Author: sneff

alexandra..

The money of Budapest residents is in Gergely Karácsony’s pocket.

While the government invested 3,000 billion forints in developing the capital, while Karácsony’s administration’s main revenues nearly doubled, and while they were unable to show a single independent development over six years, we are supposed to believe that the mayor has nothing to do with the financial troubles of the Budapest Municipality.

The people of Budapest are far smarter than that, Mr. Mayor!

So money clearly went to all of this: dozens upon dozens of advisors, massive communication billboards, and so on, and so on. Money was definitely spent on these things, and it was also spent on projects that were really more about appearances — superficial, cosmetic efforts — like so-called housing bridge programs, where maybe a dozen apartments were managed to be rented out in a year, through “Maxwell” or similar completely unserious initiatives. And it’s very hard to see through what is actually going on inside the companies involved.

So I think this is really where the problem lies, because if we look at what happened over time: there was this huge Karácsony Gergely–style performance — leaning back, playing the overturned beetle — claiming that everything would grind to a halt, that the capital would go bankrupt, because without money they wouldn’t be able to close the fiscal year.

And then December 31 passed, January 1 arrived, and it turned out that Budapest did not go bankrupt after all. Everything continues to operate as before, even though Gergely Karácsony said that if he didn’t get this and that and that — which he was in fact demanding back completely without legal grounds — then it would all be over.

🎯 Core Function (Real Purpose)

The statement is not a substantive analysis of Budapest’s finances, but rather serves to:

  • personally blame Gergely Karácsony,
  • render government-level withdrawals and decisions invisible,
  • and suggest that “if there is a problem, the money must have ended up in the mayor’s pocket.”

👉 Pre-fixed conclusion:
“The capital’s financial problems are not systemic, but stem from Karácsony’s incompetence.”

1️⃣ Monetary Scapegoating

“The money of Budapest residents is in Karácsony Gergely’s pocket.”

🔹 Technique: criminalizing metaphor
🔹 Effect:
– implies theft without evidence
– triggers emotional outrage (“they stole our money”)
– no data needed, the image alone is sufficient

👉 A classic authoritarian move: assertion → moral judgment → no burden of proof.

2️⃣ False Comparison (False Balance)

“The government developed the capital with 3,000 billion forints”
vs.
“they were unable to show a single independent development”

🔹 Technique: context removal
🔹 Trick:
– omits where the government funding came from (EU funds, central-state projects)
– omits what was simultaneously taken away from the capital
– the notion of “independent development” is deliberately left vague

👉 Logical fallacy: if there is no money and no authority, there can be no “independent” development either.

3️⃣ Trivialization of Visible Projects

“showy nonsense,” “housing-bridge gimmicks,” “completely unserious”

🔹 Technique: mockery + trivialization
🔹 Effect:
– all social or experimental programs become laughable
– impact is irrelevant; mood is everything
– the audience does not evaluate, it ridicules

👉 If you ridicule it, you don’t have to refute it.

4️⃣ Vague Corruption Suggestion

“it’s hard to see what’s going on inside the companies”
“that’s where the dog is buried”

🔹 Technique: evidence-free insinuation
🔹 Mechanism:
– no concrete accusation is made
– yet a sense of corruption is created
– legally untouchable, politically toxic

👉 A classic dog-whistle technique.

5️⃣ Apocalypse Bluff, Reframed After the Fact

“the capital will go bankrupt” → yet it didn’t

🔹 Technique: retrospective delegitimization
🔹 Manipulation:
– conceals why bankruptcy did not occur
– conceals the temporary fixes and legal workarounds used
– survival itself is framed as proof of deception

👉 If it didn’t die, then it must have been pretending.

6️⃣ Populist Closure – “In the Name of the People”

“Budapest residents are much smarter than that!”

🔹 Technique: collective authorization
🔹 Effect:
– anyone who disagrees is “not smart”
– the speaker positions themselves as the voice of “the people”
– debate is closed

👉 This is not an argument; it is a final verdict.

🧠 Summary – What Is Actually Happening?

This statement:

❌ provides no numerical, verifiable data
❌ avoids any discussion of government responsibility
❌ offers no systemic analysis
✅ relies on character assassination + emotional manipulation

👉 The goal is not truth, but a lasting mental image:
“Karácsony = money pit = liar = incompetent.”

balazs propaganda idiots..

I made a video last week about the Tisza Party candidate in North Pest, Anna Müller, who is a teacher, a high school teacher, and who says that in her school children are living in fear, they are anxious, they have no motivation to go to school, they are afraid of tests, and of course everything is blamed on the government, or rather on Viktor Orbán’s policies. Overload, anxiety, pressure to perform.

