❗ The Brussels left would continue to blackmail Hungary over migrants — but we will not give in!
It is not enough for the Brussels bureaucrats that the Court of Justice of the European Union previously imposed an unprecedented, politically motivated ruling, ordering Hungary to pay a daily fine of one million euros, plus an additional 200 million euros.
❌ Now they are stepping up another level and launching yet another procedure against our country.
And all this simply because we are not willing to allow migrants onto Hungarian territory. They want even more money from us — this is how they would try to force us to accept foreigners.
The Brussels left would continue to blackmail Hungary because we refuse to take in migrants. This means, quite literally, that they are still imposing a daily fine of one million euros on us — because we refuse to accept this so-called migration pact. And now they want to increase this penalty even further; this is what they are demanding from Ursula von der Leyen.
Well, I can still say this clearly: as long as Hungary has a national government, as long as Fidesz is in power, we will not give in to blackmail, and we will not allow migrants to enter Hungary.
Let us be absolutely clear: as long as the national government is in place, as long as Fidesz governs, we will not yield to blackmail. No matter how large the fine may be, we will not allow illegal migrants into Hungary!
🟠 This is the safe choice!
🎯 Core Function (Real Purpose)
The text is not legal or migration-related information, but rather:
- the construction of a blackmail narrative (“Brussels is forcing us with money”),
- the creation of an external enemy image (“the Brussels left”),
- the enforcement of internal political loyalty (“as long as we are in power, we will protect you”),
- the pre-closure of the electoral choice.
👉 The conclusion is not reached at the end, it is decided in the very first sentence:
Fidesz = protection / Anyone else = submission.
1️⃣ Rule-of-law judgment → political blackmail
“an unprecedented, politically motivated ruling”
🔹 Technique: delegitimisation
🔹 Reality: the ruling was issued by a court, not by a political party.
👉 What this does:
- presents a legal decision as a political attack,
- thereby absolves the government of responsibility for the legal violation.
2️⃣ “The Brussels left” – a manufactured enemy
🔹 Technique: vague scapegoating
There is:
- no specific person,
- no specific law,
- no identifiable decision-maker.
There is:
- a foggy, emotional enemy label: “the Brussels left”.
👉 This is not analysis, but emotional branding.
3️⃣ Financial penalty = admitting migrants (false causality)
“this is how they would force us to accept foreigners”
🔹 Technique: false causal chain
🔹 Reality:
- the fine is linked to non-compliance with legal obligations,
- it is not an automatic ‘migrant admission fee’.
👉 The text deliberately blurs together:
- rule-of-law obligations, and
- an imagined migration threat.
4️⃣ Numerical shock tactic
“one million euros per day”
🔹 Technique: number shock
🔹 Goal:
- outrage,
- fear,
- a sense of being “under siege”.
📌 Context is deliberately omitted:
- why,
- since when,
- for which legal violation,
- what alternatives exist.
5️⃣ Ursula von der Leyen as a personalised villain
“this is what they are now asking from von der Leyen”
🔹 Technique: personalisation + power distortion
She is:
- not the sole decision-maker,
- not someone who “hands out punishments”.
👉 But in propaganda, one face works better than an institution.
6️⃣ The mantra: “as long as we are in power”
“as long as there is a national government…”
“as long as Fidesz is in power…”
🔹 Technique: exclusivity + political coercion
👉 The unspoken message:
- if you don’t vote for us, migrants will come,
- there is no middle ground,
- there is no rule-of-law debate.
🧠 Summary – what is really happening?
This text:
- does not inform,
- does not debate,
- does not explain,
but instead:
✔️ generates fear
✔️ names an enemy
✔️ demands loyalty
✔️ shuts down critical thinking
👉 This is not politics. It is emotional coercion.