Author: sneff

never forget viktor orban propaganda

“The President of the Tisza Party is insane.”
– How can a government say something like this?

This sentence is not a slip of the tongue.
Not a misunderstanding.
Not “overly harsh debate.”

It is a public statement by a minister holding an official government position — Gulyás Gergely — made about the leader of an opposition party, Magyar Péter, the president of the Tisza Party.

1️⃣ This is not political criticism, but psychiatric stigmatization

In a democratic system:

  • political claims are debated with arguments,
  • programs are challenged with data,
  • decisions are criticized with accountability.

Here, however, it is not a claim that is attacked — but the person is declared mentally ill.

👉 This is classic dehumanization:
if someone is labeled “insane,” then

  • there is no need to debate them,
  • no need to respond to their arguments,
  • no need to take their questions seriously.

2️⃣ A minister has no right to hand out “diagnoses”

A member of government:

  • is not a doctor,
  • is not a medical expert,
  • is not a private individual.

Their words carry the weight of the state.

When a minister calls a political opponent “insane,” then:

  • political debate is shut down,
  • stigmatization is legitimized at the state level,
  • and the message is sent: anyone who opposes us is not normal.

This is not an opinion — it is the language of power.

3️⃣ Why now? – When there is no program

The timing is not accidental:

  • there is no detailed government program,
  • the campaign is disguised as “normal governance,”
  • real issues (cold, social care, energy) receive no substantive answers.

👉 When arguments run out, labeling begins.
When there is no substance, humiliation remains.

4️⃣ This is no longer strength, but decline

A confident government:

  • debates,
  • argues,
  • calculates.

An insecure government:

  • labels,
  • mocks,
  • calls others mentally ill.

The fact that a government official can publicly say
“the president of the Tisza Party is insane”
reveals not the weakness of the opposition, but the moral deterioration of those in power.

One-sentence summary

When a minister replaces political debate with a psychiatric label, it is not a campaign tactic — it is the final stage of propaganda.

orban proganda

The sure choice ❗️😉🟠

In an age of danger, when our lives are overshadowed by wars and crises, the most important thing is for Hungary to have an experienced, anti-war, and national government.

With a leader who not only reacts to events, but thinks ahead—always staying one step ahead of the others.

Let’s listen to reason and vote for Fidesz and Orbán Viktor!

viktor orbán corruption 2026

enable sbutitle with cc

The interview features Ligeti Miklós, Legal Director of Transparency International Hungary, discussing systemic corruption in Hungary, with a detailed case study from the healthcare sector and broader state-level corruption mechanisms.

1. Uzsoki Street Hospital – Paid Surgeries via a Private Company

Transparency International investigated paid surgical services at Uzsoki Street Hospital, linked to a private company, Magyar Egészségügyi Szolgáltatóház Kft., formerly owned (fully or partially) by Papcsák Ferenc.

Key findings:

  • Between 2020–2024, the company billed the hospital 906 million HUF.
  • The company’s total revenue in the same period was 1.134 billion HUF, implying ~1 billion HUF potential profit.
  • 595 inpatient procedures were sold through the company in five years, 492 of them orthopedic surgeries (knee and hip prostheses).
  • At the same time, nearly 6,000 Hungarian patients were waiting more than 60 days, often 270–370 days, for the same surgeries through the public system.

The surgeries were performed using:

  • state-owned hospital infrastructure,
  • publicly paid doctors and nurses,
  • publicly funded operating rooms.

Yet patients paid the private company to bypass waiting lists.

Transparency International argues this resembles state-funded infrastructure producing private profit, comparable to “after-hours factory moonlighting” in the 1980s.

2. Waiting Lists vs. “Free Capacity”

Although the hospital claimed these services used “free capacity,” Ligeti argues:

  • If free capacity truly existed, it should have been used to reduce public waiting lists, not sold privately.
  • Evidence suggests Hungarian patients were told they could skip the queue by paying the private company, which would constitute a criminal offense.

A government investigation concluded this was not illegal gratuity (hálapénz) because payments went to a company, not directly to doctors—an interpretation Ligeti criticizes as formalistic and evasive.

