Author: sneff

dezse propaganda

“Take a look at how intelligence is overflowing.
Yesterday I introduced you to János, who poses on Facebook in a T-shirt depicting a hanged Orbán. Now let me introduce you to another intelligent voter from Tisza: Lajos. Lajos is the one who has been commenting under several of my posts that he’s waiting for me to show one of my body parts. ‘Flash a muff,’ as he puts it.

Now, you might reasonably ask me why I’m once again bringing up such an idiot from the other side. Well, exactly because we’ve just returned from the anti-war rally in Kaposvár. And the thing is, one can legitimately ask why the right organizes programs for itself every weekend, and why right-wing people gather—especially now, in the final stretch of the campaign—to meet each other, talk, and listen to the politicians they want to see leading the country.

And this is precisely why. There is such a huge need for this kind of intellectual cleansing, or intellectual boost, that these meetings provide. Because in everyday life we’re consumed by social media; we spend most of our time there. And the result is that we might start to believe that in Hungary there are more people like this Lajos and János—people who are this sick, with such sick ideas—and that all sense of Hungarian identity, intelligence, and basic humanity has completely died out in them.

Then the weekend comes, we gather—each time in a different city—and what used to happen once, or at most twice a year at the Peace March now happens every single weekend at these anti-war rallies. Because when you go there, you meet kind-hearted, friendly, smiling people, who are even capable—when the opportunity arises—of asking intelligent, thoughtful, normal questions of their prime minister.

You see, this is what has held this entire community together for a long time now. The fact that we don’t spend most of our time writing filthy, hateful comments at the other side. Instead, we work, raise children, run households, build our lives. And when such an opportunity comes along, we go out on the weekends, meet each other, and have good conversations at these anti-war rallies or in any right-wing community.

Because that’s who we are. And that’s why, no matter how much the other side flails, no matter how many laughing emojis they hand out, no matter how aggressive they are, and no matter how hard they try to wage some kind of psychological warfare on people—it won’t succeed. Because they don’t have what we have.

They don’t know that feeling. That sense of spiritual superiority, that inner peace, that happy awareness of how good it is to be Hungarian today—how good it is to be born Hungarian, how good it feels to be proud of being Hungarian—while still being able to get ahead in life, being allowed to live, even receiving help if you want it. And on top of that, having a prime minister who looks out for the interests of Hungarian people, rather than selling the country off to whichever multinational or EU leader happens to be next in line.

That is an incredibly reassuring feeling. I hope we’ll be able to feel it for a long time to come.

People like Lajos, on the other hand, will be stuck in the comments forever. You’re miserable. Every last one of you.

Tisza commenters vs. the right-wing community.
There’s a difference between the two that’s hard to miss. That’s exactly why anti-war rallies and right-wing community events are so necessary. Because they feel extremely comfortable on social media and create the illusion that their stupid, aggressive behavior is the majority.

But it’s not. In Hungary, sane people are still in the majority.
And in April, we’ll prove that with numbers 😉😉😉😉”

🎭 1. Apparent message (surface level)

The speech claims that:

  • “Tisza” commenters are primitive, sick, and aggressive,
  • the right-wing community, by contrast, is intelligent, moral, hard-working, and family-oriented,
  • social media presents a distorted picture, while in reality “we are the majority,”
  • anti-war rallies provide intellectual and moral purification,
  • the country’s leader (Viktor Orbán) represents the interests of Hungarian people, not those of “multinationals” or “Brussels.”

This is the storefront.

🎯 2. The REAL function (unspoken)

This is not argumentation, but identity-reinforcing and exclusionary propaganda.

The purpose of the text is to:

  • deepen the us-versus-them divide,
  • dehumanize the opponent (“sick,” “miserable”),
  • convey a sense of moral superiority within one’s own camp,
  • invalidate criticism on psychological grounds (it’s not untrue because it can be refuted, but because “they” are the ones saying it).

🧩 3. Propaganda and manipulation techniques used

1️⃣ Isolated extreme examples → generalization

“János,” “Lajos” – sexual, aggressive comments

➡️ Classic cherry-picking:
a few unacceptable comments are magnified into a collective identity.

“This is what the other side is like.”

Not evidence, but character assassination at the group level.

2️⃣ Moral superiority narrative

“we work, raise children, run households”

➡️ Implied message:

  • if you’re critical → you don’t work,
  • if you’re in the opposition → you don’t have a family,
  • if you comment → you’re immoral.

This is self-justifying identity construction, not fact.

