Knights of the Tisza Party in “Country of Love”! Hatred is pouring out of them — they are wishing death upon their political opponent. Shame!
And a question: is the paper poop? No. Yesterday I showed a message that arrived in the Red Post box, trying to persuade me to jump in front of a train. Now comments came under that video.
“I agree with the writer, I wouldn’t skip it either.”
“Good advice should be followed.”
“I’d only feel sorry for the train driver.”
“Listen, the Budapest–Belgrade railway line supposedly runs at 160. That’s already a good speed — good suggestion, I support it.”
And one more question: is the paper poop? No, ladies and gentlemen. It’s fish in tomato sauce. The enthusiastic Tisza supporter who wishes for my death has just surprised me with fish in tomato sauce.
Well, this is who they are.
The Red Post box is located in Káposztásmegyer. Go ahead!
🔴 1️⃣ “Hatred is pouring out of them” – collective stigmatization
Technique: generalization + moral superiority
From one (alleged) message:
→ “Tisza supporters wish death on people”
→ “This is who they are”
📌 Logical leap:
one comment → an entire political community
This is identity framing:
not a single commenter, but “the whole camp” becomes morally unacceptable.
🔴 2️⃣ Dramatizing a death threat – emotional shock
Technique: fear amplification + moral shock
“Jump in front of a train”
“It goes 160 km/h”
“I support it”
Here’s the key move:
– quotes an (unverifiable) message
– plays it up
– then turns it back against the entire community
👉 Two emotions are triggered in the viewer:
– outrage
– protective instinct
This is classic martyr-narrative construction.
🔴 3️⃣ “Is the paper crappy?” – absurd distraction insert
Functionally, this section uses:
Technique: absurdism + meme-ification
The “tomato fish” scene is:
– grotesque
– distracting
– easily clip-able
– meme-ready
👉 The serious accusation (a death wish) gets mixed with an absurd gag.
This reduces accountability while increasing shareability.
🔴 4️⃣ The “Red Mailbox” – naming a physical location
“It’s out in Káposztásmegyer. Go for it!”
This becomes a subtle directed-mobilization element.
He doesn’t explicitly say “go there” –
but he names the location.
This is classic “dog whistle” communication:
not an explicit instruction, but it activates the more radical followers.
🔴 5️⃣ The most interesting part – the possibility of self-provocation
The structural pattern looks like this:
- Create a shocking stimulus
- Publish it
- Generate comments
- Highlight the most extreme ones
- Deliver a moral judgment about the entire camp
This is a self-sustaining conflict machine.
If there’s no hatred → it doesn’t work.
If there’s little hatred → it must be amplified.
If there’s no clear perpetrator → assign a collective label.
🎯 Summary
This is not information.
This is:
– victim-role construction
– collective enemy creation
– emotional mobilization
– meme-based shock tactics
– subtle mobilization
The strongest element is not that “someone wrote something ugly.”
It’s that from this, the narrative builds:
→ an identity war
→ moral superiority
→ political mobilization
→ a self-constructed heroic storyline.