3. Systemic Corruption and State Capture

Ligeti rejects the term “mafia state,” instead describing state capture, where:

  • Institutions formally exist and employ competent professionals,
  • but political pressure prevents proper enforcement in sensitive cases.

He outlines how corruption has become systemic, including:

  • Massive wealth accumulation by politically connected figures (e.g. Mészáros Lőrinc, Tiborcz István),
  • Over 270 billion HUF missing from foundations linked to the Hungarian National Bank,
  • 1,300+ billion HUF channeled into opaque private equity funds,
  • 1,000+ billion HUF spent on state propaganda, largely benefiting a few companies.

4. Selective Enforcement and Impunity

While the state has effectively eliminated:

  • small-scale corruption,
  • gratuity payments,
  • VAT evasion,

it tolerates or ignores large-scale, politically aligned corruption.

A key feature of the system is impunity—not only for elites, but also for lower-level actors operating within tolerated schemes (e.g. sports tax subsidy abuse).

5. Asset Recovery After the NER

Ligeti argues that after a political transition:

  • Some money flows can be immediately stopped (e.g. propaganda spending),
  • Others require restoring real competition in public procurement,
  • Full asset recovery is complex but feasible with political will.

He emphasizes that corruption is now one of the top two public concerns in Hungary, and may become a decisive political issue.

6. Transparency International’s Legal Work

In the past year:

  • Transparency International initiated 20 public-interest data cases,
  • 10 were won with final judgments, several others at first instance,
  • Major victories included cases against the Uzsoki Hospital and central bank foundations.

Orbán’s latest collapse …..

HUNGARY 21%

According to Viktor Orbán, the Hungarian dream is owning a home, and the market will not become more expensive as a result of the three-percent loan.

In the third quarter of 2025, house prices, as measured by the House Price Index, increased by 5.1% in the euro area and by 5.5% in the EU compared with the same quarter of the previous year. In the second quarter of 2025, house prices increased by 5.1% and 5.5% in the euro area and EU, respectively. These figures come from Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union.

“The 3 percent Otthon Start home loan will remain in place as long as Fidesz–KDNP is in government,” said Orbán Balázs on Harcosok órája.

Sunflower cabaret 🌻 — Tisza attacks the 3% home loan, Europe sends more weapons to Ukraine, Trump has halted immigration.

Péter Szijjártó
on Hour of the Warriors!

Violence against women, the 3% home loan under heavy fire,
Dopeman 🤜🤛 Péter Magyar!
Harcosok órája
with Eszter Vitályos – Tuesday, 7:30 AM

🤡 The fear-mongering has kicked off! HOUSING HORROR 😅
The opposition has gone after the 3% home loan!
#otthonstart #harcosokklubja

Let’s move on to the OtthonStart program, because it clearly shows that this is an excellent measure: from the far left through the far liberal side, and now even Péter Magyar’s camp, everyone is attacking it. Just look at the front pages from yesterday and the day before.

“Housing horror begins in Hungary — OtthonStart could unleash everyone’s nightmare.”

Yes, once again we’re getting the kind of commentary where people are urged to practice self-control and count to three before speaking.

“Housing horror is starting, dear people, housing horror is starting, because the government is giving everyone the opportunity to buy their first home with a 3% fixed-rate loan, backed by state guarantees.”

THIS IS THE GOVERNMENT OF HOMES.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1467830464220912

For me, this was the quote and my favorite: “This is the start of a housing horror in Hungary; the Home Start could unleash everyone’s worst nightmare.” It’s frightening.
Yes—and I would indeed join you in what you mentioned earlier, namely that it was obvious from Korányi’s remarks that what is good for the country is bad for Tisza, and what is bad for the country is good for Tisza. That is the main starting point.

And this program is good. It would help tens of thousands of young people buy their first home, help tens of thousands of property owners sell their homes, and create job opportunities for tens of thousands of construction companies. This program is good for the economy, and it is also good for the budget. From this it follows that it is bad for the opposition—bad for Tisza.

orban and szandi propoganda

❗ The stakes of the election are enormous: either we defend our peace and security, or we allow warmongering and political instability to take over. Once we give in to destructive forces, it will be extremely difficult to undo—no matter which government comes afterward. Let’s not take the risk.

