It is shocking that something like this could happen: Anita Orbán of the Tisza Party and her Soros-linked journalist friend, Szabolcs Panyi, allegedly wiretapped Péter Szijjártó in cooperation with foreign intelligence services.
We had already suspected that Tisza was working together with foreign forces to overthrow the government, but we did not expect that they would already be talking about what kind of data they would hand over to their journalist ally once they come to power.
Meanwhile, Péter Magyar remains completely silent on all of this and has not commented in any way on the fact that his candidate for foreign minister, Anita Orbán, is collaborating with a Soros-linked journalist and foreign intelligence services.
It is becoming increasingly clear that two very different paths lie ahead of us. Either a Ukraine-friendly, Brussels-aligned Tisza government comes to power, or the national government remains under the leadership of Viktor Orbán, who continues to prioritize Hungarian interests and guarantees the security of the Hungarian people. That is why Fidesz is the only safe choice.
Alexandra, in the studio you were discussing the audio recording that was made public this morning, in which Szabolcs Panyi, a left-wing journalist linked to Tisza, admitted cooperating with foreign intelligence services. I’m interested in your personal opinion—when you first came across this news, what was your initial reaction?
I saw it this morning—I think it was on Mandiner—this roughly 10-minute audio recording, and my first reaction was shock and outrage. Shock that something like this could happen. We suspected that foreign forces might be working against us in cooperation with Hungarian actors around Tisza, but the fact that they are doing this in such a brutal way—and that they are already discussing what data they would release if they come to power—is astonishing.
Or that they are already talking about who should be dismissed or retained, and whether a Tisza-affiliated, foreign-funded, Soros-linked journalist would have a say in such decisions—that, I must say, provoked both shock and outrage in me.
From this, it is clear that the real choice before us is whether Hungary continues to have a prime minister like Viktor Orbán, who prioritizes national interests, or whether a Ukraine-friendly, Brussels-aligned, foreign-influenced government connected to intelligence services comes to power—which obviously would not represent Hungarian interests.
It is also outrageous that Péter Magyar has not spoken out on this issue at all. He has made no comment whatsoever on the fact that his intended foreign minister, Anita Orbán, maintains close personal ties with this Soros-linked journalist associated with Tisza.
If you want, I can also break this down into propaganda techniques like your previous analyses.
🔍 Core Narrative
👉 “Tisza + journalists = foreign spy network”
👉 “Péter Magyar = silence → complicity”
👉 “There are two paths: treason vs national defense”
👉 “Viktor Orbán = security and national interest”
👉 “Fidesz = the only safe choice”
🧩 Underlying Formula (classic campaign logic)
a disputed / unproven case
→ forced interpretation (“espionage”)
→ external enemies (intelligence services, Soros, Brussels, Ukraine)
→ internal traitors (Tisza, journalists)
→ moral panic (“they will release data”, “they will fire people”)
→ binary choice (“us vs them”)
→ political mobilization (“Fidesz is the only solution”)
👉 This does not inform — it pushes toward an emotional decision
🧠 Influence Techniques (detailed)
1️⃣ Enemy construction (enemy framing)
Excerpt:
“collaborating with foreign intelligence services”
“Soros-linked journalist”
Technique:
➡️ merging multiple enemies into one block
➡️ linking global forces with domestic actors
Goal:
➡️ maximize perceived threat
Effect:
➡️ “this is no longer politics, but an attack on the country”
2️⃣ Suggesting guilt without evidence
Excerpt:
“admitted cooperating with intelligence services”
Technique:
➡️ presenting claims as facts without proof
➡️ audio recording = illusion of unquestionable evidence
Goal:
➡️ shut down debate
Effect:
➡️ the audience stops asking: “is this actually true?”
3️⃣ Guilt by association
Excerpt:
“Anita Orbán’s friend → journalist → intelligence services”
Technique:
➡️ relationships used instead of evidence
➡️ chain: friend → network → espionage
Goal:
➡️ discredit an entire political side
Effect:
➡️ “anyone connected to them is suspicious”
4️⃣ False dilemma
Excerpt:
“two very different paths lie ahead”
Technique:
➡️ only two options presented:
- Orbán = security
- Tisza = foreign control
Goal:
➡️ eliminate middle-ground positions
Effect:
➡️ forced choice
👉 This is one of the strongest manipulations in the text
5️⃣ Fear appeal (existential level)
Excerpt:
“they will release data”
“they will fire people”
“a government controlled from abroad”
Technique:
➡️ concrete, personal consequences
➡️ not abstract politics, but “what happens to you”
Goal:
➡️ trigger anxiety
Effect:
➡️ “this is dangerous for me personally”
6️⃣ Projection (mirror technique)
Essence:
➡️ accusations of “foreign ties” are shifted onto the opponent
Technique:
➡️ preemptively neutralizing criticism of one’s own side
Effect:
➡️ “they are the spies, not us”
7️⃣ Generating moral outrage
Excerpt:
“shock”, “outrage” repeated multiple times
Technique:
➡️ emotion as a guiding signal
➡️ if it’s outrageous → it must be true
Goal:
➡️ suppress critical thinking
8️⃣ Silence = guilt (argument from silence)
Excerpt:
“Péter Magyar is silent → did not comment”
Technique:
➡️ lack of response = admission
Goal:
➡️ reinforce accusations without evidence
Effect:
➡️ “if he doesn’t deny it, it must be true”
9️⃣ “People vs outsiders” framing
Excerpt:
“Hungarian interest vs foreign interest”
Technique:
➡️ identity-based conflict
Goal:
➡️ turn political choice into identity
Effect:
➡️ “if you’re not with us, you’re against us”
🔟 “Only solution” narrative
Excerpt:
“Fidesz is the only safe choice”
Technique:
➡️ total exclusion of alternatives
Goal:
➡️ pull in undecided voters
Effect:
➡️ “there is no other option”
⚠️ Overall Picture (brief)
This text:
👉 does not prove
👉 does not nuance
👉 does not analyze
but instead:
👉 constructs enemies
👉 generates fear
👉 builds a betrayal narrative
👉 forces a binary choice
🧠 One-sentence diagnosis
👉 This is a classic combination of “national security panic + betrayal narrative + false dilemma”, aimed not at informing but at rapid emotional mobilization before an election.