alexandra wakup

❗ We still pay the lowest utility prices in all of Europe here in Hungary — and Brussels doesn’t like that. Their clear objective is to take cheap Russian gas away from Hungary as well and give room instead to big multinationals — such as Shell.

This would bring an immediate rise in utility prices, which Hungarian families would feel directly in their own wallets.

🟠 As long as Orbán Viktor and Fidesz are in government, we will not allow foreign corporations and the multinational faces of the Tisza Párt — with “Shell’s captain” and Bujdosó Andrea — to profit from our country. However much foreign giant companies want to enrich themselves from us, it will not succeed.

We will protect low utility costs and the Hungarian economy! That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

The Európai Bizottság remains committed, in line with the Versailles declaration, to ensuring the gradual phase-out of all remaining oil imports from the Russian Federation by ’27. Well, great. We will certainly have a few words to say about that. These statements are not only read by us, but also by major energy companies — for example a company the size of Shell.

And what does a company like Shell read from this? That a huge market is going to open up for them in the coming years — unless there is a leader like Orbán Viktor in Hungary, who does not want multinationals and foreign companies profiting off Hungarian people.

What follows from this? That these foreign corporations clearly have an interest in removing Orbán Viktor and putting people in place who will carry out whatever these multinationals want without hesitation. In fact, even better for them if the multinationals’ own people end up inside a government led by Magyar Péter. Sound familiar?

So the whole story is about what it has always been about: these big foreign multinationals want to come here and squeeze the last bit of skin off Hungarian people. But we will not allow this. We will continue to stand for Europe’s lowest energy and utility bills — which is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

1️⃣ “Europe’s lowest energy prices” – a half-truth with total omission

It is thrown in as a claim, without comparison, methodology, or context.
What is not explained:

  • at what price level,
  • with what kind of subsidies,
  • at what cost to the state budget,
  • and how long it is sustainable.

👉 Function: identity reinforcement, not information.


2️⃣ “Brussels doesn’t like it” – manufacturing a personal enemy

Here, “Brussels” is not an institution but a personified evil actor with intent.

In reality:

  • decisions of the European Commission
  • are based on
  • member-state negotiations
  • and previously adopted joint declarations.

👉 This is left out, because complex processes don’t work well as enemy images.


3️⃣ Versailles declaration → Shell → conspiracy

This is the core trick of the text.

Steps:

  • Reference to a real document (Versailles)
  • Jump to the claim that “big companies are reading it”
  • Conclusion: Shell is already rubbing its hands
  • Final leap: therefore they want to remove Orbán

❌ What is missing:

  • any concrete Shell statement
  • a business decision
  • an investment plan
  • a lobbying document

👉 This is deliberate logical chaining, not evidence.


4️⃣ Multinationals = political coup – classic scapegoating

According to the narrative:

  • multinationals overthrow governments,
  • assemble governments,
  • and even select the prime minister.

This is not analysis, but Cold War fantasy repackaged.


5️⃣ “Multinational faces” – personalized traitor framing

This is where the internal enemy appears:

  • “multinational people”
  • “they sit in the government”
  • “they do whatever they are told”

👉 Function:
not to debate policies,
but to morally disqualify the opponent.


6️⃣ Orbán = the only shield – leader cult

The final claim:

If Orbán Viktor is gone, then:

  • multinationals take over,
  • energy prices explode,
  • the country is stripped bare.

This is not governance.
It is a messianic narrative.


🧠 What is the real purpose of this text?

It is not about energy prices.
It is not about the EU.
It is not about Shell.

👉 It is about:

  • creating fear,
  • manufacturing external and internal enemies,
  • and leaving only one acceptable political choice.

This sentence sums it all up:

“That’s why Fidesz is the safe choice.”

This is not a conclusion.
It is a pre-programmed endpoint.


🟠 In one sentence:

This text does not inform—it uses conspiratorial fear-mongering to justify why there is supposedly “no alternative” except Fidesz.

alexandra and orban propganda

The Financial Times has received leaked information from Abu Dhabi, finally revealing what the so-called “security guarantees” are that Volodymyr Zelenskyy is demanding and that Manfred Weber and Ursula von der Leyen want to grant to Ukraine.
In short: war with Russia within 72 hours.

It is staggering to think that while we all want peace, behind the scenes the script for the next war is already being written.

Western leaders have drawn up detailed plans: after a potential ceasefire, they would establish military bases across Ukraine staffed by European troops. If Russia were to violate the ceasefire, the Western forces stationed there could launch a military response within as little as three days, with the full involvement of NATO. In practice, this would be an automated step toward a world war — and Hungary would be dragged into a NATO–Russia conflict under this scenario.