Several people commented on this video and sent messages on Messenger saying that this is not acceptable: that a teacher complains about the education system and says that in her school children are terrified, feel unwell — but did she try to address this problem? Did she report it to anyone? If she could not solve it herself, did she ask for help?

Simply saying, like every Tisza supporter, that “the country doesn’t work, education doesn’t work, and then everything will be much better once there is a change of government” — nobody buys that.

🎯 Core Function (real purpose)

The statement is not about the condition of the education system, and it does not examine children’s mental strain, but instead:

  • delegitimizes the teacher who voices criticism,
  • discredits the Tisza narrative,
  • disconnects the problem from the systemic level,
  • and preemptively rejects the possibility of change (“no one is buying this”).

👉 The conclusion is fixed in advance:
“Problems in education are not systemic; the critical speaker is either incompetent or acting in bad faith.”

1️⃣ Individualization of the problem – detaching the system

“…a teacher is complaining… did she try to resolve the problem?”

🔹 Technique: shifting responsibility (individualization)
🔹 Mechanism:

  • a nationwide education problem is reduced to the personal competence of a single teacher,
  • the systemic level disappears from view.

👉 Classic authoritarian logic:
if there is a problem, it is not the system’s fault, but the individual’s.

2️⃣ Moral inversion – the victim becomes the accused

“…this is not okay, that a teacher is complaining…”

🔹 Technique: moral framing
🔹 Effect:

  • raising the problem itself becomes ethically questionable,
  • instead of anxious children, the focus shifts to the “complaining teacher.”

👉 Message:
“Whoever talks about the problem is the problem.”

3️⃣ Pseudo-professionalism – “did she report it?”

“Did she report it? Did she ask for help?”

🔹 Technique: superficial rationality
🔹 Reality:

  • these questions are not asked to gain information,
  • but to shift the burden of proof onto the critic.

👉 Manipulation:
until you can document every step you took, you have no right to speak.

4️⃣ Collective stigmatization – “like every Tisza supporter”

“Saying what every Tisza member says…”

🔹 Technique: collective labeling
🔹 Effect:

  • individual content disappears,
  • a pre-fabricated enemy identity takes its place.

👉 This is not debate, but stigma.

5️⃣ Pre-closed debate – “no one is buying this”

🔹 Technique: discourse closure
🔹 Function:

  • it does not refute,
  • it forbids taking the issue seriously.

👉 Authoritarian communication marker:
truth is irrelevant; what matters is what is ‘allowed’ to be discussed.

🧠 Summary – what is actually happening?

This statement:

  • does not protect children,
  • does not improve education,
  • does not argue with evidence.

Instead, it:

✔️ silences,
✔️ personalizes blame,
✔️ morally stigmatizes,
✔️ and shuts down the very idea of change.

👉 This is not education policy. This is loyalty enforcement.

orban propaganda from dezse

Hi everyone! According to the “dream book” of politics, it is not advisable to label voters. To speak harshly about them, to criticize them, to demean or degrade them. But I think that is the dream book of politicians. I am not a politician. I am a journalist, although I do not really consider myself one. On Facebook, for lack of a better option, I selected it from a dropdown menu. Media worker, presenter—that probably fits me better.

And when I tell you that, even separating myself from my employer, I am speaking as Krisztián Lentulai, a Hungarian citizen, because I am expressing my feelings to you, then take it that way.

Those people from Tisza. Those from DK. But above all now, the Tisza supporters. Those who wish for my death. Those who want to wait for me at my workplace and smash my head in. Those who, in a somewhat gentler way compared to the previous ones, simply want me to lose my job. Or want me thrown into prison.

I hold them responsible for it if hell breaks loose here and a civil war situation develops. I hold them very, very responsible.

🎯 Core Function (real objective)

The text is not a personal confession, but rather:

  • enemy construction,
  • moral self-exoneration for one’s own aggressive speech,
  • fear-mongering, and
  • preemptive scapegoating for a potential future conflict.

👉 The ultimate message:
“If there is violence, it won’t be because of me, but because of them.”

This is one of the most serious propaganda maneuvers.

1️⃣ “I am not a politician” – role masking (role laundering)

Key statements:

  • “I am not a politician.”
  • “I am speaking as a Hungarian citizen.”
  • “I am expressing my feelings.”

