🌍 Hungarians living abroad also support Fidesz! Some are coming home from England to vote for Fidesz, while others from Austria and Sweden support the national government! 🇭🇺
Hungarians living abroad clearly see what it’s like when a country gives up its sovereignty, when gender ideology and mass migration become part of everyday life. That’s why many are returning home to vote for Fidesz—so that the same thing cannot happen here.
They also know that only Viktor Orbán is capable of saying no to pressure from the Brussels elite and protecting Hungary’s peace and freedom.
This is the kind of country we want—and this is what the people of Budapest we visited together with Gyepes Ádám also confirmed.
🟠 For every Hungarian, no matter where they live, Fidesz is the only safe choice on April 12!
My godchild living in England plans to come home and will definitely vote for Fidesz. And my cousin living in Austria sent me an email recently, describing in detail how they follow Hungarian Facebook, and said that if they could vote here, they would vote only for Orbán.
It’s quite telling that even people abroad, after seeing things for themselves, say this. I also have a cousin in Sweden who constantly complains that Swedish newspapers criticize Orbán. But they come home every summer and see what reality is like here.
Of course, over there they probably portray Hungary as some kind of dictatorship where uniformed police beat people all day and no one can speak freely—everything is painted as terrible. But they know what the real situation is.
And they always ask me to write more so they can stay informed. Yes, that’s good—it’s important that they stay updated from here.
👉 Main narrative:
- “Hungarians living abroad also support Fidesz”
- “West = decline (migration, gender, oppression)”
- “Hungary = safety, freedom”
- “Orbán Viktor = the only protector”
- “Election = survival vs. decline”
👉 Hidden formula:
anecdote + fear + generalization + authority + repetition
→ “even people abroad see it → therefore it’s true”
🔍 What is actually happening here?
1️⃣ Anecdotal “evidence” (anecdotal evidence)
👉 Example:
“my godmother from England… my cousin from Austria… a relative from Sweden…”
👉 Technique:
- a few personal stories → presented as “proof”
- family connections → create a sense of credibility
👉 Goal:
➡️ “this is real because specific people say it”
👉 Effect:
➡️ you don’t question it → because it feels “realistic”
📌 Reality:
This is not representative. 2–3 people ≠ the entire Hungarian diaspora.
2️⃣ Bandwagon / illusion of majority
👉 Example:
“Hungarians abroad also support Fidesz”
👉 Technique:
- minority examples → framed as majority opinion
- creates a “everyone thinks this way” feeling
👉 Goal:
➡️ don’t stand out
➡️ “if others think this → it must be true”
👉 Effect:
➡️ conformity (you align with the “majority”)
3️⃣ Demonizing the West (fear framing + enemy construction)
👉 Example:
“gender madness,” “migration flood,” “giving up sovereignty”
👉 Technique:
- simplified, negative labels
- complex social issues → reduced to alarming slogans
👉 Goal:
➡️ fear of the “foreign example”
➡️ “this must not happen here”
👉 Effect:
➡️ emotional rejection instead of analysis
4️⃣ “Us vs. Them” (binary polarization)
👉 Division:
- Us: Hungarians, Fidesz, safety
- Them: the West, Brussels, media
👉 Technique:
- splitting the world into two sides
- no nuance
👉 Goal:
➡️ simplify the decision
➡️ strengthen loyalty
👉 Effect:
➡️ black-and-white thinking
5️⃣ Protector narrative (protector framing)
👉 Example:
“only Orbán Viktor can protect…”
👉 Technique:
- safety tied to a single ব্যক্তি
- “no alternative” framing
👉 Goal:
➡️ create dependency
➡️ simplify the choice
👉 Effect:
➡️ “if not him → danger”
6️⃣ Discrediting media (reality control)
👉 Example:
“Swedish media criticizes Orbán… but that’s not reality”
👉 Technique:
- foreign media = distortion
- “reality” = own narrative
👉 Goal:
➡️ exclude opposing information
👉 Effect:
➡️ closed information bubble
7️⃣ Repetition + emotional reinforcement
👉 Example:
“Of course… they know… that’s right…”
👉 Technique:
- constant reinforcement
- conversational, “friendly” tone
👉 Goal:
➡️ make it feel natural
➡️ avoid the feeling of propaganda
👉 Effect:
➡️ subconscious internalization
🎯 Summary (short):
👉 This text:
- does not prove → it tells stories
- does not analyze → it simplifies
- does not debate → it frames
👉 Its strongest tools:
- personal stories (illusion of credibility)
- fear of the “West”
- “everyone thinks this” effect
- presenting a single solution (Orbán)
⚠️ In one sentence:
👉 “Even people abroad see it → therefore it’s true → so vote accordingly.”