The Hungarian people are ashamed of Németh Balázs’s very existence.

The Tisza Party is lying. This was proven again today! Video in the comments.

Before, during, or after shoveling snow, everyone should watch the interview with the former mid-level official who defected from Tisza, which was broadcast on M1. I’ll post the link below.

He admits it—clearly—that Tisza says one thing during the campaign and plans something completely different. They are planning tax increases and austerity measures.

Everyone should take this seriously, because this is the truth.

alexandra total idiot

They deceive, they lie, they are two-faced, and they cannot say no to Brussels. That is Tisza.
Fidesz is the safe choice.

They are dishonest and two-faced, and I couldn’t even tell you what they are proud of. Have you ever been in a situation where you really wanted to believe someone, but they kept deceiving you over and over again? You can’t do that overnight. You can’t win an election by openly saying you’re going to raise taxes. You know, even utility cost reduction was a humbug.

Would you entrust your future to someone who hides their real intentions and keeps getting caught in their lies? The party’s goals — its real goals — are different from what they openly communicate. “I won’t say everything, because then we’d fail.”

Within Tisza, there exists a campaign-style program. With this, we win the election, and then we implement the convergence program. What does this mean for you? Anyone who calls themselves progressive will eventually be held to account. Neither Magyar Péter nor Tisza will be able to avoid taking a clear stance on Ukraine.

Europe should prepare for Russia to remain a long-term military adversary. And I don’t think Hungary will be able to stay out of this.

🔴 1️⃣ Labeling instead of evidence (character assassination)

“They deceive, they lie, they are two-faced…”

This is not a factual claim, but a judgment.

❌ There is no:

  • specific case
  • date
  • quotation
  • evidence

👉 Technique: repeated negative labels trigger a sense of “truth.”
If you repeat something often enough, the brain starts treating it as fact.


🔴 2️⃣ “Brussels” as a magical enemy (external scapegoat)

“They can’t say no to Brussels.”

This is an empty accusation, because it never specifies:

  • what exactly
  • when
  • in which decision

👉 Technique: vague enemy construction
Brussels = foreign power = automatic suspicion.


🔴 3️⃣ Emotional projection through personal disappointment

“Have you ever wanted to trust someone, only to be constantly deceived?”

This is not politics — it’s psychological hijacking.

👉 Technique:
the listener’s personal life disappointment is projected onto the Tisza Party.

This creates an emotional short-circuit: you don’t evaluate — you remember.


🔴 4️⃣ Pre-written failure narrative

“You can’t win an election by raising taxes.”

❗ No one actually said taxes would be raised.

👉 Technique:
a future intention is presented as a fact in order to:

  • delegitimize in advance
  • shut down all later debate

🔴 5️⃣ “Utility price cuts are a sham” – straw man

“Utility price cuts are just a sham.”

This is a deliberately oversimplified claim that:

  • provides no context
  • offers no breakdown
  • avoids real debate

👉 Technique: straw man
A complex economic issue is reduced to a caricature.


🔴 6️⃣ Secret plan = conspiracy signaling

“I won’t say everything, because then we’d fail.”

This is a key sentence.

👉 Its function:

  • exempts the speaker from providing evidence
  • casts them as a “revealed insider”
  • creates suspicion: “there’s something dark here”

This is conspiracy framing — without proof.


🔴 7️⃣ Campaign program vs. “real program”

“A campaign-style program… then a convergence program.”

👉 Technique: dual-reality narrative
It suggests:

  • what you hear = a lie
  • the truth = hidden austerity

This is fear-mongering, not analysis.


🔴 8️⃣ Ukraine as a forced path + fear

“They won’t get away without taking a position on Ukraine.”

👉 Technique: geopolitical coercion framing
The message is:

  • there is no choice
  • war is inevitable
  • anyone not with us is dangerous

This appeals to existential fear.


🔴 9️⃣ “Europe vs. Russia” – the final frame

“Russia will be a long-term military adversary.”

