If there were no Russia–Ukraine war, gasoline would be below 500 forints per liter. Everyone who works to prolong the war (Brussels, Kyiv, Tisza) is an obstacle to lowering fuel prices.

A thought about gasoline prices, because I see that the agitators are already stirring things up. If there were no war — no Russia–Ukraine war — prices would return to the 2022 level, meaning fuel would drop below 500 forints per liter. Everyone who works for the continuation of the war — Ursula von der Leyen, Manfred Weber, President Zelensky, the Tisza Party, Péter Magyar, István Kapitány — are obstacles to gasoline prices falling below 500 forints per liter.

So let the agitators keep agitating.

🎭 Propaganda and Influence Techniques in Balázs’s Message

The text is a political campaign message that uses several classic rhetorical and propaganda techniques. Its goal is to reduce the complex issue of fuel prices to a simple political conflict and trigger an emotional reaction from the reader.

Below are the most important techniques.

---

1️⃣ Simple cause–effect explanation (oversimplification)

Excerpt:

“If there were no Russian-Ukrainian war, gasoline would be below 500 HUF.”

Technique:
👉 Oversimplification

Goal:
To explain a complex economic phenomenon (fuel prices) with a single cause.

Effect:
Readers may believe that
➡️ fuel prices are high solely because of the war,
even though in reality many factors influence them (global oil prices, refining costs, taxes, exchange rates, etc.).

---

2️⃣ Scapegoating

Excerpt:

“Brussels, Kyiv, Tisza… Ursula von der Leyen, Manfred Weber, President Zelensky…”

Technique:
👉 Scapegoating

Goal:
To blame specific political actors for an economic problem.

Effect:
The reader’s anger or frustration is directed toward a clearly defined political group.

---

3️⃣ Creating an enemy image

Excerpt:

“Everyone who works to prolong the war…”

Technique:
👉 “Us vs. them” narrative

Goal:
To divide actors into two camps:

• they: pro-war actors
• we: those who want peace and cheap fuel

Effect:
Readers are more likely to emotionally identify with the “we” side.

---

4️⃣ Repetition

Excerpt:

“If there were no war… fuel would be below 500.”

Technique:
👉 Repetition of a key claim

Goal:
To reinforce the core message in the reader’s mind.

Effect:
Repeated statements can begin to feel more credible simply through repetition.

---

5️⃣ Emotional language and agitation

Excerpt:

“the agitators are agitating”

Technique:
👉 Emotional rhetoric / stigmatization

Goal:
To portray critics as provocateurs or manipulators.

Effect:
Readers may take opposing viewpoints less seriously.

---

6️⃣ Shifting political responsibility

Technique:
👉 Narrative reframing

Goal:
To link the issue of fuel prices to external political actors.

Effect:
An economic issue is reframed as a political conflict.

---

✅ Summary

The core narrative of the text is:

➡️ “No war → cheap fuel.”
➡️ “Certain political actors are prolonging the war.”
➡️ “Therefore they are responsible for high fuel prices.”

This follows a classic campaign logic:

simple cause → identified enemy → emotional reaction.

Disgusting clowns: they are working to prevent Hungary from receiving cheap Russian oil, yet at the same time they are inciting people with fuel prices! That’s all the Tisza–Brussels–Kyiv gang is capable of.

Is Tisza really going to announce a fuel price cap? And are those liberal portals really cheering that idea, the same ones that in recent years claimed that regulating prices was something from the devil? And do those people really have the nerve to talk about fuel prices while, together with Zelensky and Brussels, they are actively working to stop cheap Russian oil from coming to Hungary?

Give me a break!

🎭 Propaganda and Influence Techniques in Balázs’s Message

The text is not a simple political opinion, but a strongly emotion-driven campaign message that uses several classic propaganda and rhetorical techniques to influence the reader.

---

1️⃣ Enemy Image and Demonization

Excerpt:
“Disgusting clowns… the Tisza–Brussels–Kyiv criminal gang”

Technique:
👉 Enemy framing / demonization

Goal:
To group political opponents into a single “evil bloc” (Tisza, Brussels, Ukraine).

Effect:
A simple mental picture forms in the reader’s mind:

• “They” → enemies
• “We” → the Hungarian side

This simplifies complex political issues.