👉 I was a guest on the podcast The Other Side, where we discussed these decisive, fate-shaping questions among many other topics.
The full episode will be available today from 6:00 PM on The Other Side YouTube channel. Don’t miss it!

In my view, it is not a solution when someone, instead of doing their own job, resorts to the political act of pointing fingers at others. In politics as well, what you do not say and do not show will not be visible. If someone messes this up once, then any government may come afterward—it is not something that can really be undone.

1️⃣ “The stakes of the election are enormous” – Existential framing

“either we defend our peace and security, or…”

What is happening?
The election is not presented as a choice between political alternatives, but as a matter of existence itself.

🎯 Technique: Existential framing
👉 Anyone who is not “with us” is positioned as being against peace and security.

2️⃣ Vague threat: “warmongering,” “destructive forces”

“warmongering and political instability”
“destructive forces”

What is missing?

  • no names
  • no concrete decisions
  • no events
  • no evidence

🎯 Technique: Vague enemy construction
👉 A faceless enemy onto which anything can be projected.

3️⃣ The irreversibility narrative

“once we give in… it will be extremely difficult to undo”
“then any government may come afterward”

What is happening?
The self-correcting capacity of democracy is being denied.

🎯 Technique: Point-of-no-return framing
👉 If you don’t vote this way now, everything is lost forever.

This is strong fear-based mobilization.

4️⃣ “Let’s not take the risk!” – Command-style closure

This is not an argument, but an instruction.

🎯 Technique: Command framing
👉 Obedience replaces thinking.

5️⃣ Media legitimization: The Other Side podcast

“I was a guest on The Other Side podcast”

🎯 Technique: Authority & platform laundering
👉 The message is disguised as a “conversation,” not as a campaign message.

(The fact that it appears in a podcast does not make it any less propaganda.)

6️⃣ Projection: “pointing fingers at others”

“it is not a solution to point fingers at others”

What is the contradiction?
The entire text:

  • points fingers at others
  • constructs a nameless enemy
  • shifts responsibility

🎯 Technique: Projection
👉 What the speaker is doing is precisely what they accuse others of.

7️⃣ “What you don’t show won’t be visible” – Pseudo-wisdom

This is an empty, cliché truism that:

  • proves nothing
  • yet sounds like “common sense”

🎯 Technique: Common sense fallacy
👉 The lack of substance is replaced with the appearance of wisdom.

8️⃣ Overall picture – in short

This text:

  • generates fear
  • manufactures a vague enemy
  • turns the election into a fatal, irreversible moment
  • denies democratic feedback and correction
  • applies moral pressure

It does not debate.
It directs.

Key sentence that sums it all up

“If someone messes this up once, it can hardly be undone.”

This is not analysis.
This is psychological coercion.

Dezse and the entire propaganda apparatus went into action after Trump sent a letter to Orbán on December 10, 2025.

today 2026.01.09…

Good morning everyone, covered in beautiful snow!
Have you read that Trump wrote a letter to Viktor Orbán? That’s pretty cool, isn’t it? Especially since the President of the United States may soon visit our small country.
(Warning: intense cult-like excitement expected!!!) 💪🇭🇺🇺🇸

Dear Mr. Prime Minister,

Thank you for your thoughtful letter and for the friendly sentiments you shared regarding our most recent meeting at the White House. It was a pleasure to host you and your delegation as we celebrated the golden age of U.S.–Hungarian relations together.

I look forward to further deepening our cooperation in the areas of defense, energy, and illegal migration.

Your firm leadership serves as an example to the rest of the world. You have always stood resolutely in defense of the principles that make Hungary such a great place—faith, family, and sovereignty. America greatly appreciates this kind of courage.

I am grateful for your invitation to visit Hungary. My team will be in touch regarding scheduling. Once again, thank you for your friendship and support. I also wish you great success in the Hungarian election campaign.

Sincerely,
Donald J. Trump
President of the United States of America

nemeth balzs..