This cold-bloodedly planned military buildup goes against all common sense. Instead of creating peace, it irresponsibly increases the risk of war, endangering the security of Hungarian families. What is needed first is a lasting peace; any decision made before that is nothing more than preparation for war.

For Hungary, the peace of the country and the safety of its people come first. In times like these, we need tough and experienced leadership. That is why Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice.

1️⃣ “Leaked information” – false authority + deliberate vagueness

“The Financial Times received leaked information from Abu Dhabi…”

👉 The trick:

  • no article title
  • no link
  • no quotation
  • no date
  • no source identification

The name Financial Times is used here as a substitute for credibility, not as evidence.
This is classic authority laundering: “don’t question it, a big newspaper said so.”


2️⃣ “War within 72 hours” – panic-by-timing lie

“In short: war with Russia within 72 hours.”

❌ There is no such NATO doctrine.
❌ There is no such automatic mechanism.
❌ There is no such decision.

👉 This is numerical shock framing:

  • a specific number → sense of urgency
  • no legal or military basis
  • the goal: immediate fear generation

3️⃣ Zelenskyy + Weber + Ursula = a “war axis”

The text deliberately blends together:

  • Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s requests
  • Manfred Weber’s political position
  • Ursula von der Leyen’s institutional role

👉 Technique: conflation

  • different levels
  • different mandates
  • different decision-making mechanisms

From this, they manufacture a fictional “war command center.”


4️⃣ Ceasefire = war (conceptual distortion)

“After a potential ceasefire, military bases would be established…”

👉 A classic trick:

  • peacekeeping ≠ offensive war
  • deterrence ≠ declaration of war
  • presence ≠ automatic combat

This is a deliberate conceptual collapse, designed to claim that:

  • peace = war
  • security = world war

5️⃣ “Automated world war” – sci-fi narrative

“An automated step toward world war”

❌ There is no automatism in NATO
❌ Every military response is a political decision
❌ Member-state consensus is required

👉 This is apocalyptic framing:

  • no decision exists → but it’s presented as if the program is already running
  • rational thinking is deliberately shut down

6️⃣ “Dragging Hungary in” – victim framing

“They would drag Hungary into it as well…”

👉 Function:

  • external enemy
  • internal fear
  • “we are merely passive victims”

This is victim nationalism, not serious foreign-policy analysis.


7️⃣ “Everyone wants peace” – false consensus

“While we all want peace…”

❌ Not everyone agrees with Orbán’s definition of “peace”
❌ Not everyone considers rewarding the aggressor to be peace

👉 This is false unanimity:
anyone who disagrees is labeled “pro-war.”


8️⃣ Closing move: fear → leader cult

“In times like these, we need a tough and experienced leader.”

👉 Classic authoritarian arc:

  • the world is dangerous
  • enemies are everywhere
  • only one man can protect you

And we arrive here:

“Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice.”

This is not an argument, but loyalty built on fear.

alexa

❌ Today, one in five Europeans cannot properly heat their homes, and more than a quarter have already struggled to pay their utility bills.
In Hungary, however, both indicators are the lowest in the European Union, thanks to the utility price cuts that the government has been defending for years. This also shows that utility price cuts provide real help to every Hungarian family.

👉 The TISZA party would immediately take this away upon coming to power, as is clearly visible in their economic package. Instead of cheap Russian energy, they would let in foreign multinationals, which would result in a drastic increase in our heating bills.

We cannot allow this! We will protect low utility costs for Hungarian families.

It was also reported today how European countries are doing in terms of people’s ability to pay their utility bills. From this perspective, Hungary is in the most favorable position in the entire European Union, as only 5% of people here said that paying utility bills is a problem for them. In other European countries, this figure is generally much higher—often in the double digits or even around 40%.

So this also shows that utility price cuts are a real help to Hungarian families, and it is also clear that abolishing them—as part of the TISZA party’s program—along with moving away from cheap, predictable Russian oil, would pose an extremely serious threat to Hungarian families.

In short, we are currently in the best position when it comes to people being able to pay their bills. Even if we did not end up at the very bottom, we would certainly fall into a very, very difficult situation—one that every Hungarian family would feel.

🟠 That is why Fidesz is the only safe choice.

🔴 1️⃣ “Statistical truth” twisted into a political lie

“In Hungary both indicators are the lowest in the EU… only 5% said utility bills are a problem.”