---

2️⃣ Emotional Outrage

Excerpt:
“Disgusting clowns”, “criminal gang”, “do they really have the nerve”

Technique:
👉 Emotional framing / outrage mobilization

Goal:
To trigger a strong emotional reaction before the reader evaluates the claims rationally.

Effect:
The message generates anger and indignation, which increases political mobilization.

---

3️⃣ Scapegoating

Excerpt:
“They are working to prevent Hungary from receiving cheap Russian oil.”

Technique:
👉 Scapegoating

Goal:
To blame a specific political bloc for high energy or fuel prices.

Effect:
Economic problems are turned into a simple narrative:

“If they weren’t there → energy would be cheap.”

---

4️⃣ Highlighting Hypocrisy

Excerpt:
“Liberal portals that previously considered price regulation the work of the devil…”

Technique:
👉 Hypocrisy accusation

Goal:
To undermine the credibility of political opponents.

Effect:
Readers may conclude that the opposition is inconsistent or hypocritical.

---

5️⃣ Rhetorical Questions

Excerpt:
“Is Tisza really announcing a fuel price cap?”
“Do they really have the nerve…?”

Technique:
👉 Rhetorical questioning

Goal:
To suggest the desired conclusion without providing evidence.

Effect:
Readers are nudged toward the implied answer.

---

6️⃣ Simplified Cause-and-Effect Narrative

Narrative presented in the text:

1. The opposition + Brussels + Ukraine are working together.
2. They block cheap Russian energy.
3. Therefore fuel prices rise.

Technique:
👉 Simplification / simplified geopolitical narrative

Goal:
To turn a complex energy and geopolitical issue into an easy-to-understand story.

Effect:
The audience receives a quick and digestible political explanation.

---

7️⃣ “Us vs. Them” Framing

Implicit message:

• Us: Hungarians who want cheap energy
• Them: Brussels, Ukraine, Tisza, liberal media

Technique:
👉 In-group vs. out-group framing

Goal:
To place the reader on the “us” side.

Effect:
Strengthens political loyalty and group identity.

---

✅ Summary

The core propaganda strategy of the message relies on:

• emotional outrage
• enemy construction
• scapegoating
• accusations of hypocrisy
• rhetorical questions
• simplified geopolitical storytelling

The goal is not to explain energy policy in detail, but to construct a clear and emotionally resonant political narrative:

“The opposition is working together with Brussels and Ukraine against Hungary’s cheap energy.”

39 days until the decisive election!
We must stay out of the war and prevent Hungarian money from being sent to Ukraine.

The first step is drilling.
The second step is threading.
The third step is transportation.
And the fourth step is installation.

The fifth step would be for it to stay up until the end of the campaign — but unfortunately opposition poster-vandal gangs are causing trouble here in North Pest.

We are trying to stop them.
There is plenty of work dealing with them.

A vote cast for Mi Hazánk in the individual constituency in North Pest is a wasted vote. Only Fidesz is the safe choice.

Mi Hazánk? Mi Hazánk — what do we think about Mi Hazánk? That is also a choice. But in this case? In my opinion, a vote cast for Mi Hazánk in the individual constituency here will be a wasted vote. I would be glad if, as a Mi Hazánk supporter, you cast your vote for me in the individual constituency. Because I believe that otherwise it will be a wasted vote.

And if we want peace, security, and stability in Hungary, then a Fidesz–KDNP majority is needed in the new parliament. That is something we can guarantee.

1️⃣ “Wasted Vote” Narrative

Key statement:

“A vote cast for Mi Hazánk in the individual district in North Pest is a wasted vote.”

📌 Technique:
This is the “wasted vote” argument, a common electoral persuasion strategy.

🎯 Goal:
To discourage voters from supporting smaller parties by suggesting that such votes have no real impact.

💥 Effect:
Voters may abandon their preferred party and instead support the largest competitor, even if it is not their first choice.

---

2️⃣ Strategic Voting Pressure

Key statement:

“I would be happy if, as a Mi Hazánk supporter, you cast your vote for me in the individual district.”

📌 Technique:
This is strategic vote redirection.

🎯 Goal:
To convince voters of another party that supporting their own party locally is pointless, therefore they should transfer their vote to the candidate who has a chance to win.

💥 Effect:
It can consolidate votes around larger parties and weaken smaller competitors.

---

3️⃣ False Dilemma (Binary Choice)

Key statement:

“Only Fidesz is the safe choice.”

📌 Technique:
False dilemma framing — presenting politics as if there were only two meaningful options.

