– So, prison. Who are the most unacceptable Fidesz politicians you would send first to enjoy the delights of the TISZA “Road to Prison” program? And you’ve ended up in very elite company: Viktor Orbán, Antal Rogán, Máté Kocsis, János Lázár. On the one hand, congratulations; on the other, if we look at this and at the cult-like atmosphere among TISZA supporters over the past year and a half, a pretty clear picture emerges of who they really are.
– This happens before every election. These stupid, stinking communists crawl out of the woodwork every time. Their fathers and grandfathers also wanted to throw everyone in prison. For them, democracy has always meant jailing political opponents. That’s what they did 70 years ago—why would they do anything differently now? They’re communists; this is their worldview. They can’t really break out of it, which also means they don’t gain the trust of voters—and this time will be no different.
It’s snowing beautifully. Could it be that Péter Magyar would deny even this?
He’s capable of denying anything. Today he said that TISZA has never supported European war plans. But of course they have—last spring they voted in the European Parliament to support Ukraine unconditionally and to give them as much money as they ask for the fighting. So what is that, if not support?
1️⃣ Mocking, emotional opening (ridicule framing)
“The snow is falling beautifully. Maybe Péter Magyar would deny even this?”
Technique: ridicule and pre-emptive character attack
No factual claim is made; instead, a personality trait is implied: dishonesty.
Snowfall is an obvious, apolitical fact → the absurd comparison is used to trigger an emotional reaction, not rational evaluation.
Purpose: to push the audience into emotional alignment before any argument appears.
👉 This is classic poisoning the well: discredit the person before presenting content.
2️⃣ Absolutization and demonization
“He’s capable of denying anything.”
Technique: totalization
“Anything” removes nuance, exceptions, or context.
It does not dispute a specific statement; it delegitimizes the entire person.
👉 This is character assassination, not argumentation.
“Shoveling snow at 5:20 a.m. is priceless, but despite TISZA supporters cheering for everything to go wrong, the snow did not paralyze Hungary. From what I saw, a few trucks jackknifed overnight, but the rescue operations went smoothly. Another round is coming today—everyone should be more cautious!”
1️⃣ Innocent opening → emotional identification
“Shoveling snow at 5:20 a.m. is priceless.”
Everyday hero narrative An early-rising, working person → “I am one of you.”
The word “priceless” creates a positive emotional frame: nostalgic, communal, warm.
👉 This is ethos-building: positioning the speaker as authentic, “of the people.”
2️⃣ Smuggling in a hidden enemy image
“Despite TISZA supporters cheering for everything to go wrong.”
This sentence is a key propaganda element.
What happens here?
Attribution of intent without evidence → No one was “cheering”; this is not a fact, but an assertion.
Moral stigmatization of the enemy → “They want the country to fail.”
👉 This is internal enemy framing: not critics, but “traitorous cheerleaders.”
3️⃣ Natural phenomenon = government success
“The snow did not paralyze Hungary.”
Snow is not a political actor, yet it is framed as if:
the government defeated it,
the opposition failed.
👉 Outcome hijacking: a partly random event is presented as a political achievement.
👉 Germany has so far sent more than €16 billion to Ukraine. We have already seen where this money ends up — on gold-plated toilets and other expenses of the Ukrainian war mafia.
While they are so generous in financing the continuation of the war, Germany’s healthcare system is in crisis. Next year, a €12 billion shortfall is expected in the sector, which they plan to cover by introducing patient fees.
❌ Sound familiar? In Hungary, the left has already threatened people with patient fees in the past — and Hungarians rejected it then, and they will reject it in the future as well.
The Tisza Party would immediately line up to finance Ukraine, but as long as there is a national government in Hungary, we will not send money to the war. Hungary will not contribute to enriching the Ukrainian war mafia with Hungarian taxpayers’ money.
🟠 We stand on the side of peace, and in April, Hungarians can reaffirm this with their votes.
Patient fees are coming — but not here, in Germany. In Germany, a €12 billion hole will appear in next year’s budget, while €16 billion has already been spent financing the Ukrainian war. We have seen where this money goes — to gold toilets and to financing the Ukrainian war mafia. As a result, the €12 billion healthcare deficit will be paid by German taxpayers through patient fees.
Sound familiar? In Hungary, the left already tried this, but Hungarians rejected it. If the Tisza were to come to power, austerity would come — and war-related tax increases would come too. As long as Hungary has a national government, we will not spend money on the war.
1️⃣ Shock numbers + false causality
“Germany has sent over €16 billion to Ukraine… meanwhile there is a €12 billion hole in German healthcare.”
Propaganda technique:
Two unrelated budget items are placed side by side
A cause–effect relationship is implied without evidence
👉 Implied claim: “If there were no Ukraine funding → there would be no healthcare crisis.”