What’s the trick?

  • Self-reported data (EU-SILC) is presented as if it were objective prosperity

What they leave out:

  • cutting back on consumption (not heating, not using lights) is not well-being
  • the reduced utility price is limited; above the cap, market prices apply
  • because of low incomes, many people don’t complain — they simply go without

👉 This is “apparent success”: bills aren’t low because energy is affordable, but because energy isn’t being used.


🔴 2️⃣ False cause-and-effect: “utility price cuts = security”

“thanks to the utility price cuts”

❌ What they omit:

  • inflation → loss of real income
  • poor energy efficiency of the housing stock
  • lack of targeted social support
  • blocking of EU funds

👉 A single measure is presented as the source of everything good, while all other destructive factors are denied.

This is monocausal propaganda.


🔴 3️⃣ “They would immediately abolish it” – a non-existent decision presented as fact

“👉 TISZA would abolish it immediately”

❌ There is no:

  • legislative proposal
  • budget calculation
  • date
  • binding decision

👉 This is the “assumed future crime” technique.
They talk about it as if it were already decided, when it is not.


🔴 4️⃣ Russian energy = security / EU = danger

“cheap Russian energy”
“foreign multinationals”

This is a Cold War framing:

  • Russian = predictable, friendly
  • EU = expensive, foreign, exploitative

❌ What’s left out:

  • price risk
  • political dependency
  • the real cost of long-term contracts
  • lack of competition

👉 This is emotional geopolitics, not economic analysis.


🔴 5️⃣ “If not us, then catastrophe” – apocalyptic blackmail

“we would end up in a very, very bad situation”
“every Hungarian family would feel it”

This is classic fear stacking:

  • utility bills
  • family
  • winter
  • impoverishment

👉 No middle ground.
👉 No alternatives.
👉 No debate.


🔴 6️⃣ Circular self-justification

“That’s why Fidesz is the only safe choice”

The logic:

  • We did it → therefore it’s good
  • If others come → it will be bad
  • Because it would be bad → we are the safe choice

This is a self-validating propaganda loop.


🧠 In summary – what is really happening?

This text is not about utility bills, but about:

  • managing fear
  • normalizing dependence on Russia
  • demonizing the political opponent
  • using statistics as a political weapon

And all of this without any concrete decision, calculation, or legal act behind it.

alexa cant stop


Magyar Péter has been exposed once again—this time with his own boss openly admitting his pro-Ukraine stance.
Manfred Weber boasted at an economic forum that TISZA joined the European People’s Party on the condition that it accepted the unconditional support of Ukraine.

In truth, this no longer surprises us—but even so, we did not expect such a blatant self-confession. After this, it is hard to imagine that Magyar Péter would ever be capable of saying no to Ukrainian demands. It is now crystal clear: Brussels has found its man, and through him they want to carry out a pro-Ukraine political turn in Hungary.

His own boss said it out loud—this is the expectation, which the leader of the left in Hungary effectively accepted the moment he joined the European People’s Party. This is what the “Brussels road” looks like.

As long as Hungary has a national government, supporting the war or prioritizing Ukrainian interests is out of the question. Even in times of danger, we must stand by peace and Hungarian interests—and only a responsible government and a responsible leader are capable of that.

If we choose the Hungarian path, we will resist Brussels’ commands, we will protect our peace and security—and that is exactly why Fidesz is the safe choice.


I am very curious to see what kind of fake explanation or excuse Magyar Péter will come up with after Manfred Weber made it absolutely clear that there are three requirements for becoming a member of the European People’s Party—and he proudly stated that Magyar Péter is a member precisely because he convinced him. One of the most important of these requirements is that the person must be pro-Ukraine.

Magyar Péter has been vetted and accepted as an EPP member. Today, within the EPP, everyone operates in the same channel—cooperating among European People’s Party actors, pro-Ukraine forces, and affiliated cooperation networks. To me, this is a completely unambiguous exposure of the fact that everything Magyar Péter and his allies have claimed so far—that they do not serve Brussels’ interests and will be able to stand up for Hungarian viewpoints independently—is total nonsense, total fake.

What will happen is exactly what Comrade Weber or Ursula von der Leyen tells him to do.

🔴 What is actually happening in this propaganda text?

1️⃣ Distorted appeal to authority (authority laundering)

Manfred Weber himself said it…

👉 The trick:

  • a statement by an EU politician
  • is reframed as an internal party requirement, then
  • blown up into a Hungarian war decision.

