According to Katalin Cseh, the rules should be rewritten so that Brussels can make decisions on Ukraine’s EU membership and other war-related issues while bypassing Hungary. Yes, they really want to change those framework rules that govern, for example, how decisions are made. And this is exactly why the country’s leadership must not be entrusted to Brussels’ people — which is why Fidesz is the safe choice.
1️⃣ Sovereignty-threat narrative
The phrase “bypassing Hungary” suggests that external forces would strip the country of its right to decide.
It triggers a strong emotional response (defensiveness, outrage).
2️⃣ Oversimplified enemy image (“Brussels’ people”)
The EU’s institutional system is portrayed as a single, hostile actor.
Internal debates, legal frameworks, and differences between member states disappear from the picture.
3️⃣ Fear → political conclusion
A logical leap: from a contested claim directly to a party preference.
A classic “if not us, then they will take it away” argument.
4️⃣ False dichotomy
Only two options are presented:
- national sovereignty + Fidesz
- Brussels + war
Other possible positions are excluded.