– Eight hundred billion euros. It’s unbelievable what Brussels expects from us. This is not our war, and it should not be our money. The Ukrainian prime minister announced that they would need 800 billion euros to be able to continue the war — and this does not even include the costs of warfare. They would make Europe pay this amount, but we Hungarians will not allow it. For us, our families, our businesses, and our pensioners come first. Hungary is the voice of peace in Europe, and we will protect Hungarians’ money. Here in Abaúj and Zemplén, every forint matters, and nationally we must also protect the money we have earned with hard work. The current national government can guarantee that peace is maintained and that the money stays with Hungarian families and continues to grow there. Let us not allow Brussels to drag us into war and make us pay for the costs of war. Let us stand up for Hungarian interests and for peace.
Propaganda & Rhetorical Breakdown
1️⃣ “800 billion euros” as a shock trigger
“Eight hundred billion euros. It’s unbelievable…”
Technique: 👉 Shock number framing
Opens with a huge figure without context
No clarification of:
time frame
categories
source or methodology
what is included or excluded
Effect: The number is meant to paralyze emotionally, not inform. Fear replaces critical thinking.
2️⃣ “This is not our war” → false ownership framing
“This is not our war, and it should not be our money.”
Technique: 👉 Moral disengagement + ownership exclusion
Detaches the conflict from:
European security
alliance obligations
geopolitical consequences
Logical flaw: Economic and security impacts cannot be opted out of by declaration.
3️⃣ “The Ukrainian prime minister announced” → authority + distortion
“The Ukrainian prime minister announced that they would need…”
Technique: 👉 Appeal to authority + meaning shift
A macroeconomic estimate is reframed as:
“money to continue the war”
The jump from state functioning → war financing is asserted, not proven
– What do you think about the Prime Minister’s press conference?
– Well, left-wing journalists tried to corner the Prime Minister, but obviously they couldn’t. We are not going to war, the government will not give Hungarians’ money to Ukraine, and it will not let migrants in on Brussels’ orders either — these are the most important things.
❗ Over the next ten to fifteen years, there will be a growing demand for native Europeans from Western Europe to work and live in Hungary.
🟠 We will continue to refuse illegal immigration! Our country will remain migrant-free, and this will become increasingly attractive to people living around us as well.
“Ask us anything. Anything goes — we’ll answer live on air!”
“In x years, when these videos resurface in front of your child — or your future employer — how will you look them in the eye? Deleting them from Facebook doesn’t mean they disappear everywhere.”
“Imagine that by the end of the year we have established the Hungarian Path Digital Civic Circle, with the aim of building a strong, cohesive community rooted in the traditions of the popular movement, for Hungarians who stand for the ideal of a nation-building state and who care about the future of the entire Hungarian nation.
💪🏻 We are counting on those who believe that serving the national cause is important in the digital space as well; who are willing to act for the interests of the community beyond their own personal success; and who consider it essential to take stock of our roots, preserve our national identity, and modernize the national idea.
👥 László Kéri is a regular visitor at the TISZA headquarters. According to the photos, the left-wing economist is a frequent guest at briefings held by Péter Magyar and his team. It is well known that Kéri has repeatedly advocated tax increases, the abolition of utility cost cuts, and he himself has admitted that TISZA is a left-wing party.
❌ Same left-wing gang, just in a different disguise. We know them — we don’t want them!
– Let me tell you the scandal of the week — even though it’s only Monday, I think this already deserves a prize. What happened is that László Kéri has been exposed: for months now, he has been regularly visiting TISZA’s central office, their campaign headquarters, for briefings.
– For example, here he is saying — forgive me — that a flat tax system is also nonsense. He calls it complete stupidity and says he doesn’t agree with it at all.
– Yes, you heard that right: this is the same László Kéri about whom Péter Magyar has repeatedly claimed that they have absolutely nothing to do with each other.
– They present people unknown to us as TISZA’s “experts.”
– And he asks for those talking points that attack the utility cost reduction policy.
– Regarding utility cost cuts, every “expert” says by now that it’s been the world’s biggest bluff for a long time.
– Or the statements that, for example, his wife, Mária Zita Pesti, is pushing in favor of tax increases.
– Anyone who talks about cutting VAT must also talk about raising taxes.
– And they claim the TISZA Party does all this independently.
Well, in my opinion, this is what a truly embarrassing and awkward exposure looks like.
1️⃣ “Exposure” as a presupposed crime
“Let me tell you about the exposure of the week…”
The opening frame already asserts guilt before any evidence is presented.
There is no legal violation, no secret, no prohibited act — yet it is still called an “exposure.”
👉 Framing: the event is not described; it is pre-judged and labeled.
2️⃣ Guilt by association (association fallacy)
“László Kéri regularly visits the Tisza Party’s central office…”
The implied logic is:
Kéri is present → Tisza is left-wing → therefore everything Tisza says is illegitimate
What is not examined:
what he actually said,
what he proposed,
whether he had any decision-making role.
👉 This is not argumentation but contamination: “Anyone in the same room must be the same.”
