The collusion between Tisza and the Ukrainians could not be more obvious anymore.
A Ukrainian analyst said that Péter Magyar has to “stroke” his voters, telling them what they want to hear if he wants to win — namely, that “they do not want to send weapons and soldiers to Ukraine.” But this is just an appearance — we know exactly what’s behind it.
All of this is in line with what Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has also stated: that the Ukrainians are developing Tisza’s online mobilization network, while at the same time wiretapping Péter Szijjártó.
Hungarians do not want a puppet government that serves Ukrainian interests! As long as there is a national government, Hungary will remain a sovereign and free state, and we will protect the interests of Hungarians. That is why the only safe choice is Fidesz!
Péter Magyar has to “pamper” Hungarians before the election, because until then he must not reveal that he would send weapons to Ukraine and support them, said a Ukrainian analyst. They are asking for support, claiming that Hungarians should help with weapons — but people are saying no, no, no.
This is not the first time I’ve heard something like this, because Roland Ceber also said that now everyone on the Ukrainian side should keep quiet a bit, otherwise the truth might come out — namely that the Tisza party and the Ukrainians are closely intertwined, and both sides are interested in having a government in Hungary that does not represent Hungarian interests, but instead would, for example, admit Ukraine to the European Union in 2027, and send Hungarian money and our soldiers’ weapons to Ukraine.
Well, this is exactly what we do not want. That is why analysts are now outraged and trying to put a lock on their mouths for the next few days.
🔍 Main Narrative
👉 “Tisza = a network serving Ukrainian interests”
👉 “Péter Magyar = deceives voters”
👉 “Opposition victory = weapons, money, soldiers sent to Ukraine”
👉 “Government = sovereignty and protection”
👉 “Election = national defense vs betrayal”
🧩 Hidden Formula (very clear)
a vague source (“a Ukrainian analyst said”)
→ assumption presented as fact
→ reinforced by another claim (“Orbán also said it”)
→ building a conspiracy (Ukraine + Tisza + wiretapping)
→ existential threat (soldiers, money, war)
→ betrayal narrative (“puppet government”)
→ single solution (“only Fidesz”)
👉 Classic: insinuation → linking → fear → forced choice
🧠 Influence Techniques
1️⃣ Conspiracy framing
👉 “Ukrainians are developing… wiretapping… collaborating”
- No evidence → but presented as a complete story
- Multiple unrelated elements tied into one chain
Goal: create an image of a large, invisible enemy
Effect: distrust, paranoia
2️⃣ False source credibility
👉 “a Ukrainian analyst said”
- No name, no context
- Still used as “evidence”
Goal: imitate legitimacy
Effect: “an insider said it → must be true”
3️⃣ Mind reading / intent attribution
👉 “they are just soothing voters”
👉 “in reality they would send weapons”
- Claims intentions that were never stated
Goal: destroy trust
Effect: “what they say is a lie”
4️⃣ Fear appeal (war + money + soldiers)
👉 “they will send our soldiers”
👉 “they will give away Hungarians’ money”
- Existential triggers: life + finances
Goal: emotional shock
Effect: panic, defensive reflex
5️⃣ Enemy coalition building
👉 Blending Ukraine + EU + opposition
- Separate actors → one unified “camp”
Goal: simplify a complex world
Effect: “everyone is against us”
6️⃣ Betrayal narrative
👉 “puppet government”
👉 “not serving Hungarian interests”
- Elevates it to a moral issue
Goal: delegitimize
Effect: “not just wrong, but traitors”
7️⃣ False dilemma
👉 “either Fidesz, or a Ukrainian puppet government”
- No middle ground
Goal: narrow the choice space
Effect: forced decision
8️⃣ Repetition hypnosis (very strong here)
👉 “we don’t want it, we don’t want it…” (repeated)
- Deliberate emotional overload
Goal: shut down rational thinking
Effect: visceral rejection
9️⃣ Collapse into chaotic speech (intentional)
The text breaks down toward the end (“we don’t want it…”)
- Not accidental: emotional overload → logic fades
Goal: emotion over logic
Effect: “it feels true” reaction
⚠️ What’s especially important
This text does NOT aim to inform, but to:
👉 trigger emotions (fear + anger)
👉 provide an enemy
👉 push toward a single decision
🧠 In short: why it feels disgusting
Because it:
- manipulates → instead of arguing
- uses fear → instead of facts
- oversimplifies → instead of explaining
- tries to affect you → instead of informing
👉 Your brain detects that something is “off” → that’s why the nausea kicks in