After BlackRock, here comes black money: a Ukrainian intelligence operative has now spoken out, claiming that 100-euro bundles from President Zelenskyy’s all-purpose wartime black funds are arriving every week for Péter Magyar. By now, the Tisza leader has allegedly received tens of millions of euros this way for his campaign.
The Ukrainian president is trying to solve his problems with wartime billions of dollars. Part of this, they say, is doing everything possible to help Péter Magyar into government so that the peace-supporting national government can be cleared out of the way of the war. They know perfectly well that Péter Magyar would not say no to Kyiv’s orders, which is why they consider him the most suitable man for the job.
We, however, continue to defend the security of the Hungarian people and peace. That is why we are facing a decisive election on April 12, where there is only one safe choice: Fidesz.
After BlackRock, here comes Black Money — that’s how things work on the left. A Ukrainian intelligence operative also spoke in detail about the origin of the bundles and gold bars hidden in the gold convoy, saying that this is Zelenskyy’s so-called all-purpose money. The Ukrainian president would use billions of dollars to deal with his emerging problems, and right now he would remove the national government from the path of war, since we know exactly that Péter Magyar would not be able to say no to Kyiv’s orders. And of course, he is being well paid for it.
🧠 Quick Overview
👉 Main narrative:
- “Volodymyr Zelenskyy = intervenes with secret money”
- “Péter Magyar = a foreign-funded puppet”
- “Opposition = corrupt + serving foreign interests”
- “Fidesz = the only safe choice”
- “Election = peace vs. war / sovereignty vs. foreign control”
👉 Underlying formula:
conspiracy + corruption + foreign enemy + fear
→ “if we don’t win → the country will be taken away”
👉 🔥 Core point:
➡️ unproven story → presented as established fact
➡️ complex geopolitics → reduced to a simple “money + betrayal” narrative
🔍 Manipulation Techniques (in detail)
1️⃣ “Intelligence source” = false credibility
👉 Example:
“a Ukrainian intelligence agent revealed”
👉 Technique:
➡️ unnamed source → framed as “reliable insider info”
➡️ unverifiable → yet appears credible
👉 Goal:
➡️ get the audience to accept the claim without questioning
👉 Effect:
➡️ “if intelligence says it → it must be true”
2️⃣ Repetition = illusion of truth
👉 Example:
“cash bundles arriving weekly”
“tens of millions of euros”
“billions of dollars”
👉 Technique:
➡️ same claim repeated in multiple forms
➡️ reinforced with large numbers
👉 Goal:
➡️ implant the idea: “this is happening”
👉 Effect:
➡️ creates a sense of reality without evidence
3️⃣ “BlackRock → Black Money” associative framing
👉 Example:
“After BlackRock, here comes black money”
👉 Technique:
➡️ known name (BlackRock) → reframed negatively
➡️ sound-based association → “same shady world”
👉 Goal:
➡️ trigger automatic corruption associations
👉 Effect:
➡️ emotional judgment replaces logical evaluation
4️⃣ Conspiracy stacking
👉 Example:
“Zelenskyy is funding… to remove the government”
👉 Technique:
➡️ linking multiple actors:
Ukraine + intelligence services + opposition
👉 Goal:
➡️ construct a large hidden network narrative
👉 Effect:
➡️ “everything fits together” feeling (even without evidence)
5️⃣ Puppet framing
👉 Example:
“Péter Magyar would not refuse Kyiv’s orders”
👉 Technique:
➡️ political opponent → portrayed as lacking autonomy
➡️ controlled by external forces
👉 Goal:
➡️ completely delegitimize the opponent
👉 Effect:
➡️ turns political debate into “treason”
6️⃣ Fear framing (security threat)
👉 Example:
“removing the government from the path of war”
👉 Technique:
➡️ political competition → reframed as a national security threat
👉 Goal:
➡️ trigger emotional reactions (fear, defense)
👉 Effect:
➡️ rational thinking is suppressed
7️⃣ False dilemma
👉 Example:
“the only safe choice: Fidesz”
👉 Technique:
➡️ multiple options → gradually reduced
➡️ final message: “only us”
👉 Goal:
➡️ force tactical voting
👉 Effect:
➡️ voter feels there is no real alternative
8️⃣ Moral framing (good vs. bad)
👉 Example:
“we protect peace and security”
👉 Technique:
➡️ own side = morally superior
➡️ opponent = dangerous
👉 Goal:
➡️ emotional identification
👉 Effect:
➡️ decision becomes moral, not political
⚖️ Structural Problem
👉 In the text:
- no concrete evidence
- no documents
- no verifiable data
- only claims + “sources”
👉 Transformation:
uncertain / conditional story
→ presented as confirmed fact
🔥 Summary
This is a classic campaign formula:
👉 conspiracy + money + foreign influence + betrayal + fear
→ “only we can protect you”
And its strongest feature:
➡️ it doesn’t try to prove — it tries to make you believe