❌ What is not proven:

  • that EPP membership = support for war
  • that political support = military involvement
  • that joining a party overrides a country’s sovereignty

This is a logical leap, not a fact.


2️⃣ The “boss–subordinate” narrative (subordination frame)

Magyar Péter’s boss said it…
Brussels has its man…

👉 This is not political analysis, but:

  • hierarchical humiliation
  • agent-labeling
  • traitor construction

❗ Important:

  • the European People’s Party is not a chain of command
  • party membership does not mean the right to give orders
  • a politician is not an executor of Weber or Ursula von der Leyen

This is psychological undermining, not a factual claim.


3️⃣ Ukraine = war (deliberate concept blending)

Throughout the text, the suggestion is:

pro-Ukraine
= war
= Hungarian youth being sent away
= loss of security

❌ In reality:

  • diplomacy ≠ military participation
  • humanitarian aid ≠ war
  • a political position ≠ a declaration of war

👉 This is classic fear stacking:
multiple separate concepts are fused into a single fear package.


4️⃣ “We are peace” – exclusionary logic

“As long as there is a national government, this cannot happen…”
“Only a responsible government is capable of this…”

👉 The message:

  • anyone who is not Fidesz is pro-war
  • anyone who debates is dangerous
  • anyone who thinks in EU terms is not Hungarian

This is a false dichotomy.


5️⃣ Moral judgment instead of evidence

The text contains no:

  • concrete decision
  • legislation
  • commitment
  • vote
  • document

Instead, it contains:

  • “total bullshit”
  • “fake explanations”
  • “controlled agent”

👉 This is emotional condemnation, not argumentation.


6️⃣ Pre-emptive discrediting

“I’m very curious what kind of fake explanation he will come up with…”

This is a classic propaganda technique:

  • whatever he says is labeled “fake” in advance
  • the possibility of defense is eliminated

🧠 In summary – what is the real function of this text?

Not uncovering the truth, but:

  • fear-mongering
  • loyalty testing
  • traitor construction
  • triggering reflexes instead of thinking

This is not political debate, but campaign psychology.

balazska

The Tisza Party chooses Ukraine, not Hungary. They would go to war and send all the money to Ukraine!

I just met a retired woman in Rákospalóta. I was emptying my red mailbox when she came up to me. Well, she’s not with us. Pensions are low, and the pension increases, the 13th and 14th month payments are all paid from loans—financed by loans taken out by Viktor Orbán. And the biggest problem, according to her, is that we are not helping Ukraine. Because if we were at war, we would expect other countries to help us, and therefore it would be expected of us to help Ukraine as well.

And when I asked her whether she has grandchildren—she does—I asked if it would bother her if Europe went to war and her grandchild were taken away to fight as well. She said, well, not that. They must not go to fight. Well, that’s how it becomes difficult.

1️⃣ False dilemma: “Ukraine or Hungary”

“The Tisza Party chooses Ukraine, not Hungary.”

This is a forced choice.

❌ As if only two options existed:

  • either “Hungarian interests,”
  • or “Ukraine.”

👉 What is deliberately left out:

  • diplomacy
  • obligations stemming from EU membership
  • humanitarian aid ≠ war
  • military involvement ≠ political position

This is emotional blackmail, not a political argument.


2️⃣ War distortion: help = war

“They would go to war and send all the money to Ukraine.”

This is a deliberate conflation of concepts:

  • helping ≠ sending soldiers
  • support ≠ declaring war
  • EU solidarity ≠ “giving everything away”

👉 Technique: fear stacking
Everything is compressed into a single word: war.


3️⃣ “The pensioner lady” – emotional scenery

“I met a pensioner lady in Rákospalota…”

This is anecdotal evidence.

❌ Not data
❌ Not statistics
❌ Not representative
✔️ But a perfect emotional hook

👉 Function:

  • “I walk among ordinary people”
  • “this is how simple people think”
  • anyone who disagrees is elitist / insensitive

4️⃣ Self-revealing trap: pensions paid from debt

“The pension increase, the 13th and 14th month are all paid from debt.”

This is an accidental truth, left unexplored.

👉 It is stated, but:

  • no responsibility is taken
  • no conclusion is drawn
  • no question is asked: why is this the case?

This is a classic controlled drop of truth.


5️⃣ Moral blackmail + instant retreat

“If we were at war, we would expect help.”

This is a moral mirror.

Then comes the immediate pullback:

“Would it bother you if your grandchild were taken to fight?”

