“He was running his daughter; the girls made money too. Everyone benefited, right?”
Nagy Feró made this remark at the Peace March about the Szőllő Street case, in which the former director of a Budapest juvenile correctional institute was arrested in May on suspicion of human trafficking and forced labor. When Telex asked him what he meant by this, he explained that we don’t know whether the girls were forced into prostitution or did it voluntarily.
Several politicians later reacted to his statement. Dobrev Klára said that anyone who speaks about victims this way is not worthy of the Kossuth Prize, nor of being held up as an example to anyone. Lázár János also commented, saying that the government does not revoke Kossuth Prizes. Meanwhile, a municipal councilor in Őrbottyán called for Nagy Feró to be stripped of his honorary citizenship of the town.
At the same time, the government side did not rally behind him either. Vitályos Eszter distanced herself from his remarks. Bayer Zsolt asked Nagy Feró to apologize—as a man should—and then have a drink together. The musician initially told him to go to a warmer climate as well.
Eventually, however, the ice began to break. In a program on HírTV, the musician said that he apologizes to the girls.
❗️Supporters of Tisza, downtown liberals, and Orbán-phobic propagandists should stop reading now, because this will knock them out of their dream world — just as András Hajós and Márk Ember were recently “enlightened.”
(Anyone who hasn’t yet seen the artists’ podcast should catch up! They acknowledge that Viktor Orbán was right when he closed the borders in 2015.)
🇮🇹 In Italy, the alarm has been sounded because the authorities are powerless against criminal gangs of young migrants! (We have already seen this in other Western member states as well, such as Sweden, Belgium, France…)
– Predominantly 15–18-year-olds form gangs and terrorize people; – Almost without exception they are second-generation immigrants, with a few Italian youths joining them; – They carry knives, and it takes only a word or a facial expression they perceive as offensive for them to attack anyone; – Theft, robbery, drug dealing, violence against civilians and police — this is how they spend most of their time;
❗️ “We underestimated the phenomenon, and now we can no longer keep it under control,” said the secretary of the Italian gendarmerie trade union — in other words, admitting that they made a mistake and that there is no way back 🤷♂️
🇭🇺 Let us learn from others’ mistakes!! No matter how much Brussels and the Tisza Party push… No matter how much the party colleagues and experts of Péter Magyar repeat that “we should be good people and let migrants in because it is beneficial”… No matter how much migrant-friendly propaganda pours over us from RTL and liberal trash portals…
❗️We must stick to the Hungarian path, otherwise Hungarian cities — especially the outer districts of Budapest — will meet a similar fate. Mass migration must be stopped! Fidesz is the safe choice ❗️
🎭 Central Narrative
“Migration = chaos, violence, irreversibility; Orbán = the only protection.”
The entire text is steered toward this single conclusion.
1️⃣ Pre-emptive exclusion and stigmatization (gatekeeping + dehumanization)
“Supporters of Tisza, downtown liberals, and Orbán-phobic propagandists should stop reading…”
🔹 Technique: identity-based exclusion 🔹 Effect:
positions the reader as an “insider”
anyone who disagrees is framed not as rational, but as “phobic” or “living in a dream world”
👉 Goal: to shut down debate at the very beginning.
According to Katalin Cseh, the rules should be rewritten so that Brussels can make decisions on Ukraine’s EU membership and other war-related issues while bypassing Hungary. Yes, they really want to change those framework rules that govern, for example, how decisions are made. And this is exactly why the country’s leadership must not be entrusted to Brussels’ people — which is why Fidesz is the safe choice.
1️⃣ Sovereignty-threat narrative
The phrase “bypassing Hungary” suggests that external forces would strip the country of its right to decide.
It triggers a strong emotional response (defensiveness, outrage).
“So, if Péter Magyar’s people come to power and we submit to everything Ursula and her circle say from Brussels, then among other things we would be investing 1.3 million forints per family into Ukraine. That’s what it would cost Hungarians if we agreed to the demand Ukraine submitted to Ursula’s people. This is that 800-billion-dollar financing program, with which we could play the good guys and with which the European Union’s member states would rebuild a country that isn’t even part of the EU and has nothing to do with it.
No words are needed — she is one of Hungary’s shames.
We will not pay Brussels so that our money can be sent to Ukraine. That would be utter nonsense—there’s no question of it. We are launching a petition. Spread the word.
Viktor Orbán has announced that we are launching a petition against Ukraine’s new $800 billion demand. Brussels must not send Hungarians’ money to Ukraine! ❌
‼️According to Brussels, the “price of peace” is €90 billion in joint borrowing — €60 billion of it for weapons. This is not a peace plan. It is a war budget, and its cost will be paid by Hungarian families.
📉 While Europe’s competitiveness is rapidly declining, energy prices are sky-high, and farmers and businesses are struggling, Brussels is pushing for new debt to finance a prolonged war.
🇭🇺 Hungary’s position has been clear since the start of the war: we need peace, not weapons. What is needed is negotiation, not a war financed by loans.
Have you seen the latest Medián poll? Of course I have — it’s fake, as usual, fake. What’s interesting, and I don’t know if you’ve seen it, is that the Democratic Coalition has gone after Medián. They claim that the polling company asked them for money, they didn’t pay, and that’s why — according to DK — they are being measured lower than they really are.
