—causing energy prices to skyrocket immediately.

This is something Hungarians do not want! The national government will protect utility price reductions and Hungary’s energy supply, just as it has done so far, despite all Ukrainian pressure. We will not allow Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Péter Magyar and his allies, or the Brussels elite to dig into Hungarians’ pockets!

🟠 That is why only Fidesz is the safe choice!

---

We are here with Ferenc Horsi at the Fidesz office on Baross Street, and it’s already very busy this morning, as we are distributing the direct mail letters that the Prime Minister is sending to supporters during the final stretch of the campaign. And this campaign push has gained special relevance today, as this morning a defector from Tisza exposed the reality online—what kind of measures István Kapitány is preparing in order to take money from people if they come to power.

We know that he represents the interests of Shell, not Hungarian families. In practice, we could say goodbye to utility price reductions, because they would move away from Russian energy. We could say goodbye to protected prices as well—meaning fuel could reach 1,000 forints per liter.

They are even planning to introduce a special tax, and MOL Group would effectively be sidelined.

Well, I think this is something we definitely do not want to see in the coming years. Reassure me, Orsolya!

Absolutely—we do not want this, and we will not allow it. That’s what we work for every day. Hungary must remain Hungary. We want to live in peace and pay affordable utility bills, just as we have in recent years.

This is a government decision—it doesn’t fall from the sky. We must choose a government that guarantees these decisions.

That’s right—so let’s not waste time, let’s deliver those letters!

👉 Main narrative:

• “Energy transition = brutal price increases”
• “Opposition = higher taxes + higher utility costs”
• “Fidesz = protection + cheap energy”
• “Election = utility price cuts vs. impoverishment”

👉 Underlying formula:
fear + personal finances + external enemy + “savior government”
→ “if not us → you will pay much more”

👉 🔥 Core point:
➡️ unproven “leaked document”
➡️ extreme consequences (2.5x utility bills, 1000 HUF fuel)
➡️ simple cause-effect: “opposition → price hikes”

---

🔍 Manipulation techniques (detailed)

1️⃣ “Leaked document” = false credibility

👉 Example:
“leaked document”, “clearly stated in black and white”

👉 Technique:
➡️ creates the illusion of secret insider information
➡️ unverifiable source presented as fact

👉 Goal:
➡️ preempt criticism (“this is already proven”)

👉 Effect:
➡️ the reader is less likely to question it

---

2️⃣ Economic fear framing

👉 Example:
“2.5x utility bills”, “1000 HUF fuel”, “new taxes”

👉 Technique:
➡️ emphasizes direct personal financial loss

👉 Goal:
➡️ trigger emotional reaction (not rational thinking)

👉 Effect:
➡️ “I can’t afford this → I won’t vote for them”

---

3️⃣ False causality

👉 Example:
“phasing out Russian energy → immediate drastic price increases”

👉 Technique:
➡️ oversimplifies complex energy policy

👉 Goal:
➡️ assign a single cause/blame

👉 Effect:
➡️ “everything bad comes from the opposition’s decisions”

---

4️⃣ Enemy coalition framing

👉 Example:
“Volodymyr Zelenskyy + Péter Magyar + Brussels elite”

👉 Technique:
➡️ merges multiple actors into one hostile bloc

👉 Goal:
➡️ amplify perceived threat

👉 Effect:
➡️ “everyone is against us”

---

5️⃣ Protector framing (“we will protect you”)

👉 Example:
“we will protect utility price cuts”, “energy security”

👉 Technique:
➡️ government positioned as defender

👉 Goal:
➡️ create a sense of safety

👉 Effect:
➡️ “without them, I’d be at risk”

---

6️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Example:
“Fidesz or price hikes”

👉 Technique:
➡️ presents only two options

👉 Goal:
➡️ narrow perceived choices

👉 Effect:
➡️ “there is no real alternative”

---

7️⃣ Repetition + exaggeration

👉 Example:
“we could say goodbye… we could say goodbye…”

👉 Technique:
➡️ repetition of key message + extreme numbers

👉 Goal:
➡️ reinforce and anchor the message

👉 Effect:
➡️ “this must be true”

---

⚖️ What can be concluded?

👉 This is a classic campaign message:

• no concrete, verifiable evidence
• but strong elements of:
  • fear
  • financial shock
  • enemy construction
  • simple storytelling

👉 The key is not information, but emotion:
➡️ “I’m afraid → I choose the safe option”

Agents, millions of euros, and pro-Ukrainian interests… This is exactly what we will not give in to!

Across all of Europe, we are the only country that has been able to say no to war since it broke out.

That is why Ukrainians have appeared in the Hungarian election—with their money, their oil blockade, and their spies—and have even infiltrated Hungarian politics.