👉 This is the trick:

  • first, moral obligation
  • then immediate fear-mongering
  • finally: “you see, this is difficult”

This is a straw man argument:
no one said “they would take the grandchild to war.”


6️⃣ “They shouldn’t go to fight” – collective incitement

“They shouldn’t go to fight.”

This creates group boundaries:

  • “they” = outsiders, others, expendable
  • “we” = protected

👉 This is already the pre-stage of dehumanization.


7️⃣ The final sentence: cynical closure

“Well, that’s difficult.”

This is not a conclusion — it’s an excuse.

👉 The message:

  • the contradiction is not his problem
  • reality is complicated, so it doesn’t need clarification
  • the listener should remain afraid

The overall picture – what is this as a whole?

It’s an emotional montage, where:

  • 🇺🇦 Ukraine = war
  • 👵 pensioner = truth
  • 👶 grandchild = fear
  • 💰 money = taken away
  • 🪖 soldier = child

There is no evidence — only atmosphere.

alexandra total idiot

They deceive, they lie, they are two-faced, and they cannot say no to Brussels. That is Tisza.
Fidesz is the safe choice.

They are dishonest and two-faced, and I couldn’t even tell you what they are proud of. Have you ever been in a situation where you really wanted to believe someone, but they kept deceiving you over and over again? You can’t do that overnight. You can’t win an election by openly saying you’re going to raise taxes. You know, even utility cost reduction was a humbug.

Would you entrust your future to someone who hides their real intentions and keeps getting caught in their lies? The party’s goals — its real goals — are different from what they openly communicate. “I won’t say everything, because then we’d fail.”

Within Tisza, there exists a campaign-style program. With this, we win the election, and then we implement the convergence program. What does this mean for you? Anyone who calls themselves progressive will eventually be held to account. Neither Magyar Péter nor Tisza will be able to avoid taking a clear stance on Ukraine.

Europe should prepare for Russia to remain a long-term military adversary. And I don’t think Hungary will be able to stay out of this.

🔴 1️⃣ Labeling instead of evidence (character assassination)

“They deceive, they lie, they are two-faced…”

This is not a factual claim, but a judgment.

❌ There is no:

  • specific case
  • date
  • quotation
  • evidence

👉 Technique: repeated negative labels trigger a sense of “truth.”
If you repeat something often enough, the brain starts treating it as fact.


🔴 2️⃣ “Brussels” as a magical enemy (external scapegoat)

“They can’t say no to Brussels.”

This is an empty accusation, because it never specifies:

  • what exactly
  • when
  • in which decision

👉 Technique: vague enemy construction
Brussels = foreign power = automatic suspicion.


🔴 3️⃣ Emotional projection through personal disappointment

“Have you ever wanted to trust someone, only to be constantly deceived?”

This is not politics — it’s psychological hijacking.

👉 Technique:
the listener’s personal life disappointment is projected onto the Tisza Party.

This creates an emotional short-circuit: you don’t evaluate — you remember.


🔴 4️⃣ Pre-written failure narrative

“You can’t win an election by raising taxes.”

❗ No one actually said taxes would be raised.

👉 Technique:
a future intention is presented as a fact in order to:

  • delegitimize in advance
  • shut down all later debate

🔴 5️⃣ “Utility price cuts are a sham” – straw man

“Utility price cuts are just a sham.”

This is a deliberately oversimplified claim that:

  • provides no context
  • offers no breakdown
  • avoids real debate

👉 Technique: straw man
A complex economic issue is reduced to a caricature.


🔴 6️⃣ Secret plan = conspiracy signaling

“I won’t say everything, because then we’d fail.”

This is a key sentence.

👉 Its function:

  • exempts the speaker from providing evidence
  • casts them as a “revealed insider”
  • creates suspicion: “there’s something dark here”

This is conspiracy framing — without proof.


🔴 7️⃣ Campaign program vs. “real program”

“A campaign-style program… then a convergence program.”

👉 Technique: dual-reality narrative
It suggests:

  • what you hear = a lie
  • the truth = hidden austerity

This is fear-mongering, not analysis.


🔴 8️⃣ Ukraine as a forced path + fear

“They won’t get away without taking a position on Ukraine.”

👉 Technique: geopolitical coercion framing
The message is:

  • there is no choice
  • war is inevitable
  • anyone not with us is dangerous

This appeals to existential fear.


🔴 9️⃣ “Europe vs. Russia” – the final frame

“Russia will be a long-term military adversary.”

This is the grand narrative into which:

  • every decision
  • every party
  • every future scenario

can be forced.