🔹 Technique: evasion of responsibility
🔹 Trick:
– while delivering a political message,
– the speaker detaches himself from political accountability

👉 Classic propaganda move:
political speech = “just a private opinion.”

2️⃣ Pseudo-objectivity and status shifting

Key elements:

  • “I am a journalist, although I don’t consider myself one”
  • “media worker, host”
  • “independent even from my employer”

🔹 Technique: identity blending
🔹 Effect:
– when advantageous: journalist
– when responsibility arises: private individual

👉 This is credibility maneuvering, not honesty.

3️⃣ Collective stigmatization (group guilt)

Keywords:

  • “those Tisza supporters”
  • “DK supporters”
  • “but above all now, the Tisza supporters”

🔹 Technique: collective labeling
🔹 Operation:
– anonymous, unverified claims
– criminalization of an entire political community

👉 Individual threats ≠ collective guilt

This is a basic propaganda rule:
if no one is named, the stain can be applied to anyone.

4️⃣ Victim posture + fear spiral

Claims:

  • “they wish for my death”
  • “they want to smash my head in”
  • “they want to throw me in prison”

🔹 Technique: victimization
🔹 Problem:
– no evidence
– no concrete individuals
– no mention of legal action or reports

👉 Emotional shock precedes rational evaluation.

5️⃣ Preemptive transfer of responsibility (preemptive blame)

Key sentence (critical):

“I hold them responsible if things spiral out of control here and a civil-war-like situation emerges.”

🔴 THIS IS THE MOST DANGEROUS PART

🔹 Technique: legitimization of future violence
🔹 Logic:
– I am only speaking
– they are provoking
– if something happens, it is their fault

👉 This is a textbook example of authoritarian propaganda.

6️⃣ Implicit threat + moral blackmail

Hidden message:

  • “if you don’t stay silent”
  • “if you criticize”
  • “then you will be responsible”

🔹 Technique: moral pressure
🔹 Effect:
– silencing
– self-censorship
– “better not speak up”

🧠 Summary propaganda formula

Structure of the text:

  • I am not a politician
  • Yet I name political enemies
  • They threaten me
  • I am the victim
  • If violence occurs → it is their fault

👉 This is not an opinion. This is narrative construction.

📌 Final conclusion

This statement is:

  • not innocent,
  • not personal,
  • not journalistic,

but conflict-escalating propaganda, which:

❗ normalizes political hatred
❗ asserts collective guilt
❗ preemptively absolves its own side of all consequences

Speaker: Lentulai Krisztián

orban viktor propaganda again

And the day came when László Kéri from Tisza sat down and told it to our faces that Hungary cannot withdraw itself from the war. In my view, Hungary will not be able to pull itself out of this. Here it is in a longer version as well. László Kéri talks about Europe preparing for war, and that if Péter Magyar comes to power, he will have no other choice either, because Hungary cannot remove itself from the war. Europe has already decided this, and if you look at the leading nations, it is clear that from German military diplomacy to the British, it is being seriously considered that further conflict with the Russians is not out of the question, and that Europe should prepare for Russia to become its long-term military adversary. In my view, Hungary will not be able to get out of this.

Dear László Kéri, Péter Magyar, and all the other Tisza sect members: go to hell! Viktor Orbán will stay instead, and he will make sure that Hungary does not go to war, just as he has managed to do over the past four years.

🎯 Core Function (Real Purpose)

The text does not inform, and it is not a geopolitical analysis. Instead, it serves to:

  • instill fear (“war is inevitable”),
  • create scapegoats (Tisza, Kéri, Péter Magyar),
  • present a single ‘savior’,
  • force emotional loyalty.

👉 The conclusion is fixed in advance:
“If it’s not Viktor Orbán, then there will be war.”

1️⃣ “We’re not saying it — he is” – outsourcing responsibility

“…the Tisza-affiliated László Kéri sat down and told it to our faces…”

🔹 Technique: outsourcing of blame
🔹 How it works:

  • no direct claim is made,
  • instead, someone is “quoted,”
  • and the quote is then presented as destiny.

🔹 Manipulation:
Kéri’s opinion = objective reality = inevitable war.

👉 The audience does not examine context, only emotional content.

2️⃣ Determinism: “this has already been decided”

“Europe has already decided this”
“Hungary cannot extract itself”

🔹 Technique: narrative of inevitability
🔹 Effect:

  • the illusion of political choice disappears,
  • the future becomes a “forced track.”

👉 A classic authoritarian move:
if there is no choice, there is no responsibility either.