🎯 Goal:
To simplify the political landscape into:

• Fidesz = stability and safety
• All others = uncertainty or risk

💥 Effect:
Voters are pushed toward the presented “safe” option because alternatives appear irrational or pointless.

---

4️⃣ Fear Framing (Security Narrative)

Key statements:

“So that there will be peace, security and calm in Hungary.”

📌 Technique:
Security-based emotional framing.

🎯 Goal:
To connect the party with peace, safety, and stability, while implying that other outcomes may lead to instability.

💥 Effect:
Voters may prioritize security over political diversity, increasing support for the party presented as the guarantor of stability.

---

5️⃣ Authority Claim

Key statement:

“We can guarantee that.”

📌 Technique:
Authority assertion.

🎯 Goal:
To present the speaker’s political force as the only actor capable of delivering stability and security.

💥 Effect:
Creates the perception that the party has unique competence or control over outcomes.

---

📊 Overall Communication Strategy

The message combines several persuasive layers:

1. Delegitimizing smaller parties (Mi Hazánk vote = wasted vote)
2. Redirecting voters toward the dominant party
3. Simplifying politics into a binary choice
4. Linking the party to safety and peace
5. Presenting itself as the only reliable guarantor

📌 Result:
The voter is subtly guided toward a single conclusion:

Supporting any party other than Fidesz is irrational because it either wastes the vote or risks the country’s stability.

A developing, livable, and safe district. I agree with Balázs Barkóczi. We need a developing, livable, and safe North Pest. But right now it is developing backwards, run by lazy politicians. Many people say it has become unlivable. And we know exactly that it is only safe as long as Viktor Orbán is the prime minister. Otherwise they would drag the whole country into war, and migrants would be brought here to a suburban district of the capital. We don’t want that.

1️⃣ Positive framing of the desired future

Key phrase:
“Developing, livable, safe district.”

📌 Technique:
The message begins with a strongly positive vision using universally attractive words: developing, livable, and safe.

🎯 Purpose:
To create an emotional baseline that most readers will automatically agree with. Almost everyone wants to live in a safe and livable area.

💥 Effect:
Readers subconsciously associate this positive vision with the politician being supported.

---

2️⃣ Creating a contrast narrative

Key phrase:
“But now it is developing backwards, lazy politicians are running it.”

📌 Technique:
A contrast framing is created between the ideal future and the allegedly failing present.

🎯 Purpose:
To present the current political leadership as incompetent or ineffective.

💥 Effect:
The audience is encouraged to feel frustration with current leaders and openness toward political change.

---

3️⃣ Appeal to unnamed public opinion

Key phrase:
“Many people say it is unlivable.”

📌 Technique:
Use of vague collective authority.

🎯 Purpose:
To suggest that dissatisfaction is widespread without providing evidence.

💥 Effect:
Readers may assume that the majority shares this opinion, which can influence their own perception.

---

4️⃣ Security narrative linked to a specific leader

Key phrase:
“We know it is only safe as long as Viktor Orbán is the prime minister.”

📌 Technique:
Leader-centric security framing.

🎯 Purpose:
To connect the idea of safety directly to a single political leader.

💥 Effect:
The message implies that political change would automatically create insecurity.

---

5️⃣ Fear framing (war narrative)

Key phrase:
“Otherwise they would drag the whole country into war.”

📌 Technique:
Fear appeal.

🎯 Purpose:
To raise anxiety about potential geopolitical consequences if the current leadership changes.

💥 Effect:
Fear can make voters prefer stability and continuity over political change.

---

6️⃣ Migration threat framing

Key phrase:
“Migrants would come here to a suburb of the capital.”

📌 Technique:
External threat narrative.

🎯 Purpose:
To present immigration as a direct local risk.

💥 Effect:
Transforms a broader geopolitical issue into a personal, neighborhood-level concern.

---

7️⃣ Closing with a clear rejection slogan

Key phrase:
“We do not want this.”

📌 Technique:
Simplified emotional conclusion.

🎯 Purpose:
To give readers an easy, emotionally satisfying position to adopt.

💥 Effect:
Encourages identification with the speaker and reinforces group unity.

---

✅ Overall communication strategy

The message combines three main narrative pillars:

• Hope narrative: a developing and livable district
• Fear narrative: war and migration
• Leadership narrative: security tied to a specific political leader

European families with children receive unprecedented support in Hungary as well. Many people support Fidesz precisely because of this! There is a lot at stake, so let’s not make a mistake in April.

