Author: sneff

Based on what has happened, one clear and grave conclusion can be drawn:
In Hungary, judicial decisions are no longer binding within the Fidesz’s political practice; at best, they are treated as mere recommendations — and this is now openly acknowledged.

The Budapest-Capital Regional Court issued a clear and unequivocal order prohibiting the distribution of a publication containing false information and suitable for political intimidation. The decision was lawful, well-founded, and binding on everyone. Nevertheless, the government-aligned media apparatus did not halt the distribution; instead, it deliberately continued it and even demonstratively promoted it.

In a rare but exceptionally strong statement, the Hungarian Association of Judges warned that
if anyone believes a court decision does not apply to them, they are calling into question the country’s legal order and the fundamental principles of the Fundamental Law.
This is no longer about the authority of the judiciary, but about the collapse of the enforcement of shared rules.

What makes this case truly serious is not the violation itself, but the attitude behind it:

• the banned material continued to be distributed,
• the court’s decision was mocked and trivialized on political and media platforms,
• government actors openly encouraged its dissemination.

This is not a misunderstanding, not an administrative error, not a legal dispute.
👉 This was a deliberate political message:
“Courts matter only until they stand in our way.”

The purpose of the publication was not to inform, but to instill fear, mislead the public on a mass scale, and exert political pressure. When the court stopped this, the response was not retreat, but escalation. This clearly shows that the violation was embraced, the conflict was intentional, and the constraints of the rule of law have become secondary to political gain.

The final conclusion

👉 In Hungary, according to the Fidesz’s exercise of power, courts no longer issue binding decisions — they merely offer recommendations. And for the first time, this is not even being concealed; it is openly defended.

This represents a qualitative rupture in the rule of law:

• not silent circumvention of the law,
• not a technical loophole,
• but a public rejection of the legal order in the form of a political demonstration.

“They will give it back the same way once Tisza comes to power.
They won’t—at all.”

(0:00) Let Tisza win an election in Hungary in such a way that the Ukrainians repay the loan.
(0:04) For now, the danger—the immediate danger of war—has been averted,
(0:08) but the risk of war is greater than it was before the Brussels summit.
(0:12) So there is no reason for anyone to relax.

(0:14) Why is it greater?
(0:15) Because although the frozen Russian assets were not stolen or confiscated,
(0:21) they decided to provide a war loan.
(0:25) This amounts to 90 billion euros at this moment.
(0:30) This war loan is given to Ukraine, which means that Ukraine will have to repay it.

(0:37) So let Tisza win an election in Hungary in such a way that the Ukrainians repay the loan.
(0:41) That is roughly what this means.
(0:43) We did not come here in vain.

(0:47) So Ukraine has to be given a loan.
(0:50) But there is another problem—not only that they may not repay it, but that they have no money.
(0:54) Some European politicians want war.

(0:57) They believe that a country with nuclear weapons can be defeated in a conventional war.
(1:04) Good luck with that.
(1:06) They should play with their own grandchildren, not ours.

(1:10) Do not trust that European politicians are sober-minded enough not to drag us into a war.

“The video shows how Fidesz uses municipal assemblies for national party-political propaganda on matters over which the given body has neither legal jurisdiction nor decision-making authority.”

“The recording makes it clear that placing personal income tax, nationwide tax policy, and issues falling under parliamentary competence on a municipal agenda is legally unfounded and serves exclusively as political message-manufacturing.”

“This is not a local public matter, not a municipal competence, but a deliberate overstepping of institutional authority.”

WHY IS THIS VIDEO STRONG?

Based on the uploaded transcript:

• It clearly states that
  👉 personal income tax, special taxes, and nationwide tax policy are not municipal competencies.
• The technique is exposed:
  • pre-written propaganda text
  • disguised as a “verbal motion”
  • forcing a political position without legal authority
• A clear contrast emerges:
  • a “hypothetical TISZA tax”
  • versus 20 already implemented Fidesz tax increases that have actually burdened residents
• The key line is spoken: “They want to talk about nothing. They are shadowboxing.”

This is not an opinion, but procedural and jurisdictional criticism.

We will not allow Hungarians to be ripped off!