3️⃣ Enemy construction: collective stigmatization

“Tisza cult member”

🔹 Technique: dehumanization + cult framing
🔹 Function:

  • the opponent is not a political actor,
  • but an irrational, dangerous mass.

👉 This excludes debate, because you don’t debate a cult.

4️⃣ False causal chain (false cause)

“If Péter Magyar comes, he’ll have no choice — there will be war”

🔹 Technique: post hoc ergo propter hoc
🔹 Problem:

  • no decision-making authority is shown,
  • no concrete military obligation is named,
  • no legal mechanism is presented.

👉 Yet the emotional equation works:
Péter Magyar = war.

5️⃣ Savior narrative: one man prevents disaster

“Viktor Orbán will stay and sort it out…”

🔹 Technique: personality cult + messianic framing
🔹 Message:

  • not institutions,
  • not alliances,
  • not legal frameworks,
  • but one man is holding back war.

👉 This is not politics — it is a creed.

6️⃣ Vulgarity and rage as “authenticity”

“go to hell!”

🔹 Technique: anger-as-authenticity
🔹 Effect:

  • aggression appears as honesty,
  • anger becomes truth.

👉 Rational analysis is replaced by instinctive reaction.

7️⃣ Temporal distortion: “it worked in the past four years”

🔹 Technique: selective reinterpretation of the past
🔹 Problem:

  • the war was not a Hungarian decision,
  • Hungary was not a belligerent party,
  • no causal link is proven.

👉 Retroactive heroization.

📌 Actors by narrative function

  • László Kéri – a “dark prophet” whose words are treated as fate
  • Péter Magyar – carrier of future catastrophe
  • Viktor Orbán – the sole guarantee of peace

🧠 Summary – what is actually happening?

This text is:

  • not analysis,
  • not debate,
  • not information,

but a simple emotional command:

“You must be afraid.
The enemy is the cause of your fear.
The solution is to keep everything exactly as it is.”

balazska orbán propaganda

Péter Magyar has introduced his new “economic development” expert, who openly admits to being a big fan of Gordon Bajnai 🤷‍♂️
This is going to hurt!! But only if we allow the Bajnai team to take over the country’s leadership.

Author – Németh Balázs:
If Bajnai returns, it will hurt every Hungarian family and pensioner. We already got to know them before 2010!

Author – Németh Balázs:
It’s hard to create a clearer situation before an election than this: do we bring back the pre-2010 world, with a left-wing economic policy that supports multinationals and squeezes families? Or do we continue along the patriotic Hungarian path?

🎯 Core Function (Real Purpose)

The text is not an economic policy analysis, but rather:

  • fear-mongering,
  • scapegoating,
  • reactivating past trauma,
  • enforcing a binary (“either–or”) political choice.

👉 The conclusion is predetermined:
“Fidesz is the only acceptable choice.”

1️⃣ “Bajnai = it will hurt” – activating traumatic associations

“If Bajnai comes, it will hurt every Hungarian family and pensioner.”

🔹 Technique: emotional conditioning
🔹 Tool: metaphor of physical pain (“it will hurt”)

What does this do?

  • It does not discuss a program
  • It does not discuss concrete measures
  • It creates a sensation: pain, loss, fear

👉 This is not an argument, but an emotional trigger.

2️⃣ Guilt by association

“Magyar Péter introduced his new expert, who is an open admirer of Gordon Bajnai.”

🔹 Technique: associative stigmatization
🔹 Logic:

  • what the person says does not matter,
  • what matters is who they like.

👉 A classic propaganda trick:
“If A was bad, and B likes A, then B must also be bad.”

No professional rebuttal is required.

3️⃣ “The pre-2010 world” – temporal demonization

“We knew them before 2010!”

🔹 Technique: historical scare image
🔹 Effect: manipulation of collective memory

What is conspicuously missing?

  • a specific year
  • a specific decision
  • concrete data

👉 “The pre-2010 world” is not a historical category, but a rhetorical bogeyman.

4️⃣ False dilemma (“there is no third way”)

“Do we bring back the pre-2010 world… or continue on the patriotic Hungarian path?”

🔹 Technique: false dilemma
🔹 Message:

  • either them (bad, painful, anti-family),
  • or us (good, patriotic, safe).

👉 This deliberately removes nuance:

  • no reform,
  • no alternative,
  • no debate.

5️⃣ Moral labeling instead of economic policy

Key terms:

  • “pro-multinational”
  • “oppressing families”
  • “patriotic Hungarian path”

🔹 Technique: moral polarization
🔹 Effect: economic policy is turned into a moral issue

👉 Anyone who is not with us is morally wrong.