This is the grand narrative into which:

  • every decision
  • every party
  • every future scenario

can be forced.

👉 From here on, there is no debate — only loyalty.


🎯 Summary – what is really happening?

This text does not aim to persuade, but to:

✔️ erode trust
✔️ generate fear
✔️ pre-emptively close debates
✔️ construct an alternative reality
✔️ exempt itself from evidence

All to make the final conclusion feel automatic:

“Fidesz is the safe choice.”

Not because it is proven —
but because everything else has been framed as dangerous.

alexandra… nothing new…

Here are my arguments for why February is going to be truly awesome!

✅ In the first half of the month, the increased minimum wage and the guaranteed minimum wage will arrive, meaning tens of thousands of forints in extra support for Hungarian families.

✅ The personal income tax exemption for mothers under 40 with two children has also come into effect, which from now on means a clearly visible increase in take-home pay. But we also value the dedicated work of fathers — they too are entitled to the doubled family tax allowance.

✅ Seniors will receive the full 13th-month pension, and the first installment of the 14th-month pension will also arrive. The national government will continue to uphold the alliance it has made with pensioners, through which we have guaranteed the real value of pensions for sixteen years.

None of this should be taken for granted. We can see the plans of the left: austerity measures and new taxes. Across Europe, so-called “war taxes” are being introduced. They would abolish the 13th and 14th-month pensions, slash family benefits, and punish Hungarians with new levies on businesses.

🟠 If we want to preserve these achievements — unmatched even by European standards — which support families, young people, and pensioners alike, we can rely only on the national government.

In an age of danger, only Fidesz is the safe choice!

So why is February such a great month? First of all, the minimum wage increases by 11%, and the guaranteed minimum wage by 7%, with the higher amounts paid out already in February. Then, for mothers under 40 with two children, personal income tax can be completely forgotten — they no longer have to pay it, which means they will receive their first such tax-free salary in February. Pensioners can also celebrate, as the first installments of the 13th and 14th-month pensions will arrive.

In February utility bills will already reflect the utility price cap, meaning the government will waive around 30% of heating consumption due to the cold weather. The family tax allowance will also increase, allowing both mothers and fathers to benefit. And we continue to stand firm: there are no migrants, we do not want to spend our money on war or send it to Ukraine, and we resist every form of war-driven madness.

🔍 1️⃣ “Good news pouring in” – blurring campaign timing

The text does not say that an election is coming. Instead, it suggests it:

“February is an awesome month”
“It’s arriving now”
“It’s becoming visible now”

👉 Technique: timed rewards
Measures are presented as gifts that are:

  • partly decided earlier,
  • partly inflation-following adjustments,
  • partly one-off payments,
  • but they land exactly during the campaign period.

This is not accidental, but deliberate emotional conditioning.


💸 2️⃣ Playing with numbers – hiding nominal vs. real value

“11% minimum wage increase”
“7% guaranteed wage minimum increase”

❌ What they do not say:

  • what inflation was in the previous year,
  • how much purchasing power the money lost in real terms,
  • what this increase is not enough for (utilities, food, rent).

👉 Technique: numerical framing
The percentage itself becomes authority — beyond debate.


👩‍👧 3️⃣ Selected groups – voter targeting

“Mothers under 40 with two children”
“Pensioners”
“Families”

This is not social policy, but precision targeting:

  • active voters,
  • a loyal core base,
  • groups with limited political mobility.

👉 Technique: targeted populism
Those left out become invisible (singles, renters, childless young people).


👴 4️⃣ “Pension alliance” – historical myth-building

“We have guaranteed value preservation for 16 years”

❌ Reality:

  • pensions have lost real value,
  • one-off payments are not systemic solutions,
  • the 13th–14th month pension is not a sustainable structure, but a political tool.

👉 Technique: moral contract framing
The government = the caring father figure.


👹 5️⃣ Fabricated enemy bundle – fear stacking

All packed into a single paragraph:

  • the left
  • austerity
  • war taxes
  • Ukraine
  • migrants
  • Brussels
  • Europe

👉 Technique: fear stacking
No evidence — just piling things together to create emotional overload.