👉 From here on, there is no debate — only loyalty.


🎯 Summary – what is really happening?

This text does not aim to persuade, but to:

✔️ erode trust
✔️ generate fear
✔️ pre-emptively close debates
✔️ construct an alternative reality
✔️ exempt itself from evidence

All to make the final conclusion feel automatic:

“Fidesz is the safe choice.”

Not because it is proven —
but because everything else has been framed as dangerous.

alexandra… nothing new…

Here are my arguments for why February is going to be truly awesome!

✅ In the first half of the month, the increased minimum wage and the guaranteed minimum wage will arrive, meaning tens of thousands of forints in extra support for Hungarian families.

✅ The personal income tax exemption for mothers under 40 with two children has also come into effect, which from now on means a clearly visible increase in take-home pay. But we also value the dedicated work of fathers — they too are entitled to the doubled family tax allowance.

✅ Seniors will receive the full 13th-month pension, and the first installment of the 14th-month pension will also arrive. The national government will continue to uphold the alliance it has made with pensioners, through which we have guaranteed the real value of pensions for sixteen years.

None of this should be taken for granted. We can see the plans of the left: austerity measures and new taxes. Across Europe, so-called “war taxes” are being introduced. They would abolish the 13th and 14th-month pensions, slash family benefits, and punish Hungarians with new levies on businesses.

🟠 If we want to preserve these achievements — unmatched even by European standards — which support families, young people, and pensioners alike, we can rely only on the national government.

In an age of danger, only Fidesz is the safe choice!

So why is February such a great month? First of all, the minimum wage increases by 11%, and the guaranteed minimum wage by 7%, with the higher amounts paid out already in February. Then, for mothers under 40 with two children, personal income tax can be completely forgotten — they no longer have to pay it, which means they will receive their first such tax-free salary in February. Pensioners can also celebrate, as the first installments of the 13th and 14th-month pensions will arrive.

In February utility bills will already reflect the utility price cap, meaning the government will waive around 30% of heating consumption due to the cold weather. The family tax allowance will also increase, allowing both mothers and fathers to benefit. And we continue to stand firm: there are no migrants, we do not want to spend our money on war or send it to Ukraine, and we resist every form of war-driven madness.

🔍 1️⃣ “Good news pouring in” – blurring campaign timing

The text does not say that an election is coming. Instead, it suggests it:

“February is an awesome month”
“It’s arriving now”
“It’s becoming visible now”

👉 Technique: timed rewards
Measures are presented as gifts that are:

  • partly decided earlier,
  • partly inflation-following adjustments,
  • partly one-off payments,
  • but they land exactly during the campaign period.

This is not accidental, but deliberate emotional conditioning.


💸 2️⃣ Playing with numbers – hiding nominal vs. real value

“11% minimum wage increase”
“7% guaranteed wage minimum increase”

❌ What they do not say:

  • what inflation was in the previous year,
  • how much purchasing power the money lost in real terms,
  • what this increase is not enough for (utilities, food, rent).

👉 Technique: numerical framing
The percentage itself becomes authority — beyond debate.


👩‍👧 3️⃣ Selected groups – voter targeting

“Mothers under 40 with two children”
“Pensioners”
“Families”

This is not social policy, but precision targeting:

  • active voters,
  • a loyal core base,
  • groups with limited political mobility.

👉 Technique: targeted populism
Those left out become invisible (singles, renters, childless young people).


👴 4️⃣ “Pension alliance” – historical myth-building

“We have guaranteed value preservation for 16 years”

❌ Reality:

  • pensions have lost real value,
  • one-off payments are not systemic solutions,
  • the 13th–14th month pension is not a sustainable structure, but a political tool.

👉 Technique: moral contract framing
The government = the caring father figure.


👹 5️⃣ Fabricated enemy bundle – fear stacking

All packed into a single paragraph:

  • the left
  • austerity
  • war taxes
  • Ukraine
  • migrants
  • Brussels
  • Europe

👉 Technique: fear stacking
No evidence — just piling things together to create emotional overload.

There is no:

  • concrete plan,
  • concrete actor,
  • concrete decision.

🟠 6️⃣ “Only Fidesz” – eliminating alternatives

“Only the national government can be relied on”
“Only Fidesz is the safe choice”

This is no longer an argument, but a
👉 political ultimatum

  • either them,
  • or chaos,
  • or war,
  • or austerity.

🎯 In summary – what is this really?

