The Tisza “country of love” proves itself yet again! 😂
Let me tell you a lovely little story. The Tisza supporters have come up with a new prank. Since I have two email addresses publicly available on the internet—so that voters, North Pest voters, or in fact anyone in the country can stay in touch with me, which is kind of the whole point of being a representative, or even a candidate—they decided to target those email addresses.
They started registering my email addresses on thousands of different platforms. I’ve received thousands of notifications from adult websites, betting sites, sports sites—messages saying that someone has registered or attempted to register using my email address.
They incite, they provoke, they spread hatred, and they want to cause harm at any cost. Meanwhile, we are dealing with the country and with the future of the Hungarian people. That’s the difference.
Fortunately, after April 12, they will calm down too.
1️⃣ “Love Country” – pre-emptive mocking framing
“The Tisza ‘Love Country’ proves itself again!”
This is not a description, but labeling.
Putting the word “love” in quotation marks = irony → the opponent is framed as hypocritical from the outset.
👉 Function:
Before any facts are presented, the speaker places themselves in a position of moral superiority.
2️⃣ The storytelling trap (“Let me tell you…”)
“Let me tell you a nice little story.”
This is not evidence, but an anecdote.
There is no:
- technical proof
- timestamp
- IP address / source
- police report
- service provider confirmation
👉 The audience is not meant to verify — only to feel.
3️⃣ Imposing collective guilt
“The Tisza supporters came up with a new prank…”
There is no specific perpetrator → every Tisza supporter becomes guilty.
This is a classic case of collective guilt:
- no names
- no individuals
- no chain of responsibility
👉 An entire political community is criminalized.
4️⃣ Disgust and fear triggers
“adult sites, betting sites…”
This is not a random list:
- adult content → moral disgust
- gambling → deviance
- “thousands” → shock value
👉 The goal is emotional repulsion, not fact-finding.
5️⃣ Assigning motives without proof
“They incite, provoke, spread hatred, they want to cause harm.”
This is mind-reading.
It does not state what happened, but why it allegedly happened — without evidence.
👉 This is psychological suggestion:
“they are bad, we are good.”
6️⃣ Moral binary framing (US vs THEM)
“While we focus on the country…”
A clean binary framework:
| US | THEM |
|---|---|
| country | harm |
| future | hatred |
| calm | provocation |
👉 Politically, this is an identity war, not a debate.
7️⃣ Timed reassurance = veiled threat
“After April 12, they will calm down as well.”
This suggests two things at once:
- We will win
- After that, you will fall silent
👉 This is not reconciliation — it is a power message.
🧠 Overall picture – what is this really?
❌ Not fact-finding
❌ Not a legal matter
❌ Not a proven attack
✅ Delegitimization wrapped in a victim narrative
✅ Collective scapegoating
✅ Emotional disgust + moral panic
✅ “We are order” messaging
This is not about what happened to an email address,
but about who is considered a legitimate political actor.