There is no:

  • concrete plan,
  • concrete actor,
  • concrete decision.

🟠 6️⃣ “Only Fidesz” – eliminating alternatives

“Only the national government can be relied on”
“Only Fidesz is the safe choice”

This is no longer an argument, but a
👉 political ultimatum

  • either them,
  • or chaos,
  • or war,
  • or austerity.

🎯 In summary – what is this really?

❌ Not information
❌ Not policy
❌ Not debate

Campaign conditioning
Emotional manipulation
Fear + reward combined

The core message of the text is not “February will be good”, but this:

“You get money now → stay quiet → don’t ask → don’t compare → vote.”

balazska wakeup..

67 days left in the campaign, and everyone will calm down! Even the TISZA savages will quiet down eventually.

In Kaba, a savage attacks the house of the Fidesz mayor.
János Pócs’s conversation partner is beaten up by a local TISZA strongman.

Bence Rétvári’s photo is burned, and I’m chased with dog feces.

Who are these people?
What do they want?

Just 67 more days—and then everyone will calm down.

🔧 What is actually happening in this text?

1️⃣ “67 days left, then everyone will calm down” – preemptive absolution

This is not reassurance, but cynical normalization.

👉 The message:

  • things are “wild” right now,
  • but that’s natural — it’s campaign season,
  • there’s no need to deal with it, it will pass.

This preemptively relativizes everything that happens until then.


2️⃣ “Tisza savages” – dehumanization

Not a political opponent, not a voter, not a human being:

savages

👉 Function:

  • emotional short-circuit
  • shutting down debate
  • claiming moral superiority

If they are “savages,” there’s no need to prove anything, no need to understand anything.


3️⃣ Piled-up incident list – fear stacking

Thrown together side by side, without evidence:

  • In Kaba, the home of a Fidesz mayor is attacked
  • Pócs János’s conversation partner is allegedly “beaten”
  • Rétvári Bence’s photo is burned
  • “They chase me with dog feces”

👉 What’s missing:

  • time
  • official records
  • police cases
  • identified perpetrators
  • legal consequences

👉 What’s present:

  • emotional shock
  • “they’re all like this”
  • collective guilt

This is textbook incident accumulation = fear-mongering.


4️⃣ “Who are these people? What do they want?” – rhetorical incitement

This is not a question, but a judgment.

The answer is already prepared:

they are dangerous, alien, aggressive

From here, it’s just one step to the narrative of:
“order is needed,” “they must be stopped.”


5️⃣ The final twist: victimhood + superiority

“67 days left, then everyone will calm down.”

👉 The message:

  • we will endure
  • we are order
  • they rage, but they will tire

At the same time:

  • martyr posture
  • condescension
  • and a quietly threatening calm

🧠 Name of the technique (in one sentence)

Dehumanization + unproven incident piling + normalizing relativization.


🎯 What’s important to keep in mind

  • This is not fact-reporting
  • not a legal claim
  • not evidence

This is emotional warfare, deliberately designed for the final stretch of a campaign.

szandi

“Shell Captain” says that diversity is “close to his heart,” and that he is also glad people are coming “from Asia or Africa.”
This seems to be a standard multinational expectation—we can recall the words of Andrea Bujdosó, the TISZA party’s Budapest faction leader, who repeated the very same globalist talking points word for word.

We understand that at Shell this defines corporate governance, but Hungary is more than a Western multinational corporation.

The hypocrisy we see on the left is astonishing. At home they talk about always representing Hungarian interests, yet when Brussels or their multinational bosses ask, they argue without objection for sensitivity training, diversity, and migrants.

They always sing whatever tune their financiers ask of them.

Just listen to how “Shell Captain” speaks, almost verbatim and very emotionally, about diversity—and clearly about migration as well:
“Another element that is very close to my heart in my life is diversity. Something we see more and more in the world, in politics. And for this, we need different people. Asian people, African people.”

