The Tisza Party has fallen captive to the Bajnai–Soros circle.
It was expected. Sorry, Tisza supporters—now I’m the one who has to deliver the bad news to you. Someone has to do it. Your darlings do not want to win in April.
Here we have this new woman who was deployed from the Bajnai–Soros circle to stand next to Magyar Péter. She supported globalist multinationals, and in her very first public statement she says that she has put an end to Hungarian vetoes in the EU.
Put an end to Hungarian vetoes.
Which means:
yes to the migration pact,
yes to Ukraine’s EU membership,
yes to Hungary supplying weapons to the war,
and then sending soldiers into the war.
These people do not want to win.
With promises like this, how could anyone win an election in Hungary?
Make a bet—you’ll be better off if they don’t win. Because this Sorosist, Bajnai-aligned team would truly abolish vetoes, and Hungary would fall into a terrible state.
They would send our money to Ukraine.
Gender lobbyists would arrive.
And of course, no-go zones would form in the outer districts of Hungary’s major cities.
No!
🎭 Apparent message (surface level)
The text claims that:
- the Tisza Party has been “captured” by a
“Bajnai–Soros circle” (→ Bajnai Gordon, Soros György), - a woman was “assigned” next to Magyar Péter,
- she is abolishing Hungarian vetoes,
- therefore:
- migration is coming,
- Ukraine will join the EU,
- weapons will be delivered,
- soldiers will be sent,
- gender lobby,
- no-go zones,
- money being “sent” to Ukraine,
- therefore it is better if Tisza does not win.
This is the surface narrative.
🎯 The REAL function (why the text exists)
This is not information, but:
👉 fear-mongering + stigmatization + self-justifying conclusion
The goal is not to prove anything, but to:
- trigger emotional panic,
- pre-emptively exclude any rebuttal,
- turn the opponent into a scapegoat,
- and strip the listener of the ability to think.
🧩 Key techniques – point by point
1️⃣ “Bajnai–Soros circle” = a magical enemy construct
Not an organization.
Not a program.
Not a decision-making body.
A vague, unprovable label that can be pinned on anyone.
Guilt by association: what matters is not what someone says, but who can be pointed to behind them.
👉 Classic conspiracy framing.
2️⃣ Logical leap chain (domino lie)
“ends vetoes”
→ “yes to migration”
→ “yes to Ukraine”
→ “weapons deliveries”
→ “soldiers”
→ “no-go zones”
⚠️ Not a single step is proven—yet all are treated as established fact.
This is a textbook slippery slope.
3️⃣ False “inside knowledge” posture
“I’m the one telling you the bad news”
This is the prophet role:
- no source,
- no quotation,
- no document,
just “I know.”
👉 Authority comes not from evidence, but from tone.
4️⃣ Paradoxical message: “they don’t want to win”
This is especially revealing.
The real message:
“If someone says something different from what we taught you to fear, then they must not want to win.”
👉 This shuts down political competition:
- no alternative is allowed,
- only “madness” or “betrayal.”
5️⃣ Moral blackmail + apocalypse framing
“They would send our money away”
“gender lobbyists”
“no-go zones”
“Hungary would end up in a terrible state”
This is fear stacking:
not one concrete danger, but an accumulation of emotional noise.
👉 The listener does not think—
they defend themselves.
🧠 What is conspicuously MISSING?
❌ concrete quotation
❌ legal text
❌ decision or resolution
❌ voting date
❌ source
❌ possibility of counter-argument
This is not debate.
It is a pronouncement of guilt.
🧩 Summary – what is actually happening here?
This text:
- does not analyze the Tisza program,
- does not argue,
- does not prove,
but instead:
👉 manufactures fear,
👉 names an enemy,
👉 criminalizes alternatives,
👉 and tells you in advance what you must think.