3️⃣ Community ecstasy as a substitute for truth

“kind-hearted, smiling people,” “intellectual boost,” “happy awareness”

➡️ The communal experience becomes emotional proof.

But:

  • good feelings are not a criterion of truth,
  • belonging does not refute valid criticism.

This is emotional reinforcement, not rationality.

4️⃣ Psychologizing the enemy

“they use psychological warfare”

➡️ The trick:

  • every criticism → attack,
  • every question → aggression,
  • every opposing opinion → manipulation.

This creates a closed system:
anyone outside is malicious by definition.

5️⃣ Nation = political camp

“how good it is to be Hungarian today”

➡️ The implication:

  • the “good Hungarian” = us,
  • anyone not with us → less Hungarian.

This is identity appropriation, a classic populist element.

6️⃣ Pre-announced electoral validation

“in April we’ll prove it with numbers 😉”

➡️ Announced victory in advance =
psychological pressure + self-fulfilling narrative.

Not analysis, but a mobilizing act of belief.

🧠 4. The most important UNSTATED sentence of the speech

“It doesn’t matter what you say – it matters who you are.”

This is the essence of propaganda.

If:

  • “they” say it → sick, aggressive,
  • “we” say it → moral, true.

This is not politics, but tribal thinking.

⚠️ 5. What is the real danger?

Not that someone builds a community.

But that:

  • critical thinking = betrayal,
  • a question = an attack,
  • the opponent = less than human.

From here on, there is no debate – only loyalty tests.

🧩 Closing summary – in one sentence

This text is not about what is true,
but about who belongs to us – and who does not count as human.

balazska wake up.. not need words..

The red mailbox is going to its first location.
By now, everyone knows that this is where we collect the problems and questions people have, the things residents are dissatisfied with, what causes everyday frustration, what they feel is missing, or even what they see as an opportunity here in Újpalota and across the 15th district.

From January 27, the mailbox will be placed on the main square in Újpalota, where it will remain until February 1. We’re waiting for your messages there, or you can also send them by email to nemetbalasvagyok@gmail.com.

We are starting a new chapter in the 15th district, as well as in the northern part of the 4th district, in Káposztásmegyer.
It’s going to be good!

Alexandra… war, Brussels, and everything else.

How old will you be in 2046? 🤔
According to Brussels’ leaked plan, we would be paying for Ukraine’s war until then.
$800 billion in support, plus another $700 billion in military spending – all from European taxpayers’ money.

But it doesn’t stop there:
Ukraine’s unconditional EU accession, the destruction of Hungarian farmers through GMO Ukrainian grain.

The Tisza Party would say yes to every demand from Brussels, but we cannot allow Hungarians to be put in danger! 🛑
We defend Hungarian interests! 🇭🇺
Let’s not allow decisions to be made about us, without us!

In April too, Fidesz is the only safe choice.

How old will you be in 2046?
You probably don’t even want to think about it, yet according to Brussels’ new plan, you would still be paying for Ukraine’s war until then.

In short:
$800 billion for Ukraine from European taxpayers’ money and accelerated EU accession by 2027, without conditions.
$700 billion for weapons and armies, GMO Ukrainian grain and food on your table, and of course the rights of the Hungarian minority still won’t matter.

The free-for-all can continue while globalist big capital grows rich off Ukraine.

Hungary’s position, by contrast, is very clear:
Hungarians’ money belongs to Hungarians, Hungarian farmers must be protected, and decisions must not be made about us without us.

That’s why the April election is not just about four years, but at least ten years of our future.
If we give in to Brussels now, Hungarians are finished.
That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

🎯 The real function (why this text exists)

This text does not inform. It:

👉 creates existential fear
👉 paralyzes with a distant time horizon (“2046”)
👉 offers no escape route (“if we give in now, it’s over”)
👉 demands exclusive loyalty

This is mobilizing panic communication, not political argument.

🧠 Key manipulations – point by point

1️⃣ “How old will you be in 2046?”

Time-trap

Most people cannot realistically think 20 years ahead.
The question triggers anxiety, not reasoning.
Classic future-dread framing.

👉 Not data, but a psychological anchor.

2️⃣ “Leaked Brussels plan”

Unproven authority

No document
No decision-making mechanism
No legal binding force

👉 The word “leaked” exempts the claim from proof.

3️⃣ Stacked shock numbers ($800 + $700 billion)

Numerical shock therapy

Not budget lines
No annual breakdown
No member-state contribution ratios
No legally approved commitments

👉 The number doesn’t explain — it hits.

