❗️Instructive data from a German survey.
IF YOU ARE A TISZA SUPPORTER, DON’T READ THIS — YOUR WORLD WILL COLLAPSE❗️
⚠️ German companies that do business with Russia and/or operate in Russia were asked about the war and the sanctions.
☝️ While Brussels politicians (and at home, TISZA/DK politicians) and so-called “experts” have been repeating for four years that any potential economic cooperation with Russia is simply “EWWWW,” German businesses are standing much more firmly on the ground of common sense.
Here are the figures:
📍 Only 4% of German companies plan to leave the Russian market.
Four percent! Ninety-six percent are staying.
📍 Roughly half (49%) of representatives of German companies operating in Russia believe that the sanctions harm Germany more than they harm Russia.
📍 There is a general view among respondents that German and European politicians are underestimating the resilience of the Russian economy in the face of sanctions.
📍 And one final remark from German company executives:
“Wishful European thinking and the denial of reality regularly lead to underestimating the endurance of the Russian population.”
☝️ This is what it looks like when the real world and (economic) reality collide with the pink fever dreams of Brussels bureaucrats.
❗️ Power must be taken in Brussels before Ursula von der Leyen, Manfred Weber, and the rest of Magyar Péter’s bosses completely destroy Europe!
1. Pre-emptive exclusion and public shaming
“IF YOU SUPPORT TISZA, DON’T READ THIS”
This is classic in-group / out-group framing:
- Those “with us” are portrayed as smart and realistic.
- Those outside are framed as stupid, fanatical, and mentally fragile — “their world will collapse.”
👉 It does not argue; it attacks identity.
👉 The goal is to trigger defensive reflexes, not thinking.
2. Appeal to authority — without a source
“a German survey,” “German companies,” “German business leaders”
This is an appeal to authority, except:
- no research institute is named,
- no sample size, timing, or methodology,
- no verifiable or linkable source.
👉 The numbers are unverifiable, yet presented as facts.
👉 A classic propaganda trick: “foreign, therefore credible.”
3. Selective statistics (cherry-picking)
“96% stay,” “49% say sanctions hurt more”
What is left unsaid:
- company size is unknown,
- sectors are not specified,
- no distinction between profit, loss, withdrawal, or frozen operations.
👉 The opinion of a narrow interest group is elevated to universal truth.
👉 This is not economic analysis, but a narrative driven by interests.
4. False dichotomy
“Brussels bureaucrats’ pink-colored delusions” vs. “the real world”
The framing:
- Brussels = detached, irrational, wish-driven
- “Us” = sober, realistic, truth-telling
👉 This black-and-white framing excludes:
- complex economic impacts,
- differing strategic interests,
- long-term political risks.
5. Dehumanizing language and fear-mongering
“who is killing Europe”
This is:
- emotional exaggeration,
- apocalyptic imagery,
- demonization of political opponents.
👉 The goal is not persuasion, but mobilization through fear.
6. Scapegoating and personalization
Ursula von der Leyen,
Manfred Weber,
Magyar Péter
Three different actors on three different levels:
- EU institutional leader,
- European party politician,
- Hungarian opposition figure,
➡️ fused into a single “chain of command,” as if part of a conspiracy.
👉 This is a conspiratorial narrative, not political analysis.
7. The core message (stripped down)
The text’s real claim is not economic, but political:
“Don’t think in nuances.
Whoever is not with us is an enemy of Europe.
Power must be taken — at any cost.”
Short conclusion
This post is:
❌ not balanced
❌ not verifiable
❌ not analysis
but rather:
✅ emotional manipulation
✅ identity-based incitement
✅ propaganda built on a ‘us vs. them’ logic