Acceptance. Diversity.
Well, the people close to our hearts are Hungarians—not migrants and not diversity as an ideology. And if we’re talking about diversity, then the TISZA party is extraordinarily two-faced. They say one thing when speaking at home, and something entirely different when they need to deliver results to their Brussels patrons.

If we stay on the Hungarian path, we can keep all these two-faced multinational figures and their circles at bay—those who babble incoherently about diversity and immigration.

We can preserve straight and honest speech, because even in times of danger we must stand up for Hungarian interests.

Only a national government is capable of this. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

1️⃣ Multinationals = foreign = suspicious (guilt by association)

The opening of the text does not argue — it labels:

  • “multinational expectations”
  • “globalist slogans”
  • “Brussels or multinational bosses”
  • “funders”

👉 Technique: guilt by association
If someone:

  • works for a multinational company
  • talks about diversity

→ they are automatically framed as not representing Hungarian interests, therefore not credible.

There is no evidence, only emotional linkage.


2️⃣ A cherry-picked quote → inflated into an ideological confession

The statement attributed to the “Shell Captain”:

“Asian people, African people… acceptance, diversity”

This is standard HR / corporate language, which the text transforms into:

  • migration policy
  • an anti-national stance
  • a pro–Tisza Party ideology

👉 Technique: frame shift
A workplace or values-based statement is turned into a national security issue.


3️⃣ The “double standards” narrative — without evidence

Claim:

“they say one thing at home and another in Brussels”

Missing entirely:

  • a concrete statement
  • a date
  • a document
  • comparable quotations

👉 Technique: alleged double talk
This is a defamatory framing, not analysis.


4️⃣ False dilemma: Hungarian interests OR diversity

The text sets up an opposition between:

  • “Hungarian people”
    vs
  • “migrants and diversity”

👉 Technique: false dichotomy
As if:

  • acceptance ≠ Hungarian interests
  • diversity ≠ national interests

This is an emotional short circuit, not logic.


5️⃣ “Us” vs “them” — identity politics as a conversation stopper

Key phrases:

  • “Hungarian people are closest to our hearts”
  • “multinational faces and their gangs”
  • “rambling nonsense about diversity”

👉 Technique: dehumanization + moral superiority

At this point, debate ends:

  • “we” = pure, honest
  • “they” = foreign, paid, two-faced

6️⃣ “An age of danger” — permanent threat framing

“even in times of danger, we must stand firm”

👉 Technique: permanent crisis framing
When there is danger:

  • no debate
  • no nuance
  • no questions

7️⃣ The inevitable conclusion

“Only a national government is capable of this — that’s why Fidesz is the safe choice!”

👉 Technique: closed-loop propaganda
The text:

  1. creates a threat
  2. excludes all alternatives
  3. leaves only one solution: Fidesz

🎯 Summary — what is actually happening?

This text is not about migration.
It is about:

  • identity-based fear
  • loyalty testing
  • enemy construction

The goal is:

  • emotional closure
  • exclusion of critical thinking
  • discrediting alternative political actors (e.g. the Tisza Party, via association with Shell)

If you want, I can also:

  • 🔹 condense this into a 1-minute explainer
  • 🔹 rewrite it as a first-person “propaganda confession”
  • 🔹 adapt it for international media / NGO audiences

Just say the word.

szentkiralyi wake up

An extraordinary sight! 🙂
They’re sliding the new railway bridge of the Southern Railway Circle project on Bartók Béla Road into place.

When this several-hundred-billion-forint investment is completed, suburban and Budapest public transport will go through a level of development not seen in a decade.

In Budapest too, Fidesz is the safe choice! 😉

The visual element is not information, but an emotional trigger.

👉 Big machines
👉 A bridge
👉 Movement
👉 The feeling that “the country is being built”

This is a visual substitute for proof:
it does not demonstrate that

  • the investment is good
  • it is worth the cost
  • more important things are not being neglected because of it

It only shows that something big is happening.