4️⃣ “Unconditional EU accession”

Legally false claim

EU accession = unanimity + negotiation chapters + veto rights
It cannot happen without Hungary.

👉 The text conceals that the brake is in the Hungarian government’s hands.

5️⃣ GMO Ukrainian grain = destruction of Hungarian farmers

Scapegoating + oversimplification

No price, quota, quality, or market regulation analysis
No alternatives
Only fear imagery

👉 Farmers become an emotional shield.

6️⃣ “If we give in now, Hungarians are finished”

Doomsday logic

No middle ground
No negotiation
No correction

👉 This is cult logic, not politics.

🔴 The core contradiction

“Don’t decide about us without us!”

⬇️

While the text simultaneously hides that:

Hungary has veto power
Neither accession nor funding is automatic

👉 Cognitive dissonance:
If we have no say — why do we have a veto?

🧩 What the text actually does

• Time-horizon terror (2046)
• Fear stacking (war + money + grain + minorities)
• Enemy simplification (“Brussels”, “globalists”)
• Binary choice:

Either Fidesz
or national destruction

This is self-sealing propaganda logic.

⚠️ Short conclusion

This message is:

❌ not fact-based
❌ not legally coherent
❌ not an invitation to debate

✔️ builds an emotional pressure funnel
✔️ manufactures loyalty through fear
✔️ shuts down thinking

kakadu

According to the Hungarian foreign minister, the Ukrainian government is running in the Hungarian elections under the name “Tisza.”

According to the Hungarian foreign minister, the Ukrainian government is running in the Hungarian elections under the name “Tisza.”

Szijjártó to the Ukrainian foreign minister: “Be careful—you’re going to lose a lot, more than you think.

haven’t got word….

orban propaganda

We live in an age of danger.
War, migration, energy crises, and tax increases threaten our everyday lives. This is what the world has become today.

In times like these, we must not experiment. We need responsible leadership that can keep Hungary out of war—and only Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are capable of doing that.

We are the only safe choice. Only the national government can guarantee peace and security for Hungary.

balzska

The Tisza Party has fallen captive to the Bajnai–Soros circle.
It was expected. Sorry, Tisza supporters—now I’m the one who has to deliver the bad news to you. Someone has to do it. Your darlings do not want to win in April.

Here we have this new woman who was deployed from the Bajnai–Soros circle to stand next to Magyar Péter. She supported globalist multinationals, and in her very first public statement she says that she has put an end to Hungarian vetoes in the EU.

Put an end to Hungarian vetoes.

Which means:
yes to the migration pact,
yes to Ukraine’s EU membership,
yes to Hungary supplying weapons to the war,
and then sending soldiers into the war.

These people do not want to win.
With promises like this, how could anyone win an election in Hungary?

Make a bet—you’ll be better off if they don’t win. Because this Sorosist, Bajnai-aligned team would truly abolish vetoes, and Hungary would fall into a terrible state.

They would send our money to Ukraine.
Gender lobbyists would arrive.
And of course, no-go zones would form in the outer districts of Hungary’s major cities.

No!

🎭 Apparent message (surface level)

The text claims that:

  • the Tisza Party has been “captured” by a
    “Bajnai–Soros circle” (→ Bajnai Gordon, Soros György),
  • a woman was “assigned” next to Magyar Péter,
  • she is abolishing Hungarian vetoes,
  • therefore:
    • migration is coming,
    • Ukraine will join the EU,
    • weapons will be delivered,
    • soldiers will be sent,
    • gender lobby,
    • no-go zones,
    • money being “sent” to Ukraine,
  • therefore it is better if Tisza does not win.

This is the surface narrative.

🎯 The REAL function (why the text exists)

This is not information, but:

👉 fear-mongering + stigmatization + self-justifying conclusion

The goal is not to prove anything, but to:

  • trigger emotional panic,
  • pre-emptively exclude any rebuttal,
  • turn the opponent into a scapegoat,
  • and strip the listener of the ability to think.

🧩 Key techniques – point by point

1️⃣ “Bajnai–Soros circle” = a magical enemy construct

Not an organization.
Not a program.
Not a decision-making body.

A vague, unprovable label that can be pinned on anyone.

Guilt by association: what matters is not what someone says, but who can be pointed to behind them.

👉 Classic conspiracy framing.

2️⃣ Logical leap chain (domino lie)

“ends vetoes”
→ “yes to migration”
→ “yes to Ukraine”
→ “weapons deliveries”
→ “soldiers”
→ “no-go zones”

⚠️ Not a single step is proven—yet all are treated as established fact.