“Jurassic Park — it has started, it has started.
László Kéri regularly visits the headquarters of the Tisza Party. What was denied before — that Kéri László is not connected to Tisza — when he or his wife talks about austerity measures, they say it’s not the Tisza Party speaking. Well of course it is the Tisza Party speaking — here it is, plain to see.

MSZP and MSZMP — a lot could be written about that. They have reactivated themselves; they’ve bloomed again around Tisza. There they are, smiling in the photo, of course, full of happiness. György Surányi, starting with Lajos Bokros — everyone looks as if they’ve taken some kind of revitalizing capsule.

The political dinosaurs of the former post-communist era have risen again. Jurassic Park has begun, it has begun, because they were in a state of suspended animation for fifteen years, and now they are vital again, feeling at the height of their strength.

They can tell the Tisza audience whatever they want — the audience applauds. They feel that within the Tisza Party they have finally found a home again, because this left-liberal way of thinking can be realized there without obstacles, with the help of Péter Magyar.

There is nothing new under the sun — these are the same old people, now operating under the codename Tisza.”**

1️⃣ “Jurassic Park” – a dehumanizing metaphor

The central image of the speech is Jurassic Park:

“the political dinosaurs of the post-communist era”

🎯 Technique: Dehumanization + ridicule framing

Those targeted are portrayed not as people or thinking political actors, but as:

  • obsolete,
  • dangerous,
  • instinct-driven creatures.

👉 This removes the need to debate them, because “they would have gone extinct anyway.”

2️⃣ Guilt by association

The implied logic:

Kéri László → Tisza Party → austerity → “then this is Tisza speaking”

🎯 Technique: Association fallacy

There is no:

  • quotation,
  • decision,
  • party resolution.

Only insinuation: “he goes there → therefore it’s theirs.”

3️⃣ Temporal collapse: MSZP = MSZMP = Tisza

“MSZP and MSZMP — a lot could be written about that”

🎯 Technique: Historical smear / temporal collapse

Thirty to forty years of political history are compressed into a single stain:

  • if someone was ever left-wing,
  • they are still the same today,
  • and therefore automatically illegitimate.

👉 This is not analysis, but historical fear-mongering.

4️⃣ “They reactivated themselves” – the zombie narrative

“revitalizing capsule… suspended animation”

🎯 Technique: Zombie narrative

The political opponent is framed as:

  • not new,
  • not renewing itself,
  • but a resurrected past.

👉 This rejects the very possibility of change.

5️⃣ Construction of a collective enemy

A list of names (without evidence):

  • Surányi György
  • Bokros Lajos
  • “and everyone else”

🎯 Technique: Name stacking

Many names create the appearance of proof.

But there is:

  • no claim,
  • no action,
  • no specifics.

6️⃣ Infantilization of the audience

“they can say whatever they want — they applaud”

🎯 Technique: Audience belittling

The Tisza voter is portrayed as someone who:

  • does not think,
  • merely reacts,
  • is just “happy to clap.”

👉 This builds a sense of moral superiority.

7️⃣ Péter Magyar as the “gatekeeper”

“with the help of Péter Magyar”

🎯 Technique: Gatekeeper framing

The entire alleged “scheme” is personalized:

  • he “lets them in,”
  • he “covers for them,”
  • he “enables them.”

👉 This makes the enemy easy to personify.

8️⃣ “Codename” – conspiracy framing

“now operating under the codename Tisza”

🎯 Technique: Conspiracy framing

The party is framed as:

  • not real,
  • merely a disguise,
  • with “the same people behind it.”

👉 This pre-emptively immunizes the narrative against any rebuttal.

Summary – what is actually happening?

This text:

❌ does not analyze programs
❌ does not examine decisions
❌ does not use data

✔️ provokes emotional disgust
✔️ activates fear of the past
✔️ manufactures a collective enemy

🎯 Goal:
Do not ask what the Tisza Party says, but “who these people really are.”

orban viktor and máté kocsis current leader of the Fidesz parliamentary group.

enable cc for subtitle

What you posted (the “Hour of Truth – Kocsis Máté” episode transcript) is not a slip, not an emotional outburst, not campaign rhetoric gone too far.
It is a consistent, openly embraced political worldview.

