Category: nemeth balazs : Words vs. Facts

balazska

The Tisza Party would immediately abolish utility price cuts and hand the money over to multinationals!

I wonder whether Áron Sutyó will make a video saying: Pista—Captain Pista—you made 37 million dollars as a mercenary during the war in four years. As private wealth. And now you want to give Hungarian families’ utility price cuts to your multinational buddies. Well then—Noár, Pista, Captain Pista—go to hell!

🧠 WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING IN THE TEXT?

🔴 1️⃣ Immediate existential shock – “abolishing utility price cuts”

Claim:

“The Tisza Party would immediately abolish utility price cuts”

👉 Technique: fear trigger / survival framing

  • Not a debate
  • Not a “possibility”
  • Not a “condition”

An instant sense of loss: heating, electricity, survival.

🎯 Effect:
The brain stops analyzing → switches to defense mode.

🔴 2️⃣ Enemy construction = “multinationals”

“They would give the money to multinationals”

👉 Technique: economic scapegoating

  • Vague but emotionally strong term
  • No company named
  • No contract
  • No amount

“Multinationals” = faceless exploiters.

📌 Trick:
No need to prove anything, because this is an emotional code, not an economic concept.

🔴 3️⃣ Whataboutism + personal attack

“I wonder whether Áron Sutyó would make a video saying…”

👉 Technique: deflection by accusation

  • Does not defend the original claim
  • Points elsewhere: “what about you?”

🎯 Goal:
To derail and fracture the direction of the debate.

🔴 4️⃣ Militarized demonization

“You made 37 million dollars… off the war… as a commander”

👉 Technique: war profiteer framing

Keywords:

  • “war”
  • “made money”
  • “commander”

❌ Missing:

  • sources
  • context
  • legal status

📌 Effect:
The person is morally disqualified before they can say anything.

🔴 5️⃣ Nicknaming + mockery = stripping human status

“Pista, Captain Pista”

👉 Technique: infantilization + ridicule

  • Not debate, but character assassination
  • The name loses seriousness → the person loses legitimacy

🔴 6️⃣ Vulgarity as “closure”

“Rot in hell!”

👉 Technique: aggressive emotional closure

This is not an outburst — it has a function:

  • It shuts down thinking
  • It signals to the audience:
    👉 “There is nothing here to weigh or consider.”

🧩 THE BIG PICTURE – WHAT KIND OF STYLE IS THIS?

This is the Balázska formula:

  1. Fear (utility prices)
  2. Enemy (multinationals)
  3. Deflection (“what about you”)
  4. Moral execution (war profiteer)
  5. Mockery
  6. Vulgar finale

👉 This is not information.
👉 Not debate.
👉 Not opinion.

This is emotional mobilization + thought suppression.

🎯 SAID OUT LOUD

The text does not want to be true.
It wants you to be angry, afraid, and to take a position reflexively.

balazska

Tisza supporters!
You can hope for a change of government, but you’d better start saving well in advance for higher energy prices!!

“Are you stupid, I can fake something like this anytime?”
That was the brilliant Tisza-style reaction to the fact that yesterday I presented an annual utility bill I received from a Hungarian pensioner living in Germany.
This pensioner pays 1.5 million forints per year for gas, water, and electricity in his studio apartment — nearly 1.4 million forints just for gas and electricity alone.

Here in Hungary, we pay around 250,000 forints per year on average for gas and electricity.
In Romania, it’s 600,000,
in Slovakia, 650,000,
in Poland, 900,000,
in Czechia, more than 1 million forints.

What costs 250,000 forints here at home costs 1.4 million forints for that Hungarian pensioner living in Germany.

So yes — you can prepare for a change of government, you can cheer for it — but then it’s worth starting to save right now for energy price hikes.

The German utility bills we showed are not fake, not forged.
Lying and making things up — that’s Tisza’s specialty.

🧠 What is actually happening in this text?

🔴 1️⃣ “Tiszások!” – creating a collective enemy

👉 Us vs. them framing

It does not attack a specific claim, but labels an entire group.
From the very first line, it designates an “enemy” onto whom anything can be projected from that point on.

🔴 2️⃣ Preloaded fear: “start saving for higher energy prices”

👉 Fear preloading

There is no evidence — instead, fear is pre-programmed:

  • government change = guaranteed price hikes
  • no “if,” no “maybe” — it is presented as a settled fact

This is not economic analysis, but a panic trigger.

