Think Orbán propaganda isn’t real? Look below. The proof speaks for itself. No words.

The Tisza Party is a hate cult! They beat anyone bloody who dares to oppose them!

I skimmed the news, and it looks like I’m actually pretty moderate compared to this dog-poop and porn-site type of harassment. Because now the narrative is already that they beat their political opponents bloody.

A hate cult.

Luckily, after April 12 we won’t have to deal with them anymore.

Idiot Balázska is lying

We opened the red mailbox! Here are the messages, uncensored! We’re putting North Pest into motion.

I’m Balázs Németh — my face is shining with grease. Thank you, that was a really useful message. Now let’s see the first week’s harvest, what kinds of messages came into the red mailbox. Of course, the gloves are justified — rubber gloves — because in the first days the Tisza supporters surprised us with dog excrement.

“Dear Balázs Németh, as a resident of Újpalota, I really miss the swimming pool.”

“Dear Balázs, replacing the old No. 69 tram is the most important task.”

Here they’re mentioning my mother — this is disgusting.

“Get the hell out of public life, you disgusting, stinking peasant.”

Of course, we thank everyone who sent sensible and useful messages. It seems many people did.

Go Fidesz, go Balázs Németh! We must finally sweep away this useless left-wing district leadership. We’re on it!

1️⃣ Pre-written narrative, post-hoc “evidence”

“We opened the red mailbox! Here are the messages, uncensored!”

This is a self-authenticating trick:

  • no public access
  • no independent verification
  • no counts, ratios, or documentation

👉 Whoever controls the box controls reality.


2️⃣ Dog feces + vulgarity = demonization of the opponent

“The Tisza supporters surprised us with dog excrement.”

This is not information, but moral contamination:

  • the opponent = filth
  • the opponent = stench
  • the opponent = non-human

👉 Classic dehumanization, designed to shut down debate instantly.


3️⃣ “Mixed harvest” – carefully edited

The dramaturgy of the scene:

  • a disgusting message
  • an insulting message
  • one or two “normal” requests
  • and finally, the flag-waving:

“Go Fidesz, go Balázs Németh!”

👉 The implied message:

  • “See, the majority is with us”
  • “Criticism is just vulgar abuse”

This is false proportional framing.


4️⃣ Victim role + moral superiority

“We thank everyone who sent sensible and useful messages.”

He is portrayed as:

  • patient
  • civilized
  • working

Others are framed as:

  • smelly
  • hateful
  • destructive

👉 This is a performance of moral superiority.


5️⃣ Open incitement at the end

“This useless left-wing district leadership must be removed once and for all.”

This is no longer an opinion, but political violence language:

  • collective stigmatization
  • closure of the enemy image
  • “we are order”

🧠 Why is it fair to say “he’s writing it to himself”?

Because:

  • there is no control
  • there is no trace
  • there is no transparency
  • there is only a camera

This is not participation — it’s theater.


In short

This scene is:

  • not dialogue
  • not community involvement
  • not representation

👉 It is a one-man propaganda ritual, where the same person is simultaneously:

  • the people
  • the victim
  • the judge
  • and the savior

balazska

Let’s be patient with the Tisza supporters! These are not easy days for them. A lot of positive measures are coming into force in February.
It may sound strange coming from me, but I ask everyone to be patient with the Tisza supporters.
These are not easy days for them.
It’s February, and increased wages are coming.
Families with children will benefit, as the increase in the tax allowance for children comes into effect.
Mothers under the age of 40 with two children will no longer pay personal income tax.
Then, a few days later, the 13th-month pension arrives, along with the first installment of the 14th-month pension.
So these are difficult days for those who say that everything is bad in Hungary.
It’s not bad at all.
In Europe, the war is blocking the economy.
We know this, we see it.
But despite this, we are not giving up our most important goals at home.

1️⃣ “Let’s be patient with the TISZA supporters” – pseudo-empathy + moral superiority

This is not genuine empathy, but a favor dispensed from a position of superiority.

  • “we” → calm, successful, on the right side
  • “they” → nervous, frustrated, losing

👉 Message: anyone who criticizes is really just jealous and in a bad mood.


2️⃣ “They’re not having easy days” – psychologizing the opponent

He does not engage with their arguments, but labels their emotional state.

  • no policy debate
  • no rebuttal
  • only emotional stigmatization

👉 This is infantilization: not political opponents, but “misbehaving children.”


3️⃣ Listing February measures – a reward list used as a weapon

The list is not analysis, but conditioning:

  • higher wages
  • tax allowances
  • personal income tax exemption
  • monthly pension payments

👉 Psychological function:
“If you criticize now, you are ungrateful.”