This is a textbook slippery slope.

3️⃣ False “inside knowledge” posture

“I’m the one telling you the bad news”

This is the prophet role:

  • no source,
  • no quotation,
  • no document,

just “I know.”

👉 Authority comes not from evidence, but from tone.

4️⃣ Paradoxical message: “they don’t want to win”

This is especially revealing.

The real message:

“If someone says something different from what we taught you to fear, then they must not want to win.”

👉 This shuts down political competition:

  • no alternative is allowed,
  • only “madness” or “betrayal.”

5️⃣ Moral blackmail + apocalypse framing

“They would send our money away”
“gender lobbyists”
“no-go zones”
“Hungary would end up in a terrible state”

This is fear stacking:
not one concrete danger, but an accumulation of emotional noise.

👉 The listener does not think—
they defend themselves.

🧠 What is conspicuously MISSING?

❌ concrete quotation
❌ legal text
❌ decision or resolution
❌ voting date
❌ source
❌ possibility of counter-argument

This is not debate.
It is a pronouncement of guilt.

🧩 Summary – what is actually happening here?

This text:

  • does not analyze the Tisza program,
  • does not argue,
  • does not prove,

but instead:

👉 manufactures fear,
👉 names an enemy,
👉 criminalizes alternatives,
👉 and tells you in advance what you must think.

alexandra …

Now then, let everyone raise their hand who was surprised that Péter Magyar once again recruited someone from the Bajnai circles. This time it’s Anita Orbán. She is the one who sat together with Gordon Bajnai in the liberal foreign-policy organization Globsec, specifically on its board of directors. What’s more, Anita Orbán also served together with George Soros’s son, Alex Soros, on the European Council on Foreign Relations.

We know perfectly well what Anita Orbán thinks, as she has written and spoken about it many times herself. Russian gas is bad, the Eastern Opening is bad—Brussels must be good, and Uncle George Soros and his son are even better.

So—who’s surprised? Anyone?

Once again, the Tisza Party has recruited an old left-liberal globalist. This time it is Anita Orbán, who, hand in hand with Gordon Bajnai, represented globalist interest groups on the board of the liberal Globsec organization, and together with Alex Soros did the same within the European Council on Foreign Relations.

In the end, what belongs together always grows together.

Serving globalist interests—or representing Hungarian interests and the Hungarian people. On April 12, we will decide between these two paths. Only Fidesz is the safe choice.

🎭 Apparent Message (Surface Level)

The text claims that:

  • Magyar Péter and the Tisza Party recruit people
    from “left-liberal, globalist circles”,
  • Orbán Anita is connected to
    Bajnai Gordon and Alex Soros,
  • therefore they represent “globalist interests” rather than
    “Hungarian national interests”,
  • and consequently, only Fidesz is the “safe choice”.

This is not an argument, but a chain of associations.

🎯 Real Function (Why It Exists)

This text does not aim to inform, but to:

  • construct an identity conflict (“us” vs. “them”),
  • pass moral judgment without evidence,
  • pre-emptively shut down thinking (“anyone who isn’t surprised already understands”).

👉 The goal: don’t analyze — feel.

🧩 Key Propaganda Techniques

1️⃣ “They Belong Together” Narrative (Transferred Guilt)

sat together
participated jointly
arm in arm
“what belongs together grows together”

🔴 Logical fallacy:
participation ≠ ideological identity ≠ political program.

This is a classic case of guilt by association.

2️⃣ Soros Trigger Automatism

  • George Soros
  • his son
  • Brussels
  • globalist

🧠 This is not information, but a conditioned reflex trigger for the core audience.

No new facts — just keywords stacked in sequence.

3️⃣ False Dichotomy (False Dilemma)

Serving globalist interests
OR
representing Hungarian people

🔴 As if:

  • multiple foreign policy approaches could not exist,
  • energy policy and geopolitical orientation could not be debated,
  • there were only “good” and “evil” sides.

This is an interpretive trap.

4️⃣ Mockery and Infantilization

“Uncle George Soros and his son are even better”

This is not an argument, but:

  • emotional degradation,
  • trivialization of the opponent,
  • placing the audience in a position of moral superiority.

5️⃣ “Who’s Surprised?” – Self-Sealing Rhetoric

This sentence implies:

  • if you disagree, then:
    • you are naïve,
    • uninformed,
    • “unable to see the connections”.

