👉 The first Tisza supporter admitted they want to put Zelensky in power!
László Kéri admitted on the left-wing’s in-house TV channel, Kontroll, that he would be happy if the Ukrainian president became Hungary’s prime minister. As an advisor to Péter Magyar, he clearly revealed what they truly represent and who they really serve—because if they came to power, they simply wouldn’t be able to say no to orders from Brussels or Kyiv.
🟠 If you don’t want Zelensky imposed on you, vote for Viktor Orbán and Hungarian interests in April, because only Fidesz is the safe choice!
László Kéri said that if the choice is between Viktor Orbán and Zelensky, then he would choose Zelensky. Listen, Zsuly—isn’t it possible that the positive message was about cooperation with Zelensky? You know what? Then Zelensky it is. Well, this is typical Tisza-style behavior from the first Tisza supporter, László Kéri, because we know exactly that for them anything from Brussels or Ukraine is acceptable. For us, however, Hungarians come first—that’s why Fidesz is the safe choice.
🔍 Core Narrative
👉 “The opposition = serves foreign interests (Ukraine, Brussels)”
👉 “Our side = protector of Hungarian interests”
👉 “The election = homeland vs. foreign control”
This is a classic sovereignty vs. betrayal framing.
🧠 Deep Propaganda Structure
The text operates on 5 levels at once:
- enemy construction (Ukraine, Brussels)
- personal threat (“on your neck”)
- distortion (what Kéri actually said)
- simplification (complex issue → single claim)
- forced electoral choice (“only Fidesz”)
1️⃣ “They want to put Zelensky in power” – false framing
Technique:
➡️ deliberate misinterpretation
➡️ presenting an absurd claim as fact
➡️ the word “admitted” = imitation of credibility
Goal:
➡️ shock the audience
➡️ make the opponent look ridiculous and dangerous
Effect:
➡️ “these people are insane”
➡️ rational verification is bypassed
⚠️ Real issue:
➡️ Kéri did not say this (it was a conditional comparison)
➡️ an opinion is reframed as a concrete political plan
2️⃣ “Advisor to Péter Magyar” – guilt by association
Technique:
➡️ association
➡️ projecting one person’s statement onto an entire political side
Goal:
➡️ indirectly discredit Péter Magyar
➡️ avoid engaging with actual policies
Effect:
➡️ “they are all like this” mindset
⚠️ Real issue:
➡️ no evidence this is an official position
➡️ individual opinion ≠ party policy
3️⃣ “Orders from Brussels or Kyiv” – external control narrative
Technique:
➡️ external enemy framing
➡️ suggestion of a “puppet government”
➡️ emotionally loaded keywords
Goal:
➡️ create fear of losing national control
➡️ activate identity (“Hungarians vs outsiders”)
Effect:
➡️ distrust toward the opposition
➡️ stronger loyalty to the governing side
⚠️ Real issue:
➡️ no concrete mechanism is presented
➡️ complex EU politics reduced to “orders”
4️⃣ “If you don’t want Zelensky on your neck” – fear trigger
Technique:
➡️ personal threat framing
➡️ emotional overload
➡️ construction of an irrational scenario
Goal:
➡️ trigger fear and disgust
➡️ force a quick, emotional decision
Effect:
➡️ reaction instead of thinking
➡️ “this must be avoided at all costs”
⚠️ Real issue:
➡️ unrealistic scenario
➡️ no real political basis
5️⃣ “Only Fidesz is the safe choice” – exclusion framing
Technique:
➡️ binary worldview (only 2 options)
➡️ elimination of alternatives
➡️ decision pressure
Goal:
➡️ maximize votes
➡️ narrow the choices of undecided voters
Effect:
➡️ feeling that “there is no alternative”
⚠️ Real issue:
➡️ multiple political options exist
➡️ artificially simplified reality
💣 Key Manipulation (most important part)
👉 from a conditional comparative statement
➡️ they construct a concrete political agenda
This is one of the strongest propaganda distortions:
opinion → intention → program → threat
🎯 Overall Picture
This text:
👉 does not inform
👉 does not analyze
👉 but builds an emotional trigger chain:
- shock (“Zelensky will be prime minister”)
- fear (“on your neck”)
- betrayal (“Brussels/Kyiv”)
- solution (“vote for Fidesz”)
🧠 In short
This is a classic, heavily distorting campaign message that:
➡️ twists a statement
➡️ builds a false narrative on top of it
➡️ generates fear
➡️ then offers a single “solution”