🔴 3️⃣ A single story → universal truth

👉 Anecdotal absolutism

From a story that is:

  • unnamed
  • unverifiable
  • a vague “I received a bill” type of anecdote

👉 they jump to national, even European-level conclusions.

This is textbook manipulation:

one case ≠ a system

🔴 4️⃣ Numbers used to shock, without context

👉 Numerical shock framing

A list is presented:

  • Germany: 1.4 million
  • Hungary: 250 thousand
  • Romania, Slovakia, Poland…

❌ What is missing:

  • apartment size
  • actual consumption
  • insulation quality
  • price caps / subsidies
  • income ratios

The numbers do not explain — they only intimidate.

🔴 5️⃣ Criticism = lying

👉 Delegitimization shortcut

The audience is not allowed to respond with:

  • doubt
  • questions
  • verification

Because anyone who asks:

“lies,” “fakes,” “is a Tisza supporter”

This is criticism-proof communication.

🔴 6️⃣ Moral labeling

👉 Moral inversion

“The habit of lying is the Tisza Party’s own.”

It does not say:

  • “this claim is incorrect”

Instead, it says:

  • “this is what they are like”

This is character assassination, not debate.

🎯 What is the real message?

Not:

“let’s examine energy prices”

But this:

“If you want change, you will be punished.”

This is:

  • blackmail
  • intimidation
  • voter conditioning

🧩 Why is this a typical Balásy-style product?

Because it combines, all at once:

  • fear
  • enemy construction
  • shock through numbers
  • moral stigmatization
  • closure of debate

And none of it is evidence.

balazska not need word

The construction of Paks II has begun❗️ The libs want to keep this quiet too 😅 Pathetic!

These Brussels puppets really are this pathetic. I wonder how many articles the liberal 444 published today about the start of construction of Paks II?

A project that will determine Hungary’s energy supply for decades, that also guarantees low utility prices — and is a major success of the government.

Zero. That is: zero.

balazska

Then there’s immigration. And before I set off, I just have to tell you what I read in the past few minutes. In Belgium, in Ghent, there will be festive decorative lighting for Ramadan for an entire month starting this spring. As it turns out, I didn’t know this, but there are already such Ramadan-related light displays in some major Dutch cities, in certain districts of Brussels, and in parts of London as well.

So this is where Western Europe is heading: Christmas markets are being abolished, even the very name “Christmas” is being removed, yet for Ramadan they welcome the Muslim population and Muslim tourists with festive decorative lighting. Well, I’m not sure this is the right direction. I think we should remain Hungary.

🔴 1️⃣ “This is where Western Europe is now” – distorted generalization

Claim:

“In Belgium, in Ghent… in major Dutch cities, in certain districts of Brussels, and in some parts of London…”

👉 Technique: constructing a civilizational collapse narrative from fragmented examples

❌ What actually happens:

  • a few specific, local municipal decisions
  • → “Western Europe as a whole”
  • → “this is where they’ve ended up”

This is a false scale shift:
local decorative lighting ≠ civilizational direction.

🎯 Effect:
The listener does not ask:

“Where exactly, for whom, and why?”

but instead feels:

“This is happening everywhere → it will reach us too.”

🔴 2️⃣ Christmas vs. Ramadan – manufactured value conflict

Key sentence:

“They abolish Christmas markets… but put up festive lights for Ramadan.”

👉 Technique: false dichotomy + emotional confrontation

❌ What’s missing:

  • a specific city
  • a specific regulation
  • a specific decision
  • any proof that the two happened in the same place

📌 Classic trick:

“What we lose → they receive.”

This is not a fact, but emotional balance-sheet framing.

🔴 3️⃣ “This may not be the right direction” – unsupported normative judgment

👉 Technique: insinuation

  • no data
  • no social impact assessment
  • no alternative proposed

Only a feeling:

“this is not good.”

🎯 Effect:
The listener cannot debate — only identify with it or reject it.

🔴 4️⃣ “Let us remain Hungary” – identity closure

👉 Technique: emotional closing line + political immunization

What does “remain Hungary” mean here?

