The nationwide tour is already underway! We are going to every county and all 106 constituencies. Let’s meet in person and talk about the key issues facing the country.
On April 12, the stakes will be enormous: either we stay out of the war and keep Hungarians’ money at home, or we get dragged into the war and send our money to Ukraine.
We choose the Hungarian path, the path of peace. Let’s show that we are the majority!
Attention, we’re setting off and taking the whole country on. We won’t stop at Budapest — we’ll be present in every county and visit all 106 constituencies. Let’s meet and speak with everyone about both national and local issues.
The stakes are huge: either we choose the Hungarian path, stay out of the war, and keep Hungarians’ money at home, or we line up behind Brussels and get pulled into the war — and our money goes with it.
We will continue on the Hungarian path. Let’s talk face to face across the entire country. Don’t forget: we are the majority. If we stand together now, on April 12 we will achieve a great victory. I’m really looking forward to it — see you soon.
1️⃣ Existential Election Framing (“war or peace”)
📌 Technique:
The election is reduced to a binary survival question:
– “we stay out of the war”
– “we get dragged into the war”
– “we keep the money at home” vs. “we send it to Ukraine”
🎯 Goal:
To transform political competition into a moral and security ultimatum.
Voters are not meant to choose between policy programs, but to decide based on fear.
💥 Effect:
Rational deliberation recedes into the background.
The decision becomes an emotional reflex: security vs. danger.
2️⃣ False dilemma (false dichotomy)
📌 Technique:
Only two options are presented:
– “the Hungarian path”
– “falling in line with Brussels”
🎯 Goal:
To eliminate nuance and middle positions.
As if no political alternative could simultaneously seek peace while advocating a different economic policy.
💥 Effect:
The decision becomes identity-based.
Anyone who is not “with us” is framed as “pro-war.”
3️⃣ External enemy construction (“Brussels”)
📌 Technique:
An abstract, faceless power is portrayed:
“falling in line with Brussels.”
🎯 Goal:
To frame domestic political debate as foreign interference.
Not party vs. party → but Hungary vs. external forces.
💥 Effect:
Instead of a policy debate, a sovereignty reflex is triggered.
4️⃣ Illusion of majority (“we are the majority”)
📌 Technique:
Repeated assertions:
– “we are the majority”
– “if we unite, we will win”
🎯 Goal:
To trigger the bandwagon effect (joining the perceived winner).
To psychologically steer undecided voters toward the “winning side.”
💥 Effect:
Voters do not want to remain in the minority.
Collective identity is strengthened.
5️⃣ Mobilization dynamic (“we will take the country by storm”)
📌 Technique:
Emphasis on action, momentum, and physical presence:
– “every county”
– “all 106 constituencies”
🎯 Goal:
To demonstrate strength, organization, and nationwide reach.
💥 Effect:
The movement appears active, powerful, and unstoppable.
🔎 Summary
This text builds on a classic crisis narrative:
- Fear frame: war
- Economic threat: “they will take our money”
- External enemy: Brussels
- Identity frame: “the Hungarian path”
- Majority psychology: “we are the majority”
The election is thus presented not as a political choice,
but as a civilizational and survival question.