A young left-leaning Tisza supporter — but at least we had a good conversation!
He should also know that Péter Magyar cannot say no to the EU’s war plans, just as he does not say no to Zelensky’s oil blockade either!!
I’m a young centre-left supporter, but… what kind of voter does that mean? Or which party?
I’m one of the Tisza Party voters. Have a nice day!Balázs Németh: Hello!
Csanád Bábik: I’m Csanád Bábik. Are you collecting signatures? Supporters?Balázs: No, no, no.
Csanád: I’m an opposition-leaning young person.
Balázs: Well! I like talking to opposition supporters.
Csanád: I wrote a letter to Viktor Orbán. It’s a critical letter, and I would like it to reach his desk so that he can actually read it and respond.
I’m a centre-left young person, but… what kind of voter does that mean? Which party does that represent?
I’m one of the Tisza Party voters.Well, Tisza is basically left-leaning, so in that sense it’s fine. But I hope that even if Tisza were in government, there would be changes — and that voters would move in a positive direction.
It’s certain that there would be changes in the country if there were a Tisza government.
You would receive a draft notice for military service, our money would go there, soldiers would be sent.
Did Péter Magyar actually suggest that he would do this?
Péter Magyar took photos in Munich two and a half weeks ago with one of the EU’s most pro-war leaders.
From what I see, it would only bring negative changes, both in this constituency and nationally as well.
Csanád: Yes, yes. Well… I don’t agree with that, but… I’ll deliver the letter.
1️⃣ Staging a “friendly debate”
Key element:
“Left-wing young person, Tisza supporter — but at least we had a good conversation!”
📌 Technique:
A staged “civilian conversation.” The politician presents it as if he were calmly debating an average opposition voter.
🎯 Goal:
To create the impression that he is open, capable of dialogue, and able to speak respectfully even with opposition supporters.
💥 Effect:
The viewer feels:
“at least he talks to people.”
2️⃣ False representation (fake sample)
Key element:
The “center-left young person” repeatedly speaks uncertainly about his own political identity.
📌 Technique:
Presenting a single individual as a typical Tisza voter.
🎯 Goal:
To create the impression in the viewer’s mind:
Tisza voter = uncertain, doesn’t really know what they want.
💥 Effect:
The opposing camp appears incompetent or confused.
3️⃣ Fear appeal – war narrative
Key sentences:
“Péter Magyar cannot say no to the EU’s war plans.”
“You would receive a call-up for military service.”
📌 Technique:
Fear appeal (fear-based propaganda).
🎯 Goal:
To make voters imagine personal losses, such as:
- conscription
- war
- sending soldiers abroad
💥 Effect:
The political debate turns into an existential threat.
4️⃣ Scapegoating – EU and Ukraine
Key element:
“Zelensky’s oil blockade”
📌 Technique:
Simplifying a geopolitical conflict into a clear enemy image.
🎯 Goal:
To construct the narrative:
EU + Ukraine → harming Hungary
Tisza → supporting it
💥 Effect:
Voters may feel that external forces are manipulating the country.
5️⃣ Building moral superiority
Key element:
“I like talking to opposition supporters.”
📌 Technique:
Self-positioning as a calm, democratic actor.
🎯 Goal:
The politician places himself above the conflict.
💥 Effect:
The viewer may perceive:
“he is reasonable, the other side is radical.”
6️⃣ Closing the narrative – guided conclusion
By the end of the conversation the frame becomes:
Tisza → war
EU → pressure
opposition voter → uncertain
Balázs → calm and rational
📌 Technique:
Story framing — guiding the audience toward the intended conclusion.
🎯 Goal:
To make viewers feel they arrived at the conclusion logically.
💥 Effect:
The propaganda works almost invisibly.
💡 Summary
The video follows a classic campaign format:
- imitation of a spontaneous civilian conversation
- portraying the opponent as uncertain
- fear appeal (conscription, war)
- geopolitical scapegoating
- building moral superiority
👉 This is why it appears to be a “spontaneous street conversation,” while in reality it delivers a carefully framed political narrative.