🌐 No matter how much the online world tries to spin things against us, in reality, we are the majority!

By now, it has become clear that Brussels, in collusion with foreign tech companies, is restricting right-wing content, thereby supporting Péter Magyar’s pro-Ukraine campaign.

👉 However, facts are stubborn things, and the Hungarian people have already made their decision. While Viktor Orbán is greeted by huge crowds and packed town squares at every stop of his nationwide tour, fewer and fewer people are interested in the leader of the left.

But we cannot stop here. There are still 23 days left until April 12, and we must work relentlessly until then. On to victory—go Fidesz!

Algorithms and fake profiles cannot go out into the streets. Over the past years, guidelines and expectations have been set from Brussels toward Meta that effectively required certain topics to be hidden from users. This means that content critical of migration, or of LGBTQ and gender issues, has practically been suppressed on Facebook and hidden from users. What we are seeing now is the same type of intervention.

And I believe that anyone who attended the Peace March or has been present at the Prime Minister’s nationwide events can clearly see what reality is—and what the distorted image of the online space looks like. Algorithms and fake profiles cannot appear in the streets; this is also clearly visible at Péter Magyar’s events.

In contrast, at the Prime Minister’s events, real, freedom-loving Hungarian people continuously stand up against the foreign pressure and coercion directed at us.

I also believe it is outrageous that there are attempts—at this level and in this way—to interfere in Hungarian elections in order to remove a national and sovereign government. A government which, even now, is preventing Hungarian money from being sent to Ukraine, blocking Ukraine’s accession to the European Union from 2027, and preventing the country from being dragged into the war.

🔍 Main narrative

👉 “They want to silence us (Brussels + tech companies)”
👉 “But in reality, we are the majority”
👉 “There is a strong leader (Orbán)”
👉 “There is a weak / artificial opponent (Péter Magyar)”
👉 “The election = reality vs. manipulation”

➡️ Classic formula:
external conspiracy + oppression + majority identity + mobilization

---

🧠 Influence techniques

1️⃣ Conspiracy narrative (Brussels + tech companies)

Excerpt:
“Brussels is colluding with foreign tech companies…”

Technique:

• invisible, unprovable background force
• linking multiple actors (EU + Meta)
• presented as fact without concrete evidence

Goal:
➡️ create distrust toward all information
➡️ criticism = manipulation

Effect:
➡️ the follower doesn’t question, but “exposes”

---

2️⃣ “We are the majority” (false consensus)

Excerpt:
“in reality, we are the majority”

Technique:

• illusion of majority
• social pressure (“everyone thinks this”)

Goal:
➡️ pull in the undecided
➡️ reinforce group identity

Effect:
➡️ anyone who disagrees → “minority”, “wrong”

---

3️⃣ Online vs. reality contrast

Excerpt:
“the online world distorts… reality = crowds”

Technique:

• creating two separate realities
• delegitimizing online criticism

Goal:
➡️ neutralize negative comments
➡️ own camp’s experience = “real reality”

Effect:
➡️ strengthening the echo chamber

---

4️⃣ Dehumanizing the opposition (“fake profiles”)

Excerpt:
“algorithms and fake profiles”

Technique:

• the opponent is not even a “real person”
• portrayed as artificial

Goal:
➡️ destroy the opponent’s legitimacy

Effect:
➡️ no need for debate → “they don’t even exist”

---

5️⃣ Crowd scenes as “proof”

Excerpt:
“crowded main squares”

Technique:

• visual evidence = political truth
• cherry-picking (only own events)

Goal:
➡️ create the feeling that “victory is already decided”

Effect:
➡️ bandwagon effect (“join the winners”)

---

6️⃣ Threat + protection narrative

Excerpt:
“foreign pressure and blackmail”

Technique:

• external enemy
• country “under attack”

Goal:
➡️ fear + group cohesion

Effect:
➡️ criticism = “helping the enemy”

---

7️⃣ Mobilization (campaign mode)

Excerpt:
“23 days… we must work relentlessly”

Technique:

• urgency
• activation

Goal:
➡️ passive supporter → active campaigner

Effect:
➡️ emotional escalation, reduced rational thinking

---

⚙️ Deeper pattern (what bothers you too)

The point of the text is not whether it is true, but that:

➡️ it shuts down thinking

Because if:

• all criticism = censorship
• all opponents = fake
• all data = manipulated

then:

👉 there is no information that could disprove it

This system protects itself.