Daily street experiences, just like almost every evening here on Facebook. A man came up to us here at Mézes-Kalács Square, a 40-year-old (in his 41st year), with two children and a wife who live here in the 15th district. He said that in his entire life he had never signed a supporter sheet for any political party, but now, for the first time, he signed for Fidesz. The reason is that he wants his two children to grow up and be raised in peace and stability, and he is very, very satisfied with the support that Hungarian families receive from the national government.

This kind of story exists as well — and not in small numbers. So thank you very much for the support, let’s keep pushing forward. 39 days to go, and we will achieve a big, bright victory!

🎭 Propaganda and Influence Techniques in Balázs’s Text

The post is not simply reporting a street encounter. It is a political campaign narrative built with several classical propaganda and persuasion techniques designed to strengthen support for the governing party and mobilize voters before the election.

---

1️⃣ Anecdotal evidence as political proof

Key element

“A 40-year-old man with two children came to us… he had never signed a support sheet for any party before, but now he signed for Fidesz.”

📌 Technique
Use of a personal anecdote presented as representative evidence.

🎯 Goal
To create the impression that ordinary people are spontaneously supporting the party, even those who were previously apolitical.

💥 Effect
Readers may perceive this as proof of a broader social trend, even though it is only a single unverifiable story.

---

2️⃣ Construction of a “typical voter”

Key element

The man is described as:

• around 40 years old
• married
• two children
• local resident

📌 Technique
Creation of a relatable archetype.

🎯 Goal
To present the supporter as a normal Hungarian family man, someone many voters can identify with.

💥 Effect
The reader subconsciously interprets the message as:

“People like us support this party.”

---

3️⃣ Appeal to family security

Key element

“He wants his children to grow up in peace and calm.”

📌 Technique
Emotional framing using family and children.

🎯 Goal
To connect political choice with protecting children and stability.

💥 Effect
Political support becomes associated with responsible parenting, making opposition appear indirectly risky or irresponsible.

---

4️⃣ Positive reinforcement narrative

Key element

“He is very satisfied with the support provided to Hungarian families.”

📌 Technique
Policy validation through personal testimony.

🎯 Goal
To reinforce the government’s central campaign message that family policies are successful and widely appreciated.

💥 Effect
Readers receive a simplified takeaway:

“Families benefit → families support the government.”

---

5️⃣ Bandwagon effect

Key element

“There are many like this.”

📌 Technique
Bandwagon messaging — suggesting growing mass support.

🎯 Goal
To create the perception that support for the party is widespread and increasing.

💥 Effect
People are psychologically more inclined to support what appears to be the majority choice.

---

6️⃣ Campaign mobilization framing

Key element

“39 days left and we will win a big, bright victory.”

📌 Technique
Election countdown and victory framing.

🎯 Goal

• energize supporters
• maintain campaign momentum
• frame the election outcome as already heading toward victory

💥 Effect
Supporters feel part of an inevitable winning movement, which increases motivation to participate.

---

✅ Overall communication strategy

The post combines:

• personal storytelling
• family-focused emotional appeal
• majority illusion
• campaign mobilization

to transform a simple anecdote into a narrative of growing popular support for the party.

Opposition voters wouldn’t be bothered by 1,000-forint petrol because their salaries and pensions are so high! 🤡
I ask that we keep our common sense! In April, Fidesz is the safe choice!

I received a brilliant message from an opposition pensioner about Zelensky shutting off the Druzhba oil pipeline, which could push fuel prices up to 1,000 forints. He writes that as a single opposition supporter living on a pension of around half a million forints, and with a son—also an opposition supporter—earning a net seven-figure salary, it wouldn’t be a problem for them to pay for fuel or for the price increases caused by higher petrol costs.

So this opposition pensioner isn’t worried about Zelensky’s pressure or about 1,000-forint petrol, because apparently the situation in Hungary is so “bad” that he can easily pay for everything from his half-million-forint pension.

1️⃣ Use of a fabricated or unverifiable “source”

Key element:

“I received a brilliant message from an opposition pensioner…”

📌 Technique:
Referring to an anonymous, unverifiable person.

🎯 Goal:
This allows the politician to make claims about the opposition without stating them directly, attributing them instead to an “alleged” individual.

💥 Effect:
Viewers may easily believe it because it sounds like a real story, even though no evidence is provided.