🧠 “A multi-hundred-billion investment” – numbers as authority

The huge sum here is not a subject of debate, but scenery.

Its function:

size = sense of importance
expensive = serious
serious = good

What’s missing:

cost–benefit ratio
alternatives
what did not happen instead (hospitals, education, railway conditions, etc.)

This is the logical slide of “size = success.”


🚆 “Unseen development in a decade” – a temporal illusion

This is especially interesting because…

👉 The same political side has been governing for 15 years.

So the hidden meaning of the sentence is:

“Development is happening now… despite the fact that we have been in charge for a decade and a half.”

This is shifting responsibility in time:

past failures → somehow “belong to no one”
present spectacle → credit to the government


🎯 The final leap: infrastructure → party preference

This is the core manipulation.

The post’s logical chain:

A bridge is being built → big investment → development →
therefore: vote for Fidesz

❗ But there is no direct logical connection between the two.

A transport project does not prove that:

healthcare is better
education is better
real incomes have grown
the impact of inflation has decreased

This is project-based loyalty building.


🎭 The style: light, smiley, “positive propaganda”

🙂 😉 emojis =

no debate
no problems
only success
anyone who criticizes is just “grumpy”

This is mood politics, not fact-based communication.


🧩 Summary — techniques used simultaneously

TechniqueWhat it does
Spectacle politicsConstruction = feeling of progress
Numerical authorityBig cost replaces real arguments
Time distortion15 years of rule → not mentioned
Project = system successOne bridge → the whole country is doing well
Positive mood bubbleCriticism = being a spoil-sport

💬 The real question the post tries to avoid:

How is it possible that after 15 years in power, “development is only starting now”?

győr

The person speaking is NOT a Fidesz mayor.
He is the mayor who claims he is trying to uncover corruption inside city-owned companies after management control was taken away from him by a Fidesz-majority city council.

So the situation is:

👉 He says he is exposing the system, not running it.


🔍 What does the mayor claim?

He describes what he believes is a systematic scheme to avoid public procurement rules and move public money through questionable contracts.

1️⃣ Splitting contracts to avoid public tenders

Many contracts are suspiciously set at 19 million HUF, just below the 20 million HUF public procurement threshold.

He gives examples where:

  • Two contracts were signed on the same day
  • With the same person/company
  • For the same type of work
  • Each worth 19 million HUF

Together that equals 38 million HUF, which should require a public tender — but split, it avoids the law.

Hungarian procurement law explicitly forbids artificial splitting like this.


2️⃣ A “construction” company with no physical workers

One company mentioned (Standard Quality Kft.) allegedly:

  • Has no physical labor staff
  • Still performs maintenance/physical work contracts
  • Shows extremely high profits (60–84%), far above market norms
  • Receives large sums, which then quickly leave the company

The mayor raises the key question:

👉 If they have no workforce, who is actually doing the work — and where is the money going?


3️⃣ Refusal to provide financial data

The mayor says he requested:

  • Bank statements
  • Contracts
  • VAT records
  • Partner lists

City company managers refused to provide the data, and even the supervisory board representative could not access it.


⚖️ Legal consequences

Because of this, the mayor filed criminal complaints for suspected:

  • Anti-competitive collusion in public procurement
  • Breach of fiduciary duty causing major financial damage
  • Use of false private documents

The police have reportedly opened investigations.


🧭 Political context in simple terms

ActorRole in the story
Mayor (speaker)Claims he is trying to expose corruption
Fidesz-majority city councilTook control of municipal companies away from him
Municipal company leadersRefused to hand over financial data
PoliceInvestigation started

🎯 Bottom line for international viewers

This video is a mayor publicly accusing city-linked companies of systematically bypassing procurement laws and mismanaging public money, and saying he has gone to the police because he was denied access to financial records.

It presents the situation as a conflict between an elected mayor seeking transparency and a city-company structure he claims is blocking oversight.

alexandra and propaganda

Whoever asks questions gets beaten.
Whoever exposes the truth gets intimidated.
That’s exactly what happened to Rácz Rihárd.