---

🧩 Why followers “buy into it”

Not because they are “stupid”, but because it works:

✔️ 1. Simple worldview

• good vs. bad
• no uncertainty

✔️ 2. Emotional satisfaction

• “we are the majority”
• “we see the truth”

✔️ 3. Group identity

• you belong somewhere

✔️ 4. Cognitive protection

• no need to doubt

---

🎯 In short

This text:

➡️ does not inform
➡️ but frames + mobilizes + immunizes

In Brussels, it has been made clear that in the coming years migration pressure, the energy crisis, and the risk of war escalation will only increase. On top of that, they want to force Ukraine into the European Union on us.

Now it will be decided who represents the interests of the Hungarian people: the national government, which protects the country and can say no to harmful Brussels plans, or Tisza, which would carry out foreign demands without question.

Let’s not take risks! Right now, peace and security are the only viable path. Let’s be wise and choose certainty—choose Fidesz!

🔍 Main Narrative

👉 “A dangerous world is coming (migration + energy + war)”
👉 “Brussels and Ukraine want to force this on us”
👉 “There is a defensive force (the government)”
👉 “There is a compliant opponent (Tisza)”
👉 “The choice = security vs. risk”

➡️ Classic formula:
global threat + external pressure + internal traitor + savior leader

---

🧠 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Fear stacking

Excerpt:
“migration pressure + energy crisis + war escalation”

Technique:

• multiple crises layered on top of each other
• no details → only creates a feeling

Goal:
➡️ overload rational thinking
➡️ trigger emotional response (anxiety)

Effect:
➡️ the reader doesn’t analyze, but “moves toward safety”

---

2️⃣ Deterministic future framing

Excerpt:
“will only increase”

Technique:

• future = निश्चितly negative
• no alternatives, no uncertainty

Goal:
➡️ shut down debate (“this is already decided”)

Effect:
➡️ the choice becomes a “forced situation”

---

3️⃣ Construction of an external enemy

Excerpt:
“Brussels… want to force it on us”

Technique:

• EU framed as an aggressive actor
• “force on us” = coercive framing

Goal:
➡️ evoke sovereignty fear
➡️ create “us vs. them” thinking

Effect:
➡️ stabilizes the enemy image

---

4️⃣ Ukraine as a threat focal point

Excerpt:
“They want to force Ukraine on us”

Technique:

• simplifies a complex EU enlargement issue
• Ukraine = source of the problem

Goal:
➡️ direct negative emotions toward a single target

Effect:
➡️ easily identifiable “enemy”

---

5️⃣ False dilemma (black-or-white framing)

Excerpt:
“national government vs. Tisza”

Technique:

• only 2 options presented
• no middle ground

Goal:
➡️ narrow the perceived choices
➡️ simplify decision-making

Effect:
➡️ if you’re not with them → you’re “wrong”

---

6️⃣ Delegitimizing the opposition

Excerpt:
“would carry out foreign demands without question”

Technique:

• opponent = puppet / subordinate
• no independent agency

Goal:
➡️ undermine credibility
➡️ create distrust

Effect:
➡️ not an alternative → but a threat

---

7️⃣ Savior-leader narrative

Excerpt:
“protects the country”

Technique:

• government = active protector
• implicit: others are incapable

Goal:
➡️ strengthen loyalty
➡️ leader = security

Effect:
➡️ emotional attachment

---

8️⃣ Activation of risk aversion

Excerpt:
“Let’s not take risks!”

Technique:

• loss aversion
• preference for the status quo

Goal:
➡️ reject change

Effect:
➡️ “stick with what feels safe”

---

9️⃣ Simple emotional closure

Excerpt:
“peace and security” / “choose the safe option”

Technique:

• positive keywords
• no concrete content

Goal:
➡️ emotional closure
➡️ reinforce the decision

Effect:
➡️ memorable, easy-to-repeat message

---

⚙️ Overall Mechanism

This is how the message works:

1. Builds fear (global crises)
2. Defines an enemy (Brussels + Ukraine)
3. Identifies an internal threat (opposition)
4. Offers a solution (government)
5. Simplifies the decision (risk vs. security)

➡️ This is a classic “protection vs. threat” campaign model

If Tisza wins, Zelensky will never reopen the Druzhba pipeline.