The TISZA Party wants to establish a pro-Ukrainian government in Hungary, but we will not allow Volodymyr Zelenskyy to sit on our necks!

We Hungarians will protect low energy prices and will not take part in any Brussels war loans.

In times of danger, only a responsible and experienced leader can keep us out of war—that is why only Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice!

🧠 Quick Overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Ukraine = intervening (money, spies, energy)”
• “TISZA = serving Ukrainian interests”
• “Fidesz = protection, peace, stability”
• “Election = sovereignty vs. occupation / peace vs. war”

👉 Underlying formula:

conspiracy + external enemy + fear + “savior leader”
→ “if not us → foreign control / war”

👉 🔥 Core message:

➡️ unproven claims → presented as facts
➡️ complex geopolitics → reduced to a simple “Ukrainian interference” narrative

---

🔍 Manipulation techniques (in detail)

---

1️⃣ Conspiracy framing

👉 Excerpt:
“agents, millions of euros… their spies… infiltrated”

👉 Technique:
➡️ intelligence-style narrative without evidence
➡️ multiple elements combined → “invisible network”

👉 Goal:
➡️ trigger emotional shock
➡️ shut down critical thinking (“too big to question”)

👉 Effect:
➡️ the audience stops demanding proof
➡️ automatic distrust toward the opponent

---

2️⃣ External enemy construction (enemy framing)

👉 Excerpt:
“Ukrainians have appeared in the Hungarian election”

👉 Technique:
➡️ an entire country framed as a collective threat
➡️ domestic politics → reframed as foreign attack

👉 Goal:
➡️ strengthen “us vs. them” thinking
➡️ trigger national unity

👉 Effect:
➡️ opposition is categorized as “not serving national interests”

---

3️⃣ Guilt by association

👉 Excerpt:
“TISZA Party = pro-Ukrainian government”

👉 Technique:
➡️ no evidence → simple linkage
➡️ Ukraine = negative context → automatic transfer

👉 Goal:
➡️ discredit the opponent quickly
➡️ avoid discussing actual policies

👉 Effect:
➡️ simplified, emotional decision-making

---

4️⃣ Fear framing

👉 Excerpt:
“in times of danger… only this way we can stay out of war”

👉 Technique:
➡️ existential threat (war)
➡️ election framed as a survival issue

👉 Goal:
➡️ replace rational evaluation with emotional reaction

👉 Effect:
➡️ “better the known than the unknown” mindset

---

5️⃣ False dilemma

👉 Excerpt:
“only Orbán Viktor and Fidesz are the safe choice”

👉 Technique:
➡️ eliminates all alternatives
➡️ narrows the political space

👉 Goal:
➡️ remove perceived choice

👉 Effect:
➡️ “there is no other option” feeling

---

6️⃣ Protector / savior leadership framing

👉 Excerpt:
“only a responsible, experienced leader…”

👉 Technique:
➡️ leader = safety
➡️ nation’s fate tied to one person

👉 Goal:
➡️ build personal loyalty

👉 Effect:
➡️ criticism = “attack on security”

---

7️⃣ Oversimplification & false causality

👉 Excerpt:
“that is why Ukrainians have appeared…”

👉 Technique:
➡️ complex events → reduced to a single cause
➡️ logical leap without evidence

👉 Goal:
➡️ create a simple, digestible explanation

👉 Effect:
➡️ illusion of understanding → actually distorted

---

8️⃣ Patriotic framing

👉 Excerpt:
“We Hungarians will protect…”

👉 Technique:
➡️ activates collective identity
➡️ political choice = patriotic duty

👉 Goal:
➡️ emotional identification

👉 Effect:
➡️ disagreement = “not on our side”

---

⚠️ Critical point (reality vs. narrative)

👉 In the text:

• no concrete evidence
• no sources
• no verifiable data

➡️ yet presented as factual statements

---

🔥 Summary

This is a classic, highly structured campaign message:

👉 conspiracy + external enemy + fear + leader-centric narrative

The goal is not to inform, but to:

➡️ create an emotional state
➡️ simplify decision-making
➡️ enforce political loyalty

Aggression, ranting, hatred – this is what Tisza supporters have repeatedly shown, all while talking about building a “country of love.” They try to provoke Fidesz supporters who have gathered peacefully, but we will not fall for these attempts. No matter how many provocateurs Péter Magyar sends there, they cannot ruin our mood.

We know very well: you cannot build a country or a future on hatred and threats. The national government believes in the power of love and unity, and our peaceful mass events prove this. Only Fidesz is the safe choice!

I’ve brought you another collection showing what these Tisza supporters are really like, even as they talk about building a country of love. It’s worth watching the short clip below. Meanwhile, we continue to believe in the power of love and unity—even if Péter Magyar constantly sends his people to provoke Fidesz events to spoil our mood. We will not allow it.