Rácz Rihárd is a brave man who stood up
and told the truth.
He told what really happened at the Lázár Info event.

Because it wasn’t just that Magyar Péter allegedly sent his thugs to the Lázár Info
to make noise and intimidate people
who went there
and dared to stand up for their opinions.

That wasn’t all.

What also happened was that these people were paid
to be there and to stir things up.
They were given 20,000 forints plus money for fuel.

So they were the ones who gave the money to those people?
— Yes.
Twenty thousand and fuel money?
— Yes.

And Rácz Rihárd was brave enough
to say this out loud
and expose them.

And let me tell you what his “reward,”
his “thanks” from Magyar Péter’s side was.

One of Magyar Péter’s enforcers,
one of the TISZA thugs,
sent his own people —
his daughter and his son-in-law — after Rihárd
to beat him up.

And they did beat him.
They even tried to force him into a car.

In the dark?
— Yes.
And who attacked him?
— The daughter and the son-in-law.
The daughter and son-in-law of that guy?

“I was on the ground, they dragged me, they wanted to take me away.
I don’t know where.
They were pulling me toward the car door, trying to shove me inside.
Thank God it didn’t succeed.”

We don’t know what would have happened to Rihárd
if they had managed to do that.

I believe this is a red line
that until now had not been crossed in politics.

And I never thought
that even in this openly declared campaign
our opponent would cross it.

But it happened.
And they did it.

And I only ask everyone
to think about whether they want a country
where the country’s leader believes
that political disagreements
should be settled with violence.

Where he sends his people
after another outspoken, brave person
to beat him up.

Because I certainly do not want that.

🧨 1️⃣ “Whoever asks questions gets beaten” – a total fear frame

This is collective intimidation, not a factual claim.

  • no concrete case
  • no date
  • no location
  • no police procedure

👉 The message: “If you speak up, you’re next.”
This is intimidation, not information.


🎭 2️⃣ One single story → system-level terror

The story of one person (Rácz Rihárd) is presented as if it were:

  • a general practice
  • a nationwide method
  • a political strategy

👉 A classic case of projection-based generalization.


⚖️ 3️⃣ Allegations of serious crimes – zero evidence

Specific accusations are made:

  • hiring thugs
  • paid provocateurs
  • physical assault
  • attempted kidnapping

❌ But there is no:

  • police report
  • investigation
  • case number
  • list of witnesses
  • medical report

👉 Legally, this is defamation.
Communicatively, it is a shock narrative.


💰 4️⃣ “20,000 forints + gas money” – a fairy tale disguised as realism

The specific amount is a psychological trick:

  • “small money” → sounds believable
  • no payment method
  • no source
  • no contract
  • no witnesses

👉 This is the false logic of “detail = truth.”


👪 5️⃣ “The daughter and the son-in-law” – emotional desecration

One of the most severe manipulation techniques:

  • involving family members
  • a dark abduction scenario
  • “we don’t know what would have happened…”

👉 This is a fear fantasy, not an event description.


🧠 6️⃣ “A red line” – the moral panic button

The text claims:

“We’ve never seen anything like this in politics.”

This is objectively false — but that’s not the point.

👉 The goal:

  • moral shock
  • shutting down thinking
  • forcing immediate emotional alignment

🎯 7️⃣ The final question – a false dilemma

“Do you want a country where…?”

This is not a question. It is coercion:

  • if you don’t believe it → you support violence
  • if you challenge it → you’re against the victim
  • if you ask questions → you’re dangerous

👉 This destroys democratic debate.


🧩 The overall picture in one sentence

This is not a report, but:

unproven criminal accusations + fear-mongering + moral panic + collective intimidation

classic election propaganda.

alexa and propaganda

Brussels wants to cut Hungarian pensions so badly that it even finances events for left-wing organizations where they openly talk about it. 😅
That’s exactly why, if TISZA were to come to power, they would immediately abolish the 13th and 14th month pensions.

