In a video, this is the Tisza “country of love.” You cannot build a country on hatred. Whoever loves their homeland, wants peace, and values secure livelihoods should vote for Fidesz and Viktor Orbán!

Come on, come on! They’ve shown up on the phone! In masks! What’s wrong with us here? In masks! “Dirty Fidesz! Dirty Fidesz! Dirty Fidesz! Death to Fidesz! Die! Only Tisza, that’s it! New Júrás Fidesz! Dirty Fidesz! Dirty Fidesz! The van is coming! Get the hell out of here! Dirty Fidesz! Dirty Fidesz! Dirty Fidesz!”

🔍 Main Narrative

👉 “We = love, peace, patriotism (Fidesz)”
👉 “They = hatred, aggression, chaos (Tisza)”
👉 “The election = peace vs hatred”
👉 “The majority is normal → they are just a loud minority”

---

🧩 Hidden Formula (very clear)

a video (“country of love” + shouting)
→ building contrast (“we are peaceful / they are hateful”)
→ highlighting extreme scenes (swearing, “drop dead”)
→ generalization (“they are like this”)
→ moral judgment (“you cannot build a country on this”)
→ political conclusion (“vote for Fidesz”)

👉 Classic: contrast → demonization → moral superiority → voting

---

🧠 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Moral framing (good vs evil)

👉 “country of love” vs “hatred”
👉 “patriotism” vs “shouting”

🎯 Goal:
reduce politics to a simple moral choice

💥 Effect:
you’re not choosing between programs, but between “good” and “bad”

---

2️⃣ Highlighting extreme behavior

👉 “Fidesz should die!”
👉 “drop dead”
👉 swearing, aggression

🎯 Goal:
show the most extreme example → project it onto the whole group

💥 Effect:
the brain perceives this as “typical”

---

3️⃣ Generalization (group labeling)

👉 “Tisza supporters are like this”

🎯 Goal:
turn individual behavior → into a group characteristic

💥 Effect:
you no longer see individuals, but a “dangerous crowd”

---

4️⃣ “We are the normal majority”

👉 “this is reality everywhere”
👉 “this is already normal”

🎯 Goal:
create a bandwagon / majority illusion

💥 Effect:
👉 undecided people tend to align with the “majority”

---

5️⃣ Emotional trigger + immediate political direction

👉 anger → fear → disgust
👉 “therefore vote for Fidesz”

🎯 Goal:
push decision-making in an emotional state

💥 Effect:
critical thinking is reduced

---

6️⃣ False binary choice

👉 “hatred” vs “peace”
👉 no middle ground

🎯 Goal:
limit the decision to two options

💥 Effect:
alternative choices disappear

---

7️⃣ Enemy construction (toward dehumanization)

👉 “they shout, swear, destroy”

🎯 Goal:
portray them not as political opponents, but as a “dangerous mass”

💥 Effect:
easier to reject or hate them

---

⚠️ What’s important to see (reality vs narrative)

👉 Every protest has extreme voices
👉 Highlighting them ≠ the full reality of the group
👉 The “love vs hatred” frame = political oversimplification

---

🎯 Summary

👉 This is a textbook propaganda pattern:

• cherry-picked aggressive scenes
• projecting onto the whole group
• moral contrast
• emotional manipulation
• ending with political direction

---

👉 In short:

incident → generalization → demonization → “we are the good ones” → vote

Look at this! According to the editor-in-chief of 444, it’s certain that Fidesz will win the الانتخابات, and he even says there’s a chance of a two-thirds majority.

It seems the momentum is starting to fade even in the pro-Tisza propaganda media… 😅
There are many of us and we will win, but for that we need to get everyone out to vote—we have to convince everyone both personally and in the digital space. Let’s stand together against blackmail and war! Let’s not allow Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Brussels to cut us off from cheap energy!

This election is also about the wallets and the future of Hungarians. In times of danger, what we need is not risk and hatred, but security, strength, and experience.
That’s why Viktor Orbán and Fidesz are the safe choice!

Now take a look at how the editor-in-chief of 444 evaluates the upcoming election results:

“I expect that the Fidesz national list will get around 2.5 million votes—that’s the key point. Somewhere between 2.5 and 2.6 million. Even if they get less than 2.4, that would still be very strong.
And how much will the Tisza Party get on the national list, Péter? I’d say a maximum of 2.4 million. Boom! Around 2.4 million. Yes, roughly around 2.4.