  • not a legal definition
  • not an economic one
  • not a cultural one

but rather:

“if you disagree → you don’t belong here.”

📌 This is an identity switch:

  • accept the narrative → “you are Hungarian”
  • ask questions → “Westernized / foreign / dangerous”

🧠 Overall picture: what is the text actually doing?

✔️ It is not about immigration policy
✔️ not about religious freedom
✔️ not about urban policy

👉 It is performing cultural fear-conditioning:

  • small event → large fear
  • concrete detail → deliberate blurring
  • question → identity lockdown

This is emotional conditioning, not information.

alexa

Bokros Lajos from TISZA has gone off the rails, and wearing a Ukrainian badge he is now openly demanding not only more tax brackets, but the immediate abolition of all tax benefits as well.
Mothers, fathers, the elderly, the young… you see: if these left-wing dinosaurs come back to power riding on TISZA’s back, then we’re in serious trouble.

That’s exactly why: Fidesz is the safe choice! 😉

What I really want to emphasize is that tax brackets themselves are only the smaller part of the change.
The bigger part of the change is the almost complete elimination of tax benefits and exemptions.

Here I am primarily thinking of social policy measures—that is, the family tax allowance, child-related tax benefits, and the lifelong tax exemption for mothers with two or three children.
All of this must be completely forgotten.

🔴 1️⃣ Scapegoating + past-evoking demonization

Key figure: Bokros Lajos

“unleashed,” “left-wing dinosaurs,” “if they come back, we’re screwed”

👉 Technique: reviving historical trauma

Bokros’ name = 1995 → austerity → fear

no evidence, only association

the “return” narrative works even if he has no real decision-making power

🎯 Effect:
Voters are no longer weighing policies — they are fleeing from a nightmare image.

🔴 2️⃣ “Tisza = Bokros” → collective guilt

Target: the Tisza Party

“if these dinosaurs return on the back of Tisza…”

👉 Technique: guilt by association

one person’s opinion
→ an entire party
→ every voter

❌ What’s missing:
party resolution
program quotation
official position

🎯 Effect:
No need to debate Tisza — it’s enough to stick Bokros’ label on them.

🔴 3️⃣ Ukrainian pin = emotional trigger

“wearing a Ukrainian pin while lashing out”

👉 Technique: visual enemy construction

the pin is not an argument, it’s a symbol

automatic linkage:
Ukraine → war
war → money
money → “they take it from us”

🎯 Effect:
The text is not about tax policy, but about loyalty.

🔴 4️⃣ Fear stacking through target groups

“Mothers, fathers, elderly people, young people…”

👉 Technique: fear stacking

everyone is addressed
no one is left out
no exception, no escape route

📌 Classic campaign trick:
“Even if you aren’t afraid, surely there’s someone you should be afraid for.”

🔴 5️⃣ Real quote → distorted framing

“the near-total abolition of benefits and exemptions”

⚠️ This is where the trick gets subtler:

there is a real sentence
but there is no:
– context
– decision-making level
– timeline
– legislative process

👉 What the communication does:
policy debate → immediate existential threat

🔴 6️⃣ “That’s why: Fidesz is the safe choice”

Target: Fidesz

👉 Technique: false exclusivity

no alternatives
no nuance
only: us or catastrophe

🎯 Psychological closure:
After frightening the audience, it immediately offers shelter.

🧠 Overall picture – what’s really happening?

This is not a tax policy debate, but:
– invoking the past
– enemy designation
– fear-mongering
– collective guilt
– emotional closure

By the end, the voter doesn’t know what would change, only feels:
👉 “If I don’t vote for them, something bad will happen.”

balazska

The Tisza Party and Brussels’ candidates are still doing nothing but running away. They cannot reveal their real plans!

Did you see it? A few Tisza candidates dared to step out onto the streets—then they fled as soon as journalists tried to find them to ask questions. Here in North Pest, Anna Müller doesn’t dare to face the voters. She’s one of the worst Tisza candidates out of the 106, isn’t she—she never appears anywhere we voters could meet her. And yet we have questions: about the war, immigration, austerity measures, and Ukraine’s accession to the EU. Her bosses keep saying that Ukrainians must be admitted into the Union. So what does Anna Müller think?

