
👉 It’s astonishing to see the double standard represented by Magyar Péter: he accuses others of exactly what is being committed by people in his own circle.
Paid thugs, daily intimidation, and ongoing violent actions are not part of our political side. This harmful and dangerous public atmosphere was introduced in Hungary by the Tisza movement, no matter how hard they try to conceal it.
🟠 Let’s not fall for the incitement—we are the guarantee of peace. Only Fidesz is the safe choice.
I honestly can’t keep up with how someone posts 28 times a day and writes 4,600 comments in between—obviously. Come on, Szandra! Have you seen what Magyar Péter is doing? They have nothing left but to turn Hungarians against Hungarians.
So let me get this straight: is it really Magyar Péter who is accusing us of creating some kind of civil-war situation—when his own associate, Romulus, previously said (in a threatening manner) that everyone should be very careful so that such a situation “doesn’t arise”?
And is it really the same Magyar Péter who sent his hired enforcers after a man named Richard because he dared to tell the truth—namely, that Magyar Péter paid 20,000 forints plus fuel money to people to go and cause trouble at a Lázár János forum, and that afterward these same people beat up Richard for speaking out about what happened?
What did he see? That was the whole point. There was a case in Gyöngyös—I went there with them on purpose. So they were paid to go to Gyöngyös? Yes. What’s more, they even tried to force him into a car.
There are limits even to shamelessness—and although Magyar Péter crosses them regularly, this is, even by his standards, a particularly disgusting maneuver, in my view.
1️⃣ Criminalization without evidence (character assassination)
“paid criminals”
“thugs / enforcers”
“daily threats”
“continuous violent actions”
❌ There is no:
- case number
- police report
- indictment
- court ruling
- credible source
👉 This is not a factual claim, but labeling.
If repeated often enough, the brain starts to treat it as fact.
This is smear-through-repetition.
2️⃣ Victim–perpetrator role reversal (reverse victimhood)
“they are not part of our political side”
“we are the guarantee of peace”
👉 The trick:
- first, others are branded as violent,
- then the speaker presents themselves as the enforcer of order.
This is psychological self-absolution:
“If we are peace, then anyone opposing us is a danger.”
3️⃣ Hearsay presented as evidence (anecdotal manipulation)
“a man named Richard”
“he said”
“they saw it”
“he told them”
❗ Notice:
- no last name
- no date
- no clearly identified location
- no recording, no official report
👉 This is anecdotal ‘proof’, used to manufacture mass accusations.
4️⃣ Fear-mongering + civil war insinuation
“civil war situation”
“we must be very careful”
“Hungarians being turned against Hungarians”
👉 Classic fear stacking:
- violence
- threats
- chaos
- internal enemy
Then comes the “solution”:
“Only Fidesz is the safe choice.”
This is not an argument — it is a trigger for defensive reflexes.
5️⃣ Collective guilt and associative smearing
Individual figures (“Romulus”, “Richard”)
➡️ projected onto an entire political community.
👉 Technique: guilt by association
If one person is labeled “bad”, everyone becomes guilty.
6️⃣ Information overload (confusion flooding)
- too many names
- too many stories
- jumping timelines
- emotional saturation
👉 The goal is not understanding,
but to make you lose the thread and simply feel that “something is wrong”.
🧠 Overall picture
This text does not inform. It:
- manufactures enemies
- projects imminent violence
- frames itself as “peace”
- criminalizes without evidence
- generates emotional panic
And it closes with a campaign slogan.
❗ The key takeaway
If there is no evidence,
but many strong accusations,
and it always ends with the same line:
“Only Fidesz is the safe choice.”
👉 then you are not seeing reality —
you are seeing engineered fear.