⚠️ Important omissions:

  • no mention of inflation
  • no mention of real value
  • no mention of sustainability

4️⃣ “These are hard days for those who say everything is bad” – false dichotomy

This is a thought-terminating trap:

  • either you say “everything is good”
  • or you’re labeled as someone who “sees everything as bad”

👉 The critical middle ground disappears, where:

  • there can be achievements
  • AND there can be serious problems

5️⃣ “Not bad at all” – declarative tone without evidence

This is an authoritarian linguistic gesture.

No argument → a declaration.
No proof → closure.

👉 Message:
“The reality is not up for debate. We define it.”


6️⃣ “In Europe, the war is blocking the economy” – shifting responsibility outward

A classic double technique:

  • causes of problems → external
  • causes of success → internal

👉 This allows one to be simultaneously:

  • a victim
  • AND heroic leadership

7️⃣ “We will not give up our goals” – mission rhetoric as closure

This sentence contains no measurable objective.

  • no numbers
  • no deadlines
  • no accountability

👉 Only an identity message:

“We endure. Anyone who questions us is weakening the cause.”


🧠 Overall picture – what is this as a whole?

This is not information, but:

  • emotional conditioning
  • moral hierarchy
  • a reward–shame dual mechanism
  • thought-terminating language

📌 In short:

Those who are dissatisfied are bad people.
Those who ask questions are ungrateful.
Those who would debate are already “having hard days.”

total idot balazska … 0 bit gay

The attacks by the Tisza supporters continue! This is their world: chaos, destruction, and agitation!

Situation report from the Tisza kindergarten: over the past day alone, political attacks have continued. On Sunday evening, for example, they sent nearly 3,000 fake followers to my Instagram account. My email address was registered yet again on adult websites. Then they registered me as a supporter of the Tisza Party, the Democratic Coalition, and the Workers’ Party. And this is not being done by bots—real people are doing it—because in the case of the Workers’ Party, the completed registration form was sent back, with “place of birth: Lipótmező,” “permanent address: Karmelita,” stating that I wish to become a member of the Workers’ Party and also support it financially.

And the Tisza lunatics came up with another new joke. In my name, they ordered books worth tens of thousands of forints, listing the delivery address as the Fidesz office in Budapest’s 15th district. I wish everyone continued enjoyment until April 12; from the 13th onward, the world will be set right again—the idiots will go among the idiots, and those whose task it is will continue to run the country.

1️⃣ “The Tisza attacks continue!” – guilt assigned in advance

The very first sentence shuts down thinking.

  • no evidence
  • no identified perpetrator
  • no date / record / police report

👉 Frame: “they are attacking, I am the victim”
This is a classic moral-high-ground opening.


2️⃣ Chaos–destruction–incitement: three-word demonization

“This is their world: chaos, destruction, incitement”

This is not a description, but labeling.

  • no link to concrete events
  • no causal chain
  • no proof

👉 Function: emotional short-circuiting.
The reader is not meant to ask questions.


3️⃣ The “situation report” trick – pretending to be official

“Situation report from the Tisza kindergarten”

This does two things at once:

  • belittles (“kindergarten”)
  • adopts an authoritarian tone (“situation report”)

👉 The speaker presents themselves as a law-and-order authority.


4️⃣ Digital harassment narrative – without evidence

Instagram followers, email registrations, book orders:

  • technically doable by anyone
  • not provably linked to any political organization
  • no reference to police action
  • no confirmation from service providers

👉 This is anecdote stacking, not proof.


5️⃣ “It’s not a machine, it’s a human” – the invisible enemy

This is a key sentence.

  • excludes all alternative explanations
  • manufactures emotional certainty
  • proves nothing

👉 Classic conspiracy logic:
I know it because I feel it.


6️⃣ Reference to mental illness as a stigmatizing weapon

“Place of birth: Lipótmező”

This goes particularly deep.

  • using the name of a psychiatric institution
  • conflating political opponents with mental illness
  • mockery + stigmatization

👉 This is dehumanization, not political debate.


7️⃣ Apocalyptic date + the chosen ones

“From April 13, the world will be restored”

This follows a quasi-religious logic:

  • now there is chaos
  • purification is coming
  • “the idiots go with the idiots”
  • “we will continue to run the country”

👉 WE = order, power, legitimacy
👉 THEY = waste, to be removed

This is an authoritarian worldview, not a campaign message.


🧠 The big picture – how deep are we?

✔️ Enemy construction
✔️ Accumulation of unproven accusations
✔️ Mockery of mental illness
✔️ “We stay, they disappear” logic

👉 This is no longer defense, but psychological preparation:

  • criticism is illegitimate
  • the opponent is not human
  • power is framed as a “natural state”

balazska cant stop

We are doubling the number of red mailboxes. This week, we’re collecting development ideas in Rákospalota. Let’s go, North Pest!

The district-touring red mailbox has arrived in Rákospalota, right by Rákos Road. It will be here from Tuesday to Sunday, and I’m waiting for your development ideas and messages. Everyone in the area will receive a message card where you can write your thoughts for me, but you’re also welcome to drop in a note on your own paper.