---

2️⃣ Straw man argument

Key claim:

“Opposition voters wouldn’t be bothered by 1000-forint fuel.”

📌 Technique:
Attributing an exaggerated or distorted position to the opponent.

🎯 Goal:
To portray the opposition as if they don’t care about rising prices.

💥 Effect:
The audience may feel that:

“These people are completely disconnected from reality.”

---

3️⃣ Construction of an enemy image

Structure:

Zelensky = “blackmail”
Opposition = “supports it”

📌 Technique:
Linking an external enemy with a domestic political opponent.

🎯 Goal:
To create a simple equation in the voter’s mind:

opposition = foreign interests

💥 Effect:
The political debate becomes not a policy issue but a question of loyalty.

---

4️⃣ Economic fear-mongering

Key element:

“1000-forint fuel”

📌 Technique:
Emphasizing an extreme future price scenario.

🎯 Goal:
To build on people’s fears about rising living costs.

💥 Effect:
Voters focus less on the actual structure of energy supply and more on the emotional reaction:

“If they come to power, everything will become more expensive.”

---

5️⃣ False social framing

Key element:

“a 500,000-forint pension”

📌 Technique:
Generalizing from an exceptional case.

🎯 Goal:
To suggest that opposition supporters are a wealthy elite who are unaffected by price increases.

💥 Effect:
It creates social tension:

• “they are rich”
• “we are the ones who have to pay”

---

✅ Summary

The core narrative formula is:

opposition + Zelensky → expensive fuel → danger for Hungary

This is a simple emotional framing that avoids discussing the real questions of energy policy (refinery technology, multiple supply routes, market pricing) and instead focuses on building political loyalty.

A young left-leaning Tisza supporter — but at least we had a good conversation!
He should also know that Péter Magyar cannot say no to the EU’s war plans, just as he does not say no to Zelensky’s oil blockade either!!

I’m a young centre-left supporter, but… what kind of voter does that mean? Or which party?
I’m one of the Tisza Party voters. Have a nice day!

Balázs Németh: Hello!
Csanád Bábik: I’m Csanád Bábik. Are you collecting signatures? Supporters?

Balázs: No, no, no.

Csanád: I’m an opposition-leaning young person.

Balázs: Well! I like talking to opposition supporters.

Csanád: I wrote a letter to Viktor Orbán. It’s a critical letter, and I would like it to reach his desk so that he can actually read it and respond.

I’m a centre-left young person, but… what kind of voter does that mean? Which party does that represent?
I’m one of the Tisza Party voters.

Well, Tisza is basically left-leaning, so in that sense it’s fine. But I hope that even if Tisza were in government, there would be changes — and that voters would move in a positive direction.

It’s certain that there would be changes in the country if there were a Tisza government.

You would receive a draft notice for military service, our money would go there, soldiers would be sent.

Did Péter Magyar actually suggest that he would do this?

Péter Magyar took photos in Munich two and a half weeks ago with one of the EU’s most pro-war leaders.

From what I see, it would only bring negative changes, both in this constituency and nationally as well.

Csanád: Yes, yes. Well… I don’t agree with that, but… I’ll deliver the letter.

1️⃣ Staging a “friendly debate”

Key element:
“Left-wing young person, Tisza supporter — but at least we had a good conversation!”

📌 Technique:
A staged “civilian conversation.” The politician presents it as if he were calmly debating an average opposition voter.

🎯 Goal:
To create the impression that he is open, capable of dialogue, and able to speak respectfully even with opposition supporters.

💥 Effect:
The viewer feels:
“at least he talks to people.”

---

2️⃣ False representation (fake sample)

Key element:
The “center-left young person” repeatedly speaks uncertainly about his own political identity.

📌 Technique:
Presenting a single individual as a typical Tisza voter.

🎯 Goal:
To create the impression in the viewer’s mind:

Tisza voter = uncertain, doesn’t really know what they want.

💥 Effect:
The opposing camp appears incompetent or confused.

---

3️⃣ Fear appeal – war narrative

Key sentences:

“Péter Magyar cannot say no to the EU’s war plans.”

“You would receive a call-up for military service.”

📌 Technique:
Fear appeal (fear-based propaganda).

🎯 Goal:
To make voters imagine personal losses, such as:

• conscription
• war
• sending soldiers abroad

💥 Effect:
The political debate turns into an existential threat.