After all, the European Commission plans to permanently ban Russian energy just three days after the Hungarian elections.

And Tisza’s “Shell-linked” politicians want to break away from Russian energy.
Zelensky wants this too.

So Péter Magyar would have no power or influence to force the reopening of the pipeline.

As a result, fuel prices would rise to 1,000 forints, we could say goodbye to utility price caps forever, and our annual utility bills would increase from 250,000 to 800,000–1,000,000 forints.

Only Viktor Orbán has the strength to break this oil blockade.

If Viktor Orbán wins, the oil will flow again.

No Orbán, no oil. But what does that actually mean?

It means that if Viktor Orbán does not remain Hungary’s prime minister, we will effectively have to say goodbye forever to cheap Russian energy.

In Brussels, they are counting on being able to push us out of our position through various forms of intervention and pressure.

That is why they scheduled, for April 15—just three days after the Hungarian elections—a debate in the European Union about permanently eliminating all Russian energy sources across all member states, including Hungary.

But we must be clear about what this means for us.

It means there will be no alternative but to purchase much more expensive raw materials instead of gas and crude oil.

This would be reflected in the wallets of every Hungarian household. Instead of the current utility cost levels, families would have to pay two to three times as much.

And it would affect all our spending—not just 1,000-forint fuel, but also the prices we pay in shops, as these higher costs would be built into everything.

That is why it is crucial that on April 12 we choose the Hungarian path, and not the Brussels or Ukrainian one.

🔍 Main Narrative

👉 “If Orbán doesn’t stay → Russian energy disappears → prices collapse”
👉 “External forces (Brussels + Ukraine) are controlling the process”
👉 “The opposition (Tisza) serves this agenda”
👉 “Orbán = the only guarantee of cheap energy”

➡️ Classic formula:
external pressure + economic fear + internal enemy + savior leader

---

🧠 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Deterministic future framing (“if they win, this will definitely happen”)

Excerpt:
“Zelensky will never reopen it…”
“we can say goodbye forever…”

Technique:
➡️ assumption presented as fact
➡️ no uncertainty, no alternatives

Goal:
➡️ shut down critical thinking (“this is inevitable”)

Effect:
➡️ the reader accepts instead of evaluates

---

2️⃣ Total causal chain (false oversimplification)

Logic in the text:

Tisza wins → Zelensky decides → pipeline stays closed → energy becomes expensive → everything becomes expensive → collapse

Technique:
➡️ complex geopolitics reduced to a one-dimensional chain
➡️ everything traced back to a single cause

Goal:
➡️ create a simple, understandable “blame logic”

Effect:
➡️ reality becomes simplified and easier to manipulate

---

3️⃣ External enemy + internal collaborator

Excerpt:
“Brussels”, “Zelensky”, “Tisza”

Technique:
➡️ combining external pressure with an internal “traitor”
➡️ delegitimizing the political opponent

Goal:
➡️ “they do not serve national interests”

Effect:
➡️ moral rejection instead of rational debate

---

4️⃣ Shock with extreme price claims

Excerpt:
“1000 HUF fuel”, “800,000–1,000,000 HUF utility bills”

Technique:
➡️ specific, shocking numbers
➡️ worst-case scenario presented as certainty

Goal:
➡️ trigger immediate fear

Effect:
➡️ emotional decision-making (not rational calculation)

---

5️⃣ False exclusivity (“only Orbán”)

Excerpt:
“Only Viktor Orbán has the power…”
“No Orbán, no oil”

Technique:
➡️ presenting a single solution
➡️ all alternatives = catastrophe

Goal:
➡️ narrow the perceived choice

Effect:
➡️ forced political loyalty

---

6️⃣ Timed threat (3 days after the election)

Excerpt:
“3 days after the election…”

Technique:
➡️ specific timing → urgency
➡️ “you must decide now”

Goal:
➡️ mobilization

Effect:
➡️ panic-driven voter behavior

---

⚠️ Reality vs. Claims (Critical Points)

Here’s the key part you’re pointing out:

