🧐 It is becoming increasingly clear: it very much matters how we decide! Two paths lie ahead of us. We can stay on the Hungarian path — the path of tax cuts and peace — or we can step onto the Brussels path, with war, tax increases, and uncertainty.
The latter is the path chosen by the Netherlands, where a liberal government has been formed together with the Tisza party’s EPP sister party, and they immediately introduced a war tax, collected in the form of an income tax increase. To make it sound nicer, they call it a “freedom contribution,” but that changes nothing about the substance: they are preparing for war and burdening people with austerity measures.
👉 This is what would await Hungary as well if we were to elect a Brussels puppet government.
Instead, the national government preserves peace and tax cuts.
That is why Fidesz is the safe choice! 🟠
So what do we mean when we say that the Tisza party is risky? Just look at what is happening now in the Netherlands. In the Netherlands, a new liberal government has been formed, which is, incidentally, the European Parliamentary sister party of the Tisza party, its EPP sister party. And what did they start with? They immediately introduced a war tax in the form of an income tax increase. But of course, it would sound far too ugly to call it that, so they named it a “freedom contribution.” Isn’t that a nice phrase? “Freedom contribution” — that’s what they called this extra tax.
This is exactly what we want to spare the Hungarian people from. Here at home, we can still choose. We can choose whether to bring a Brussels party to power in Hungary — one that comes with austerity — or whether we remain on the Hungarian path.
1️⃣ “Look at the Netherlands” – importing an external scare scenario
“Look at what is happening in the Netherlands right now.”
This is a classic deterrent example, but:
- no date
- no legislation
- no specific decision-maker
- no source
👉 The Netherlands is not the subject of analysis, but a fear-inducing prop.
They are not saying:
“This happened, for this reason, through this mechanism.”
They are saying:
“It’s bad there → it will be the same here.”
This is analogy-based manipulation.
2️⃣ “Sister party” – guilt by association
“…which is, by the way, the European sister party of the Tisza Party”
This is the classic guilt by association tactic:
- it does not link programs
- it does not link decisions
- it does not link votes
Instead, it assigns emotional responsibility.
👉 If they do something, you are guilty too — even if you have nothing to do with it.
This is a basic propaganda technique.
3️⃣ “War tax” → “freedom contribution” – linguistic hysteria
“a war tax… but that would sound too ugly”
This is a straw man:
- no quoted legal name
- no proof that it is a war tax
- no proof of an income tax increase
👉 The “nice word vs. ugly word” debate distracts from the real question:
does such a measure even exist, and what exactly is it?
This is not a factual dispute — it is word-based outrage.
4️⃣ “We will protect the Hungarian people” – the savior narrative
“This is what we want to spare the Hungarian people from”
At this point, it is no longer politics but dramatic role assignment:
- they = danger
- we = shield
- you = the one to be saved
👉 From here on, rational debate becomes impossible, because anyone who questions the claim
is placed on the side of the threat.
5️⃣ “Brussels party” vs. “Hungarian path” – false binary choice
“We can choose… a Brussels party or the Hungarian path”
This is the climax of the speech and its most aggressive trick:
- no third option
- no nuance
- no concrete program
👉 In reality, choices are never this black and white,
but propaganda always turns them into that.
🧠 Summary – why this is a deception technique
This text:
❌ does not prove
❌ does not cite
❌ does not define
✔️ imports fear
✔️ assigns blame
✔️ agitates through language
✔️ forces a false choice
This is not an analysis of the Netherlands
and not the program of the Tisza Party,
but a pre-fabricated choreography of fear.