📌 Summary – what is actually happening?

This statement:

❌ does not analyze Magyar Péter’s economic program,
❌ does not present professional arguments,
❌ does not refute claims.

✔️ Instead, it:

  • generates fear,
  • invokes past trauma,
  • triggers emotional reflexes,
  • and shuts down thinking.

👉 This is not information, but a guided emotional campaign.

szentkiralyi wakeup…

❗ It’s not us saying this, but them themselves: Tisza would be the government of austerity. ❗
They would raise taxes, because in their view the flat tax is “complete nonsense.” Pensioners have also been targeted: they call the 14th-month pension “pure madness,” and describe the current pension system as “too generous,” therefore saying pensions should be “reduced.” They openly talk about the fact that they would “take away the benefits within five minutes,” and would also eliminate hospital beds.

We must not allow Tisza to burden Hungarians with new charges and, through Brussels, finance the war from it! As they themselves put it: “We can’t say everything, because then we would fail.” But regardless of how they deny it, regardless of how they lie, we will not allow them to hide the truth!

In April, the only safe choice is Fidesz! 🟠
This is Magyar Péter’s austerity program.

Someone says they are progressive—perhaps that can be acknowledged. In Hungary as well, they now want to introduce a multi-bracket tax system. The 14th-month pension is “pure madness.” The pension system is now too generous; it should be relatively reduced. “Within five minutes, they will take it away.” The same system that existed together does not necessarily need to be maintained. It is not certain that basic hospital capacities should be started everywhere. Take, for example, the flat tax system—it is complete nonsense, and I do not agree with it at all. “I won’t say everything, because then we would fail.”

1️⃣ “It’s not us saying this, but them themselves” – source shifting (outsourcing of blame)

🔹 Technique: apparent objectivity
🔹 How it works:
– the government narrative does not assert, it “quotes”
– responsibility is shifted onto the opponent (“they said it”)

👉 Effect: the audience does not examine the context of the quote, only its emotional charge.

2️⃣ Collective labeling – “Tisza would be the government of austerity”

🔹 Technique: pre-fabricated identity
🔹 How it works:
– a heterogeneous opposition space is collapsed into a single negative concept
– there is no policy debate, only stigma

👉 Classic branding propaganda: repeat it often enough and it starts to feel true.

3️⃣ Threatening pensioners – existential fear-mongering

Keywords:

“14th-month pension = pure madness”
“too generous system”
“pensions should be reduced”

🔹 Technique: target-group-specific intimidation
🔹 How it works:
– direct targeting of the most sensitive voter group (the elderly)
– the future is framed as loss

👉 Loss aversion: fear is stronger than promise.

4️⃣ “They will take it away within five minutes” – time pressure and panic

🔹 Technique: urgency, disabling rational thinking
🔹 How it works:
– no time for consideration
– the decision becomes an emotional reflex

👉 Classic campaign tool: now or never.

5️⃣ Talking about hospital closures – symbolic destruction of infrastructure

🔹 Technique: public services as emotional symbols
🔹 How it works:
– the “hospital bed” is not policy, but a symbol of safety
– change equals danger

👉 It’s not about where or why, but about “taking it away.”

6️⃣ Brussels + war = external enemy construction

🔹 Technique: externalization
🔹 How it works:
– domestic political debate → geopolitical threat
– the opponent is not mistaken, but a traitor

👉 This narrative absolves the government of all internal consequences.

7️⃣ “We can’t say everything, because then we would fail” – self-justifying ‘exposure’

🔹 Technique: dramatization of selective quotations
🔹 How it works:
– the statement is presented as a conspiracy
– the government’s role: “we expose the truth”

👉 It works even if the quote is taken out of context or distorted.

8️⃣ Binary closure – “only Fidesz”

🔹 Technique: false dilemma
🔹 How it works:
– no alternatives
– no nuance
– no debate

👉 The choice is framed not as political, but as a moral obligation.

Summary – what is actually happening?