I’ll collect the messages, organize them, and incorporate them into my representative program. With your help, together we’ll give North Pest new momentum. It’s going to be good!

1️⃣ “We double it” – false dynamism, empty performance

“We are doubling the number of red mailboxes.”

This is not development policy, it’s prop management.

There is no mention of:

  • budget
  • decision-making power
  • legal authority
  • implementation

👉 The word “double” imitates action, while in reality it only moves objects around.


2️⃣ “Collecting development ideas” – shifting responsibility

“We are waiting for development ideas.”

This is the appearance of participation, not its practice.

In reality:

  • there is no guarantee anything will be implemented
  • there is no feedback mechanism
  • there is no decision-making process

👉 If there is success → “we did it together”
👉 If there is none → “there were no good ideas”

Responsibility is pushed onto the residents.


3️⃣ The mailbox as a symbol of “folk democracy”

“Everyone will receive a message card.”

This is a strongly nostalgic, infantilizing gesture:

  • paper
  • dropping it in
  • then “I take them out and we organize them”

👉 The process is unaccountable:

  • who selects?
  • what gets included?
  • what disappears?

This is not transparent participation — it’s a black box.


4️⃣ “I’ll build it into my program” – legally and politically meaningless

This sentence commits to nothing.

There is no:

  • deadline
  • accountability
  • public list
  • justification for rejections

👉 Its communicative function is simple:

“If it doesn’t happen, it’s not my fault.”


5️⃣ “Momentum”, “it will be good” – emotional closure without content

“Together we will bring momentum to North Pest. It will be good!”

This is the classic ending of motivational emptiness:

  • no specifics
  • no benchmarks
  • no commitments

👉 The text delivers a feeling, not a decision.


🧠 Overall picture – what is this really?

This is not development policy, but:

  • role-playing (“district walkabout”)
  • stage props (the red mailbox)
  • imitation of participation
  • responsibility laundering

The residents:

  • can write
  • can drop it in
  • can hope

The politician:

  • collects
  • filters
  • later refers back to it

🎯 In one sentence:

This is not participation, but a performance of participation.
The mailbox is not decision-making — it’s a prop.

Balázska, wake up like Alexandra — and start intimidating people.

The 13th and 14th month pensions must be abolished!
That’s the message sent by the chief mastermind standing behind Magyar Péter: Ukraine needs the money!

Well then, Tisza supporters, this won’t be so easy for you.
The abolition of the 13th and 14th month pensions was announced last night by the chief strategist behind Magyar Péter.
We’ve been taken for a ride.
The money is needed for Ukraine.

1️⃣ A non-existent decision presented as a done deal

“The 13th and 14th monthly pensions must be abolished!”

This is not an announcement, not a program, and not a decision.

There is no:

  • adopted resolution
  • submitted bill
  • official statement
  • date, document, or legal act

👉 Yet it is delivered in the indicative mood, as if it had already been decided.
This is a textbook case of assumption presented as fact.


2️⃣ “Chief mastermind” – the myth of the shadowy background figure

“The chief mastermind behind Péter Magyar has sent the message”

This is a deliberately obscured figure:

  • no name
  • no position
  • no quotation
  • no source

👉 Its function is to:

  • avoid verification
  • create a conspiracy atmosphere
  • suggest that “Péter Magyar isn’t the one deciding — shadow forces are”

This is the shadow puppeteer narrative.


3️⃣ Transferring guilt: Ukraine as a money sink

“The money is needed for Ukraine!”

This is where the logical leap happens:

Pensions → Ukraine → Brussels → betrayal

There is no presentation of:

  • budgetary linkage
  • legal mechanism
  • concrete reallocation of funds

👉 Only an emotional short-circuit:

“What they take from you is given to foreigners.”


4️⃣ “We were put on the swing” – collective victimhood

This is not information, but an emotional state:

  • being deceived
  • humiliation
  • anger

👉 The listener does not evaluate — they identify with the victim role.


5️⃣ Precise target selection: seniors + fear

The 13th-month pension is:

  • symbolic income, not just money
  • the “last pillar of security”

👉 If you threaten this:

  • you trigger existential fear
  • you provoke reflexive rejection
  • no proof is required

This is not debate — it is an alarm signal.


6️⃣ Indirect demonization of Péter Magyar

The name Péter Magyar appears not through a concrete claim, but through implied guilt:

  • “the mastermind behind him”
  • “they sent the message”
  • “they want this”

👉 This way:

  • no quote from him is needed
  • no response from him is required
  • yet he becomes the one held responsible

This is proxy character assassination.


🧠 Overall picture – what is this really?

This text does not inform. It:

  • ❌ does not prove
  • ❌ does not cite sources
  • ❌ is not verifiable

But it does:

  • ✅ generate fear
  • ✅ manufacture an enemy
  • ✅ attack identity
  • ✅ activate reflexes

👉 This is not politics. This is a psychological operation.