And yes — this same worldview is presented to the outside world as “perfectly normal” by Fidesz politicians, just wrapped in a more polished, diplomatic language.

What is actually happening here?

1️⃣ Construction of an alternative reality

This discourse does not argue — it replaces reality:

  • courts = political enemies
  • independent media = “communist networks”
  • opposition = foreign-controlled puppets
  • criticism = not opinion, but attack

This creates a closed system:
anyone outside it is automatically malicious.

2️⃣ Delegitimisation of institutions (classic authoritarian pattern)

The speech does not criticise individual rulings — it attacks:

  • the judiciary as a whole,
  • journalistic organisations,
  • research institutes,
  • and indirectly EU institutions.

👉 This is not disagreement.
It is preparation for ignoring institutional decisions altogether.

3️⃣ Open enemy construction and dehumanisation

Language used:

  • “commies”
  • “filthy commies”
  • “stupid kid”
  • “communist reflexes”
  • “they’re like this by nature, their fathers were the same”

This is not accidental rhetoric.
It has a clear political function:

If someone is described like this, you don’t debate them — you deal with them.

4️⃣ Double speech: shouting at home, smiling abroad 😐

This is the core contradiction you’re pointing out:

Domestically:

  • shouting
  • fear-mongering
  • enemy lists
  • “road to prison” narratives

Internationally:

  • “sovereignty”
  • “democratic debate”
  • “national interest”
  • “peace narrative”

👉 Same system. Different packaging.

Why does this work domestically?

Because it:

  • runs on emotional overload,
  • maintains a permanent siege mentality,
  • offers a clear identity: “we are the rational ones, the others are enemies.”

It doesn’t have to be true —
it only has to be familiar and loud.

Why is it dangerous?

Because this discourse:

  • normalises distrust toward institutions,
  • prepares the logic of “law is what we say it is,”
  • and morally absolves anything done “in defence of the nation.”

In short — what you’re seeing very clearly:

👉 This is not embarrassing for them. This is the model.
👉 They’re not hiding it — they’re proud of it.
👉 And yes: they are selling this to the world as a “reasonable alternative.”

orban propaganda with szandi

🚨 Don’t they see what’s happening?!
European leaders are marching decisively toward war. Toward a war that we “haven’t seen since the time of our grandfathers and great-grandfathers.” But who actually wants this?
🟠 Hungary certainly does not — as long as we are in government, there will be peace here.

— My God, what is happening here? Where are we going, what are we doing? This is the feeling I constantly have when I watch European decision-makers, the statements of the NATO Secretary General, and serious European leaders — that honestly, people, is it really the case that only we are sensing this?

— And don’t you see where you are heading? Step by step, you are moving toward war.

— I actually think that European citizens feel this as well, but in this great democratic Europe they are given relatively little voice. What I see again is Europe wanting to take yet another step toward practically dragging itself into a war — and here I would quote Rutte — a war that we have not seen since the time of our grandfathers and great-grandfathers.

So how is it possible that someone, acting responsibly, can make such a statement — that such a war is coming? I simply cannot get away from this sentence, or these expressions, because I believe that sadly, in the family of every Hungarian there is a grandfather or great-grandfather who truly saw such a war, or who never came back — and therefore the family never saw him again.

These are not sentences that can be spoken as if we were talking about the weather. It is absolutely unbelievable.

1️⃣ Creating moral panic (“we are marching toward war”)

Key phrases:

  • “they are marching decisively toward war”
  • “toward a war we haven’t seen since our grandfathers and great-grandfathers”

What’s happening?

The text paints a picture of inevitable catastrophe.
It is not about concrete decisions, but about an emotion-driven apocalyptic narrative.

🎯 Technique: Moral panic framing
👉 Fear activation comes before thinking.

2️⃣ Vague scapegoating (“European leaders”)

What’s missing?

  • no names,
  • no decisions,
  • no dates,
  • no documents.

“European leaders” become a homogeneous, faceless mass.

🎯 Technique: Vague enemy construction
👉 This makes debate impossible — only fear remains.

3️⃣ “Only we see it” – the chosen-ones narrative

Key phrases:

  • “is it really only us who sense this?”
  • “don’t you see it?”

What’s happening?