❌ Not a program debate
❌ Not public policy
❌ Not fact-checking

✔ Emotional mobilization
✔ Fear + enemy construction
✔ Legitimation of a single outcome

The text does not want you to understand—it wants you to be afraid, and to automatically choose Fidesz, while the opponent—here, Magyar Péter and Tisza—is compressed into a single negative archetype.

peter takacs idiot…

“Expertise is overflowing‼️
My big heart will be the death of me. I simply can’t help myself when I see someone in need… Poor Péter Magyar has been abandoned by his healthcare team of several thousand outstanding experts. 😒
Luckily, I happened to be passing by and rushed to his aid. 😊

‘🤫 Listen, Peti! I know it’s not really my place to say this, because you’ve got the greatest DOCTOR of all time there, Zsolt Hegedűs (who, as minister, will also spend 27 hours a day in the operating room), plus several thousand experts with medical degrees—not to mention the basketful of doctor candidates you’ve got—but:

🤦‍♂️ There is no such thing as a TESLA MRI machine❗️
That’s not a brand name like a car; it’s a unit of magnetic field strength. Typically, machines are 1.5 Tesla or 3 Tesla.

Relax, this stays between us! 😉 I don’t want to embarrass your highly knowledgeable healthcare team—they’ve got enough problems as it is with you around…
No need to thank me, my pleasure! 😎
Greetings to the millions of DOCTORS on your team! 😘’**

🎯 Core Function (Real Purpose)

Not to clarify MR technology, but to:

  • make the subject look ridiculous,
  • cast doubt on expertise,
  • morally and intellectually devalue the opponent,
  • trigger collective laughter.

👉 The goal is to suggest that Magyar Péter’s environment is incompetent, and therefore he himself is unfit.

Applied Propaganda and Rhetorical Techniques

1️⃣ Pseudo-helpfulness (Patronizing Irony)

“My big heart will be the death of me… I rushed to help.”

🔹 Technique: fake empathy, condescending superiority
🔹 Effect:

  • the author appears as the “kind, intelligent helper”
  • the opponent is framed as a “needy fool”

👉 Classic patronizing sarcasm.

2️⃣ Mockery of Expert Authority (Caricature)

“the greatest DOCTOR of all time, Zsolt Hegedűs (who will work 27 hours a day in the operating room)”

🔹 Technique: exaggerated ridicule, caricature
🔹 Goal:

  • not to challenge the claims,
  • but to make the expert status itself laughable

👉 If the expert is ridiculous, then the entire program must be as well.

3️⃣ Technical Correction as a Political Weapon

“There is no such thing as a TESLA MR machine.”

🔹 Technique:

  • a minor terminological correction,
  • inflated into something of major importance

🔹 Manipulation:

  • a linguistic inaccuracy → proof of incompetence
  • professional discussion → narrative of political unfitness

👉 Cherry-picking + framing.

4️⃣ Conspiratorial Address (“Just Between Us”)

“Relax, just between us!”

🔹 Technique: creation of conspiratorial in-group bonding
🔹 Effect:

  • the reader feels like an insider,
  • the target is pushed outside the group

👉 This builds an emotional “us vs. him” alignment.

5️⃣ Emojis and Casual Tone as Aggression Masking

😎 🤫 😘 🤦‍♂️

🔹 Function:

  • softens the aggression,
  • legitimizes character assassination as “just a joke,”
  • makes pushback harder (“it was only humor”).

Summary – What Is Actually Happening?

✔ Not a professional debate
✔ Not public health education
✔ But rather:

personalized discrediting disguised as expert mockery

👉 The final message is not about MRI technology at all, but this:

“If they can’t even get this right, how could they possibly run a country?”

alexandra.. not need words

❗ Since 2010, the minimum wage has increased by 340 percent, from 73,000 forints to 323,000 forints. And this will continue.

Under national governments, wages have always risen; under left-wing governments, we only suffered tax increases and austerity measures.

It would be no different with Tisza either — their leaked austerity package shows they are planning the same.

🟠 Fidesz is the party of wage increases. That is why on April 12, we are once again the safe choice.

Why is Fidesz the safe choice?
I have many reasons, but if I had to name just one:
because the minimum wage rose from 73,000 forints to 323,000 forints.

orbán propaganda

The good old Telex, with its good old pro-immigration mantra again!
IMMIGRATION IS GOOD!! – this is what Telex wrote about yesterday in a spoon-fed, mind-numbing article. According to the liberal fairy tale, immigration is good because it supposedly boosted the German economy 🤡😂

Why did they write about this now ❓
Because the election campaign has started, and one of its key stakes is whether the next government will allow migrants into Hungary. And that is exactly what they want 🤷‍♂️

🇪🇺 In Brussels, Berlin, Paris, etc., they have decided to turn Europe into a migrant continent, because they believe (!!) it is beneficial.

☝️ This insanity has been actively supported for more than 10 years in Hungary as well by the liberal/left camp. “Experts,” opinion-makers, propagandists, who nowadays have organized themselves into a pack under the name “Tisza Party.”