👉 Debate is forbidden before it can even begin.

🧠 What the Text Does NOT Contain

❌ a concrete program
❌ analysis of decisions
❌ policy debate
❌ consequences of verifiable claims

This is not politics — it is a loyalty test.

🧩 Short Summary

This text:

  • does not prove, it insinuates,
  • does not debate, it judges,
  • is not about choice, but about allegiance.

👉 The real final message is:

“Don’t think — pick a side.
If you ask questions, you’re already suspicious.”

orban propaganda They are actively framing poverty.

Many people from North Pest have asked whether those living in district-heated apartments will also receive support from the government — in other words, whether the January utility price freeze applies to them as well.

The answer is yes: families living in district-heated homes will also receive assistance.
The details will be finalized by Wednesday at the latest, and they will be announced on all relevant platforms.

orban propaganda

The Tisza Party has already voted in Brussels to abolish utility price cuts. Of course, as long as Fidesz is in government, they have no chance of doing this—but the fact remains that they have already confirmed this position in two votes.

In November 2024, they voted in favor of a proposal on phasing out energy price subsidies. Let’s be clear: this means the abolition of utility price cuts. It is about conditioning people to believe that they have a right to pay less for energy, and that paying less is automatically a good thing—when in reality, there are situations where paying more for something can actually be better.

Then, last summer, they voted for a proposal that would cut Hungary off from eastern energy imports, meaning cheap Russian gas. This was also confirmed by the TISZA Party’s nominee for minister of the economy, István Kapitány.
Can we move away from Russian gas and oil? Hungary does have the possibility to procure energy from various sources, but this has to be solved technically—and I believe we will be able to solve it.

So it wouldn’t be enough to phase out subsidies and force people to pay market prices; on top of that, they would also eliminate cheap energy imports, which would mean a three- to fivefold increase in prices.
How much would your utility bills be if the TISZA Party were governing? It’s worth doing the math.

The Tisza Party has always been against utility price cuts.

Beyond the fact that their politicians and experts have repeatedly criticized utility price cuts, they have also voted several times in the European Parliament against the energy security of Hungarian families.

In November 2024, Tisza Party representatives supported the phasing out of energy price subsidies, and last summer they supported a resolution banning Russian gas imports. These are facts.

This would mean that Hungarian families would simultaneously have to pay high market prices for gas and electricity, while also bearing the price increases caused by the ban on cheap Russian energy imports.

All of this shows that the Tisza Party is merely carrying out the orders of its Brussels patrons instead of representing Hungarian families.

These are the two paths facing Hungarians, and this is also what we will decide on April 12.
Only Fidesz represents the safe choice

Propaganda analysis of the statement by Szentkirályi Alexandra

🎭 What it appears to say (surface message)

The speech claims that:

  • The TISZA Party has already voted in Brussels to abolish utility price cuts (“rezsicsökkentés”).
  • These votes allegedly prove that, if TISZA governed Hungary, families would pay market prices for energy.
  • TISZA is also accused of supporting the banning of Russian gas imports, which is framed as the only source of “cheap energy.”
  • The conclusion is that a TISZA government would cause 3–5× higher utility bills.
  • Therefore, the choice is framed as simple and final:
    Fidesz = safety, TISZA = financial disaster.

🎯 The real function of the text

This is not a policy explanation or factual clarification.
Its real function is to lock voters into a fear-based binary choice:

👉 Either Fidesz governs — or Hungarian families are financially ruined.

The speech is designed to pre-empt debate, not invite it.

🧩 Core propaganda techniques used

1️⃣ False equivalence (reframing technique)

  • EU-level discussions about energy subsidies or diversification are redefined as the abolition of rezsicsökkentés.
  • Complex regulatory votes are collapsed into one emotionally charged domestic concept.

“Energy price support phase-out” = “They want you to pay more.”
This is interpretive framing, not factual identity.

2️⃣ Fear multiplication

Two separate fears are stacked together:

  1. Market pricing (no subsidies)
  2. Loss of Russian energy imports

These are then multiplied rhetorically into a catastrophic outcome:

“3–5 times higher bills”

No calculation, no model, no timeframe — just a shock number.

3️⃣ Intent attribution without proof

The speech repeatedly claims:

  • “They want to abolish utility price cuts”
  • “They serve Brussels, not Hungarians”

No internal documents, no official party program, no binding commitment is cited.
Motives are asserted as facts.

