Aggression, ranting, hatred – this is what Tisza supporters have repeatedly shown, all while talking about building a “country of love.” They try to provoke Fidesz supporters who have gathered peacefully, but we will not fall for these attempts. No matter how many provocateurs Péter Magyar sends there, they cannot ruin our mood.
We know very well: you cannot build a country or a future on hatred and threats. The national government believes in the power of love and unity, and our peaceful mass events prove this. Only Fidesz is the safe choice!
I’ve brought you another collection showing what these Tisza supporters are really like, even as they talk about building a country of love. It’s worth watching the short clip below. Meanwhile, we continue to believe in the power of love and unity—even if Péter Magyar constantly sends his people to provoke Fidesz events to spoil our mood. We will not allow it.
“Why aren’t you fighting at the front? You should be there!
I think you should be there, at the front, you’d hear it with the others.
You should be at the front, buddy!
Why are you sticking support on your back?
You’re such a little nobody, someone who’s good for nothing.
Why?
We can talk nicely with him…
You idiot! You’re an idiot, not disabled.
Where do you think you’re from? Where do you think you’re from?
Why do you have to speak like that, sir?
Why don’t you speak from your mother if no one is interested?
Did Péter Magyar send you here? For this?
I openly say I support Tisza.
Leave, okay?
But why? Why so aggressive?
I told you, don’t film me now! Don’t be so aggressive!
Go to hell! Who the hell are you to me?
Now I’ll report you.
You said I’ll go to prison.
No, man to man!
You said I’ll go to prison, for example.
Yes, just wait! After April 12!
I consider everyone a traitor who is not willing to defend their own family—even by taking up arms and fulfilling their legal duty.
Come on!”
🧠 Quick overview
👉 Main narrative:
- “Tisza = aggressive, hateful, provocateurs”
- “Fidesz = peaceful, love, unity”
- Magyar Péter = organizer of deliberate provocations
- “Election = hate vs. love / chaos vs. order”
👉 Underlying formula:
enemy image + emotional shock + moral superiority + fear
→ “we are the good ones → they are the threat”
👉 🔥 Key point:
➡️ isolated incident (video clip) → presented as a general truth
➡️ emotional reaction → turned into a political conclusion
🔍 Manipulation techniques (in detail)
1️⃣ Enemy construction (enemy framing)
👉 Example:
“Aggression, spitting hatred, hostility – this is what Tisza supporters represent…”
👉 Technique:
➡️ describing an entire group with negative traits
➡️ no distinction between individuals and the whole group
👉 Goal:
➡️ “they = bad, dangerous”
👉 Effect:
➡️ fast emotional rejection without critical thinking
2️⃣ Moral division (us vs. them)
👉 Example:
“they = hate → we = love and unity”
👉 Technique:
➡️ black-and-white worldview
➡️ no nuance, no middle ground
👉 Goal:
➡️ simplify the choice
👉 Effect:
➡️ shuts down critical thinking
3️⃣ Provocation narrative (preemptive justification)
👉 Example:
“Magyar Péter sends his provocateurs”
👉 Technique:
➡️ every conflict is explained in advance
➡️ whatever happens → already has a built-in explanation
👉 Goal:
➡️ absolve one’s own side
👉 Effect:
➡️ any event can be fitted into the narrative
4️⃣ Isolated case → generalization (hasty generalization)
👉 Example:
aggressive speech shown in a video
👉 Technique:
➡️ behavior of a few people → projected onto the entire group
👉 Goal:
➡️ create a generalized image
👉 Effect:
➡️ distorted perception of reality
5️⃣ Emotional shock (shock content)
👉 Example:
vulgar, aggressive dialogue (“go to the front”, “you idiot”, etc.)
👉 Technique:
➡️ strong language → shock effect
➡️ emotion overrides rational thinking
👉 Goal:
➡️ trigger immediate reaction
👉 Effect:
➡️ “this is what they’re like” impression
6️⃣ Fear framing
👉 Example:
“war”, “front”, “traitor”
👉 Technique:
➡️ introducing existential threat
👉 Goal:
➡️ mobilize voters
👉 Effect:
➡️ pushes toward “safe choice”
7️⃣ “We are calm” framing (protector framing)
👉 Example:
“we don’t fall for it”, “we are peaceful”
👉 Technique:
➡️ own side = control, calmness
👉 Goal:
➡️ build credibility
👉 Effect:
➡️ sense of stability
8️⃣ Assertions presented as facts
👉 Example:
“Magyar Péter sends provocateurs”
👉 Technique:
➡️ no evidence, yet presented as a statement of fact
👉 Goal:
➡️ anchor the narrative
👉 Effect:
➡️ repetition → “feels true”
9️⃣ Mobilizing conclusion (call to action + exclusion)
👉 Example:
“Only Fidesz is the safe choice!”
👉 Technique:
➡️ excludes all alternatives
👉 Goal:
➡️ simplify decision-making
👉 Effect:
➡️ “there is no other option” feeling
⚖️ Summary
👉 This text is not trying to inform, but to:
- trigger emotions (anger, fear)
- reinforce an enemy image
- morally elevate one side
- push toward a specific political decision
👉 Strongest elements:
- generalization based on a single video
- unproven accusations
- strong emotional manipulation
- black-and-white framing