Here is the result of Péter Magyar stirring up hatred among his supporters for two years! North Pest does not want violent opposition fanatics! Fidesz is the one that can guarantee peace, calm, and security.
I came out to the field again — the guys are putting up posters on both sides of the road. Yesterday they were being pelted with oranges, today someone was threatening them and throwing stones in their direction. I would just like to ask that anyone who has a problem with Fidesz’s policies, and those who have been incited by Péter Magyar, should not take it out on them. You can see on Facebook when I’m out on the street, at which location and at what time. Come there and let’s talk it through — I won’t run away from anyone. Thank you very much.
🎭 1️⃣ Scapegoating and Personalized Responsibility
Key sentence:
“Péter Magyar has been inciting his supporters to hatred for two years!”
📌 Technique:
Attaching complex social tensions to a single individual (“incitement”).
🎯 Goal:
To simplify the conflict: not spontaneous anger, but “directed hatred.”
💥 Effect:
The audience does not weigh what actually happened, but instead links the narrative of violence to one specific person.
⚔️ 2️⃣ Moral Black-and-White Framing
Structure:
opposition = “hatred, violence, fanatics”
Fidesz = “peace, calm, security”
📌 Technique:
Total moral polarization.
🎯 Goal:
To trigger emotional identification rather than policy-based debate.
💥 Effect:
The voter chooses a moral side, not a program.
🎬 3️⃣ Dramatizing the Victim Position
Elements:
“they threw oranges”
“they threatened us”
“they spat at them”
📌 Technique:
Visualized conflict (concrete, everyday imagery).
🎯 Goal:
To evoke empathy for the “guys working out in the field.”
💥 Effect:
The campaign team appears not as political actors, but as attacked civilians.
🧠 4️⃣ Conditional Provocation + Controlled Bravery
“It’s on Facebook when I’m out there. Come talk to me.”
📌 Technique:
Appearance of openness + invitation to confrontation.
🎯 Goal:
To project strength and self-confidence.
💥 Effect:
The speaker “doesn’t run away,” therefore appears brave and legitimate.
🔥 5️⃣ Emotional Chain Reaction
Narrative arc:
Incitement to hatred
Violent consequences
We want peace
We are the safe choice
This is classic campaign dramaturgy.
Summary
This text does not prove — it frames.
It does not demonstrate that the violence was organized or directed.
It does not analyze what actually happened.
Instead, it constructs a moral story:
“We are peaceful, we are being attacked.”
This kind of narrative is highly mobilizing because it:
- generates fear,
- provides a point of identification,
- and offers a simple answer to a complex situation.