4️⃣ Pre-emptive delegitimization

Any counter-argument is neutralized in advance:

  • If TISZA denies → “They’re lying”
  • If they stay silent → “They’re hiding it”
  • If they nuance → “They already voted, the rest is talk”

This creates a closed propaganda loop.

5️⃣ Binary moral framing

The closing move is classic:

  • Two paths
  • One election date
  • One “safe” choice

There is no space for mixed policy, gradual transition, compensation mechanisms, or alternative energy strategies.

⚠️ What is deliberately missing

The speech does not discuss:

  • How rezsicsökkentés is financed
  • Long-term sustainability
  • EU compensation mechanisms
  • Energy efficiency or household insulation
  • Market volatility vs. fixed pricing risks
  • Diversification timelines and technical constraints

Absence of these topics is intentional — complexity weakens fear.

🧠 Bottom line

This is a textbook example of fear-based political communication, built on:

  • Oversimplification
  • Emotional shock numbers
  • Intent attribution
  • Binary choice framing

The conclusion (“Only Fidesz is the safe choice”) is decided first;
everything before it serves only to emotionally justify that ending.

👉 It is not an argument — it is a narrative lock.

balazska wakeup

This unfortunate German Balázs with three brain cells goes out there and says that Captain István was sent specifically to abolish utility price cuts and the bank tax.

The Tisza TikToker got offended because I dared to claim that the multinational boss joined Tisza in order to eliminate utility price cuts. Go ahead, go there and take utility price cuts away from the people!

At the same time, as a Tisza supporter, he openly admitted that he thinks utility price cuts are bad and should be abolished. I don’t agree with utility price cuts either.

What’s more, according to him, Magyar Péter and his people also know very well that utility price cuts should be abolished, but they don’t dare to talk about it during the campaign because they would lose.

I know exactly that Magyar Péter and his team cannot say that utility price cuts should be abolished, because then Fidesz would immediately launch a character assassination against them…

I’m not saying everything, because then we’d lose. Sounds familiar?

I know perfectly well that Magyar Péter and his people cannot say that utility price cuts should be abolished…

🎭 What is being said on the surface?

An emotional, personal attack claiming that:

  • “Tisza” and Magyar Péter actually want to abolish utility price cuts,
  • but allegedly do not dare to say so openly because they would “lose”,
  • and that the speaker supposedly “knows this for a fact” from inside information.

🎯 What is the REAL function?

This is not a debate, not evidence, and not fact-finding – it is the reinforcement of a pre-fabricated narrative:

👉 “If they don’t say it, that’s proof.”
👉 “If they deny it, that’s also proof.”

This is self-sealing propaganda logic.

🧩 Key elements and techniques

1️⃣ The “confession” tactic (false admission)

“He admitted, as a Tisza supporter, that utility price cuts are bad…”

🔴 A classic maneuver:

  • an individual opinion is stretched into a collective party program,
  • then sold as an “internal revelation.”

👉 No quotation. No context. No evidence. Only branding and stigmatization.

2️⃣ Appeal to secret knowledge

“I know exactly that Magyar Péter’s people cannot say this…”

This is the “I’m an insider” rhetoric.

  • no sources,
  • no documents,
  • no decisions,

yet the claim is delivered with absolute certainty.

👉 The goal is not truth, but authoritarian confidence.

3️⃣ Self-incriminating slip

This is the most revealing moment:

“I won’t say everything, because then we would lose.”

⚠️ This is highly telling:

  • it openly admits campaign logic,
  • not truth-telling,
  • but control over what may be said and what must remain hidden.

👉 He accuses the opponent of exactly what he openly confesses himself.

4️⃣ Pre-fabricated defeat prophecy

“If they said it openly, they would immediately lose.”

This is not analysis, but:

  • fear-mongering,
  • voter intimidation,
  • a loyalty test.

👉 “If you’re not with us, they will take away your utility price cuts.”

5️⃣ Character assassination as substitute for proof

“three brain cells,” “pathetic,” “triggered TikToker”

This is deliberate:

  • when evidence is missing,
  • dehumanization takes its place.

👉 Emotion replaces argument.

🧠 The core paradox

The speech contradicts itself:

  • It claims “they can’t speak because they would lose,”
  • then openly admits:
    👉 “I can’t say everything, because then we would lose.”

This is projective propaganda:
👉 what the speaker knows about himself is projected onto the opponent.

🧾 Short conclusion (one sentence)

This statement is not about utility price cuts at all—it is about the admission that in a campaign, truth does not matter; only voters’ fears do—and this is openly acknowledged.