---

🔎 1. “Zelensky opens/closes the Druzhba pipeline”

➡️ not true in this form

• the pipeline is a multi-actor system (Ukraine transit, Russian supply, EU regulation)
• not a single politician’s decision

👉 manipulation: personalization/oversimplification

---

🔎 2. “The EU will ban Russian energy in 3 days”

➡️ heavily distorted

• the EU is working on a long-term phase-out strategy
• there is no “everything ends in 3 days” decision

👉 manipulation: timed panic framing

---

🔎 3. “Only Orbán guarantees cheap energy”

➡️ not provable

• prices are determined by global markets
• alternative sources and contracts exist

👉 manipulation: exclusivity claim

---

🔎 4. “The EU is also helping rebuild Ukrainian infrastructure”

➡️ this is a real element that the text completely omits

👉 meaning:

• it’s not “just a blockade”
• but parallel reconstruction + diversification efforts

👉 manipulation: omission of context

---

🎯 Conclusion (Key Point)

This text:

➡️ does not aim to inform
➡️ aims to trigger a fear-based decision

---

Formula:

👉 economic fear (utilities, fuel)
👉 external enemy (EU, Ukraine)
👉 internal enemy (Tisza)
👉 savior (Orbán)

➡️ classic: fear-based energy propaganda

---

🧩 In short — what you’re saying (and you’re right)

👉 yes, the EU is actively working on infrastructure recovery
👉 yes, the situation is far more complex
👉 yes, there is clear simplification and distortion here

Csurgó and Somogy are on board! Go, Zita Kelei!

We cannot allow such a risky person to come to power in Hungary—someone who would drag our country into the ranks of nodding along with a “Jawohl” policy. Péter Magyar and the Tisza Party simply would not be able, nor would they want, to say no to either Brussels or Ukrainian orders. For them, the expectations of foreign financiers matter more than the wallets of Hungarian families. If it were up to them, utility price cuts would be over, and the oil taps would remain shut. Péter Magyar’s political survival depends on Brussels, while the safety of Hungarians would be put at risk precisely because of him. They themselves admitted it: if they told everything, they would fail.

One thing, however, is absolutely certain: the national government will not give in to any form of blackmail. We must break the Ukrainian oil blockade ourselves, and we have the means to do so—that is what Viktor Orbán fought for in Brussels. We are making it clear: until there is oil for Hungary, there will be no money for Ukraine! We guarantee this, whether Kyiv and Brussels like it or not. For us, Hungary comes first, and we will not allow the Hungarian people to pay the price of a war that Brussels wants to drag us into.

In the weeks remaining until the election, the question is no longer only about the economy, but also about our sovereignty. Before and after April alike, we need a responsible prime minister who can say no to Western demands and break the oil blockade. And only Viktor Orbán is capable of doing that. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice!

Main Narrative

👉 “Hungary is under external pressure”
👉 “The opponent does not serve Hungarian interests, but Brussels and Ukraine”
👉 “Economic security would also be at risk”
👉 “Only Viktor Orbán can protect the country”

➡️ Classic formula:
external enemy + internal proxy + fear + savior leader

---

Influence Techniques

1) Construction of an external enemy

Excerpt:
“Brussels and Ukrainian commands”
“to Kyiv and Brussels”
“Western demands”

Technique:
frames political debate as orders coming from foreign powers

Goal:
➡️ create the feeling that Hungary is under siege
➡️ portray domestic opponents as agents of external forces

Effect:
➡️ the reader no longer sees political competition, but national defense
➡️ strengthens the “us vs. them” divide

---

2) Suggesting loss of sovereignty of the opponent

Excerpt:
“a nodding ‘Jawohl’ policy”
“they could not and would not say no”

Technique:
depicts the opponent as subordinate and lacking independence

Goal:
➡️ present Péter Magyar not as an alternative leader, but as a puppet
➡️ judge competence based on loyalty rather than policy

Effect:
➡️ in the voter’s mind: opponent = weak, dependent, serving foreign interests

---

3) Economic fear-mongering

Excerpt:
“the wallets of Hungarian families”
“utility price caps would be abolished”
“the oil taps would remain closed”

Technique:
connects geopolitical conflict directly to everyday livelihood

Goal:
➡️ shift focus from high-level politics to personal fears
➡️ send the message: this is about your money, not abstract policy

Effect:
➡️ the reader starts fearing for their own financial security
➡️ political choice becomes an existential issue

---

4) Implication without evidence

Excerpt:
“They themselves admitted: if they told everything, they would fail.”

