And the day came when László Kéri from Tisza sat down and told it to our faces that Hungary cannot withdraw itself from the war. In my view, Hungary will not be able to pull itself out of this. Here it is in a longer version as well. László Kéri talks about Europe preparing for war, and that if Péter Magyar comes to power, he will have no other choice either, because Hungary cannot remove itself from the war. Europe has already decided this, and if you look at the leading nations, it is clear that from German military diplomacy to the British, it is being seriously considered that further conflict with the Russians is not out of the question, and that Europe should prepare for Russia to become its long-term military adversary. In my view, Hungary will not be able to get out of this.
Dear László Kéri, Péter Magyar, and all the other Tisza sect members: go to hell! Viktor Orbán will stay instead, and he will make sure that Hungary does not go to war, just as he has managed to do over the past four years.
🎯 Core Function (Real Purpose)
The text does not inform, and it is not a geopolitical analysis. Instead, it serves to:
- instill fear (“war is inevitable”),
- create scapegoats (Tisza, Kéri, Péter Magyar),
- present a single ‘savior’,
- force emotional loyalty.
👉 The conclusion is fixed in advance:
“If it’s not Viktor Orbán, then there will be war.”
1️⃣ “We’re not saying it — he is” – outsourcing responsibility
“…the Tisza-affiliated László Kéri sat down and told it to our faces…”
🔹 Technique: outsourcing of blame
🔹 How it works:
- no direct claim is made,
- instead, someone is “quoted,”
- and the quote is then presented as destiny.
🔹 Manipulation:
Kéri’s opinion = objective reality = inevitable war.
👉 The audience does not examine context, only emotional content.
2️⃣ Determinism: “this has already been decided”
“Europe has already decided this”
“Hungary cannot extract itself”
🔹 Technique: narrative of inevitability
🔹 Effect:
- the illusion of political choice disappears,
- the future becomes a “forced track.”
👉 A classic authoritarian move:
if there is no choice, there is no responsibility either.
3️⃣ Enemy construction: collective stigmatization
“Tisza cult member”
🔹 Technique: dehumanization + cult framing
🔹 Function:
- the opponent is not a political actor,
- but an irrational, dangerous mass.
👉 This excludes debate, because you don’t debate a cult.
4️⃣ False causal chain (false cause)
“If Péter Magyar comes, he’ll have no choice — there will be war”
🔹 Technique: post hoc ergo propter hoc
🔹 Problem:
- no decision-making authority is shown,
- no concrete military obligation is named,
- no legal mechanism is presented.
👉 Yet the emotional equation works:
Péter Magyar = war.
5️⃣ Savior narrative: one man prevents disaster
“Viktor Orbán will stay and sort it out…”
🔹 Technique: personality cult + messianic framing
🔹 Message:
- not institutions,
- not alliances,
- not legal frameworks,
- but one man is holding back war.
👉 This is not politics — it is a creed.
6️⃣ Vulgarity and rage as “authenticity”
“go to hell!”
🔹 Technique: anger-as-authenticity
🔹 Effect:
- aggression appears as honesty,
- anger becomes truth.
👉 Rational analysis is replaced by instinctive reaction.
7️⃣ Temporal distortion: “it worked in the past four years”
🔹 Technique: selective reinterpretation of the past
🔹 Problem:
- the war was not a Hungarian decision,
- Hungary was not a belligerent party,
- no causal link is proven.
👉 Retroactive heroization.
📌 Actors by narrative function
- László Kéri – a “dark prophet” whose words are treated as fate
- Péter Magyar – carrier of future catastrophe
- Viktor Orbán – the sole guarantee of peace
🧠 Summary – what is actually happening?
This text is:
- not analysis,
- not debate,
- not information,
but a simple emotional command:
“You must be afraid.
The enemy is the cause of your fear.
The solution is to keep everything exactly as it is.”