May God protect us from that so-called “expert government.”
As many of you may know, I am a young mother, almost 27 years old, with a two-year-old little boy. I own an apartment that I purchased with the help of a loan, I have several jobs, and I have many goals for the future that I want to achieve. I am a simple Hungarian citizen. No wealthy family background, no judicial connections, no circle of influential friends, no Rose Hill ties.
For me, one of the most important things is simply to be allowed to live — to have a government in Hungary that not only lets me live, but also gives me opportunities: so that if I am diligent, if I work, and if I have goals, I can actually achieve them.
It matters to me that a government does not restrict wherever it can, but instead creates opportunities for me to develop and move forward. That in small, everyday matters — such as utility bills or access to subsidized loans — it offers help, so that if I want to make use of those tools, I can, and through them I can progress in life.
At the same time, I also consider it extremely important that my child grows up in a safe country and is proud of where he comes from. Proud of his Hungarian identity, and proud to say that he is part of a country with more than a thousand years of history — and that one day he, too, can be a contributing member of this nation.
Now you might ask: why am I saying all of this?
Because it leads directly to the next point.
In the next video, András Schiffer speaks — and he is certainly not someone who could be accused of agreeing with Viktor Orbán, the right wing, or right-wing ideas on many issues. And yet, he sees certain situations very clearly. For example, that it is a terrible idea to place the fate of a country into the hands of people who know exactly how to organize a state to serve multinational corporations and foreign interests.
May God protect us from letting “expertise” rule the country.
I always say at moments like this that István Csurka once expressed a great truth: that “expertise” is an old Bolshevik trick. In reality, it is about disabling democratic decision-making — when we want to hand a country over to so-called experts and managers instead of the people.
🎭 1. The entry point: “a simple Hungarian mother” – credibility building
“I am a 27-year-old young mother… a simple Hungarian citizen…”
This is not a biography — it is a rhetorical shield.
What does it do?
It preemptively removes her from criticism.
“If you attack me, you attack a mother.”
The political claim is protected by emotional status.
This is the identification anchor:
“She is just like you. You are just like her.”
🧱 2. The classic “let me live” frame – the myth of negative freedom
“Don’t restrict me, create opportunities instead.”
It sounds good, but it is a false binary.
As if there were only two options:
🟢 “national government” = lets you live
🔴 “experts” = oppress you
In reality, every government restricts:
collects taxes,
regulates,
redistributes.
This is not about freedom — it is about loyalty:
“A good government is the one that supports me — as long as I don’t ask questions.”
⚡ 3. Utilities + loans = reward framing
“utility bills, subsidized loans”
This is not public policy, but conditional security:
“We help you if you stay with us.”
Support is not presented as a right, but as a granted favor.
This is classic patronage logic:
“It’s not owed — we give it.”
🇭🇺 4. Child + nation = emotional sanctuary
“be proud of being Hungarian… a thousand-year-old country”
Here, argumentation ends.
Anyone who challenges it → “endangers the child’s future”
Anyone who asks questions → “is not patriotic enough”
This is a moral shield, not an argument.
🎓 5. Bringing in András Schiffer – borrowing authority
“You can’t accuse him of supporting Orbán, YET…”
This is the “even the opponent agrees” trick.
👉 András Schiffer appears here not as a thinker, but as a prop.
What matters is not what he actually says, but that:
“he’s not Fidesz,”
“therefore objective,”
“therefore believe him.”
🧠 6. “Expert government” as an enemy image
“It’s a damn bad idea to entrust a country to experts.”
This is the true core of the speech.
Here, “expert” does not mean competence —
it means foreign, elite, alien interest.
And this leads to the key sentence.
☠️ 7. The Csurka quote – the revealing moment
“Expertise is a cheap Bolshevik trick.”
👉 István Csurka
This is brutally important, because it is a slip.
What does it really mean?
Professional decision-making is dangerous.
Measurement, data, analysis are dangerous.
The questioning citizen is dangerous.
This is no longer governance — it is the disabling of democracy:
“Don’t think. Leave it to us.”
🎯 8. The REAL message (summarized)
This speech is not about:
motherhood,
utilities,
nation,
security.
It is about this:
🔒 Do not oversee decisions.
🧠 Do not demand expertise.
🗳️ Do not practice democracy.
Because:
those who understand → ask questions
those who ask questions → are dangerous