No matter how I calculate it, the Tisza Party can win at most around 41 constituencies. But even that would require things going particularly well for them. I wouldn’t even be surprised if they only managed to win 20. The most realistic estimate is somewhere between 30 and 35. The rest would go to Fidesz.

Just think about it—even before the 2022 election, two weeks before, I was sure there wouldn’t be a two-thirds majority. I was absolutely certain.”

🔍 Main narrative

👉 “It’s already decided → Fidesz will win”
👉 “Even opposition media says so”
👉 “We are the majority → we will win”
👉 “The election = security vs chaos / war”
👉 “Mobilization = take everyone to vote”

---

🧩 Hidden formula (very clear)

citing a “neutral/independent” source (444)
→ building legitimacy (“even they say it”)
→ throwing in numbers (seemingly objective)
→ announcing victory in advance
→ emotional framing (war, coercion, danger)
→ binary choice (security vs hatred)
→ mobilization (“take everyone to vote”)

👉 Classic: legitimacy → inevitability → fear → action

---

🧠 Influence techniques

1️⃣ “Even opposition sources confirm us” (false credibility)

👉 “Even the editor-in-chief of 444 says…”

🎯 Goal:

break through distrust
“if even they say it → it must be true”

💥 Effect:

strengthens belief within the base
shakes the undecided

---

2️⃣ Pre-declared victory (bandwagon / inevitability)

👉 “Fidesz will definitely win”
👉 “even a two-thirds majority is possible”

🎯 Goal:

pull people toward the “winner” (bandwagon effect)
demotivate the opposition (“it’s already decided”)

💥 Effect:

own base: more enthusiastic
opposition: discouraged

---

3️⃣ Pseudo-analysis with numbers (false rationality)

👉 “2.5 million”, “2.4”, “30–35 seats”

🎯 Goal:

create the impression of expertise
make it seem data-driven

💥 Reality:

speculation → presented as fact

💥 Effect:

the brain “takes it seriously” because numbers are involved

---

4️⃣ Fear framing (war + energy)

👉 “war”, “coercion”, “loss of cheap energy”

🎯 Goal:

create existential threat
don’t think → react

💥 Effect:

emotion-driven decisions
rational thinking shuts down

---

5️⃣ Enemy coalition

👉 “Zelensky + Brussels”

🎯 Goal:

define an external enemy
simple worldview: “them vs us”

💥 Effect:

increased sense of threat
stronger loyalty

---

6️⃣ False dilemma (no third option)

👉 “security, strength, experience” vs “hatred, risk”

🎯 Goal:

narrow down choices
eliminate alternatives

💥 Effect:

oversimplified decision-making
reduced critical thinking

---

7️⃣ Mobilization command (direct action)

👉 “we must take everyone to vote”
👉 “we must convince everyone”

🎯 Goal:

activate the base
strengthen offline + online campaigning

💥 Effect:

pushes concrete behavior
creates social pressure

---

8️⃣ Illusion of majority

👉 “we are many and we will win”

🎯 Goal:

create a social norm
“everyone wants this”

💥 Effect:

increased conformity
undecided voters align

---

⚠️ What makes it truly “nauseating”

👉 Multiple layers running at once:

• pseudo-independent source reference
• made-up / uncertain numbers presented as facts
• fear + geopolitical panic
• “it’s already decided” framing
• direct mobilization

👉 This is no longer just messaging, but:

➡️ full-scale psychological pressure

---

🎯 In short (brutally concise)

👉 legitimacy (444)
→ inevitability (Fidesz wins)
→ numbers (illusion of credibility)
→ fear (war, energy)
→ enemy (Brussels, Zelensky)
→ binary choice
→ mobilization

👉 = complete propaganda stack

Supporters of Tisza laugh while imagining Viktor Orbán being shot in the head. This is who they are — NoÁr and his associates.

They do this in light of the fact that both Donald Trump and Fico have been shot at, and Viktor Orbán and his family are being threatened with death on a daily basis by Ukrainians.

Anyone who votes for Tisza is voting for hatred. But you cannot build a nation or a homeland on hatred.

For us, Hungary is a shared passion: whoever votes for us votes for peace, security, and stable livelihoods.

In times of danger, we must all stand behind the national government. On April 12, Fidesz is the safe choice.

Members of NoÁr associated with Tisza were laughing in their show about what it would be like if Viktor Orbán were shot in the head. They were discussing where they would stand when firing. Which profile of mine would I be, I wonder? There is absolutely nothing funny about this for any person with good taste.