❗️They are not bothered by what happened in Western cities on New Year’s Eve.
They are not bothered by terrorist attacks committed by migrants, crimes linked to migrant gangs, the rising antisemitism, violence against women, problems in schools — nothing bothers them…!

They have decided that Europe will be multicultural, whether the native population wants it or not. Unfortunately, they are making good progress — far too good.

✌️ Only one thing really hurts them!
🇭🇺 The fact that Hungary has so far managed to stay out of this collective European suicide. Here, anyone can still see what life is like in a migrant-free country.

But they cannot allow this. Hungary must be broken, forced into line ❗️

That is why they need the Tisza Party — a guarantee that Hungarian resistance will end and that Budapest will also be flooded with migrants.

And that is why we get these “sensitizing” Telex articles. The goal is for Tisza sect-followers to eagerly applaud the arrival of foreigners, just like they did 10 years ago in Vienna and Munich. It turned out wonderfully…

Have I said it already ❓
Fidesz is the safe choice 😉

🎯 Core Function (Real Objective)

The text does not inform. Instead, it:

  • generates fear,
  • constructs a collective enemy image,
  • fuels moral panic,
  • and forces a single political choice.

👉 The conclusion is predetermined:
“Fidesz is the safe choice.”
Every claim serves this endpoint.

1️⃣ Discrediting and Mockery – Excluding Debate

Target: Telex

  • “good old pro-immigration mantra”
  • “spoon-fed, mind-numbing article”
  • “liberal fairy tale”

🔹 Technique: mockery + stigmatization
🔹 Effect:

  • the reader does not evaluate content, but rejects it automatically
  • the opposing view is framed as “ridiculous” and therefore unworthy of debate

👉 A classic authoritarian move: if you ridicule it, you don’t have to refute it.

2️⃣ Conspiracy Framing – “They Have Decided”

“In Brussels, Berlin, Paris they have decided…”

🔹 Technique: conspiracy narrative
🔹 Key elements:

  • a vague “they”
  • no concrete decisions, no documents
  • no accountable actors, only a threatening background force

🔹 Effect:

  • events appear inevitable
  • independent thinking seems pointless

👉 The goal: helplessness + defensive reflex.

3️⃣ Projection of Collective Guilt

  • “terrorist attacks”
  • “migrant gangs”
  • “violence against women”
  • “antisemitism”

🔹 Technique: collective guilt attribution
🔹 Manipulation:

  • different countries and unrelated events are merged
  • all negative phenomena are reduced to a single cause

👉 No statistics, no proportions, no context.
Only emotional shock.

4️⃣ Dehumanization – The Other Side as a Sect

  • “madness”
  • “organized into a pack”
  • “Tisza sect followers”

Target: Tisza Party

🔹 Technique: dehumanization + psychologization
🔹 Effect:

  • the opponent is not a political adversary
  • but an irrational, dangerous mass

👉 This absolves the speaker from any dialogue.

5️⃣ “Natives” vs. “Foreigners” – Sharpened Identity Politics

“whether the natives want it or not”

🔹 Technique: binary worldview
🔹 Effect:

  • society is split in two
  • “we” = defenders
  • “they” = imposers

👉 This is ethnicized politics, not public policy.

6️⃣ Siege Narrative – Hungary as the Last Fortress

  • “Hungary must be broken”
  • “forced into line”

🔹 Technique: siege psychology
🔹 Effect:

  • every criticism = an attack
  • every election = a fight for survival

👉 Permanent campaign mode.

7️⃣ Closed Ending – No Alternative

  • “That’s why they need Tisza”
  • “Fidesz is the safe choice”

Target: Fidesz

🔹 Technique: false dilemma

  • either Fidesz
  • or civilizational collapse

👉 The choice is not free, but coerced.

🧠 Summary – What Does the Text Actually Do?

This statement:

  • does not inform,
  • does not weigh options,
  • does not prove anything,

but instead:

✔️ manufactures fear
✔️ names an enemy
✔️ sustains moral panic
✔️ legitimizes a single political behavior

This is not an opinion — it is directed emotional control.

alexandra propaganda

❗ Another left-wing economist has checked into Péter Magyar’s money drain!
Júlia Király, former central bank vice president, spoke in a recording where she said that, in her view, utility cost reductions are a “lie,” and that a multi-tier (progressive) tax system is “feasible.” 💭

All of these ideas are eerily identical to the views expressed by Péter Magyar and his advisers. It is worth recalling that the president of TISZA previously stated that cheap utility prices protecting Hungarian families are merely “humbug,” and that their economic program writer, Áron Dalnoki, is advocating the introduction of a progressive personal income tax. ❌

Péter Magyar and his circle are nothing more than a left-wing party with a left-wing program. With disgraced advisers, they would abolish family support schemes, eliminate the 13th and 14th month pensions, and, on orders from Brussels, funnel money to Ukraine. We must say no to this.