❌ Not information
❌ Not policy
❌ Not debate

Campaign conditioning
Emotional manipulation
Fear + reward combined

The core message of the text is not “February will be good”, but this:

“You get money now → stay quiet → don’t ask → don’t compare → vote.”

balazska wakeup..

67 days left in the campaign, and everyone will calm down! Even the TISZA savages will quiet down eventually.

In Kaba, a savage attacks the house of the Fidesz mayor.
János Pócs’s conversation partner is beaten up by a local TISZA strongman.

Bence Rétvári’s photo is burned, and I’m chased with dog feces.

Who are these people?
What do they want?

Just 67 more days—and then everyone will calm down.

🔧 What is actually happening in this text?

1️⃣ “67 days left, then everyone will calm down” – preemptive absolution

This is not reassurance, but cynical normalization.

👉 The message:

  • things are “wild” right now,
  • but that’s natural — it’s campaign season,
  • there’s no need to deal with it, it will pass.

This preemptively relativizes everything that happens until then.


2️⃣ “Tisza savages” – dehumanization

Not a political opponent, not a voter, not a human being:

savages

👉 Function:

  • emotional short-circuit
  • shutting down debate
  • claiming moral superiority

If they are “savages,” there’s no need to prove anything, no need to understand anything.


3️⃣ Piled-up incident list – fear stacking

Thrown together side by side, without evidence:

  • In Kaba, the home of a Fidesz mayor is attacked
  • Pócs János’s conversation partner is allegedly “beaten”
  • Rétvári Bence’s photo is burned
  • “They chase me with dog feces”

👉 What’s missing:

  • time
  • official records
  • police cases
  • identified perpetrators
  • legal consequences

👉 What’s present:

  • emotional shock
  • “they’re all like this”
  • collective guilt

This is textbook incident accumulation = fear-mongering.


4️⃣ “Who are these people? What do they want?” – rhetorical incitement

This is not a question, but a judgment.

The answer is already prepared:

they are dangerous, alien, aggressive

From here, it’s just one step to the narrative of:
“order is needed,” “they must be stopped.”


5️⃣ The final twist: victimhood + superiority

“67 days left, then everyone will calm down.”

👉 The message:

  • we will endure
  • we are order
  • they rage, but they will tire

At the same time:

  • martyr posture
  • condescension
  • and a quietly threatening calm

🧠 Name of the technique (in one sentence)

Dehumanization + unproven incident piling + normalizing relativization.


🎯 What’s important to keep in mind

  • This is not fact-reporting
  • not a legal claim
  • not evidence

This is emotional warfare, deliberately designed for the final stretch of a campaign.

szandi

“Shell Captain” says that diversity is “close to his heart,” and that he is also glad people are coming “from Asia or Africa.”
This seems to be a standard multinational expectation—we can recall the words of Andrea Bujdosó, the TISZA party’s Budapest faction leader, who repeated the very same globalist talking points word for word.

We understand that at Shell this defines corporate governance, but Hungary is more than a Western multinational corporation.

The hypocrisy we see on the left is astonishing. At home they talk about always representing Hungarian interests, yet when Brussels or their multinational bosses ask, they argue without objection for sensitivity training, diversity, and migrants.

They always sing whatever tune their financiers ask of them.

Just listen to how “Shell Captain” speaks, almost verbatim and very emotionally, about diversity—and clearly about migration as well:
“Another element that is very close to my heart in my life is diversity. Something we see more and more in the world, in politics. And for this, we need different people. Asian people, African people.”

Acceptance. Diversity.
Well, the people close to our hearts are Hungarians—not migrants and not diversity as an ideology. And if we’re talking about diversity, then the TISZA party is extraordinarily two-faced. They say one thing when speaking at home, and something entirely different when they need to deliver results to their Brussels patrons.

If we stay on the Hungarian path, we can keep all these two-faced multinational figures and their circles at bay—those who babble incoherently about diversity and immigration.

We can preserve straight and honest speech, because even in times of danger we must stand up for Hungarian interests.

Only a national government is capable of this. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice.

1️⃣ Multinationals = foreign = suspicious (guilt by association)

The opening of the text does not argue — it labels:

  • “multinational expectations”
  • “globalist slogans”
  • “Brussels or multinational bosses”
  • “funders”

👉 Technique: guilt by association
If someone:

  • works for a multinational company
  • talks about diversity

→ they are automatically framed as not representing Hungarian interests, therefore not credible.

There is no evidence, only emotional linkage.