The speaker places themselves in a position of moral and intellectual superiority.
Anyone who disagrees is framed as:

  • blind,
  • manipulated,
  • ignorant.

🎯 Technique: Epistemic superiority framing
👉 This is not an argument, but a status claim.

4️⃣ Victim role: “citizens have no voice”

Claim:

  • “in this great democratic Europe, citizens are given relatively little voice”

Problem:

  • no data,
  • no comparison,
  • no benchmark.

🎯 Technique: Victimization without evidence
👉 “Democracy” functions as a prop, not an analysis.

5️⃣ Isolated authority: Mark Rutte

What’s happening?

A single sentence (or a paraphrase) is highlighted.

Missing:

  • context,
  • exact quotation,
  • explanation.

🎯 Technique: Fear amplification via authority
👉 Authority is used to frighten, not to inform.

6️⃣ Instrumentalization of historical trauma

Key elements:

  • grandfather,
  • great-grandfather,
  • “who never came back.”

What’s happening?

Personal family tragedies are turned into political arguments.
The pain of the past functions as emotional coercion.

🎯 Technique: Emotional blackmail via collective memory
👉 Anyone who disagrees is framed as “insensitive.”

7️⃣ False absolute: “as long as we are in government, there will be peace”

What’s wrong?

A global conflict is reduced to a single domestic political actor.
As if one country alone could guarantee world peace.

🎯 Technique: False security promise
👉 Total oversimplification.

8️⃣ Delegitimizing rational discourse

Key phrase:

  • “you can’t talk about this as if we were discussing the weather”

What’s happening?

Calm, policy-based discussion is framed as immoral.
Emotion becomes the only “legitimate” language.

🎯 Technique: Anti-rational framing
👉 Fear becomes the measure of truth.

🔚 Conclusion — what is this really?

This is not a war analysis, but:

  • a fear-based narrative,
  • a vague enemy image,
  • political use of historical trauma,
  • a moral “us vs. them” framework.

🎯 Goal:
Not understanding, but emotional mobilization.

If you want, I can also:

  • tighten this into a short international op-ed,
  • rewrite it for an academic or NGO context, or
  • adapt it for social media or a slide presentation.

viktor orbán and trump propaganda… fidesz. szentkiralyi alexandra.

No words. Sorry from Hungary, from those of us who are not hateful.

🗯️ What is being prepared in Brussels is outrageous!
Ukraine would submit an 800 billion dollar bill—that is 260 trillion forints—to Europe for the next 10 years, and they would make our taxpayers pay this incomprehensible amount!

Ukraine is asking for so much money over the next decade that it would be enough to pay Hungarian pensions for 40 years, or all family benefits for 60 years. That is what the 800 billion dollars mean, which the Ukrainian prime minister wants to collect from Brussels.

❗ Brussels would burden Hungarians by abolishing the 13th and 14th month pensions, cutting family benefits, and introducing a progressive income tax—just to pay Ukraine’s bills.
This is our money. They would take it from Hungarian families and Hungarian pensioners!

We Hungarians will not pay the price of someone else’s war!
Hungarians’ money must remain with Hungarians!

👉 While the national government stands for peace and Hungarian interests, Brussels—and its domestic ally, the Tisza Party led by Péter Magyar—supports this debt-creating, pro-war path.
They would give away Hungarians’ money; we will protect it!

The government will soon make the report public, because Hungarian families have the right to know what plan Brussels wants to force upon them.

🟠 In April, we can choose between the Brussels path and the path of peace.

  • In mathematics there are irrational numbers, and there are irrational ones in politics as well. Let me show you one.

If you can’t read it, it’s not your fault — this is 260 trillion forints.
This is the amount the Ukrainians are demanding from Europe to keep Ukraine running.

With this sum, every Hungarian could be given 27 million forints.
Or we could pay pensions for 40 years, and all family benefits for 60 years.

And this is not the end.
This does not include military and war-related expenses.

In war, we don’t only lose human lives — Brussels would burn all our money as well.

If it were up to Brussels’ puppets, Hungarian money would be included in this amount too.
But as long as there is a national government in Hungary, Hungarians’ money will not go to Ukraine.