❗ The Tisza agent scandal is yet another piece of evidence that the left is trying to come to power by colluding with Brussels and Kyiv.

This is an entirely unprecedented case in Hungarian history: an individual calling himself a journalist not only contributed to the surveillance of the foreign minister, but actually handed over phone numbers himself.

🗣️ Moreover, on an audio recording, Szabolcs Panyi admitted that he has close ties to Anita Orbán—whom Péter Magyar has not been willing to condemn in a single word for what happened, nor remove from the stage.

They remain deeply silent. But what should we really expect, when even their IT specialists are trained in Ukraine and are familiar with even the smallest corners of the Ukrainian embassy?

❌ It is clear that within TISZA, only Zelensky’s orders can prevail, as they are simply incapable of saying no to demands. Wiretapping, agents, and scandals piling on top of each other—that is the left.

That is why in April we must place our trust in a government that resists spies and guarantees the security of our country. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

In Hungary’s modern democracy, it has never happened that someone—an individual calling himself a journalist—would contribute to the surveillance of the Hungarian foreign minister, thereby seriously endangering national security and, ultimately, the safety of every Hungarian citizen.

What makes this even more serious is that this person is in very close contact with the Tisza Party, which is preparing to govern. Since this information came to light, Péter Magyar has not provided a single sentence of explanation, has not distanced himself from it, and has not parted ways with Anita Orbán—he has remained completely silent.

And then there is the additional information: at yesterday’s session of the National Security Committee, it emerged that Tisza Party IT specialists received training in Ukraine and practically move in and out of the Ukrainian embassy.

So if, after all this, someone still does not see what forces stand behind the Tisza Party—namely Brussels and Ukraine, both working to replace Hungary’s sovereign government with a pro-Ukrainian one—then I don’t know what more would be needed.

🔍 Main Narrative

👉 “Szabolcs Panyi = agent / part of a wiretapping case”
👉 “Tisza = a network controlled by foreign actors (Ukraine, Brussels)”
👉 “The opposition = a national security risk”
👉 “Fidesz = the only protection”

👉 Classic formula: betrayal + foreign interference + fear + savior

🧠 The Real Issue (as you also point out)

👉 The claims are not proven, but instead based on:

insinuations
connections
“I heard that…” type arguments

👉 Meanwhile:

a journalist’s job = gathering and publishing information
this is not the same as participating in wiretapping

➡️ Key point: journalism ≠ operational involvement

🧠 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Labeling (agent)

👉 “an agent who calls himself a journalist”

Technique: stigmatization
Goal: discredit without evidence
Effect: the reader no longer sees a journalist, but an “enemy”

2️⃣ Guilt by association

👉 “he is connected to X → therefore he is part of it”

Technique: associative guilt
Goal: replace evidence with connections
Effect: connection creates the appearance of guilt

3️⃣ Claims without evidence

👉 “contributed to wiretapping”, “handed over phone numbers”

Technique: assertion without proof
Goal: present unverified claims as facts
Effect: the reader doesn’t question it (“it must be true”)

4️⃣ Conspiracy chain building

👉 Panyi → Tisza → Ukraine → Brussels → Zelensky

Technique: chained association
Goal: construct a large, all-encompassing narrative
Effect: creates the feeling that “everything is connected”

5️⃣ Fear framing (national security)

👉 “endangers the security of all Hungarians”

Technique: existential threat framing
Goal: trigger emotional response (fear)
Effect: reduces critical thinking

6️⃣ Silence = guilt framing

👉 “he didn’t respond → therefore he is guilty”

Technique: false inference
Goal: turn lack of evidence into “proof”
Effect: whatever happens → interpreted negatively

7️⃣ Imitation of intelligence credibility

👉 “National Security Committee”, “report”, “training in Ukraine”

Technique: appeal to authority
Goal: create the appearance of seriousness and credibility
Effect: the reader does not demand evidence

🧩 Key Logical Flaw

👉 What is implied:

“he wrote about it / is connected → therefore he participated in it”

👉 Reality:

a journalist gathers information
talks to sources
publishes

➡️ This does not prove operational involvement

⚖️ Short, Clear Counter-Narrative

👉 “The fact that a journalist gathers and publishes information does not mean they participated in any intelligence or wiretapping operation. These accusations are built on unproven claims and loose associations rather than evidence.”

🎯 Summary

This text:

👉 does not prove anything
👉 instead it connects + exaggerates + labels

Its purpose:

influencing political choice

discrediting

fear-mongering