“Why aren’t you fighting at the front? You should be there!
I think you should be there, at the front, you’d hear it with the others.
You should be at the front, buddy!
Why are you sticking support on your back?
You’re such a little nobody, someone who’s good for nothing.
Why?
We can talk nicely with him…
You idiot! You’re an idiot, not disabled.
Where do you think you’re from? Where do you think you’re from?
Why do you have to speak like that, sir?
Why don’t you speak from your mother if no one is interested?
Did Péter Magyar send you here? For this?
I openly say I support Tisza.
Leave, okay?
But why? Why so aggressive?
I told you, don’t film me now! Don’t be so aggressive!
Go to hell! Who the hell are you to me?
Now I’ll report you.
You said I’ll go to prison.
No, man to man!
You said I’ll go to prison, for example.
Yes, just wait! After April 12!
I consider everyone a traitor who is not willing to defend their own family—even by taking up arms and fulfilling their legal duty.
Come on!”

🧠 Quick overview

👉 Main narrative:

• “Tisza = aggressive, hateful, provocateurs”
• “Fidesz = peaceful, love, unity”
• Magyar Péter = organizer of deliberate provocations
• “Election = hate vs. love / chaos vs. order”

👉 Underlying formula:

enemy image + emotional shock + moral superiority + fear
→ “we are the good ones → they are the threat”

👉 🔥 Key point:

➡️ isolated incident (video clip) → presented as a general truth
➡️ emotional reaction → turned into a political conclusion

---

🔍 Manipulation techniques (in detail)

1️⃣ Enemy construction (enemy framing)

👉 Example:
“Aggression, spitting hatred, hostility – this is what Tisza supporters represent…”

👉 Technique:
➡️ describing an entire group with negative traits
➡️ no distinction between individuals and the whole group

👉 Goal:
➡️ “they = bad, dangerous”

👉 Effect:
➡️ fast emotional rejection without critical thinking

---

2️⃣ Moral division (us vs. them)

👉 Example:
“they = hate → we = love and unity”

👉 Technique:
➡️ black-and-white worldview
➡️ no nuance, no middle ground

👉 Goal:
➡️ simplify the choice

👉 Effect:
➡️ shuts down critical thinking

---

3️⃣ Provocation narrative (preemptive justification)

👉 Example:
“Magyar Péter sends his provocateurs”

👉 Technique:
➡️ every conflict is explained in advance
➡️ whatever happens → already has a built-in explanation

👉 Goal:
➡️ absolve one’s own side

👉 Effect:
➡️ any event can be fitted into the narrative

---

4️⃣ Isolated case → generalization (hasty generalization)

👉 Example:
aggressive speech shown in a video

👉 Technique:
➡️ behavior of a few people → projected onto the entire group

👉 Goal:
➡️ create a generalized image

👉 Effect:
➡️ distorted perception of reality

---

5️⃣ Emotional shock (shock content)

👉 Example:
vulgar, aggressive dialogue (“go to the front”, “you idiot”, etc.)

👉 Technique:
➡️ strong language → shock effect
➡️ emotion overrides rational thinking

👉 Goal:
➡️ trigger immediate reaction

👉 Effect:
➡️ “this is what they’re like” impression

---

6️⃣ Fear framing

👉 Example:
“war”, “front”, “traitor”

👉 Technique:
➡️ introducing existential threat

👉 Goal:
➡️ mobilize voters

👉 Effect:
➡️ pushes toward “safe choice”

---

7️⃣ “We are calm” framing (protector framing)

👉 Example:
“we don’t fall for it”, “we are peaceful”

👉 Technique:
➡️ own side = control, calmness

👉 Goal:
➡️ build credibility

👉 Effect:
➡️ sense of stability

---

8️⃣ Assertions presented as facts

👉 Example:
“Magyar Péter sends provocateurs”

👉 Technique:
➡️ no evidence, yet presented as a statement of fact

👉 Goal:
➡️ anchor the narrative

👉 Effect:
➡️ repetition → “feels true”

---

9️⃣ Mobilizing conclusion (call to action + exclusion)

👉 Example:
“Only Fidesz is the safe choice!”

👉 Technique:
➡️ excludes all alternatives

👉 Goal:
➡️ simplify decision-making

👉 Effect:
➡️ “there is no other option” feeling

---

⚖️ Summary

👉 This text is not trying to inform, but to:

• trigger emotions (anger, fear)
• reinforce an enemy image
• morally elevate one side
• push toward a specific political decision

👉 Strongest elements:

• generalization based on a single video
• unproven accusations
• strong emotional manipulation
• black-and-white framing