Recently, an Eritrean migrant who had just been released from prison stabbed people in a German shopping mall. By now, this has become an everyday occurrence in Western Europe. Ten years too late, they have also realized that this cannot go on. That is why Brussels wants to scatter, by the tens of thousands, into migrant-free countries those immigrants whom they themselves allowed in — this is the migration pact.
We, together with the Hungarian people, say a loud and clear NO to this. The representatives of the Tisza Party, meanwhile, voted a big YES in the European Parliament to speed up this pact. The positions are clear, the decision is simple: in April as well, Fidesz is the safe choice.
Another day, another piece of grim news related to migration has arrived: in the city of Ulm, a migrant stabbed two people in a shopping center. What’s more, he did this even though he had still been in prison in December for violent crimes. This shows what migration leads to — and what we do not want people to have to face in Budapest or in any other Hungarian city. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice: because we keep migrants out of the country.
“Migration = violence and chaos; Fidesz = the only protection.”
Every element of the text is driven toward this single conclusion, with no alternative interpretation allowed.
1️⃣ Isolated crime → generalized threat
“It has become everyday in Western Europe.”
🔹 Technique: overgeneralization
🔹 Effect: turns a single incident into a systemic sense of danger
👉 Trick: absence of statistical context (no proportions, trends, or comparisons).
2️⃣ Fear amplification through proximity
Ulm, shopping mall, stabbing
🔹 Technique: proximity effect and shock framing
🔹 Effect: creates a “this could happen here tomorrow” feeling
👉 Trick: the “ordinary” setting forces emotional identification.
3️⃣ Scapegoating and external enemy construction
“Brussels would disperse them”
🔹 Technique: demonization of an external actor
🔹 Effect: triggers national defensive reflexes
👉 Trick: reduces complex EU regulations to a deliberate hostile “attack.”
4️⃣ False dichotomy (forced binary choice)
Either Fidesz or migration chaos
🔹 Technique: binary framing
🔹 Effect: excludes rational debate
👉 Trick: erases any “third option” (nuanced policy solutions).
5️⃣ Political labeling and moral stigmatization
“The Tisza Party voted yes”
🔹 Technique: assigning collective guilt
🔹 Effect: moral delegitimization of the opponent
👉 Trick: conceals voting details and legal context.
6️⃣ Savior narrative
“We keep migrants out”
🔹 Technique: construction of a single protector role
🔹 Effect: fosters loyalty and obedience
👉 Trick: ties public safety exclusively to one political force.
🔍 What is missing from the text?
- Statistics (crime rates, trends, comparisons)
- Legal context (what the “pact” actually is, what obligations it entails)
- Proportionality (isolated incidents vs. systemic reality)
🧭 Conclusion
This is a classic fear-based campaign message: it converts an isolated crime into political loyalty, identifies an external enemy, and positions the governing party as the sole solution.
The goal is not to inform, but to mobilize emotions.