👉 Now Péter Mihályi, a former MSZP deputy state secretary, has openly said that the 13th and 14th month pensions should be abolished “immediately.”
According to him, the money could be spent better elsewhere — I have a pretty good guess that he would rather give it to migrants or to Ukraine.

🤝 For us, however, seniors matter. We respect them, because they worked their entire lives — in February, the 13th month pension is arriving, along with the first installment of the 14th month pension.
That’s why Fidesz is the safe choice.

The 13th month pension is arriving now, along with the first part of the 14th month — but will it arrive next year as well? Well, if we can say “no” to Brussels, then it certainly will.

The problem is that I’ve just seen a short clip in which a former MSZP deputy state secretary, together with another expert linked to Péter Magyar — András Simonovics — spoke at a conference, a clearly pro-Republican event. Their message was clear: the 13th and the 14th month pensions must be abolished.

So if anyone still has doubts about what the TISZA Party would do, they should simply do what Péter Magyar says: listen to the TISZA experts. Listen to how they argue, one after another, for phasing out “Women 40,” and for abolishing the 13th and 14th month pensions. According to them, the money could be spent better elsewhere.

I don’t know what exactly they have in mind — perhaps migrants should receive more social benefits, or maybe the money should be sent to Ukraine. In any case, we have a pretty clear idea of what’s going on in the minds of TISZA’s experts.

We, on the other hand, say that pensions must be protected. Pensioners have worked their whole lives, and they deserve secure, predictable years in retirement.

🧠 1️⃣ A non-existent decision presented as a fait accompli

“Brussels wants to cut Hungarian pensions so badly…”

There is no such decision.
There is no:

  • EU resolution
  • legislation
  • obligation
  • concrete institutional proposal

👉 This is the technique of presenting an assumption as a fact.
It is spoken about as if it were already decided, when in reality it is nothing more than rhetorical scare-mongering.


🎭 2️⃣ “Left-wing companies”, “a conference” – a deliberately vague enemy image

“They finance events for left-wing companies”

This is intentionally opaque:

  • no company names
  • no funding data
  • no contracts
  • no amounts

👉 Function: to trigger emotional distrust without any possibility of verification.


👤 3️⃣ One expert opinion → projected onto an entire party

Named individuals:

  • Mihályi Péter
  • Simonovics András

The trick:

  • an academic opinion
    → sold as a party platform
    → then framed as collective intent (“TISZA would abolish it”)

This is a logical fallacy:
an expert’s view ≠ a political decision


🔢 4️⃣ Deliberate numerical chaos

At one point they say:

  • 13th month
  • monthly
    Then later:
  • monthly
  • “first installment”

👉 Mixing = confusion = fear.
Once the listener loses the thread, emotions become easier to steer.


😱 5️⃣ Migrants–Ukraine projection (without evidence)

“I have a guess… migrants or Ukraine”

This is open speculation, yet it is delivered:

  • in declarative form
  • with a mocking tone
  • without alternatives

👉 A classic case of scapegoating + fear redirection.


🏷️ 6️⃣ “We protect – they take away” framing

This text is not about pension policy, but about identity:

“We”“They”
protect the elderlytake it away
respect workwould give it to foreigners
predictabilityuncertainty

👉 Moral blackmail:
if you are not with us → you are against the elderly.


🧨 7️⃣ One-sentence summary

This is not information, but:

🔴 fear-mongering
🔴 false causal chains
🔴 intimidation through named individuals
🔴 non-existent decisions treated as established facts

Think Orbán propaganda isn’t real? Look below. The proof speaks for itself. No words.

The Tisza Party is a hate cult! They beat anyone bloody who dares to oppose them!

I skimmed the news, and it looks like I’m actually pretty moderate compared to this dog-poop and porn-site type of harassment. Because now the narrative is already that they beat their political opponents bloody.

A hate cult.

Luckily, after April 12 we won’t have to deal with them anymore.