Lázár János …

Hotel Lentulai – hamarosan kezdődik!

Lázár János — what his own words reveal


1️⃣ “Humility” vs. reality

What he claims:

  • not self-promotion
  • service
  • not about himself

What he actually does:

  • constantly positions himself
  • in every answer, defines who is “fit” and who is “unfit”
  • sells his own impatience and harshness as superiority

👉 This is not humility, but hierarchical condescension—just expressed in disciplined language.


2️⃣ “I only execute orders” — the classic whitewash

Key sentence:

“I work for Viktor Orbán; I do what he tells me.”

This is not loyalty, but responsibility-shifting.

  • If there is success → “collective work”
  • If there is failure → “I didn’t decide”

👉 The Fidesz technocrat’s escape route:
power without responsibility.


3️⃣ “This is what voters want” — but which voters?

Constant references to:

  • “the people”
  • “Hungarian reality”
  • “the will of the nation”

Meanwhile:

  • anyone who thinks differently → unfit
  • anyone who questions → old elite
  • anyone who doesn’t get it → politically disposable

👉 This is not representation; it’s a chosen-leader–subordinate-mass logic.


4️⃣ Open relativization of democracy

One of the most serious points of the conversation:

  • he states that liberal democracy does not work
  • institutions “obstruct” strong leadership
  • a two-thirds majority is framed not as an exception, but as the norm

👉 This is not a slip—it’s an ideological position:
retrospective justification of unlimited power.


5️⃣ The lie of “we don’t debate”

He claims:

“We don’t debate individuals, we debate forces.”

What he actually does:

  • personal labeling
  • character assassination
  • psychologizing (“unfit,” “kindergarten,” “politics of revenge”)

👉 This is cowardly communication:
he hits, while pretending he didn’t.


6️⃣ Populism he denies—but practices

He claims:

  • no crude simplification
  • no demagoguery

His logic:

  • there are two paths
  • no third option
  • anyone not with us → drags the country back to pre-2010

👉 Textbook populism—just in a suit.


⚠️ The most embarrassing internal contradiction

He simultaneously claims:

  • he is just a tool
  • he is not building himself

And yet:

  • he is the one who “understands the era”
  • he is the one who “is not afraid”
  • he is the one who is “fit to lead”

👉 The classic pose:
“I don’t want to be a leader—but nothing works without me.”

For his own camp, this is the most dangerous message:
not open betrayal, but quiet positioning.


🔚 Short, internal-facing summary

Lázár János is not humble, but impatient.
He does not serve; he ranks.
He does not simplify; he excludes.
He does not debate; he labels.
And he does not assume responsibility—only power.

Szentkirályi Alexandra’s Post……..

European politicians and NATO leaders are now openly talking about a war the likes of which our grandfathers last witnessed. Such a war would have many victims—not only Europe’s economy and household cost protections, but also the lives and future of our children.

In Brussels, 24 EU member states have now made a dangerous decision. They are granting war loans to Ukraine. This means they have become even more deeply involved in the war and have a vested interest in its continuation—because they will only get their money back if the war is won.

We Hungarians do not want to be dragged into another European war, because we know what war is like. In every Hungarian family, the scars of past wars still live on; we know the losses wars have caused us.

We have said no to this war madness. We do not accept that the Hungarian people should pay the price for decisions made by others.

Defending peace is not weakness—it is responsibility.

European politicians, including the NATO Secretary General, are talking about a war unlike anything we have seen since the time of our grandfathers and great-grandfathers, and about having to accept that such a war would have victims—not only in the European economy and household cost protections, but even among our own children. We are not willing to accept this.

What has happened in Brussels in recent days is once again deeply alarming. What happened exactly? Three countries, including Hungary, refused to agree to granting a war loan to Ukraine. The other 24 member states, however, went along with it.

This means that those member states which are now taking on enormous amounts of debt in order to lend this money to Ukraine will only ever see that money returned if Ukraine wins the war. The consequence of this is that, unfortunately, these countries will become interested in the continuation of the war and in Ukraine trying to win it. And I think we all know how realistic that outcome is.

What is clear, however, is that if this war madness continues, then like a spark, in a single moment, it could sadly turn into a Europe-wide war between Europe and Ukraine.

We do not want to be dragged into this war, because every single time there has been an armed conflict between East and West, Central Europe has never been spared. In every Hungarian family there are stories about how war crippled a family for life.

Fidesz Parliamentary Group

“If we don’t have a pro-peace government, we will all pay the price.”

The entire European Union was created so that Europe would not be led by three Germans—parenthesis closed—but right now that is exactly where we are. And this is the war party.
So there is a group in Europe that wants war. At its center is the European People’s Party.
The party called Tisza in Hungary is a member of this war party.
So today, the Hungarian representative of the European war party is called Tisza, while there is also a peace party in Europe—the Patriots.
And the Hungarian representative of the peace party is called Fidesz–KDNP.
2026 will be the last election before a European war.
We must vote for peace.
If we do not have a pro-peace government in 2026, then in 2029–2030 we will all pay the price together.

Kubatov Gábor

Coincidence? Hardly…

“Do you know the cost of Péter Magyar’s austerity package? 1,300 billion forints. Exactly the same amount that the Union is asking from us to support Ukraine. Is that a coincidence? Hardly.

While the TISZA Program includes the privatization of healthcare, the privatization of pension funds, and a record-level VAT increase, they claim this is all being done in the name of social justice. The reality is much simpler: we are talking about 1,300 billion forints in austerity. And that is exactly the same amount Brussels wants to give Ukraine as war support.

And when the special issue of Bors points this out, Péter Magyar reacts hysterically—he would ban it, silence it, have it taken down. I ask: what is he afraid of? Why is the mood so “peppery”? Perhaps because his austerity package has been exposed.

Because while they talk about lofty goals, let us not forget: 24 countries, for the first time in history, have given a war loan to a non-EU country. And anyone who gives a loan wants it repaid. That can only happen if Russia is defeated. In other words, the danger is greater than ever.

This is not social policy. This is not in the interest of Hungarian families. This is wartime austerity.

We Hungarians will say no to the privatization of healthcare.
We will say no to the privatization of pensions.
We will say no to record-high VAT.
And we will say no to Hungary being reduced to the role of a wallet in Brussels’ war.

We stand on the side of peace. On the side of Hungarian families, Hungarian workers, and Hungarian pensioners.

Share this if you also want peace and not war—and check your mailbox: the truth is in there.

If you want a shorter, punchier, or more neutral/journalistic version, tell me which style you prefer.

Dániel Dobre

“Would the visit fee return?”

There was a visit fee. Would it now return?
According to TISZA’s plans, the state would withdraw from the current social health insurance system, new private insurers would enter the market, and employees would be required to contract with them. This would result in a much more expensive system, and the money freed up could then be spent on the war in Ukraine.

But what would this mean for families? Children would not even have insurance, healthcare would be privatized, and only those who have insurance with a private provider would receive care.

We say no to this. We want universal health insurance, and we want the security of the current system to remain in place for ordinary Hungarian people.

🤔 SO, SO — THE GREAT “FREEDOM-FIGHTING” TISZA SUPPORTERS…

Hollik István

Page · Politician

Kereszténydemokrata politikus, országgyűlési képviselő. Férj és három gyermek édesapja.

👉 A small but telling flaw in all this posturing: they would ban the issue of Bors that reveals the TISZA party’s austerity package.

🤫 Is Magyar Péter really this afraid of the truth?

💪 No problem — then we’ll distribute it online! Link in the comments! 👇