❗In severe psychiatric crises, patients are sometimes put in a straitjacket so that everyone can clearly see that the person is a danger to themselves and to others.
But somehow Noár slipped out of it, and since then he has been hyperventilating Magyar Péter’s lies…
Ukrainians threaten Hungarians every day. Zelensky has said that he is ready to blackmail us with the Druzhba pipeline, and the Nazi military officers he has decorated have also repeatedly threatened our country, saying they could be here “with a brigade in two minutes.”
Yes, that oil is missing from your car as well, and yes, they also want to be in your living room “within two minutes.”
As for energy issues: you are nowhere near good enough of an actor to play the role of an energy lawyer with this level of zero knowledge. 😉
Not enough oil can come from Croatia, and even that would arrive at a much higher price. Brent crude itself is already about 30% more expensive than the oil that could come from there, and the combined cost of tanker shipping and transport through the Adria pipeline is also higher.
And I saved the saddest part for the end. Noár, how much are you being paid for this? How can someone sink this low in hatred toward their own country and nation?
Do you seriously believe the Croatian prime minister from the European People’s Party (who, by the way, is currently reintroducing conscription)?
Their only problem is that their own state oil company is controlled by MOL, which is a huge Hungarian achievement and something from which every Hungarian benefits.
Right now the Croats simply see an opportunity in the Ukrainian blackmail to strengthen their own positions at the expense of Hungarians. Yes, at your expense too.
And by the way, they are lying — something Zsolt Hernádi, the CEO of MOL, demonstrated perfectly (although of course you probably didn’t see that, since you’re saying such nonsense without spending even a minute looking into the facts).
Tell us already: from what deep pit or euro-filled sack does this hatred come? Is the government lying, the prime minister lying, MOL lying, the energy lawyers lying — everyone who says that Hungary and MOL are right?
What you are doing with Tisza is shameless, lying hate propaganda. If it were up to you, Hungary would no longer have Europe’s cheapest utility costs, and gasoline would quickly rise to 1,000 forints.
Fortunately, Hungarians are far smarter than you, and they expect far more from a government than this traveling circus act you’re putting on with your friend Péter Magyar.
In April, Fidesz and Viktor Orbán are the safe choice!
The following text is a typical campaign-style political propaganda message that combines several classic manipulation and rhetorical techniques. The goal is not to provide information, but to discredit the opponent, create fear, and mobilize political support.
The simplified narrative behind the message:
➡️ Ukraine / the opposition = danger and betrayal
➡️ Government / Fidesz = protection and common sense
Below are the main techniques presented in bullet points.
🎭 Propaganda and Manipulation Techniques in the Text
1️⃣ Personal attack (ad hominem)
Excerpt
“they put a straitjacket on him…”
“he is hyperventilating Magyar Péter’s lies”
“such stupidity”
Technique
👉 personal discrediting
Goal
To question the mental state of the opponent so the reader does not focus on the arguments.
Effect
The reader focuses not on the debate but on discrediting the opponent.
2️⃣ Creating an enemy image
Excerpt
“the Ukrainians threaten Hungarians every day”
“Nazi military officers”
Technique
👉 demonization of an external enemy
Goal
To construct a simple and threatening enemy image.
Effect
The reader feels personally threatened, making them more likely to accept the political narrative.
3️⃣ Fear appeal
Excerpt
“they want to be in your living room in two minutes”
Technique
👉 visualization of existential threat
Goal
To turn a geopolitical conflict into a personal danger.
Effect
The reader reacts emotionally rather than rationally.
4️⃣ False simplification
Excerpt
“Not enough oil can come from Croatia.”
Technique
👉 oversimplification of a complex energy policy issue
Goal
To present a complicated infrastructure and market issue as a simple one-sentence truth.
Effect
The reader does not see the real factors involved (market conditions, refinery technology, transport routes, etc.).
5️⃣ Appeal to authority
Excerpt
“Hernádi Zsolt demonstrated this perfectly.”
Technique
👉 authority-based argument
Goal
To close the debate by invoking authority.
Effect
The reader feels the issue is already settled.
6️⃣ Betrayal narrative
Excerpt
“hatred toward your own country and nation”
Technique
👉 manipulation of patriotism
Goal
To portray the opponent not as a political rival but as anti-national.
Effect
Political debate turns into a moral judgment.
7️⃣ Suggestion of conspiracy
Excerpt
“does this hatred come from a sack of euros?”
Technique
👉 insinuation of foreign funding
Goal
To portray the opponent as serving foreign interests.
Effect
The reader becomes more likely to reject the opponent entirely.
8️⃣ Economic scare tactics
Excerpt
“fuel would cost 1000 forints”
Technique
👉 economic fear-mongering
Goal
To present dramatic economic consequences of the opposition’s policies.
Effect
The reader reacts through their own financial concerns.
9️⃣ “Us vs. them” tribal politics
Excerpt
“Hungarians are fortunately much smarter than you”
Technique
👉 sharp polarization of political camps
Goal
To lock the reader into a political identity group.
Effect
The debate becomes a tribal conflict rather than a rational discussion.
🔟 Campaign closing mobilization
Excerpt
“In April, Fidesz and Viktor Orbán are the safe choice!”
Technique
👉 classic campaign CTA (call to action)
Goal
To trigger a voting decision at the end of the message.
Effect
The entire message ultimately functions as political advertising.
Summary
The text is not a policy debate, but an emotionally driven campaign message that:
- uses personal attacks
- constructs an external enemy
- generates fear
- applies economic scare tactics
- manipulates patriotism
- and ultimately ends with electoral mobilization
This communication model follows the “fear + betrayal + protection” narrative, a structure commonly used in modern political propaganda.