Technique:
vague, unverifiable claim that suggests much but proves little

Goal:
➡️ create suspicion
➡️ imply the existence of a hidden, serious truth

Effect:
➡️ the reader fills in the gaps themselves
➡️ implication becomes more powerful than concrete evidence

---

5) Leader glorification

Excerpt:
“this is why Viktor Orbán fought in Brussels”
“only Viktor Orbán is capable of this”

Technique:
condenses protection, strength, and competence into a single leader

Goal:
➡️ present Orbán not just as a politician, but as a defender
➡️ tie loyalty to a person rather than policies

Effect:
➡️ the leader appears irreplaceable
➡️ elections become about personal loyalty instead of programs

---

6) False dilemma

Excerpt:
“Only Viktor Orbán is capable of this. That is why Fidesz is the safe choice!”

Technique:
frames the situation as if only two options exist:

• Orbán = security
• everyone else = danger

Goal:
➡️ narrow the scope of thinking
➡️ eliminate nuanced or middle-ground options

Effect:
➡️ the voter does not evaluate, but escapes the “worse option”
➡️ political pluralism disappears

---

7) War and siege language

Excerpt:
“blackmail”
“oil blockade”
“break it”
“will not yield”

Technique:
uses militarized, conflict-driven language for political/economic issues

Goal:
➡️ create a sense of emergency
➡️ legitimize aggressive and uncompromising behavior

Effect:
➡️ the reader feels urgency
➡️ compromise appears as weakness

---

8) Appropriation of national identity

Excerpt:
“For us, Hungary comes first”
“Hungarian people”
“Hungarian interests”

Technique:
equates a political position with the nation itself

Goal:
➡️ those who agree = “true Hungarians”
➡️ those who disagree can be framed as anti-national

Effect:
➡️ delegitimizes the opposition
➡️ emotional identification overrides rational debate

---

9) Maximizing the stakes of the election

Excerpt:
“it is no longer just about the economy, but about our sovereignty”

Technique:
frames the election as a historic, existential turning point

Goal:
➡️ mobilize voters
➡️ create the feeling that everything can be lost now

Effect:
➡️ increases political anxiety
➡️ rational comparison is pushed aside

---

What is the strongest propaganda element?

The strongest move in the text is that it compresses into a single narrative:

• Brussels
• Ukraine
• utility costs
• oil
• war
• family finances
• sovereignty
• Orbán himself

This is powerful because it creates one unified mental image:

opponent = foreign + danger + higher costs + war
Fidesz = protection + financial security + national sovereignty

This is the essence of propaganda:
not detailed argumentation, but emotional bundling.

---

Short Summary

This is a classic fear-based sovereignty propaganda text.

Main tools:

• external enemy
• internal proxy opponent
• economic fear
• leader glorification
• false dilemma
• appropriation of national identity

The goal is not to make the reader verify claims, but to make them feel:

👉 “There is danger, and only Orbán can protect us.”

We have extended the national petition until April 8, as Ukraine is still maintaining an oil blockade against Hungary.

Now more than ever, it is crucial that we express—by filling out the petition—that we will not give in to Ukrainian blackmail.

Let’s complete the national petition and send a clear message:
NO to further financing of the Russian–Ukrainian war!
NO to making us pay for the operation of the Ukrainian state over the next 10 years!
NO to raising utility prices because of the war!

Don’t forget—you can now fill it out not only on paper but online as well!

The oil blockade is still ongoing, which is why the government has extended the national petition until April 8. So if you haven’t done so yet, make sure to fill it out if you want to protest against Ukrainian blackmail in this way.

It is now available not only on paper but online as well. We can say no to three things:
We can say no to rising utility costs due to the war,
no to sending money to Ukraine,
and no to financing this war.

Say no as well—until April 8.

