We will not give Budapest residents’ money to Ukraine either!
We are sending a message from Újpalota: we will not give our money to Ukraine.
Yesterday, Brussels swallowed the idea that another 800 billion must be handed over to Zelensky and the war mafia for the coming years. They want to open a “welfare fund” for Ukraine. A welfare fund.
Meanwhile, no one in Brussels cares in the slightest about the welfare of Hungary and the Hungarian people. On the contrary: the funds that are rightfully ours are being withheld and cut off—with the support of the Tisza Party and the DK.
We will not give our money to Ukraine as long as there is a patriotic government in Hungary.
That is what’s at stake in April.
🎭 Speaker and Role
Németh Balázs
→ pro-government narrative conduit
→ role: emotional mobilization + external enemy construction + loyalty test
🎯 Core Function (real purpose)
The text is not about:
- the EU budget,
- actual financial transfers,
- Ukrainian aid mechanisms,
- Budapest’s municipal budget.
Instead, it is about:
- demonizing Ukraine,
- reinforcing Brussels as an “enemy,”
- portraying the opposition (TISZA + DK) as traitors,
- reducing the April election to a single forced stake:
👉 “either us, or Ukraine.”
🧩 Main Propaganda Techniques
1️⃣ False financial framing
“We will not give Budapest residents’ money to Ukraine.”
➡️ Budapest has no separate pool of money that can be sent to Ukraine
➡️ emotional ownership framing: “they are taking it from us”
2️⃣ Numerical shock + vagueness
“800 billion”
➡️ no source, no timeframe, no breakdown
➡️ the number is not information — it is an alarm signal
3️⃣ Moral binary
- Ukraine = “war mafia,” “welfare fund”
- Hungarians = “people no one cares about”
➡️ classic us vs. them framing
➡️ empathy toward Ukraine = betrayal of Hungary
4️⃣ Enemy stacking
Ukraine
⬇
Zelensky
⬇
Brussels
⬇
TISZA + DK
⬇
“they take your money”
➡️ merged into a single, threatening bloc
5️⃣ Conditional coercion
“We won’t give it as long as there is a patriotic government.”
➡️ electoral message:
If you don’t vote for us, your money will be taken.
🧠 The Key Sentence Where the Propaganda Exposes Itself
“This is what’s at stake in April.”
👉 From this point on, it is clear:
- not information,
- not debate,
- but voter fear-mobilization.
⚠️ One-Sentence Summary
This text is not about Ukraine, but about
covering up domestic political failures with an external enemy,
and turning the election into a coercive false dilemma:
“either us, or your money.”
If you want, I can write the single cognitive-disruptive comment
that dismantles this without shouting,
so they won’t even argue with you —
the reader will start thinking instead.