
We can say NO to Brussels! That’s why the national government must continue even after April!
These two letters arrived in your mailbox.
Oh great, the national petition has arrived. We can indicate that we don’t want to give our money to Ukraine, and we don’t want skyrocketing energy prices either.
And here’s the election notice. There, we’ll choose a government that can say no to Brussels. Thanks.
How many days are left? Two months.
🔴 1️⃣ “We CAN say NO to Brussels!”
📌 Technique: sovereignty framing + manufactured conflict
This is not a concrete policy debate, but an identity statement.
“we” → collective inclusion
“we can say no” → strength, protection
“Brussels” → simplified, faceless opponent
👉 Political coordination is framed not as negotiation, but as a resistance struggle.
There is no specific decision mentioned, no concrete EU regulation cited — only a sense of conflict.
🔴 2️⃣ The dramaturgy of the two letters
📌 Technique: visual legitimacy + conflation
Placing the “national petition” next to the “official election notice” is not accidental.
One: a government campaign tool
The other: an official electoral document
👉 Putting them side by side suggests:
supporting the government = democratic duty
Psychologically, this is powerful because it borrows the aura of state legitimacy.
🔴 3️⃣ “We don’t want to give our money to Ukraine”
📌 Technique: financial loss activation + fear framing
The word “our money”:
makes the issue personal
triggers a sense of loss
generates an immediate emotional reaction
❗ Yet there is no specific number, no concrete budget line mentioned.
This is classic:
concrete emotion + vague policy
🔴 4️⃣ “Skyrocketing energy prices”
📌 Technique: future threat + conditioning
It does not claim prices are currently skyrocketing.
Instead:
if they don’t stay in power → then prices will skyrocket.
This is conditional fear messaging.
🔴 5️⃣ “We will choose a government that can say no”
📌 Technique: binary electoral framing
The election is simplified into:
A) says no
B) cannot say no
There is no:
alternative EU strategy
negotiation model
compromise solution
Only a moral category: strong vs. weak.
🔴 6️⃣ “How many days are left? Two months.”
📌 Technique: countdown + mobilization
A countdown:
creates urgency
builds tension
activates supporters
This is campaign rhythm-building.
🎯 What is expected from followers?
- Identify with the “resisting nation.”
- Accept the Brussels vs. Hungary framing.
- Treat signing the petition as a political statement.
- Reinforce this stance at the ballot box.