---

4️⃣ Scapegoating – EU and Ukraine

Key element:

“Zelensky’s oil blockade”

📌 Technique:
Simplifying a geopolitical conflict into a clear enemy image.

🎯 Goal:
To construct the narrative:

EU + Ukraine → harming Hungary
Tisza → supporting it

💥 Effect:
Voters may feel that external forces are manipulating the country.

---

5️⃣ Building moral superiority

Key element:

“I like talking to opposition supporters.”

📌 Technique:
Self-positioning as a calm, democratic actor.

🎯 Goal:
The politician places himself above the conflict.

💥 Effect:
The viewer may perceive:

“he is reasonable, the other side is radical.”

---

6️⃣ Closing the narrative – guided conclusion

By the end of the conversation the frame becomes:

Tisza → war
EU → pressure
opposition voter → uncertain
Balázs → calm and rational

📌 Technique:
Story framing — guiding the audience toward the intended conclusion.

🎯 Goal:
To make viewers feel they arrived at the conclusion logically.

💥 Effect:
The propaganda works almost invisibly.

---

💡 Summary

The video follows a classic campaign format:

• imitation of a spontaneous civilian conversation
• portraying the opponent as uncertain
• fear appeal (conscription, war)
• geopolitical scapegoating
• building moral superiority

👉 This is why it appears to be a “spontaneous street conversation,” while in reality it delivers a carefully framed political narrative.

❗️Last night, several agitated supporters of Péter Magyar once again threatened, harassed, and tried to throw objects at and spit on the volunteers and my colleagues who are helping with the Fidesz campaign.

❗️As I already said in a previous video: if anyone has a problem with me or with the policies of Fidesz, come to me — do not act violently toward my colleagues.

🇭🇺 I am happy to talk with anyone, and I am confident that in the end we will part ways peacefully.

👍😘 We will be out on the streets again on Wednesday and Thursday.

1️⃣ Building a victim narrative

Key sentence:

“…an agitated supporter of Péter Magyar again threatened, insulted, tried to throw things at and spit on…”

📌 Technique:
Use of strong emotional language (“threatened”, “spit on”, “threw things at”) without concrete evidence.

🎯 Goal:
To create immediate sympathy and empathy toward their own side.

💥 Effect:
The viewer does not ask what actually happened, but automatically feels:

“poor guys were attacked.”

---

2️⃣ Scapegoating – shifting responsibility to one person

Key element:

“an agitated supporter of Péter Magyar”

📌 Technique:
Linking the conflict directly to a political leader (“Péter Magyar incites people”).

🎯 Goal:
To frame the tension not as a spontaneous event, but as the result of opposition incitement.

💥 Effect:
In the viewer’s mind a simple chain forms:

Péter Magyar → incitement
supporters → aggression

---

3️⃣ Generalizing from a single incident

📌 Technique:
Building a political narrative from an alleged single incident.

🎯 Goal:
To suggest that:

the opposition = an aggressive camp.

💥 Effect:
The story stops being about one situation and starts to be about an entire political group.

---

4️⃣ Constructing moral superiority

Key sentence:

“come to me, don’t act violently toward my colleagues”

📌 Technique:
The politician presents himself as a brave, open, and fair actor.

🎯 Goal:
To strengthen the moral position of his own side.

💥 Effect:
The viewer feels:

we = civilized
they = aggressive

---

5️⃣ False peace narrative

Key sentence:

“I’m happy to talk with anyone.”

📌 Technique:
Adopting a peaceful tone after describing conflict.

🎯 Goal:
To portray the politician as patient and democratic.

💥 Effect:
After the accusations, the sentence makes it seem as if:

he is the reasonable, peace-seeking side.

---

6️⃣ Permanent threat narrative

📌 Technique:
Portraying campaigning as a dangerous environment.

🎯 Goal:

• to mobilize their own supporters
• to demonize the opponent

💥 Effect:
Political competition is reframed as a security issue.

---

🧠 Structure of the overall narrative

The propaganda logic behind the message is:

1. we were attacked
2. the opposition is aggressive
3. we are peaceful
4. I am brave
5. come and talk to me

This is a classic campaign victim narrative.

---

✅ Summary

Balázska’s message is not primarily about informing people, but about emotional framing:

• victim narrative
• scapegoating
• moral polarization
• peace narrative

The objective:

to mobilize the Fidesz camp and portray the opponent as aggressive.