2️⃣ A cherry-picked quote → inflated into an ideological confession

The statement attributed to the “Shell Captain”:

“Asian people, African people… acceptance, diversity”

This is standard HR / corporate language, which the text transforms into:

  • migration policy
  • an anti-national stance
  • a pro–Tisza Party ideology

👉 Technique: frame shift
A workplace or values-based statement is turned into a national security issue.


3️⃣ The “double standards” narrative — without evidence

Claim:

“they say one thing at home and another in Brussels”

Missing entirely:

  • a concrete statement
  • a date
  • a document
  • comparable quotations

👉 Technique: alleged double talk
This is a defamatory framing, not analysis.


4️⃣ False dilemma: Hungarian interests OR diversity

The text sets up an opposition between:

  • “Hungarian people”
    vs
  • “migrants and diversity”

👉 Technique: false dichotomy
As if:

  • acceptance ≠ Hungarian interests
  • diversity ≠ national interests

This is an emotional short circuit, not logic.


5️⃣ “Us” vs “them” — identity politics as a conversation stopper

Key phrases:

  • “Hungarian people are closest to our hearts”
  • “multinational faces and their gangs”
  • “rambling nonsense about diversity”

👉 Technique: dehumanization + moral superiority

At this point, debate ends:

  • “we” = pure, honest
  • “they” = foreign, paid, two-faced

6️⃣ “An age of danger” — permanent threat framing

“even in times of danger, we must stand firm”

👉 Technique: permanent crisis framing
When there is danger:

  • no debate
  • no nuance
  • no questions

7️⃣ The inevitable conclusion

“Only a national government is capable of this — that’s why Fidesz is the safe choice!”

👉 Technique: closed-loop propaganda
The text:

  1. creates a threat
  2. excludes all alternatives
  3. leaves only one solution: Fidesz

🎯 Summary — what is actually happening?

This text is not about migration.
It is about:

  • identity-based fear
  • loyalty testing
  • enemy construction

The goal is:

  • emotional closure
  • exclusion of critical thinking
  • discrediting alternative political actors (e.g. the Tisza Party, via association with Shell)

If you want, I can also:

  • 🔹 condense this into a 1-minute explainer
  • 🔹 rewrite it as a first-person “propaganda confession”
  • 🔹 adapt it for international media / NGO audiences

Just say the word.

szentkiralyi wake up

An extraordinary sight! 🙂
They’re sliding the new railway bridge of the Southern Railway Circle project on Bartók Béla Road into place.

When this several-hundred-billion-forint investment is completed, suburban and Budapest public transport will go through a level of development not seen in a decade.

In Budapest too, Fidesz is the safe choice! 😉

The visual element is not information, but an emotional trigger.

👉 Big machines
👉 A bridge
👉 Movement
👉 The feeling that “the country is being built”

This is a visual substitute for proof:
it does not demonstrate that

  • the investment is good
  • it is worth the cost
  • more important things are not being neglected because of it

It only shows that something big is happening.


🧠 “A multi-hundred-billion investment” – numbers as authority

The huge sum here is not a subject of debate, but scenery.

Its function:

size = sense of importance
expensive = serious
serious = good

What’s missing:

cost–benefit ratio
alternatives
what did not happen instead (hospitals, education, railway conditions, etc.)

This is the logical slide of “size = success.”


🚆 “Unseen development in a decade” – a temporal illusion

This is especially interesting because…

👉 The same political side has been governing for 15 years.

So the hidden meaning of the sentence is:

“Development is happening now… despite the fact that we have been in charge for a decade and a half.”

This is shifting responsibility in time:

past failures → somehow “belong to no one”
present spectacle → credit to the government


🎯 The final leap: infrastructure → party preference

This is the core manipulation.

The post’s logical chain:

A bridge is being built → big investment → development →
therefore: vote for Fidesz

❗ But there is no direct logical connection between the two.

A transport project does not prove that:

healthcare is better
education is better
real incomes have grown
the impact of inflation has decreased

This is project-based loyalty building.


🎭 The style: light, smiley, “positive propaganda”

🙂 😉 emojis =

no debate
no problems
only success
anyone who criticizes is just “grumpy”

This is mood politics, not fact-based communication.


🧩 Summary — techniques used simultaneously

TechniqueWhat it does
Spectacle politicsConstruction = feeling of progress
Numerical authorityBig cost replaces real arguments
Time distortion15 years of rule → not mentioned
Project = system successOne bridge → the whole country is doing well
Positive mood bubbleCriticism = being a spoil-sport

💬 The real question the post tries to avoid:

How is it possible that after 15 years in power, “development is only starting now”?