We cannot gamble with our future, and we cannot allow ourselves to be made to pay the price of this senseless war. 🟠
In April, it is up to us to send this message together! Fidesz is the safe choice!

Júlia Király has also emerged from the pantry. She says that utility cost reductions are a lie and that progressive taxation is possible. What do you think about this? Utility cost reduction is, in reality, a lie. A certain kind of progressivity in the tax system is feasible.

A whole gallery has found itself again: László Kéri, or Zita Mária Pestnyi, András Kármán, and the list could go on at length. Júlia Király has now stepped into the usual left-wing narrative, attacking the Hungarian people with both feet.

But what should we expect from the left? This is what they know, this is what they would do, and they have even said that they cannot talk about it now, but after the election, everything will be possible.

🎯 Core Function (Real Objective)

The text is not an economic policy debate, but rather:

  • character assassination,
  • scapegoating,
  • fear-mongering,
  • and the communication of a pre-fabricated political verdict.

The conclusion is fixed from the very beginning:
👉 “Péter Magyar = left-wing = anti-family = pro-war = dangerous.”
Everything else serves this premise.

1️⃣ “Checked into Péter Magyar’s money pit” – Criminalizing framing

🔹 Technique: metaphorical stigmatization
🔹 Tools: “money pit,” “emerged from the pantry”

Effect:

  • A professional opinion is no longer an opinion, but “collusion”
  • The speaker is no longer an economist, but a suspicious figure
  • The political arena is reframed as a moral battlefield (good vs. evil)

👉 Classic authoritarian rhetoric:
we do not debate the claim, we discredit the speaker.

2️⃣ Guilt by association

This is where the key maneuver happens:

“Júlia Király said this → it eerily resembles Péter Magyar’s views → therefore it is part of a left-wing conspiracy”

🔹 Technique: chained association
🔹 Logical fallacy: not proof, but deliberate conflation

👉 If two people express similar views on an issue, that does not prove political subordination.
In propaganda, however, suspicion alone is sufficient.

3️⃣ Turning an economic question into a moral crime

Utility price regulation (rezsicsökkentés)

The word “lie” is isolated and weaponized:

  • no context,
  • no explanation,
  • no data.

🔹 Technique: emotional trigger
🔹 Intended message:

“Anyone who criticizes it is acting against the Hungarian people.”

Progressive taxation

It is presented as:

  • a “left-wing attack,”
  • an “anti-family threat,”
  • a “hidden agenda.”

👉 There is no discussion of:

  • where it would apply,
  • at what rates,
  • to which income levels.

Only fear remains.

4️⃣ “Discredited advisers” – Personal discrediting through listing

The list itself becomes the weapon.

🔹 Technique: collective stigmatization
🔹 Effect:
– what anyone actually said no longer matters
– being labeled “left-wing” is sufficient

👉 This is sectarian logic: group identity outweighs the content of the argument.

5️⃣ Total future dystopia – without evidence

The text claims that they would:

  • abolish family benefits,
  • eliminate the 13th and 14th month pensions,
  • finance Ukraine “on Brussels’ orders.”

🔹 Technique: apocalyptic future projection
🔹 Problem:
📌 not a single concrete quote or policy document is cited

👉 This is not information, but intimidation.

6️⃣ “They can’t talk about it now, but after the election everything will be possible”

🔹 Technique: conspiracy narrative
🔹 Function:
– all denials are pre-emptively invalidated
– if they deny it → “they’re lying”
– if they don’t → “they admitted it”

👉 This is a logical trap with no escape.

7️⃣ Closing: collective emotional blackmail

“We cannot risk our future.”
“They would make us pay for the war.”

🔹 Technique: existential fear
🔹 Goal:
👉 the election is framed not as a choice, but as self-defense

And here comes the pre-manufactured conclusion:

🟠 “Fidesz is the safe choice.”

🧠 One-sentence summary

This text does not argue; it:

  • stigmatizes,
  • conflates,
  • intimidates,
  • and morally coerces.

Economic policy is merely scenery.
The real message is this:

“Anyone who thinks differently is a danger to you.”