And it is especially not funny in light of what has happened in recent years. During the American campaign, Donald Trump was shot at, and only by chance — and by the grace of God — did he survive. Then Fico was also shot and seriously injured.

And in recent weeks, Viktor Orbán has been threatened by the Ukrainian president Zelensky, who said he would give his address to his “boys,” meaning his soldiers, so they could “have a talk” with him.

A Ukrainian lieutenant general even went so far as to threaten Viktor Orbán along with his children and grandchildren.

Such things have no place in politics — especially not in times as frightening and dangerous as the ones we are living through now.

I believe that this kind of anger, this dangerous anger, has absolutely no place anywhere near the Hungarian government — and that is exactly what Tisza would represent.

🔍 Main narrative

👉 “Tisza = violent, hate-driven side”
👉 “Orbán = threatened leader / target”
👉 “The world is dangerous → assassination attempts happen”
👉 “The election = peace vs violence”
👉 “Fidesz = security, stability, protection”

---

🧩 Hidden formula (very clear propaganda logic)

a selected scene / claim (“they laugh about shooting”)
→ moral outrage (“this is unacceptable”)
→ inclusion of real events (attacks on Trump and Fico)
→ emphasis on personal threat (Orbán + family)
→ generalization (“this is what they are like”)
→ existential danger (“dangerous emotions”)
→ binary choice (“they = hate / we = peace”)
→ mobilization (“stand behind us, vote”)

👉 Classic: incident → fear → moral judgment → political decision

---

🧠 Influence techniques

1️⃣ Fear appeal (existential threat)

👉 “Trump was shot at”, “Fico was shot at”
👉 “Orbán and his family are being threatened”

🎯 Goal:
don’t think → feel fear

💥 Effect:
the brain switches to threat mode → critical thinking decreases

---

2️⃣ Emotional chaining (association chaining)

👉 a humorous/tasteless scene
→ linked to real assassination attempts
→ then to Orbán’s personal danger

🎯 Goal:
everything gets categorized as violence in the viewer’s mind

---

3️⃣ Generalization (group labeling)

👉 “This is who they are”
👉 “Anyone who votes for Tisza votes for hate”

🎯 Goal:
reduce an entire political group to a single negative image

---

4️⃣ False dilemma (false binary)

👉 “hate vs peace”
👉 “Tisza vs Fidesz”

🎯 Reality:
politics is far more complex → here it is artificially simplified

---

5️⃣ “Protector leader” framing

👉 “stand behind the national government”
👉 “security, peace”

🎯 Goal:
power = protection
opponent = danger

---

6️⃣ Moral outrage trigger

👉 “there is nothing to laugh about”
👉 “unacceptable for any decent person”

🎯 Goal:
frame it not as politics → but as a moral violation

---

7️⃣ Enemy construction + demonization

👉 “hate”, “dangerous emotions”
👉 indirect association with violence

🎯 Effect:
the opponent is no longer political → but a threat

---

⚠️ What’s important

This text does not prove anything. Instead, it:

• triggers emotional reactions
• connects different events
• and suggests a conclusion from them

👉 This is not fact-based reasoning, but emotional narrative building

---

💥 Short, blunt evaluation

This is a textbook campaign message:

👉 fear + moral outrage + “us vs them” = votes

Its goal is not to help you decide what happened,
but to shape what you feel and who you vote for.

Supporters of Tisza have been commenting on the so-called “Tisza agent scandal,” saying “we were already missing Soros.” Well, we certainly didn’t miss him—but coming from a party where Orbán Anita sits in the same organization as little Soros, we can believe it…

But getting to the point: the case of Szabolcs Panyi is serious because until now it was only obvious—or at least suspected—by people with common sense that left-wing journalists are not paid from abroad just for their pretty eyes, but at the same time fulfill serious expectations from foreign intelligence services in order to weaken Hungary.

None of them had admitted this before; they avoided the topic like the plague. But Szabolcs Panyi was exposed by an audio recording, and then he admitted everything.

And why Soros? Let’s look at it on paper—who pays Szabolcs Panyi. He is a “journalist” at Direkt36, which is a pressure group funded from abroad. One of Direkt36’s main sources of income is funding from the Civitates Foundation. Civitates is an international funding hub—and guess who contributes money to it: the Soros Foundation, the Erste Bank foundation, and many others.

So if we strip away the makeup and reveal the financial flows hidden behind these foundations, in the end it is Soros’s dollars and Erste’s euros that land in Panyi’s account.

