
Let’s stand together against unprecedented hatred!!
#northpest #pestujhely #kaposztasmegyer #rakospalota #ujpalota
What Tisza supporters are doing is brutal. Several people who attended the poster event here, or who help our work as activists, have reported it. Those who appeared in videos and photos say that an unprecedented wave of hatred has been directed at them. They are being humiliated, harassed, intimidated, and mocked.
Fortunately, many have also said that despite all of this, they do not regret standing with us. I sincerely thank everyone for that.
At the same time, I would like to offer that if there are people who, despite all this—or even because of it—are proud to stand with the national forces and proudly call themselves patriots, then write to me at nemethbalazsvagyok@gmail.com, and let’s make a joint video or photo.
Let’s show that there are many of us, and that those who are being targeted and intimidated are not alone.
1️⃣ Building a victim narrative (victimhood framing)
Excerpt
“an unprecedented wave of hatred has been unleashed on them”
“they are humiliated, harassed, terrorized, and mocked”
Technique
The text portrays one political camp as a collective victim.
Strong emotional words:
- wave (tsunami)
- terrorized
- humiliated
- harassed
Goal
➡️ to trigger emotional identification
➡️ to create a sense of moral superiority
Effect
The reader may feel that:
- “they are victims”
- “they must be defended”
2️⃣ Creating an enemy image (enemy construction)
Excerpt
“what the Tisza supporters are doing”
Technique
The political opponent is presented as a collective group.
Not individual people, but:
➡️ “the Tisza supporters”
Goal
To create a simple conflict:
- us
- them
Effect
Polarization.
3️⃣ Emotional exaggeration (emotional amplification)
Key words
- brutal
- unprecedented
- tsunami
- terror
Technique
The text strongly dramatizes the situation.
It is not framed as:
- debate
- conflict
- criticism
but as:
➡️ “terror”.
Goal
To provoke an immediate emotional reaction.
Effect
Rational evaluation is pushed into the background.
4️⃣ Collective mobilization (mobilization framing)
Excerpt
“Let’s show that there are many of us”
Technique
This is a classic movement-style call to action.
The message shifts:
from complaint
➡️ to mobilization.
Goal
To build group identity.
Effect
The reader may feel:
➡️ “I should join”.
5️⃣ Strengthening group identity (identity framing)
Excerpt
“supporters of the national forces”
“patriots”
Technique
A political stance becomes a moral identity.
It is not simply:
- supporting a party
but rather:
➡️ patriotism.
Goal
To turn a political choice into a moral question.
Effect
Anyone outside this group is implicitly framed as:
➡️ “not a patriot”.
6️⃣ Self-justifying narrative (self-justification loop)
The logic of the text:
- “They attack us”
- “We are victims”
- “This proves that we are right”
- “Therefore we must unite even more strongly”
This creates a closed communication loop.
🧠 The psychological pattern behind the text
This follows a classic political mobilization formula:
1️⃣ threat
2️⃣ victim narrative
3️⃣ identity
4️⃣ mobilization
Structure:
enemy → victim → community → action
⚠️ Why it may feel like “they accuse others of what they themselves do”
Because it reflects a common phenomenon called:
projective propaganda (projection)
This means:
➡️ accusing the opponent
➡️ of the very techniques used in one’s own communication.
Examples:
| Claim | Actual communication pattern |
|---|---|
| “wave of hatred” | strong emotional polarization |
| “terror” | political dramatization |
| “they harass us” | amplification of conflict |
📌 In short
The text does not primarily provide information. Instead, it:
- generates emotion
- builds identity
- mobilizes supporters.
That is why it feels like propaganda.