🔍 Main Narrative

👉 “Hungary is under attack (oil blockade, Ukrainian blackmail)”
👉 “We are defending ourselves (petition = resistance)”
👉 “They want to make you pay for the costs of the war”
👉 “Now is the time to act (April 8 deadline)”

➡️ Classic formula:
threat + external enemy + financial fear + rapid mobilization

---

🧠 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Threat amplification (crisis framing)

“they are still keeping Hungary under an oil blockade”

Technique:

• frames a complex/debatable situation as a direct attack
• the word “blockade” creates a war-like perception

Goal:
➡️ immediate sense of danger
➡️ emotional reaction (not rational evaluation)

Effect:
➡️ the reader feels: “something serious is happening right now”

---

2️⃣ Simplification of the enemy image

“Ukrainian blackmail”

Technique:

• reduces the entire conflict to a single label
• an entire country = “the blackmailer”

Goal:
➡️ create a clear enemy
➡️ trigger anger and resistance

Effect:
➡️ no nuance, no complexity
➡️ black-and-white thinking

---

3️⃣ Activation of financial fear

“rising utility costs”, “they will make us pay”

Technique:

• pocketbook politics (strongest emotional trigger)
• emphasizes future personal loss

Goal:
➡️ make politics personal
➡️ affect everyone → mass mobilization

Effect:
➡️ “this affects me” → stronger reaction

---

4️⃣ “We say NO” mantra (repetition + rhythm)

3× “WE SAY NO”

Technique:

• chant-like, campaign-style repetition
• simple, binary choice

Goal:
➡️ easy to remember
➡️ strengthen group identity

Effect:
➡️ reflex instead of thinking
➡️ “you’re either with us or against us”

---

5️⃣ False dilemma

“either you say no → or you pay / support the war”

Technique:

• no middle ground
• petition = the only action

Goal:
➡️ steer toward one specific action
➡️ exclude alternatives

Effect:
➡️ narrowed thinking

---

6️⃣ Urgency (deadline pressure)

“until April 8” (repeated multiple times)

Technique:

• pressure through a deadline
• FOMO (fear of missing out)

Goal:
➡️ immediate action
➡️ no time to think it through

Effect:
➡️ impulsive decision-making

---

7️⃣ Illusion of participation

“let’s fill it out”, “let’s send a message”

Technique:

• petition = feeling of political action
• low-threshold activism

Goal:
➡️ involvement
➡️ sense of activity

Effect:
➡️ the person feels: “I did something”

---

⚠️ Deeper propaganda structure

This text actually:

👉 does not inform
👉 but mobilizes + legitimizes

Structure:

• crisis (oil blockade)
• enemy (Ukraine)
• personal loss (utilities, money)
• simple solution (petition)
• urgency (deadline)

➡️ this is a textbook campaign CTA (call to action)

---

🧨 Why it feels like “overcompensation”

1️⃣ Too much repetition

• the same message repeated 4–5 times
  ➡️ sign of weakness (not strong enough on its own)

---

2️⃣ Overly direct mobilization

• “fill it out”, “say no”, “now”
  ➡️ not trying to persuade, but to pressure

---

3️⃣ Oversimplified narrative

• complex geopolitics → “Ukrainian blackmail”
  ➡️ reduces credibility

---

4️⃣ Petition as a “solution”

➡️ real impact is minimal
➡️ more like data collection / political signaling

---

5️⃣ Panic tone

• “now more than ever”
  ➡️ classic late-campaign escalation

---

🎯 Summary (short)

This is a:

👉 fear-based mobilization message
👉 combining external enemy + financial threat
👉 pushing toward low-effort action (petition)

And yes:

➡️ it clearly shows urgency and overdrive
➡️ aimed more at activating the existing base than persuading new voters

👉 While I was continuing Fidesz’s nationwide tour in Csurgó, the Prime Minister was fighting for Hungarians in Brussels. Yesterday, Viktor Orbán did not give in to Ukrainian blackmail: once Ukraine restores oil deliveries and Hungary receives guarantees that this will not happen again, the money can be sent.

With this, we are not attacking Ukraine, but defending Hungarian interests. Europe cannot survive the global oil crisis without cheap Russian energy—this is something they still do not understand in Brussels.

We know that in Brussels they are openly working to make the national government lose the elections and to bring a pro-Ukrainian government to power—one that would provide financial and military support to Ukraine in line with Brussels’ expectations.