I don’t know. What is certain is that here, in our own constituency, we have a fresh poll. I already talked about it in a video last night, and here, for example, the DK individual candidate is much stronger than the Tisza one. We’ll see how this turns out.
1️⃣ “Fake, as usual” – pre-emptive delegitimization
Technique: discrediting without evidence Labeling the Medián poll as automatically “fake” pre-empts any substantive debate. 👉 Goal: to trigger an emotional reflex in the audience (“this is obviously a lie”) before any numbers or methodology are discussed.
2️⃣ DK vs. Medián – amplifying a trust conflict
Technique: implying an institutional conspiracy According to the narrative, the Democratic Coalition is performing worse because it refused to pay Medián. 👉 This is a serious allegation, yet no evidence is presented. The aim is not to prove the claim, but to undermine trust in the poll itself.
3️⃣ “We have our own poll” – constructing a parallel reality
Technique: introducing counter-data from an unverifiable source The reference to a “local” and “fresh” poll comes with:
no methodology,
no sample size,
no publicly verifiable data.
👉 Function: to neutralize the national poll without actually refuting it.
4️⃣ “The DK candidate is stronger than the Tisza one” – wedge-driving narrative
Technique: opposition fragmentation Emphasizing that the DK candidate is stronger than the Tisza Party’s candidate:
relativizes Tisza’s national momentum,
fuels local rivalry,
creates uncertainty among opposition voters.
5️⃣ “We’ll see what happens” – an exit-ramp conclusion
Technique: diffusing responsibility The closing line leaves all scenarios open:
if Medián turns out to be right → “we said there was a dispute anyway,”
if not → “see, the local poll was what mattered.”
🔎 Overall picture
This statement does not analyze the substance of the poll. Instead, it:
attacks the pollster,
introduces an alternative (unverifiable) dataset, and
conducts a political positioning battle within the opposition.
Together with patriotic women, we have launched a DPK petition so that we women can also make our voices heard amid the madness of war: https://dpkor.hu/nok-a-haboru-ellen/
In December, I visited Transcarpathia, in Mezőkaszony—just two hundred meters from the Hungarian border.
I met Hungarian women there: wives, mothers, and grandmothers. Women whose husbands did not come home, and women whose sons will never knock on the door again.
They still get up every morning, go to work, and carry on—but now they do so alone. Because war does not only kill on the front lines; it also destroys homes. Hungarian homes, just a stone’s throw away from us. And yet, far too little is said about this.
This week also marked the memorial day of the Don catastrophe. At times like this, it is worth stopping for a moment and remembering that Hungary knows exactly what the price of war means.
Not from theory or calculations, but from monuments, graves, and family tragedies. At the Don Bend, an entire generation was lost, and behind them remained Hungarian women who had to carry on with life alone—and with it, the history of Hungary.
That is why it is so important that we also send a message, so that everyone knows: women want peace.
We have just launched an online petition specifically addressed to girls, women, and mothers, encouraging them—independently of party politics—to stand up for peace and to raise their voices against war.
I would also very much like to encourage those women who, under the internal rules of Magyar Péter’s circle, have been forbidden from supporting Fidesz’s anti-war initiatives, to speak up freely as well, not to give in to this blackmail or coercion. And if they feel that it matters to them to raise their children in peace, that they do not want their brothers, fathers, or sons to be sent to war, and that they do not want to pay the price of this war either, then they should feel free to sign this petition as well.
🎭 Central Narrative
“Peace = a female moral truth” The text suggests that any woman who does not support the petition is acting against women’s historical experience and moral duty.
1️⃣ Emotional legitimization through personal experience
“In December, I was in Transcarpathia…”
🔹 Technique: testimony + proximity 🔹 Effect:
forces emotional identification
elevates the speaker above the debate as an “eyewitness”
👉 Trick: individual experience → general political conclusion
2️⃣ Historical parallel as moral blackmail
Don Bend, widows, lost generations
🔹 Technique: invocation of collective trauma 🔹 Effect:
anyone who disagrees is framed as “disrespecting the victims”
appropriation of historical memory
👉 Manipulation: World War II ≠ today’s geopolitical situation yet they are emotionally merged
3️⃣ “Women speak on behalf of women” – false representation
“So that we women can also make our voices heard”
🔹 Technique: identity appropriation 🔹 Problem:
no mandate
no pluralism (“women” ≠ a unified political bloc)
👉 Message: a woman who thinks differently is “not a real woman”
4️⃣ Victim narrative + external enemy framing
“They forbade it, blackmail, coercion”
🔹 Technique: persecution narrative 🔹 Goal:
construction of moral superiority
demonization of an internal political opponent (Magyar Péter and his circle)
👉 Evidence: none — only assertion
5️⃣ False dilemma (black-and-white framing)
“Either you want peace, or you want war”
🔹 Technique: binary thinking 🔹 Reality:
no discussion of diplomacy, security policy, or international law
all nuance disappears
👉 Consequence: exclusion of meaningful debate
6️⃣ Petition as a moral test
“They should feel free to sign”
🔹 Technique: moral pressure 🔹 Hidden message:
you sign → good mother, good woman
you don’t sign → indifferent / pro-war
⚠️ Overall picture
This text is not about peace in a policy sense, but about:
