RTL is relativizing, Tisza is downplaying it, but the bloody reality of war is merciless.
At the end of December, I myself visited Transcarpathia and spoke with those devastated mothers and children who lost their loved ones in a senseless war.
They will never again see their fathers and sons. Those who relativize the horrors that have taken place disregard the pain of the Hungarian families affected.
Europe wants to go to war — that is the reality.
We can hear what the British or French Chiefs of Staff are saying — that “we must accept the loss of our children” — or we can look at the Brussels programs that outline plans for war by 2030.
In the West, they have decided they want war, and they want to drag Hungary into it. They even have their person for this in the figure of Péter Magyar, who would not be able to say no to such orders.
That is why in April we must place our trust in a government that can resist war demands even in dangerous times — Fidesz is the safe choice.
A video was posted today on the Fidesz-Budapest page. It was created with the help of artificial intelligence. What is the message of this video? What can be seen in it? Fortunately, for now, this is only a nightmare scenario for us here in Hungary — but for many people, this is everyday reality. Including for Hungarians.
For example, at the end of December I was in Császlóc, in Transcarpathia, where I spoke with a mother who tearfully told me how she lost her 37-year-old son, Mihály. Then I met Istvánka, a very kind teenage boy whose father was also taken by the war.
The statements made in recent months by European leaders — whether by the British or French Chiefs of Staff, the NATO Secretary General, or Manfred Weber — all point in the same direction: this is Europe’s war. We must prepare. We must accept that we may lose our children in this war. We must prepare for a war the likes of which we have not seen since our grandfathers’ time.
The European Union’s 2030 strategy also states that by 2030 Europe must be prepared for a wartime situation. All of this unfortunately shows that this is not an unimaginable danger — even if, in the comfort of a big city or the relative safety of Hungary, one might sometimes feel that it cannot affect us.
1️⃣ Designating a Media Enemy – “RTL relativizes”
📌 Technique: delegitimization + media enemy construction
👉 Instead of debating specific content, it morally discredits the entire channel.
👉 “Relativizes” and “trivializes” function as moral accusations.
🎯 Goal:
Centralize media trust within the speaker’s own camp
Exclude critical voices
💥 Effect:
The audience no longer asks: What is RTL saying?
But rather: Whose side is RTL on?
2️⃣ Personal Testimony – Transcarpathia, mothers, children
📌 Technique: first-hand witness framing + emotional identification
👉 Mentions specific names, ages, and a grieving mother in tears.
👉 Personal presence acts as a credibility shield.
🎯 Goal:
Claim the moral high ground
Activate empathy
💥 Effect:
Emotional identification overrides geopolitical complexity.
3️⃣ Moral Blackmail – “Whoever relativizes disregards the pain”
📌 Technique: moral blackmail + false dilemma
👉 Either you agree, or you are insensitive to the victims.
🎯 Goal:
Shut down debate
Apply moral pressure
💥 Effect:
Rational criticism becomes morally risky.
4️⃣ Existential Threat – “Europe wants to go to war”
📌 Technique: threat amplification + collective future anxiety
👉 References to a “2030 war plan,” losing children, quotes from military leaders.
🎯 Goal:
Activate security instincts
Generate future-oriented anxiety
💥 Effect:
The election becomes framed not as a policy choice, but as a survival decision.
5️⃣ External Control Narrative – “They decided it in the West”
📌 Technique: sovereignty framing + external command narrative
👉 Decisions are portrayed not as democratic processes, but as imposed “orders.”
🎯 Goal:
Create national cohesion
Strengthen anti-Brussels sentiment
💥 Effect:
Politics is framed as a geopolitical chess game.
6️⃣ Identifying “Their Man” – Péter Magyar
📌 Technique: agent narrative + loyalty framing
👉 Not a policy critique, but a question of character and allegiance.
🎯 Goal:
Delegitimize the alternative
Frame the election as a loyalty test
💥 Effect:
Political competition is reframed as moral betrayal.
7️⃣ AI Video – Visual Shock + Normalization
📌 Technique: fear visualization + “this could be the future” framing
👉 The AI-generated video is not an argument, but an emotional projection of the future.
🎯 Goal:
Make an abstract threat concrete
Create emotional imprinting
💥 Effect:
The image becomes stronger than the argument.
🧠 Overall Communication Pattern
The message is built from five layers:
- Media delegitimization
- Personal emotional testimony
- Moral polarization
- Existential future fear
- Electoral loyalty framing
At the end of the logic:
“War or Fidesz.”
Not a policy debate.
Not a strategic analysis.
But election mobilization built on security instinct.