🟠 We ask everyone to stand up for Hungary on April 12, to unite against the war, and to say no to Zelensky’s candidates!

While we are here at this forum talking about what is at stake in the election, the Prime Minister has been fighting—and is still fighting—in Brussels. He is fighting against the Ukrainian and Brussels-based blackmail that we have experienced in recent weeks and months. And I believe he will be the only European leader at the end of this Brussels meeting who can return home having done what he promised. He may stand alone among European leaders.

For example, the German Chancellor, who only yesterday spoke tough in the German parliament about how they would break us Hungarians, will likely return empty-handed—with nothing to show and a broken promise—because once again, they will not succeed in breaking us or Viktor Orbán.

🔍 Main Narrative

👉 “Viktor Orbán is fighting for Hungarians in Brussels”
👉 “Ukraine and Brussels are blackmailing Hungary”
👉 “Without cheap Russian energy, Europe will collapse”
👉 “The opposition = a pro-Ukrainian puppet government”
👉 “The election = national defense vs. submission”

➡️ Classic formula:
external enemy + blackmail + heroic leader + final choice

---

🧠 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Hero-building (leader as savior)

Excerpt:
“the Prime Minister fought… and is still fighting”

Technique:

• continuous “battle” narrative
• single active actor: Orbán
• personifies the country

Goal:
➡️ leader = protection
➡️ strengthen loyalty

Effect:
➡️ criticism feels like “betrayal”

---

2️⃣ “Blackmail” framing

Excerpt:
“Ukrainian and Brussels blackmail”

Technique:

• simplifies a complex political situation
• presents negotiation as a threat

Goal:
➡️ create moral superiority
➡️ delegitimize the opponent

Effect:
➡️ no “compromise,” only “resistance”

---

3️⃣ False dichotomy (black-and-white world)

Excerpt:
“we are not attacking Ukraine, we are defending Hungarian interests”

Technique:

• excludes alternative positions
• presents only two options

Goal:
➡️ narrow the thinking space

Effect:
➡️ any criticism = “against Hungarian interests”

---

4️⃣ Fear narrative (energy + war)

Excerpt:
“Europe cannot survive without cheap Russian energy”

Technique:

• exaggerated, absolute claim
• turns an economic issue into an existential one

Goal:
➡️ create urgency
➡️ trigger fear

Effect:
➡️ rational debate is pushed aside

---

5️⃣ Conspiracy-style framing

Excerpt:
“in Brussels they openly work to make the government lose the elections”

Technique:

• external forces manipulating domestic politics
• presented as fact without evidence

Goal:
➡️ build distrust
➡️ create a “siege mentality”

Effect:
➡️ all criticism = external attack

---

6️⃣ Blending the enemy

Excerpt:
“pro-Ukrainian government”, “Zelensky’s candidates”

Technique:

• opposition = foreign interests
• linking domestic actors to external enemies

Goal:
➡️ delegitimize the opposition

Effect:
➡️ not political debate → “national vs. foreign”

---

7️⃣ Mobilization through fear

Excerpt:
“stand up for Hungary… say no”

Technique:

• election framed as a battle
• presented as a moral duty

Goal:
➡️ increase turnout

Effect:
➡️ not voting = “not standing up for the country”

---

8️⃣ National exceptionalism / isolation

Excerpt:
“he will be the only European leader”

Technique:

• “everyone else is wrong”
• we are the only correct path

Goal:
➡️ justify a separate path

Effect:
➡️ isolation appears as a virtue

---

⚙️ Deep Structure (what the text actually does)

This text functions as an emotional decision machine:

Threat
→ Ukraine + Brussels + energy + war

Hero
→ Viktor Orbán

Traitor / danger
→ opposition (“pro-Ukrainian”)

Choice = survival
→ not a political decision, but “defense”

---

🎯 Overall Effect

➡️ strong emotional reaction (fear + anger)
➡️ reduced critical thinking
➡️ maximized loyalty
➡️ voter mobilization

---

🧠 Why it makes you feel “sick”

This is a completely understandable reaction, because the text:

• does not inform → it directs
• oversimplifies a complex reality
• relies on constant enemy construction
• pushes emotions instead of arguments

The brain often detects this as manipulation, which can trigger a physical discomfort reaction.