🚨 The largest Ukrainian public-affairs influencer, who has 13 million followers, has outlined the six points of the “Zelensky plan,” which allegedly aims to replace Viktor Orbán with Péter Magyar.
- Every political reaction should “serve Orbán’s defeat.”
- Hungary should not be attacked directly; instead, pressure should be applied through Brussels.
- Péter Magyar should be allowed to freely criticize Ukraine, but this would only be a performance until the elections: “time must be given to Magyar to criticize us; we have to play along with him.”
- Influence Hungarian voters in Transcarpathia so that they either vote for Tisza or do not vote at all.
- Achieve the same among the Hungarian minority in Transylvania, together with the Romanian government, where there is already “experience in cooperation.”
- Conduct information warfare by amplifying anti-Orbán narratives, scandals, and fake news in the Hungarian public sphere.
Outrageous and scandalous. Tisza is deeply in the Ukrainians’ pocket. On April 12, we must defend our country’s independence and stand up for peace!
🟠 Only Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice!
One of the Ukrainian public influencers with the largest reach spoke about this six-point plan describing how they should coordinate with Péter Magyar’s camp. The information contains critical claims.
According to him, in order to create a situation where Hungary would have a Ukraine-friendly government instead of the current national government, this man openly says that Péter Magyar should be allowed during the election period—while implicitly coordinating with Ukraine—to criticize certain Ukrainian positions. But this would only serve the purpose of helping Péter Magyar come to power in Hungary.
After that, all the things that Viktor Orbán and the current government are currently blocking would supposedly be implemented together with Péter Magyar—for example allowing Ukraine to join the European Union from 2027, or sending Hungarian taxpayers’ money to Ukraine.
This is exactly what we do not want to allow.
1️⃣ Construction of a Conspiracy Narrative (conspiracy framing)
Excerpt
“Six points of the Zelensky plan… how to cooperate with Péter Magyar.”
Technique
The text claims the existence of a secret political plan in which:
- foreign actors
- an opposition politician
- international organizations
are allegedly working together to replace the Hungarian government.
Problem
The text:
- does not provide a specific source
- does not quote a verifiable statement
- does not present the full context
Goal
To create suspicion and distrust.
Effect
The reader may feel that
➡️ a secret international conspiracy is taking place against Hungary.
2️⃣ Building an External Enemy Image (external enemy framing)
Excerpt
“a Ukrainian-friendly government”
“they are in the Ukrainians’ pocket”
Technique
The political opponent is portrayed as representing foreign interests.
Goal
To transform the political debate into a national defense issue.
Effect
Voters may perceive that
➡️ the election is not a political competition
➡️ but rather “the defense of Hungary.”
3️⃣ Guilt by Association
Excerpt
“Tisza is deeply in the Ukrainians’ pocket.”
Technique
A political party is linked to a foreign power without evidence.
This is a common propaganda method:
- “Brussels’ man”
- “Soros’ man”
- “Russian agent”
- “Ukrainian puppet”
Goal
To question the loyalty of the opponent.
Effect
The reader may feel that
➡️ the opponent does not represent their own country.
4️⃣ Selective Information and Vague Source (vague source technique)
Excerpt
“the biggest Ukrainian influencer… with 13 million followers”
Technique
The text suggests credibility, but provides no:
- name
- precise quotation
- link
- full video
- context
Goal
To make the source difficult to verify, while still appearing credible.
Effect
The reader may think:
➡️ “If such a big influencer said it, it must be true.”
5️⃣ Political Theater Narrative (strategic deception framing)
Excerpt
“Péter Magyar may criticize Ukraine, but it is only a performance.”
Technique
This is an immunizing propaganda tactic.
The logic:
- if he criticizes → that is proof
- if he does not criticize → that is also proof
Goal
To present every possible behavior of the opponent as manipulation.
Effect
For the reader:
➡️ there is no information that could disprove the narrative.
6️⃣ Information Warfare Rhetoric (information warfare framing)
Excerpt
“information warfare with anti-Orbán narratives”
Technique
Political criticism is framed as warfare.
Goal
To elevate political debate into a security issue.
Effect
The reader may feel that
➡️ criticism is not democratic debate
➡️ but rather an attack.
7️⃣ Electoral Mobilization (electoral mobilization framing)
Excerpt
“on April 12 we must defend the independence of our country”
Technique
The entire narrative ends in an electoral call to action.
This is a classic campaign structure:
- presenting a threat
- identifying an enemy
- offering a solution
Solution
“Only Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice.”
📊 The Overall Propaganda Formula of the Text
The communication follows this logic:
1️⃣ foreign conspiracy
2️⃣ opposition = foreign puppet
3️⃣ secret plan against Hungary
4️⃣ information warfare
5️⃣ election = defense of the country
This structure is one of the most common narratives in modern campaign propaganda.
✅ Important note
A propaganda analysis does not claim that a statement is true or false.
Instead, it examines:
➡️ how the text attempts to influence the reader.