🔴 1️⃣ “They are fleeing” narrative – a cowardice frame without evidence

Claims:

  • “they are only fleeing”
  • “they don’t dare to come out”
  • “they ran away”

👉 Technique: labeling behavior instead of providing evidence

❌ What they do not provide:

  • a specific location
  • a specific time
  • any footage
  • any quotation
  • any unanswered question

🎯 Effect:
The voter does not ask what the program is, but instead feels:

“whoever doesn’t come out must be afraid / hiding something.”

This is emotional conditioning, not information.

🔴 2️⃣ Discrediting an individual → collective guilt

Pattern:

  • “a few Tisza candidates”
  • ↓
  • Müller Anna
  • ↓
  • “they are all like this”

👉 Technique: cherry-picking + generalization

From one alleged incident they extrapolate:

  • 106 candidates
  • an entire party
  • a complete political alternative

👉 Consequence:
There is no need to debate programs, data, or the budget.

🔴 3️⃣ “We would have questions” – a false dialogue

Key sentence:

“We would have questions about war, immigration…”

❗ Reality:

  • no actual questions listed
  • no invitation
  • no debate format
  • no verifiable event

👉 This is not dialogue, but:

“we would ask questions, but they don’t dare”
— even when no one asked anything at all.

🔴 4️⃣ “Their bosses say so” – the external control narrative

Claim:

“their bosses keep saying…”

👉 Trick:

  • “Brussels” presented as a hostile actor with intent
  • “bosses” → subordination
  • evidence = zero

❌ There is no:

  • quotation
  • document
  • vote
  • decision
  • date

🎯 Goal:
To turn political debate into a question of treason vs. obedience.

🔴 5️⃣ The biggest contradiction: “no program” vs. “secret plans”

The text contradicts itself:

  • 🔹 “there is no program”
  • 🔹 “they are hiding their real plans”

👉 Both cannot be true at the same time.

This is the Schrödinger program:

  • it doesn’t exist
  • yet it is dangerous

🎯 Its function:
Not truth, but the constant maintenance of distrust.

🧠 Overall picture – what does this text actually do?

It does not inform. It:

  • generates fear
  • destroys character
  • preempts debate
  • shifts the burden of proof
  • activates emotional reflexes

👉 This is not campaigning, but psychological pressure.

balazska again

The left wing is unfit even to organize healthcare services. The example of District XV perfectly illustrates this! All they can do is stir up tensions; they’re too lazy to work.

Judit Bidló, Deputy State Secretary from the State Secretariat for Healthcare, said:
What we keep hearing here in the district is that everything is wrong with healthcare. And I can’t really say that everything is fine, because there are indeed negative experiences. But who is responsible? Both outpatient specialist care and GP practices fall under the responsibility of the local municipality.

The government is very willing to provide assistance if anyone asks for help in operating such a system, but fundamentally this is the task of the local government.

What I have seen in neighboring districts confirms this as well: it can be done well. Whether I look at District XVI or District IV, there are districts where healthcare institutions are exemplary—both in appearance and in the available infrastructure. These are the benchmarks we should compare against. There are those who do it well.

🔴 1️⃣ “The left is incompetent” – an evidence-free judgment

Claim:

“The left is incapable even of organizing healthcare.”

👉 Technique: framing + labeling
– no data
– no concrete decisions
– no institutional chain of responsibility

📌 Effect:
The listener is no longer asking what went wrong in healthcare, but who should be blamed.

🔴 2️⃣ “There are bad experiences, but it’s not the government’s fault”

“I can’t really say it’s good, because there truly are bad experiences.”

👉 Technique: controlled admission
– acknowledges the problem
– immediately detaches it from the government

This is classic damage control:

“Yes, it’s bad, BUT we are not responsible.”

🔴 3️⃣ Shifting full responsibility onto local governments

“Both outpatient specialist care and GP practices are the responsibility of the local municipality.”

👉 Distortion:

  • healthcare workers’ wage policy → state-level
  • funding frameworks → state-level
  • doctor shortages → nationwide
  • medical equipment procurement → state regulation

📌 Reality:
Local governments operate services, but they do not decide the systemic conditions.

This is responsibility fragmentation, not analysis.

🔴 4️⃣ “The government would help if asked” – passive victim posture

“The government is very happy to provide help if it is requested.”