This globalist network has been trying to overthrow the sovereign government for over a decade—sometimes with Gordon Bajnai, sometimes with Gergely Karácsony, sometimes with Péter Márki-Zay, and now Péter Magyar is next. The difference is that this time Tisza is also receiving significant support from Ukrainian intelligence, and British intelligence is also highly active.

Because we remember: Péter Magyar was guided around Ukraine by a representative of Zelensky, an expelled Ukrainian spy from Hungary, who even called him a “friend.” We remember that in the Tisza data leak scandal, the personal data of hundreds of thousands of Hungarians was stored by Ukrainian developers.

And we remember that the autumn fake news scandal was “triggered” by agent Csaba Káncz, who is funded by British intelligence.

So before the elections in Hungary, Ukrainian services and global financial interest groups want to decide what kind of government we will have. Zelensky and Brussels want Péter Magyar, because he is their captured man who would not say no to them in anything.

But I believe that the fate of our country should be decided only by the Hungarian people. And Hungarians want peace and security—they do not want blackmail, war, soaring energy prices, or financing Ukraine.

That is why for Hungary and for every Hungarian, the safe choice is Fidesz and Viktor Orbán.

🔍 Main Narrative

👉 “Tisza + journalists = foreign spy network”
👉 “Péter Magyar = puppet serving foreign interests”
👉 “Brussels + Ukraine + Soros = a unified background power”
👉 “Election = sovereignty vs. betrayal”
👉 “Fidesz = the only safe choice”

---

🧩 Hidden Formula (very clear propaganda)

a person / organization (Panyi, Tisza)
→ mention of foreign funding
→ reframing = espionage
→ merging multiple دشمنs (Soros + EU + Ukraine + British intelligence)
→ existential threat (“they will decide the election”)
→ binary choice (“us or them”)
→ political mobilization (“only Fidesz”)

👉 Classic: suggestion → merging → fear → political control

---

🧠 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Guilt by association

👉 “Direkt36 → Civitates → Soros → Panyi → Tisza”

🎯 Goal:
no need to prove anything → just draw a chain of connections

💥 Effect:
👉 “if money comes from abroad → then they are spies”

---

2️⃣ Conspiracy stacking

👉 Soros + Erste + EU + Ukraine + British intelligence

🎯 Goal:
create an all-powerful enemy image

💥 Effect:
👉 “everything is controlled by the same network”

---

3️⃣ Presenting unproven claims as facts

👉 “he admitted it”
👉 “a recording exposed him”
👉 “a Ukrainian spy guided him”

🎯 Goal:
turn questions → into facts

💥 Effect:
👉 the reader stops questioning and accepts it

---

4️⃣ Enemy coalition building

👉 “Brussels + Zelensky + intelligence services”

🎯 Goal:
create a strong “them” bloc

💥 Effect:
👉 simplified worldview: “everyone is against us”

---

5️⃣ Existential threat (fear framing)

👉 “they will decide the election”
👉 “Hungary’s fate is at risk”

🎯 Goal:
don’t think → react

💥 Effect:
👉 anxiety → political loyalty

---

6️⃣ False causality

👉 foundation funding → journalist → espionage

🎯 Reality:
this is not a proven cause-effect relationship

💥 Effect:
👉 “it sounds logical → therefore it must be true”

---

7️⃣ Repetition + “we remember” technique

👉 repeated “we remember…”

🎯 Goal:
turn assumptions → into collective memory

💥 Effect:
👉 “if we remember it, it must have happened”

---

8️⃣ Moral panic

👉 “data being handed over”
👉 “foreign actors deciding for us”

🎯 Goal:
create moral shock

💥 Effect:
👉 “this is not politics anymore, this is betrayal”

---

9️⃣ Binary worldview (false dilemma)

👉 “Fidesz = security”
👉 “Tisza = chaos / spies”

🎯 Goal:
eliminate all middle options

💥 Effect:
👉 voting becomes a forced choice

---

🔟 Activation of national identity

👉 “only Hungarians can decide”

🎯 Goal:
emotional identification

💥 Effect:
👉 anyone choosing differently → “not truly Hungarian”

---

⚠️ Why is this so powerful (and dangerous)?

