Brussels wants to cut Hungarian pensions so badly that it even finances events for left-wing organizations where they openly talk about it. 😅
That’s exactly why, if TISZA were to come to power, they would immediately abolish the 13th and 14th month pensions.
👉 Now Péter Mihályi, a former MSZP deputy state secretary, has openly said that the 13th and 14th month pensions should be abolished “immediately.”
According to him, the money could be spent better elsewhere — I have a pretty good guess that he would rather give it to migrants or to Ukraine.
🤝 For us, however, seniors matter. We respect them, because they worked their entire lives — in February, the 13th month pension is arriving, along with the first installment of the 14th month pension.
That’s why Fidesz is the safe choice.
The 13th month pension is arriving now, along with the first part of the 14th month — but will it arrive next year as well? Well, if we can say “no” to Brussels, then it certainly will.
The problem is that I’ve just seen a short clip in which a former MSZP deputy state secretary, together with another expert linked to Péter Magyar — András Simonovics — spoke at a conference, a clearly pro-Republican event. Their message was clear: the 13th and the 14th month pensions must be abolished.
So if anyone still has doubts about what the TISZA Party would do, they should simply do what Péter Magyar says: listen to the TISZA experts. Listen to how they argue, one after another, for phasing out “Women 40,” and for abolishing the 13th and 14th month pensions. According to them, the money could be spent better elsewhere.
I don’t know what exactly they have in mind — perhaps migrants should receive more social benefits, or maybe the money should be sent to Ukraine. In any case, we have a pretty clear idea of what’s going on in the minds of TISZA’s experts.
We, on the other hand, say that pensions must be protected. Pensioners have worked their whole lives, and they deserve secure, predictable years in retirement.
🧠 1️⃣ A non-existent decision presented as a fait accompli
“Brussels wants to cut Hungarian pensions so badly…”
❌ There is no such decision.
There is no:
- EU resolution
- legislation
- obligation
- concrete institutional proposal
👉 This is the technique of presenting an assumption as a fact.
It is spoken about as if it were already decided, when in reality it is nothing more than rhetorical scare-mongering.
🎭 2️⃣ “Left-wing companies”, “a conference” – a deliberately vague enemy image
“They finance events for left-wing companies”
This is intentionally opaque:
- no company names
- no funding data
- no contracts
- no amounts
👉 Function: to trigger emotional distrust without any possibility of verification.
👤 3️⃣ One expert opinion → projected onto an entire party
Named individuals:
- Mihályi Péter
- Simonovics András
The trick:
- an academic opinion
→ sold as a party platform
→ then framed as collective intent (“TISZA would abolish it”)
❗ This is a logical fallacy:
an expert’s view ≠ a political decision
🔢 4️⃣ Deliberate numerical chaos
At one point they say:
- 13th month
- monthly
Then later: - monthly
- “first installment”
👉 Mixing = confusion = fear.
Once the listener loses the thread, emotions become easier to steer.
😱 5️⃣ Migrants–Ukraine projection (without evidence)
“I have a guess… migrants or Ukraine”
This is open speculation, yet it is delivered:
- in declarative form
- with a mocking tone
- without alternatives
👉 A classic case of scapegoating + fear redirection.
🏷️ 6️⃣ “We protect – they take away” framing
This text is not about pension policy, but about identity:
| “We” | “They” |
|---|---|
| protect the elderly | take it away |
| respect work | would give it to foreigners |
| predictability | uncertainty |
👉 Moral blackmail:
if you are not with us → you are against the elderly.
🧨 7️⃣ One-sentence summary
This is not information, but:
🔴 fear-mongering
🔴 false causal chains
🔴 intimidation through named individuals
🔴 non-existent decisions treated as established facts