Share this so it also reaches those who usually only hear Péter Magyar’s lies!
According to Manfred Weber, the European People’s Party is already “on the front line” supporting Ukraine, and he sees what Péter Magyar is doing in Hungary—and is very satisfied with it.
There’s not much to add to that. The pro-war, pro-Ukraine mainstream of the EPP is just waiting for a Tisza victory so they can finally drag Europe—and our country as well—into the war.
That’s what is at stake on April 12. Anyone who does not want war, does not want to give their money to Ukraine, and does not want to give up cheap energy due to Zelensky’s pressure should vote for Viktor Orbán.
Fidesz is the safe choice! In April, bring two more people with you!
I don’t think we could have asked for a clearer endorsement of whose side Péter Magyar is on. Manfred Weber said today that the EPP is fighting on the front line for Ukraine—just as Péter Magyar is doing in Hungary. We must make it clear once again: the European Union is standing with Ukraine. The EPP is on the front line. When I recalled Donald Tusk’s example in Poland, what Péter Magyar is doing in Hungary became clear—we know exactly what to expect. I think it is now obvious to everyone: we stand with the Hungarian people, we stand against Ukrainian pressure, while Péter Magyar continues to stand with Ukraine. That is why Fidesz remains the only safe choice.
🔍 Core Narrative
👉 “Péter Magyar = serves Ukraine / foreign interests”
👉 “The West (EPP) wants to drag Europe into war”
👉 “The election = peace (Fidesz) vs. war (opposition)”
👉 “Orbán = the only protection”
➡️ This is a external enemy + internal traitor + savior leader triangle.
🧠 Manipulation and Influence Techniques
1️⃣ Exaggerating the external enemy (Ukraine + EU)
Example:
“fighting on the front line for Ukraine”, “dragging Europe into war”
Technique:
➡️ militarized language
➡️ framing political support as war
➡️ dramatizing the threat
Goal:
➡️ create fear
➡️ portray “them” as dangerous
Effect:
➡️ emotional reaction instead of rational thinking
⚠️ Reality:
EU support ≠ automatic participation in war.
2️⃣ Guilt by association
Example:
“Weber is satisfied with Péter Magyar → therefore he supports Ukraine”
Technique:
➡️ drawing conclusions from a third party’s statement
➡️ no proven direct link
Goal:
➡️ place Péter Magyar in the “foreign interests” category
Effect:
➡️ erosion of trust
⚠️ Logical flaw:
Political alignment ≠ full agreement on everything.
3️⃣ False dichotomy
Example:
“If you don’t want war → vote for Orbán”
Technique:
➡️ presenting only two options
➡️ everything else = pro-war
Goal:
➡️ force a choice
Effect:
➡️ narrowed thinking
⚠️ Reality:
Political positions are not binary.
4️⃣ Fear + financial threat combined
Example:
“money to Ukraine”, “losing cheap energy”
Technique:
➡️ highlighting personal loss
➡️ bundling war + money + cost of living
Goal:
➡️ create a threat that affects everyone
Effect:
➡️ strong emotional trigger (economic anxiety)
5️⃣ Repetition and overemphasis
The same claims repeated:
👉 “on the front line”
👉 “this is what Péter Magyar does”
👉 “Ukrainian side”
Technique:
➡️ repetition = illusion of truth
Goal:
➡️ embed the message
6️⃣ Mobilization (call to action)
Example:
“Share this”, “bring two more people”
Technique:
➡️ activation
➡️ social pressure
Goal:
➡️ increase spread and participation
7️⃣ “Us vs. them” identity framing
👉 “we stand with the Hungarian people”
👉 “they stand with Ukraine”
Technique:
➡️ group identity building
➡️ moral superiority
Effect:
➡️ polarization
⚠️ Key Distortions
❌ political support = war (false)
❌ a statement = evidence (it’s not)
❌ only two choices exist (false dilemma)
❌ oversimplification of complex EU politics
🧩 Overall Picture
This text is not trying to inform, but to:
➡️ create fear
➡️ build an enemy image
➡️ force a decision
➡️ leave only one “safe” option
🧠 In short (bluntly)
👉 This is fear-based, oversimplified propaganda
👉 It strongly relies on anxiety about the war in Ukraine
👉 It deliberately distorts political reality
👉 In the end it doesn’t argue → it directs (“vote this way”)