👉 It’s not based on a single claim
👉 but on layered manipulation techniques built on top of each other

This text simultaneously:

• constructs a conspiracy
• defines an enemy
• creates fear
• delivers a moral judgment
• and dictates a political choice

👉 This is no longer simple campaigning → it is full-scale reality framing

---

🎯 In short (brutally condensed)

👉 “foreign money → spies → betrayal → danger → only we can protect you”

They were shouting in an unacceptable manner at Viktor Orbán’s rally in Kecskemét.
The contrast couldn’t be clearer: they only want to destroy, while we want to build. They are held together by anger and hatred, while we are united by our love for our country. Tisza supporters are no longer raging only on social media, but also at our pro-peace gatherings.
We will not let ourselves be provoked—we are the peaceful majority, and on April 12 we will win! Because only Fidesz is the safe choice.

“Dirty Fidesz! In Kecskemét, the local Tisza guy really went all out. Did you see the footage? Dirty Fidesz! Tisza is the party of peace! Dirty Fidesz! Dirty Fidesz! May Fidesz die! Drop dead!”

Yes, I saw it—they tried, in a completely unacceptable manner, to ruin our gathering where we had come together and were preparing for the elections. I think it clearly shows the difference between the two sides. We focus on ourselves, on positive things—on what holds us together and what challenges lie ahead.
They, on the other hand, come there and try to spoil things. But as the footage shows, they didn’t succeed. The atmosphere was fantastic.

That is precisely why such people cannot be entrusted with governing the country—people who take pleasure in ruining others’ achievements. In my view, these people are incapable of building anything; they can only destroy, even if they were in government.

🔍 Core Narrative

👉 “We = peaceful, constructive, patriotic majority”
👉 “They (Tisza) = aggressive, hateful, destructive minority”
👉 “The difference is obvious → therefore only Fidesz is a viable choice”

👉 This is classic:
incident → emotional amplification → moral judgment → political conclusion

---

🧩 Underlying Formula

an event (shouting, protest)
→ selected extreme examples (“die”, etc.)
→ generalization (“they are like this”)
→ moral contrast (“we are good / they are bad”)
→ political conclusion (“they must not be trusted with the country”)

---

🧠 Influence Techniques

1️⃣ Victim framing

👉 “they shouted in an unacceptable tone”
👉 “they tried to ruin it”

🎯 Goal:
– trigger empathy
– legitimize one’s own side

💥 Effect:
– the audience instinctively sides with the “attacked” party

👉 Important: it does not ask why protesters are there → it only presents them as a reaction

---

2️⃣ Moral polarization (good vs evil)

👉 “they destroy – we build”
👉 “they hate – we love our country”

🎯 Goal:
– create a black-and-white worldview
– simplify complex reality

💥 Effect:
– nuance disappears
– the choice becomes a moral decision

---

3️⃣ Demonization of the opponent

👉 “they are raging”
👉 “they are held together by hatred”
👉 “they cannot build, only destroy”

🎯 Goal:
– undermine the opponent’s legitimacy and humanity

💥 Effect:
– not a political opponent → but a dangerous group

---

4️⃣ Generalizing from extremes

👉 quoting extreme chants (“die”, etc.)

🎯 Goal:
– project the most extreme elements onto the whole group

💥 Effect:
– creates the impression that “all of them are like this”

👉 Classic distortion:
extreme case → entire group characterization

---

5️⃣ “We are the majority” framing (bandwagon)

👉 “we are the peaceful majority”

🎯 Goal:
– create social pressure
– “belong to this group”

💥 Effect:
– people tend to align with the perceived winning side

---

6️⃣ Provocation immunization

👉 “we won’t be provoked”
👉 “they failed to ruin it”

🎯 Goal:
– stabilize the base
– project strength and control

💥 Effect:
– reinforces followers: “we are disciplined and strong”

---

7️⃣ False dilemma (implicit)

👉 “they are like this → therefore they must not be trusted with the country”
👉 “only Fidesz is the safe choice”

🎯 Goal:
– eliminate alternatives

💥 Effect:
– creates the illusion that only two options exist

---

⚠️ What’s especially important (what you noticed)

👉 Completely missing:

– what triggered the situation
– what the protesters actually want
– what the criticism is about

👉 This is intentional.

🎯 Technique:
removal of context → pure emotional framing

---

🧠 Meta level (what you correctly saw)

👉 “posing in a victim role”

That’s accurate.

The structure:

– present provocation
– position own side as victim
– build moral superiority
– convert into political gain

👉 This is a classic political conversion pattern:
conflict → identity → vote

---

🎯 Summary

This text:

👉 does not describe events, but imposes an interpretation
👉 does not argue, but delivers a moral judgment
👉 does not ask questions, but shuts down thinking

👉 final message:
“they are bad → we are good → vote for us”