👉 Technique: conditional benefactor narrative
– no concrete offer
– no automatic intervention
– no accountable program

📌 Message:

“We’re ready — they’re incompetent.”

This is moral posturing, not governance.

🔴 5️⃣ Showcase comparison: “some do it well”

“District XVI, District IV — things are exemplary there.”

👉 Technique: cherry picking
– no budget comparison
– no population data
– no workload indicators
– no doctor–patient ratios

📌 Goal:
Not to solve the problem, but to shame the struggling district.

🔴 6️⃣ Borrowed authority

“Deputy State Secretary Judit Bidló…”

👉 Authority laundering:
– position equals credibility
– without data
– without accountability

📌 Message:

“A state secretary said it → therefore it’s true.”

🧠 Overall picture – what is really happening?

This text is not about healthcare, but about:

✅ acknowledging that there is a problem
❌ avoiding government responsibility
🎯 redirecting public anger toward local governments
🪞 shaming through selective examples
🛡️ defending claims with position instead of data

This is propaganda management, not public policy.

balazska

Take a look at this❗️
This is how much we would be paying for utilities without Russian energy and without the utility price reduction!
The bill was sent from Berlin!

Take a look at this❗️
This is how much utilities would cost without the utility price cap and without Russian energy.
I received an annual settlement from Germany, from Berlin, with this message and this note.

A pensioner living in Berlin, who has lived there for decades in a small apartment, wrote to me and said that he paid €3,250 per year for gas and water, plus €56 per month for electricity.

So in total, his annual utility costs amount to — calculated at 380 HUF per euro (the forint is strong now) — 1,489,000 forints per year for gas, water, and electricity.

That means he pays more than 120,000 forints per month for gas, water, and electricity.

This is what the utility costs would be here as well — in Budapest, in Hungary — even for a small studio apartment.

🔴 1️⃣ “The bill was sent from Berlin” – anecdote instead of evidence

Technique: anecdotal proof

  • an unknown pensioner
  • unknown apartment size
  • unknown consumption
  • unknown tariff
  • unknown year

👉 One bill ≠ national reality
This is not data, it’s storytelling.

📌 Classic propaganda trick:

“not statistics, but a human story” → emotional credentialing

🔴 2️⃣ Deliberate conflation: gas + water + electricity = one single “utility cost”

Trick: artificially merging different costs

  • In Germany, water and sewage are often more expensive than here
  • Water has nothing to do with Russian energy
  • yet it’s presented as if:

👉 “without Russian gas = everything becomes expensive”

📌 This is false cause-and-effect.

🔴 3️⃣ Forint–euro magic: numerical shock framing

“1,489,000 forints”

This is a psychological trick.

  • in euros: around €4,000/year
  • in forints: a shockingly large number
  • “the forint is strong” → built-in self-justification

🎯 Effect:

the listener doesn’t calculate — they just panic

🔴 4️⃣ “This is what it would cost in Budapest too” – pure fiction

❌ There is no:

  • Hungarian consumption data
  • Hungarian tariff calculation
  • apartment size
  • heating method
  • building energy rating

👉 This is not a statement, but a fear-based prediction.

📌 Typical fear projection:

“if it’s not us → Berlin hell is coming”

🔴 5️⃣ Unspoken but crucial facts (deliberately omitted)

In Germany:

  • incomes are higher
  • energy efficiency is better
  • apartments are better insulated

In Hungary:

the so-called “utility price cuts” don’t appear on the bill, but in:

  • taxes
  • inflation
  • postponed maintenance
  • budget holes

👉 This is a hidden cost, not free energy.

🔴 6️⃣ Pattern match with Alexandra

The exact same recipe:

  • abroad = nightmare
  • one person’s story = “evidence”
  • a huge number in forints
  • “without Russian energy we’d freeze to death”
  • fear-mongering with no alternatives

📌 This is not information — it’s a dependency narrative.

🎯 One-sentence summary

This is not a utility cost calculation, but emotional blackmail built on an unknown bill, used to manufacture political loyalty.

balazska

February 5! The increased salaries are coming.
If Tisza comes to power, this money will go to multinationals and to Ukraine as well!
But it won’t happen.

February 5: the phones will start ringing, the SMS messages will arrive about the increased salaries.
If Tisza comes to power, this money will go to multinationals and to Ukraine.
But it won’t happen.